Results for “user-id”

Chrome-dependent academic literature scouting and idea planning. Use when the user gives a research idea, topic, question, or draft direction and wants Codex to browse Google, Google Scholar, and academic sources through the Codex Chrome plugin, identify relevant papers, explain what can be borrowed from them, and write a planNN.md before collecting PDFs or BibTeX.

Analyze user feedback data to identify segments with sentiment scores, JTBD, and product satisfaction insights.

Turn a theory-first research idea into a proof-oriented research plan. Use after idea-creator-analysis, or when the user asks for theorem targets, assumptions, proof obligations, impossibility routes, analysis validation, or a non-experimental plan.

Create an end-to-end customer journey map with stages, touchpoints, emotions, pain points, and opportunities to identify friction points and improve user experience.

Run a structured 5-day process to prototype, test, and validate product ideas with real users. Covers mapping, sketching, deciding, prototyping, and testing across Monday-Friday.

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with acade

Search and analyze research papers, find related work, summarize key ideas. Use when user says "find papers", "related work", "literature review", "what does this paper say", or needs to understand academic papers.

Generate data-driven user personas for UX research and product design. Usage: /persona generate [options]

Capture, organize, and retrieve notes efficiently using structured formats, tagging, and file management for meetings, ideas, research, and daily logs. Use when the user requests note taking or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

Create refined user personas from research data — 3 personas with JTBD, pains, gains, and unexpected insights. Use when building personas from survey data, creating user profiles from research, or segmenting users for product decisions.

Create detailed, actionable user personas from research data, capturing jobs-to-be-done, pain points, desired gains, and unexpected behavioral insights to guide product decisions.

Create structured user interview scripts with warm-up, core exploration, and wrap-up sections for qualitative research.

Verify the accuracy of claims and statements by extracting individual assertions, identifying authoritative sources, cross-referencing evidence, and assigning confidence-scored verdicts. Use when the user requests fact checking or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

Creates research-backed user personas with JTBD, pain points, gains, and unexpected behavioral insights. Use when building personas from survey or interview data, or segmenting users to inform product decisions. Triggers on: user persona, user profile, customer segment, jobs-to-be-done, JTBD, persona creation, user segmentation, target user, who are our users.

Create refined user personas from research data with demographics, goals, frustrations, and behavioral patterns for product and UX design decisions.

Expert user experience researcher specializing in user behavior analysis, usability testing, and data-driven design insights. Provides actionable research findings that improve product usability and user satisfaction

Draft a structured grant proposal from research ideas and literature. Supports KAKENHI (Japan), NSF (US), NSFC (China, including 面上/青年/优青/杰青/海外优青/重点), ERC (EU), DFG (Germany), SNSF (Switzerland), ARC (Australia), NWO (Netherlands), and generic formats. Use when user says "write grant", "grant proposal", "申請書", "write KAKENHI", "科研費", "基金申请", "写基金", "NSF proposal", or wants to turn research ideas into a funding application.

Use when the user asks to run Gemini CLI for code review, plan review, or big context (>200k) processing. Ideal for comprehensive analysis requiring large context windows. Uses Gemini 3 Pro by default for state-of-the-art reasoning and coding.

Run customer interviews that uncover real problems using Mom Test rules: ask about their life, not your idea; focus on past specifics; and secure commitments instead of collecting compliments.

Summarize Microsoft Teams conversations, triage unread or recent activity, draft follow-ups, and manage Planner tasks through connected Teams data. Use when the user wants to review chats or channels, identify owners and next steps, prepare a safe reply or post, or turn Teams follow-ups into Microsoft Planner tasks.

Produces a decision-grade dossier on a specific company, person, nonprofit, or government org by testing the user's hypothesis rather than confirming it. Outputs an editable Word document with verdict, identity facts, 12-month activity timeline, network and reputation signals, and red flags.

Turn a vague research direction into a problem-anchored, elegant, frontier-aware, implementation-oriented method plan via iterative GPT-5.4 review. Use when the user says "refine my approach", "帮我细化方案", "decompose this problem", "打磨idea", "refine research plan", "细化研究方案", or wants a concrete research method that stays simple, focused, and top-venue ready instead of a vague or overbuilt idea.

Gmail Lead Desk — standalone sales/CS Gmail skill via the AISA gateway: OAuth connect, scan unread leads, summarize threads, draft template replies (default draft-only), archive with labels. Keywords: Gmail Lead Desk, Gmail, lead desk, sales, customer support, follow-up, unread, inquiry summary, draft reply, archive, OAuth, AISA, connected account, thread_id. Use when: the user needs this workflow's domain-specific automation or guidance.

Search, download, and extract public-domain books from Project Gutenberg. Look up books by ID or keyword via gutendex, download plain-text and EPUB editions, strip licensing boilerplate, extract clean text from EPUB for illustrated works, and classify fiction vs non-fiction. Ships a portable CLI script with zero external dependencies. Use when the user says "gutenberg", "public domain", "download a book", "classic literature", "free ebook", "gutenberg.org", or names any public-domain title or author.

Requires AISA_API_KEY. Uses the supplied AISA_API_KEY to send requests to https://api.aisa.one. Native-first ClawHub plugin for `gmail-lead-desk`. Ships the packaged AIsa skill with an `openclaw.plugin.json` manifest and a Claude-compatible bundle fallback. Gmail Lead Desk — standalone sales/CS Gmail skill via the AISA gateway: OAuth connect, scan unread leads, summarize threads, draft template replies (default draft-only), archive with labels. Keywords: Gmail Lead Desk, Gmail, lead desk, sales, customer support, follow-up, unread, inquiry summary, draft reply, archive, OAuth, AISA, connected account, thread_id. Use when: the user needs this workflow's domain-specific automation or guidance.