Results for “audit”

Conduz a execução do actions.md em código. Atualiza checkboxes para [X], escreve progress.jsonl, gera legacy-impact.md e regression-watch.md. Use quando o usuário digitar "/reversa-coding", "reversa-coding", "executar plano" ou pedir para começar a codar a feature ativa. Último skill do ciclo forward, depois de `/reversa-to-do` (e opcionalmente `/reversa-audit` ou `/reversa-quality`).

Use to design or audit a QA dispute and appeal workflow with timeboxes, adjudication standards, and second-level consistency so appeals improve trust instead of rewriting scores without rules. Trigger for "QA appeal process", "agents disputing scores", "who adjudicates QA disputes", "overturn rate too high", second-level review standards, or calibration erosion from ad-hoc score changes.

Detect abnormal access patterns in AWS S3, GCS, and Azure Blob Storage by analyzing CloudTrail Data Events, GCS audit logs, and Azure Storage Analytics. Identifies after-hours bulk downloads, access from new IP addresses, unusual API calls, and potential data exfiltration using statistical baselines.

Use to design or audit the support contribution to a customer health score, so the score predicts something instead of averaging weakly-related signals into a colour. Trigger for "build a customer health score", "add support signal to health scoring", "our health scores don't predict churn", red/amber/green account scoring, or a health score nobody trusts.

Verify a GitHub pull request against a Jira issue's goals, requirements, and acceptance criteria, then post a PR comment with the findings. Use when a user asks Codex or MoonMind to compare a PR to a Jira story/task/bug, confirm whether a PR satisfies Jira requirements, audit implementation coverage from Jira, or publish a Jira-vs-PR verification summary.

Audit and attack session cookies via missing Secure/HttpOnly/SameSite attributes, overly broad Domain/Path scope, non-expiring persistent cookies, absent __Host- and __Secure- prefixes, browser cache leakage (Cache-Control: no-store missing), session token predictability via Burp Sequencer analysis, server-side session not invalidated on logout, and SSO single-logout bypass. Tools: Burp Suite Repeater/Sequencer, OWASP ZAP, EditThisCookie, Tamper Data, Cookiebro.

Audit, write, or revise Architecture Decision Records (ADRs), including the decision of whether one is warranted. Use when an architecturally significant decision needs recording, when reviewing an existing ADR collection, or when adding ADRs to a project that has none. Detects existing template (Nygard or MADR) and defaults to Nygard for new repos. Gates comparison ADRs through a decompose-and-verify interview before drafting.

Use to design or audit the executive escalation path for a major account — intake, ownership, communication cadence and follow-through — so escalations are resolved rather than merely attended. Trigger for "design our escalation process for key accounts", "an executive escalation went badly", "customer went to our CEO", red account war rooms, or escalations that get attention and then quietly stall.

Use to review how an outsourcer, BPO or vendor handles your customer data and meets your conduct obligations, using evidence from the work rather than from their questionnaire answers. Trigger for "review our BPO's data handling", "vendor risk assessment for our outsourcer", "are our partners compliant", third-party oversight, outsourcing due diligence, or a supplier audit of a support vendor.

Measure pleasur.ai's AI-citation share across ChatGPT / Perplexity / Gemini / Google AI Overviews for the tracked query list, using SemRush (data API for AIO-presence screening + AI Toolkit via browser for share-of-voice / mention + citation gaps) and direct engine queries. Scores each query into the GEO ledger and surfaces the highest-leverage gaps to fix. The GEO Lead's core measurement loop.

Verify a completed implementation against the original instructions, a declarative source document, an issue brief, or an optional MoonSpec feature packet, plus AGENTS.md repo guidance and required tests. Use when the user asks to run or reproduce `/moonspec.verify`, perform a final read-only implementation check, audit unit and integration test evidence, classify requirement coverage, or decide whether more code or test work is needed.

Use to push call recordings into Rulebase over the REST API when the phone system has no native connection, in reviewed batches with a dry-run plan, resume and audit log. Trigger for "upload calls to Rulebase", "import call recordings", "backfill our call history into Rulebase", "get XCally calls into Rulebase", "Rulebase isn't seeing our calls", or bulk-ingesting audio for QA evaluation.

Review a code file or directory and produce an evidence-backed GitHub or Jira issue proposing bug fixes, performance improvements, modularity improvements, DRY refactors, file splitting, reusable helpers, and architecture-alignment work. Use when a user asks for a code review, technical-debt proposal, refactor proposal, quality audit, bug-risk review, architecture-alignment review, or issue creation. This skill proposes work; it does not modify code.

Reverse-engineers a federal RFP we received — given the SOW/PWS and evaluation criteria already in the Theseus KG, reconstructs the CO's hidden decision tree (upstream `sow-pws-builder` 6 scope blocks + 3 intake answers), surfaces hot buttons, ghost language, discriminator hooks, missing-section signals, and CPFF-form / Section-5 / QASP / Key-Personnel traps. USE WHEN the user asks "what scope decisions did the CO already make?", "reverse engineer this RFP", "what hot buttons are hiding in this PWS?", "where are the discriminator hooks?", "did they pick CPFF completion or term form?", "anything suspiciously missing?", or any variant of decoding CO intent. Pulls `requirement`, `deliverable`, `proposal_instruction`, `evaluation_factor`, `clause`, `performance_standard` from the active workspace KG and emits a JSON envelope feeding `proposal-generator`. DO NOT USE FOR proposal prose (`proposal-generator`), pricing (`price-to-win`), clause audit (`compliance-auditor`), or sub SOW (`subcontractor-sow-builder`).

Simplify application code for clarity without changing behavior — refactor after tests pass, reduce nesting and duplication, match project conventions. Load when refactoring for readability, cleaning up after a feature ships, or when code review flags complexity. Also triggers on "simplify this code", "code simplification", "make this easier to read", "reduce complexity", "refactor for clarity". Not for compress/split/prune-skill (skill-library files). Pairs with technical-debt-audit.

Audit, write, or revise .vale.ini, or work through vale findings on a repo. Use when adding Vale, troubleshooting silent passes or noisy findings, evolving config, or applying the suggestion → warning → error cleanup cascade after a vale run (interactive or pre-commit failure). Applies the two-hook pre-commit pattern (sync + lint), explicit Packages and per-format BasedOnStyles, scoping/ignores for false positives, and a shared accept.txt vocabulary.

Run the quarter-boundary ritual — roll the quarter-scoped project folders, archive finished projects, grade the closing quarter's GOALS/OKRs, and draft the new quarter's goals behind an approval gate. Trigger on /quarter-rollover, "quarter rollover", "roll the quarter", "close out Q2", "new quarter setup", or when tools/quarter_path.py --check reports drift. Distinct from /triage-tasks (daily gate) and /audit (repo health check).

Active Directory security audit using the MITRE ATT&CK framework. Full domain enumeration, trust mapping, GPO analysis, ACL abuse paths, ADCS attacks (ESC1-ESC8), delegation abuse (constrained/unconstrained/RBCD), fine-grained password policies, LAPS deployment, service account security, and Kerberos configuration. Uses enum4linux-ng, netexec, impacket, ldapsearch, certipy-ad, bloodhound-python, and rpcclient. Produces attack path diagrams, prioritized risk register, and PoCs. Chains into /gh-export for issue filing.

Personal finance review skill for individuals who want to understand their spending, budgets, and financial patterns. Use whenever the user wants to analyze expenses, categorize spending, review a budget, build a budget from scratch, analyze debt, audit subscriptions, understand their savings rate, or track progress toward a financial goal. Triggers: "help me review my spending", "here are my expenses", "can you look at my budget", "help me build a budget", "I want to understand where my money goes", "categorize these transactions", "help me pay off my debt", "audit my subscriptions", "am I saving enough", "am I on track for my goal", "analyze my finances", or any time the user shares financial data (even raw or messy) and wants insight. Does NOT provide investment, tax, or financial planning advice — helps users understand their own data. Trigger proactively when the user pastes transactions, expenses, or any money-related data, even without an explicit request for analysis.

Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy (see `emil-design-eng`). Default to flagging; approval is earned. Use when reviewing a diff for motion quality — not for writing features, fixing unrelated bugs, or general (non-motion) code review. For building an animation from scratch, use `animate`; for a whole-codebase audit, use `improve-animations`. Source: github.com/emilkowalski/skills.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "reflect on skills from memory", "audit marketplace skills against memory", "从记忆中检查 skills 的问题", "反思并修改 skill", "apply memory feedback to skills", or wants to turn accumulated memory feedback about this marketplace's skills into concrete skill fixes. Reads the project's persistent memory, re-verifies each known skill problem against current code, then fixes the skill or corrects the stale memory.

Use to draw a defensible sample of support conversations for QA review, an audit or a manual analysis, so the results generalise to the population rather than to whatever was easy to pull. Trigger for "which tickets should we review", "how do we pick a sample", "is our QA sampling representative", stratified or risk-based sampling, review coverage design, or a finding based on a handful of hand-picked tickets.

Use to design and audit how customers are told they are interacting with AI, or that AI was involved in a decision about them, and to evidence that it happened. Trigger for "do we tell customers it's a bot", "AI disclosure requirements", "should the bot say it's not human", "customer asked if they were talking to a person", AI transparency obligations, or evidencing that an AI-assisted decision was explained.

Use to push back-office work into Rulebase over the REST API so it can be evaluated like a conversation, with a dry-run plan, idempotent external ids and an audit log. Trigger for "send our back-office work to Rulebase", "push work items", "QA our operations team", "get case work into Rulebase", disputes or KYC queues with no customer on the line, or duplicate work items appearing after a re-run.

Federal Other Transaction (OT) prototype bid strategist for 10 USC 4021 research and 10 USC 4022 prototype/4022(f) production-follow-on agreements. USE WHEN the user asks to "build an OT bid", "respond to this OT solicitation", "estimate should-cost for an OT prototype", "is this milestone price reasonable", "compare 4022(d) cost-share paths", "team with an NDC to avoid 1/3 cost share", "OT price-to-win", or "TRL milestone phasing" — any milestone-based prototype scoping, OT cost stack, or 4022(d) cost-share strategy question. Reconstructs the AO's TRL phasing from the active workspace KG, picks the 4022(d) path that minimizes our exposure, builds a per-milestone cost stack from BLS OEWS + GSA CALC+ + GSA Per Diem, and emits a JSON envelope handed to `proposal-generator`. DO NOT USE FOR FAR-based contracts (`price-to-win`/`proposal-generator`), incumbent research (`competitive-intel`), FAR clause audit (`compliance-auditor`), or prime-to-sub SOW drafting (`subcontractor-sow-builder`).

Blog and web-content system for agency work — plan topics, interview the author for their real take, brief the angle, draft the article, plan images, verify claims, score drafts for quality and AI tells, revise, publish, and refresh aging posts. Shorthand "wltbo" also triggers it. Commands share a per-client memory of brand voice, the author's positions and stories, verified facts with expiry dates, and every published post. Use for blog posts, articles, long-form content, refreshes, keyword targeting, search intent, titles and H1s, meta descriptions, internal linking, cannibalization checks, E-E-A-T, and information gain. Also use when the complaint is "it doesn't sound like us", "it reads AI-written", "it's generic", "we already wrote this one", "the facts are made up", "there are no images", "it's too thin", or "nobody thought this through". Not for social posts, emails, internal comms, case studies (case-study-builder), site audits (website-audit), or content calendars (content-strategy).

Drafts a federally-defensible SOW or PWS the prime issues to a subcontractor / teaming partner — same FAR 37.102(d) / 37.602 / 16.601(c)(2) / 16.306(d) discipline a contracting officer applies, opposite seat. USE WHEN the user asks to "write a SOW for our sub", "draft a PWS for [Partner]", "build the teaming-partner statement of work", "convert this SOO into a sub SOW", "we need a SOW the sub will sign", or any variant of authoring a downstream work statement. Walks the upstream 3-phase tree (acquisition intake → 6 scope blocks → 14-section assembly), pulls scope from the active Theseus KG (requirements, deliverables, work_scope_items, performance_standards), enforces FAR 37.102(d) "no FTEs in body", emits a chat-only staffing handoff for the prime's cost build, writes Markdown for `renderers` → .docx. DO NOT USE FOR prime proposal prose (`proposal-generator`), reverse-engineering an RFP (`rfp-reverse-engineer`), pricing the sub (`price-to-win`), or clause audit (`compliance-auditor`).

Designer's eye QA: finds visual inconsistency, spacing issues, hierarchy problems, AI slop patterns, and slow interactions — then fixes them. Iteratively fixes issues in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying with before/after screenshots. For plan-mode design review (before implementation), use /plan-design-review. Use when asked to "audit the design", "visual QA", "check if it looks good", or "design polish". Proactively suggest when the user mentions visual inconsistencies or wants to polish the look of a live site. (gstack)

Hard readiness gate before implementation begins — cross-checks the constitution, feature spec, plan, and tasks for consistency, traceability, and unresolved ambiguity. Returns PASS or FAIL with specific findings. Load when the spec-driven-development orchestrator routes /analyze, when the user asks to cross-check spec vs plan, audit traceability, verify spec readiness, gate-check before implementation, or says "is this spec implementation-ready", "trace requirements to tasks", "/analyze", "spec sanity check", "spec readiness gate", "spec consistency check". Output: docs/reviews/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>-spec-crosscheck.md.

Surface every assumption embedded in a plan, strategy, or document, assess how critical and how validated each one is, and identify which ones to test first. Load when the user asks to map assumptions, surface hidden beliefs, find what must be true for this to work, run an assumption audit, or when deep-thinking diagnoses an assumption frame. Also triggers on "what are we assuming", "what must be true for this to work", or "find the untested beliefs". Based on David Bland and Alex Osterwalder's assumption mapping method from Testing Business Ideas.

中英双语学术降 AIGC / bilingual academic de-AIGC skill. Removes AI-generated writing signatures from empirical papers in economics, management, and the social sciences — in both English and Chinese. Covers Turnitin AI, GPTZero, Originality.ai on the English side and 知网 AMLC, 万方, 维普 on the Chinese side. Uses a six-step loop (intake → audit → claim-evidence check → differentiated rewrite → five-dimension self-score → cold-reader recheck) with two pattern libraries (22 English + 17 Chinese patterns), section-by-section strategies for empirical papers, and hard protections that keep every number, coefficient, and citation intact.

Expert ISO 27001 compliance assistant for security and compliance teams. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO 27001 or ISO/IEC 27001, including any of the following: gap analysis, auditing, compliance assessments, control checklists, policy writing, document generation, Statement of Applicability (SoA), risk assessment, risk registers, risk treatment plans, Annex A controls, ISMS implementation, clause requirements, certification readiness, transitioning from 2013 to 2022, control implementation guidance, incident response policies, access control policies, supplier security, or any information security management system (ISMS) topic. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "skill" — any ISO 27001 or ISMS question should use this skill.

Assess the test suite of a codebase — where tests are missing, where they exist but are weak, and which gaps actually matter. Use this skill whenever the user asks about test coverage, test quality, "are there enough tests", "where should we add tests", testing gaps, test debt, untested code paths, flaky tests, or generally wants to know whether a codebase is well-tested. Trigger even on casual phrasings ("is this tested?", "what's the test situation?", "audit our tests"). This skill does NOT write tests — it only assesses what exists and identifies what's missing. For test generation, this is the wrong skill.

Run a fast, read-only health check across all skills in the library and produce a structured quality report — without modifying anything. Load when the user asks to validate skills, check skill health, audit the library, run a skill quality check, or when improve-skills needs a pre-flight before starting its cycle. Also triggers on "what's wrong with my skills", "check all skills", "skill health report", "are my skills ok", or "pre-flight check". Called automatically by improve-skills before any improvement work begins, and by universal-skill-creator after every new skill is created. Never modifies any file — only reads and reports.

Run a comprehensive code review on local source files. Use this skill when the user asks to review, audit, inspect, evaluate, or check code, even if they never use the word "review." Does not post comments to GitHub pull requests — use post-code-review-to-pr for that. Does not analyze architectural structure or module boundaries — use architectural-analysis for that. Does not explain code or a PR to build understanding before reviewing — use code-overview for a written overview, or code-walkthrough to be paced through it one step at a time. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback for that.

English LaTeX academic paper assistant for existing `.tex` projects. Use this skill whenever the user wants to compile, lint, audit, or improve an English LaTeX conference or journal paper such as IEEE, ACM, Springer, NeurIPS, or ICML submissions. Trigger even when the user only mentions one paper issue, such as bibliography errors, grammar cleanup, sentence splitting, logic review, expression polishing, translation, title optimization, figure checks, pseudocode review, algorithm block cleanup, de-AI editing, or experiment-section review. Also trigger for "proofread my paper", "fix my LaTeX", "prepare for submission", "check my manuscript", "improve my writing", `algorithm2e`, `algorithmicx`, `algpseudocodex`, `Require/Ensure`, or "Algorithm 1" when the user has a .tex file.