Results for “team”

Generates structured cyber threat intelligence reports at strategic, operational, and tactical levels tailored to specific audiences including executives, security operations teams, and technical analysts.

Exploit misconfigured Active Directory Certificate Services ESC1 vulnerability to request certificates as high-privileged users and escalate domain privileges during authorized red team assessments.

Review whether a product, MVP, or feature is actually ready to launch. Use when the team needs a production-minded check across product quality, UX edge cases, auth and security, observability, support readiness, pricing readiness, and post-launch measurement.

Conduct authorized AWS penetration testing using Pacu to enumerate IAM configurations, discover privilege escalation paths, test credential harvesting, and validate security controls through systematic attack simulation.

Runs a six-phase security audit covering attack-surface mapping, STRIDE/PASTA threat modeling, technical checklists, red/blue team exercises, and a final verdict, plus incident-response and monitoring guidance.

Runs a structured security audit across six phases: attack-surface mapping, STRIDE/PASTA threat modeling, technical checklists, red/blue team analysis, and a final verdict, with optional Python automation scripts.

Review code for quality, security, performance, and maintainability following team standards. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or when the user asks for a code review. Triggers on diffs, PR references, or explicit review requests.

Configures Fail2ban with custom filters and actions to detect port scanning, SSH brute force, and network reconnaissance, automatically banning offending IPs and alerting security teams.

Runs a structured 6-phase security audit covering attack-surface mapping, STRIDE/PASTA threat modeling, technical checklists, red/blue team exercises, and a final verdict, plus incident-response and monitoring playbooks.

Provides exact payloads and bypass techniques for every PortSwigger DOM-based vulnerability lab variant, including zero-day extensions and blue team detection strategies.

Stand up a Sliver C2 server and listeners, generate cross-platform implants and beacons, and run post-exploitation, pivoting, and BOF/.NET tooling via the armory for adversary emulation.

Maps observed adversary behaviors, security alerts, and detection rules to MITRE ATT&CK techniques and sub-techniques to quantify detection coverage and guide control prioritization.

Automate multi-turn adversarial conversations against LLM agents using Microsoft PyRIT, including Crescendo and Tree-of-Attacks-with-Pruning (TAP) attack chains with scorer feedback loops.

Provides a structured workflow for reverse engineering .NET and C# binaries, including deobfuscation with de4dot, static analysis via dnSpyEx IL view, dynamic debugging, and reliable IL patching for red-team tools and malware.

Provides a structured deep-dive into CORS misconfiguration vulnerabilities with exact payloads for every PortSwigger lab variant, including zero-day escalation techniques and blue-team detection guidance.

Triages security incidents by classifying type, assigning severity based on business impact, enriching with threat intelligence, and routing to appropriate response teams using NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks.

Query MITRE ATT&CK data programmatically, map APT group TTPs to Navigator layers, create multi-layer overlays for gap analysis, and generate actionable intelligence reports for detection engineering teams.

Reverse-engineers EDR, Defender, and AV hook tables, ETW providers, and AMSI implementations to build targeted bypasses including unhooking, indirect syscalls, ETW patching, and call stack spoofing for authorized red team operations.

Use to find where support routing is failing — misrouted contacts, reassignment chains, unassigned work, and queues nobody owns. Trigger for "why do tickets bounce between teams", "are we routing correctly", "tickets sitting unassigned", "how many tickets get reassigned", ticket ping-pong, or reviewing routing rules and queue design.

You are an expert in Hapi.js, the configuration-centric enterprise framework for Node.js. You help developers build production APIs with built-in input validation (Joi), authentication strategies, plugin architecture, caching, rate limiting, and comprehensive request lifecycle hooks — designed for teams that need structure, security, and testability without third-party middleware sprawl.

Use to identify signals of customer vulnerability in support conversations and audit whether they were recognised and acted on. Trigger for "identify vulnerable customers", "did we spot the vulnerability signals", "customers in financial difficulty", bereavement or health disclosures in support, vulnerable customer handling audits, or designing vulnerability recognition for a support team.

Develop and implement OT-specific incident response playbooks aligned with SANS PICERL framework, IEC 62443, and NIST SP 800-82 that address unique ICS challenges including safety-critical systems, limited downtime tolerance, and coordination between IT SOC, OT engineering, and plant operations teams.

Independent DeepSeek-backed adversarial proof-audit step for existing theorem, lemma, proposition, or proof artifacts in Markdown, LaTeX, or proof logs. Use when asked to check, audit, verify, red-team, or adversarially review a proof; when a completed proof task needs a correctness pass; or when a broader proof workflow dispatches an independent reviewer to find gaps, hidden assumptions, counterexamples, or unjustified steps.

This skill should be used when establishing comprehensive QA testing processes for any software project. Use when creating test strategies, writing test cases following Google Testing Standards, executing test plans, tracking bugs with P0-P4 classification, calculating quality metrics, or generating progress reports. Includes autonomous execution capability via master prompts and complete documentation templates for third-party QA team handoffs. Implements OWASP security testing and achieves 90% coverage targets.

Use to push back-office work into Rulebase over the REST API so it can be evaluated like a conversation, with a dry-run plan, idempotent external ids and an audit log. Trigger for "send our back-office work to Rulebase", "push work items", "QA our operations team", "get case work into Rulebase", disputes or KYC queues with no customer on the line, or duplicate work items appearing after a re-run.

Drafts a federally-defensible SOW or PWS the prime issues to a subcontractor / teaming partner — same FAR 37.102(d) / 37.602 / 16.601(c)(2) / 16.306(d) discipline a contracting officer applies, opposite seat. USE WHEN the user asks to "write a SOW for our sub", "draft a PWS for [Partner]", "build the teaming-partner statement of work", "convert this SOO into a sub SOW", "we need a SOW the sub will sign", or any variant of authoring a downstream work statement. Walks the upstream 3-phase tree (acquisition intake → 6 scope blocks → 14-section assembly), pulls scope from the active Theseus KG (requirements, deliverables, work_scope_items, performance_standards), enforces FAR 37.102(d) "no FTEs in body", emits a chat-only staffing handoff for the prime's cost build, writes Markdown for `renderers` → .docx. DO NOT USE FOR prime proposal prose (`proposal-generator`), reverse-engineering an RFP (`rfp-reverse-engineer`), pricing the sub (`price-to-win`), or clause audit (`compliance-auditor`).

Score the experience a new customer actually has, not just whether they activated. Grades the first 90 days on the moments that make someone feel taken care of, finds where the welcome goes cold, and hands back a scored audit with the specific fixes. Built for any post-sale team, customizable to your product and lifecycle. Trigger on "audit my onboarding", "score our onboarding experience", "why do new customers churn early", "grade our first 90 days", "where does onboarding go cold", "is our welcome any good", or any onboarding-quality question.

Expert ISO 27001 compliance assistant for security and compliance teams. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO 27001 or ISO/IEC 27001, including any of the following: gap analysis, auditing, compliance assessments, control checklists, policy writing, document generation, Statement of Applicability (SoA), risk assessment, risk registers, risk treatment plans, Annex A controls, ISMS implementation, clause requirements, certification readiness, transitioning from 2013 to 2022, control implementation guidance, incident response policies, access control policies, supplier security, or any information security management system (ISMS) topic. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "skill" — any ISO 27001 or ISMS question should use this skill.

Expert SOC 2 compliance assistant covering all five Trust Services Criteria (Security/CC, Availability/A, Confidentiality/C, Processing Integrity/PI, Privacy/P). Use this skill whenever a user mentions SOC 2, Trust Services Criteria, SOC 2 Type 1 or Type 2, audit readiness, compliance gaps, control documentation, evidence collection, vendor risk questionnaires, or anything related to AICPA service organization controls. Trigger even for adjacent topics like "we need to get audited", "a customer asked for our security report", "writing an information security policy", or "preparing for an audit". Covers gap analysis, policy writing, control documentation, audit evidence preparation, and vendor risk reviews for organizations at any maturity level — from first-time startups to seasoned compliance teams.

Federal Other Transaction (OT) prototype bid strategist for 10 USC 4021 research and 10 USC 4022 prototype/4022(f) production-follow-on agreements. USE WHEN the user asks to "build an OT bid", "respond to this OT solicitation", "estimate should-cost for an OT prototype", "is this milestone price reasonable", "compare 4022(d) cost-share paths", "team with an NDC to avoid 1/3 cost share", "OT price-to-win", or "TRL milestone phasing" — any milestone-based prototype scoping, OT cost stack, or 4022(d) cost-share strategy question. Reconstructs the AO's TRL phasing from the active workspace KG, picks the 4022(d) path that minimizes our exposure, builds a per-milestone cost stack from BLS OEWS + GSA CALC+ + GSA Per Diem, and emits a JSON envelope handed to `proposal-generator`. DO NOT USE FOR FAR-based contracts (`price-to-win`/`proposal-generator`), incumbent research (`competitive-intel`), FAR clause audit (`compliance-auditor`), or prime-to-sub SOW drafting (`subcontractor-sow-builder`).