Results for “cross-validation”

Systematic API design methodology with 6 validated patterns covering parameter categorization, safe refactoring, audit-first approach, automated validation, quality gates, and example-driven documentation. Use when designing new APIs, improving API consistency, implementing breaking change policies, or building API quality enforcement. Provides deterministic decision trees (5-tier parameter system), validation tool architecture, pre-commit hook patterns. Validated with 82.5% cross-domain transferability, 37.5% efficiency gains through audit-first refactoring.

Deploy Breach and Attack Simulation tools to continuously validate security control effectiveness by safely emulating real-world attack techniques across the kill chain.

Cross-repository dependency audit. Scans package manifests for outdated packages, security advisories, version conflicts, and license issues. Produces a prioritized update plan. Supports Node.js, Python, Rust, and Go projects.

Validates Claude Ads contracts, bundles, scores, runs, capabilities, repositories, and releases with deterministic checks and recovery steps.

Verify feature, bug, UI, API, mobile, security, or deployment work against acceptance criteria.

Identify and validate cross-site scripting vulnerabilities using Burp Suite's scanner, intruder, and repeater tools during authorized security assessments.

Tests web applications for Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities by injecting JavaScript payloads into reflected, stored, and DOM-based contexts to demonstrate client-side code execution, session hijacking, and user impersonation.

Test vector stores for embedding inversion, cross-tenant leakage, and poisoning.

Assesses organizational readiness for post-quantum cryptography migration per NIST FIPS 203/204/205 standards, performs cryptographic inventory scanning, evaluates hybrid TLS configurations, and validates CRYSTALS-Kyber and CRYSTALS-Dilithium readiness.

Hard readiness gate before implementation begins — cross-checks the constitution, feature spec, plan, and tasks for consistency, traceability, and unresolved ambiguity. Returns PASS or FAIL with specific findings. Load when the spec-driven-development orchestrator routes /analyze, when the user asks to cross-check spec vs plan, audit traceability, verify spec readiness, gate-check before implementation, or says "is this spec implementation-ready", "trace requirements to tasks", "/analyze", "spec sanity check", "spec readiness gate", "spec consistency check". Output: docs/reviews/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>-spec-crosscheck.md.

Simulates SSL stripping attacks using sslstrip, Bettercap, and mitmproxy in authorized environments to test HSTS enforcement, certificate validation, and HTTPS upgrade mechanisms.

Audits source code across C++, Android, iOS, and Web to classify files, detect embedded third-party libraries, and produce four-level verdicts with interactive HTML reports.

Application-level business logic security testing for any domain. Takes an understanding-first approach: map the intended workflows before probing them. Covers: value/quantity logic abuse (negative, zero, overflow, rounding on any numeric field), workflow and state machine bypass (skipping required steps, forcing illegal state transitions, reusing one-time tokens), trust boundary violations (BOLA horizontal/vertical, BFLA, cross-tenant access, negative ownership attacks), idempotency and replay attacks (duplicate submissions, double-spend, same-reference reuse), multi-step flow integrity (checkout, registration, approval, verification), quota and rate limit bypass, time/date manipulation, and authorization code / reference number predictability. Domain-agnostic — applies to SaaS, e-commerce, banking, gaming, social platforms, APIs, or any multi-user application with stateful workflows. Chains from /pentester; chains into /param-fuzz when boundary violations or mass assignment are confirmed.

Deep OAuth 2.0 / OpenID Connect security assessment. Covers the full attack surface: redirect_uri validation bypass (path traversal, open redirect chains, subdomain confusion, URL parsing tricks, parameter pollution, response mode switching), missing/broken state parameter CSRF, PKCE downgrade and absent-challenge attacks, implicit grant token leakage (Referer, browser history, XSS fragment theft), authorization code injection, scope escalation, client confusion attacks, mutable-claims account takeover (iss+sub confusion, email-keyed identity merging), pre-account takeover via unverified registration, OpenID Connect dynamic client registration SSRF (logo_uri, jwks_uri, sector_identifier_uri, request_uri), nonce replay, ID token validation failures, Device Code phishing flow, mobile custom URI scheme hijacking, refresh token persistence, token introspection enumeration, consent screen clickjacking, host header injection, and cross-IdP mix-up attacks. Uses KOAuth, jwt_tool, nuclei oauth templates, and manual ht