Results for “quality-check”

Use when the user asks to review pull requests, analyze code changes, check for security issues in PRs, or assess code quality of diffs.

Review local branch changes for bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues using a structured checklist-driven process.

Reviews local branch changes for bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues using a structured checklist and attack surface mapping.

One-command GitHub repository health audit. Checks for missing standard files, GitHub configuration, branch protection, documentation quality, and code hygiene. Produces a scored health report with prioritized fix recommendations.

Audit and implement behavior-preserving cleanup across types, dead code, dependencies, errors, and comments

Perform code audits for quality, security, and maintainability. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with code-audit related tasks.

I'm ready to help you review code changes on your branch for bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues.

Reviews local branch changes for bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues, using a structured checklist and verification process.

Review code for quality, security, performance, and maintainability following team standards. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or when the user asks for a code review. Triggers on diffs, PR references, or explicit review requests.

Review code with specialized security, quality, and silent-failure agents.

Runs systematic quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, and responsive design, then generates a prioritized audit report with actionable recommendations without fixing issues.

Audit project and global memory for bloat, stale decisions, duplicates, contradictions, unsafe content, missing provenance, broken routing, and over-budget global files. Load when the user asks to audit memory, clean memory, check memory health, or verify memory quality.

Review whether a product, MVP, or feature is actually ready to launch. Use when the team needs a production-minded check across product quality, UX edge cases, auth and security, observability, support readiness, pricing readiness, and post-launch measurement.

Audit public skill or plugin bundles for ClawHub, Claude, Hermes, AgentSkill, AgentSkills.so, and GitHub release risks. Use when: checking Suspicious/upload flags, dangerous local behaviors, quality/security mismatches, legacy auth surface, or non-runtime files before publishing.

Creates comprehensive GitHub pull requests with automated quality validation and security scanning, then hands off to /github:review-pr for CI monitoring and reviewer-comment triage. This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a PR", "submit a pull request", or needs to merge completed work with full compliance checks.

Review code changes for correctness, completeness, bugs, edge cases, and quality. Load when the user explicitly asks to review code, check a PR, review a diff, audit recent changes, or verify an implementation matches requirements. Also triggers on "review this code", "check this PR", "review my changes", "code review", "did this implement correctly", "audit this diff", or any explicit request for a formal code review. Do NOT load for "review changes for context" or "review what happened" — those are requests to read code, not to perform a formal review.

Conduz a execução do actions.md em código. Atualiza checkboxes para [X], escreve progress.jsonl, gera legacy-impact.md e regression-watch.md. Use quando o usuário digitar "/reversa-coding", "reversa-coding", "executar plano" ou pedir para começar a codar a feature ativa. Último skill do ciclo forward, depois de `/reversa-to-do` (e opcionalmente `/reversa-audit` ou `/reversa-quality`).

Perform a static audit of an AL workspace for Business Central against the project's copilot-instructions.md contract. Reports findings by class (Compliance, Code quality, Test coverage, Permissions) and severity (Blocker, Major, Minor, Nit) with file:line citations. Never modifies code. Never invents rules. Use when asked to audit a workspace, run a compliance check, review before PR, or diagnose contract drift.

Perform a structured audit of a codebase covering security, code quality, performance, dependencies, architecture, and testing hygiene, then produce a prioritized findings report. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a code review, code audit, security review, codebase assessment, "look over this repo", "what's wrong with this codebase", legacy-code triage, pre-acquisition technical due diligence, or any request to systematically evaluate the health of a project. Trigger even when the user is casual ("can you eyeball my repo?") — this skill imposes the structure that ad-hoc review misses. This skill audits a whole repository at a point in time — for reviewing a diff or PR use the built-in code-review skill; for security checks on pending changes use security-review.

Blog and web-content system for agency work — plan topics, interview the author for their real take, brief the angle, draft the article, plan images, verify claims, score drafts for quality and AI tells, revise, publish, and refresh aging posts. Shorthand "wltbo" also triggers it. Commands share a per-client memory of brand voice, the author's positions and stories, verified facts with expiry dates, and every published post. Use for blog posts, articles, long-form content, refreshes, keyword targeting, search intent, titles and H1s, meta descriptions, internal linking, cannibalization checks, E-E-A-T, and information gain. Also use when the complaint is "it doesn't sound like us", "it reads AI-written", "it's generic", "we already wrote this one", "the facts are made up", "there are no images", "it's too thin", or "nobody thought this through". Not for social posts, emails, internal comms, case studies (case-study-builder), site audits (website-audit), or content calendars (content-strategy).