Results for “verdict”

Runs a structured security audit across six phases: attack-surface mapping, STRIDE/PASTA threat modeling, technical checklists, red/blue team analysis, and a final verdict, with optional Python automation scripts.

Use when paired tr.md and en.md files need a parity verdict, when titles, frontmatter, headings, or DOI sets may have drifted between languages, or when a bilingual document is approaching release and its translation coverage needs an audit.

Runs a structured 6-phase security audit covering attack-surface mapping, STRIDE/PASTA threat modeling, technical checklists, red/blue team exercises, and a final verdict, plus incident-response and monitoring playbooks.

Scans source code repositories across C++, Android, iOS, and Web to classify files, detect embedded third-party libraries, and produce actionable four-level verdicts per module with interactive HTML reports.

Verify fix commits address audit findings without new bugs

Automates the collection of suspicious files from endpoints and email gateways, submission to sandbox and multi-engine scanners, and generation of verdicts with IOCs for SIEM integration.

Verify fix commits address audit findings without new bugs

Validates Claude Ads contracts, bundles, scores, runs, capabilities, repositories, and releases with deterministic checks and recovery steps.

Verify feature, bug, UI, API, mobile, security, or deployment work against acceptance criteria.

Use to design or audit a QA dispute and appeal workflow with timeboxes, adjudication standards, and second-level consistency so appeals improve trust instead of rewriting scores without rules. Trigger for "QA appeal process", "agents disputing scores", "who adjudicates QA disputes", "overturn rate too high", second-level review standards, or calibration erosion from ad-hoc score changes.

Verify a completed implementation against the original instructions, a declarative source document, an issue brief, or an optional MoonSpec feature packet, plus AGENTS.md repo guidance and required tests. Use when the user asks to run or reproduce `/moonspec.verify`, perform a final read-only implementation check, audit unit and integration test evidence, classify requirement coverage, or decide whether more code or test work is needed.

Runs a structured security audit across six phases: attack-surface mapping, STRIDE/PASTA threat modeling, technical checklists, red/blue team exercises, and a final verdict, covering code, infrastructure, APIs, bots, payments, AI agents, and compliance.

Produces a decision-grade dossier on a specific company, person, nonprofit, or government org by testing the user's hypothesis rather than confirming it. Outputs an editable Word document with verdict, identity facts, 12-month activity timeline, network and reputation signals, and red flags.

Verifies that every entry in a bibliography ACTUALLY EXISTS by cross-checking it against four keyless public scholarly APIs (Crossref, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, arXiv) with a polite mailto identifier, resolving DOI/arXiv IDs, fuzzy-matching title and authors (difflib SequenceMatcher ratio >=0.70), flagging retractions marked in Crossref (update-to) or OpenAlex (is_retracted), and emitting per-entry JSON verdicts mapped to the AlterLab citation-hallucination taxonomy (TF/PAC/IH/PH/SH). Accepts BibTeX, a DOI/arXiv ID list, or free-form references; degrades gracefully offline by emitting 'unverified' verdicts and never silently passing. Use when the request mentions verify citations, check references, fabricated or hallucinated references, fake DOI, retraction check, bibliography audit, or reference existence check. Does NOT write or draft papers — for authoring a manuscript (whose citation-check mode inserts citations) prefer alterlab-paper-writer instead. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

Patent prior-art and landscape intelligence skill — not generic patent help. Commits to one of five sub-use-cases via forcing intake (novelty search / freedom-to-operate / competitive landscape / acquisition diligence / litigation prior-art) before any search runs. Searches Google Patents, Espacenet, USPTO, and optionally Lens.org for citation-graph signals. Output is an editable Word document (.docx) with verdict, ranked closest art (claim-text extracted), CPC-class-aware landscape, family-resolved hits, geographic coverage, FTO flags where applicable, strategy recommendations, and full audit log. Use when the user asks for patent searching or analysis (e.g., 'prior art search for [invention]', 'freedom to operate analysis for [product]'). Produces search signal, not legal advice — always recommends consulting a patent attorney before filing or licensing decisions. Trademark, copyright, and trade-secret questions are out of scope.

Decision-grade entity research skill — produces a hypothesis-tested dossier on a specific company, person, nonprofit, or government org, not a generic profile. Forcing intake makes the user state their hypothesis upfront (what they already believe and want to verify or disprove) so the dossier tests it rather than confirms it. Output is an editable Word document (.docx) with verdict on the hypothesis, identity facts, 12-month activity timeline, network and reputation signals, red flags, conversation hooks tied to specific findings, and source-provenance audit log. Uses WebSearch + WebFetch + free APIs (SEC EDGAR, GitHub, ProPublica) as workhorses; optional BYOK MCPs enhance coverage. Use when the user asks for background research, diligence, or meeting prep on a specific entity (e.g., 'prep me for a meeting with [person/company]', 'due diligence on [company]'). Honors sensitivity exclusions for journalism + personal-vetting contexts.