Results for “what-if”
6 skills
x3allamerican ifta-audit-preparation
Use this skill when your carrier is selected for an IFTA audit. Covers what records to produce, how the audit is conducted, and common findings.
1
theycallmeholla what-would-bezos-do
Mine a codebase or product for underexploited assets — capabilities, infrastructure, data, integrations, and workflows built for one narrow purpose that could produce far more value. Finds platform primitives hiding inside features, internal tooling that could serve customers, and data accumulated but never leveraged. Produces an evidence-gated report (max 5 opportunities, mandatory kill list, one forced answer) plus a wwbd_packet JSON. Use whenever the user says "WWBD", "what would Bezos do", "what are we sitting on", "what did we accidentally build", "what could this become", "find opportunities in this repo", "what are we underexploiting", "is there a product hiding in here", or wants to know if existing infrastructure has a bigger economic surface than it currently serves. Trigger on casual phrasings too ("anything valuable buried in this codebase?"). Analyzes what EXISTS — missing features go to gap-scan, broken code to code-audit, confusing flows to ux-audit, weak persuasion to conversion-audit.
0 · bundle
More results
saranskumar product-intake-processor
Use this when the user gives a broad app, system, service, tool, or feature request and it must be converted into structured implementation requirements, runtime assumptions, security concerns, likely components, and handoff tasks for developer or designer skills.
0 · bundle
kensaurus plan-backup-dr
Audit whether a project can actually recover from data loss — not just whether backups exist — then emit a phased DR plan. Use when "can we recover if the DB dies", "audit our backups", "what's our RPO/RTO", or "disaster recovery". Plan only. Destructive-op gates stay on plan-data-integrity.
8
petar-nauka fact-check
Verifies claims, articles, screenshots, and URLs through source-grounded analysis with an evidence ledger, source credibility evaluation, and manipulation detection. Supports quick checks, full fact-check cards, two-source comparisons, and prebunking in multiple languages and policy contexts.
74 · bundle
theycallmeholla gap-scan
Scan a codebase, live app, or site and find the features that obviously should exist but don't — missing exports, bulk actions, search/filter, undo, history, notifications, dead-end workflows, data collected but never surfaced, backend endpoints with no UI, and half-built features that stopped partway. Produces an evidence-backed, ranked punch list (top 10 max) with a portable gap_packet JSON. Use whenever the user asks "what features are missing", "what's this app lacking", "find gaps", "run gap-scan", "feature audit", or wants proposal ammo from a prospect's app. Also use it to recheck an existing gap_packet — "what's left to do", "recheck the gaps", "what got built since" — re-verifying findings against current code and marking stale ones superseded. Flags ABSENCE only — broken code goes to code-audit, confusing flows to ux-audit, weak persuasion to conversion-audit, underexploited assets to a WWBD-style analysis. If something exists but is bad, it's not a gap — hand it off.
0