Results for “win-back”

Systematically remove malware, backdoors, and attacker persistence mechanisms from infected systems while ensuring complete eradication and preventing re-infection.

Traces host-to-host pivot chains in Windows CTF challenges by recovering Kerberos tickets, credential material, and privilege edges across WinRM, SMB, and RDP.

Specialized CTF workflow for reverse engineering, malware analysis, DFIR, firmware, pwnable, and native exploit challenges under sandbox assumptions.

Provides structured reverse engineering techniques for analyzing compiled, obfuscated, packed, or virtualized targets including binaries, APKs, WASM, firmware, and custom VMs using static and dynamic analysis workflows.

Reverse-engineers EDR, Defender, and AV hook tables, ETW providers, and AMSI implementations to build targeted bypasses including unhooking, indirect syscalls, ETW patching, and call stack spoofing for authorized red team operations.

Federal Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) sweeper backed by FAR Subpart 9.5 (9.501-9.508) and the active Theseus workspace knowledge graph. USE WHEN the user asks about OCI risk on a bid, organizational conflicts, incumbent conflicts, biased ground rules, unequal access to information, impaired objectivity, or any pre-bid OCI due diligence. Pulls `company`, `incumbent`, `subcontractor`, `customer`, `program_office`, and prior-contract relationships from the workspace KG, classifies each potential conflict into one of the three FAR 9.505 classes (biased ground rules, unequal access, impaired objectivity), and emits a structured findings envelope with mitigation recommendations (firewall, NDA, recusal, novation). DO NOT USE FOR FAR clause coverage audit (use `compliance-auditor`), proposal prose (use `proposal-generator`), competitor research (use `competitive-intel`), or pricing (use `price-to-win`).