Results for “clinical-evaluation”

Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and writing with quantitative scoring and actionable feedback.

Benchmarks LLM bias by scoring responses to automatically generated open-ended questions across sensitive attributes, producing a composite fitness score from 0 to 5.

规划、撰写、重构、润色、压缩、扩写、收口和审校中文医学文本，并为持续项目建立写作主控索引、内容型总纲、全文一致性账本、章节任务书、证据账本、决策记录和最终交付物清单。支持 Grant（医学基金标书、项目申请、研究目标、任务分解、技术路线、进度与甘特图、项目管理、风险分析、创新性、预期效益、研究基础和可行性论证）与 Journal（毕业论文、期刊论文、综述、病例报告、指南解读和学术报告），自动识别或联合调用全文建构、局部构篇、语言精修、结构审计、语言审计及项目收口。