Results for “doe”

Answer repository questions grounded entirely in source code evidence. Use when user asks a question about the codebase, user wants to understand a specific file, function, or component, or user asks "how does X work" or "where is Y defined".

Answer repository questions grounded entirely in source code evidence. Use when user asks a question about the codebase, user wants to understand a specific file, function, or component, or user asks "how does X work" or "where is Y defined".

Answer repository questions grounded entirely in source code evidence. Use when user asks a question about the codebase, user wants to understand a specific file, function, or component, or user asks "how does X work" or "where is Y defined".

Answer repository questions grounded entirely in source code evidence. Use when user asks a question about the codebase, user wants to understand a specific file, function, or component, or user asks "how does X work" or "where is Y defined".

Answer repository questions grounded entirely in source code evidence. Use when user asks a question about the codebase, user wants to understand a specific file, function, or component, or user asks "how does X work" or "where is Y defined".

Answer repository questions grounded entirely in source code evidence. Use when user asks a question about the codebase, user wants to understand a specific file, function, or component, or user asks "how does X work" or "where is Y defined".

Answer repository questions grounded entirely in source code evidence. Use when user asks a question about the codebase, user wants to understand a specific file, function, or component, or user asks "how does X work" or "where is Y defined".

Answer repository questions grounded entirely in source code evidence. Use when user asks a question about the codebase, user wants to understand a specific file, function, or component, or user asks "how does X work" or "where is Y defined".

Deploy, inspect, log-tail, snapshot, and troubleshoot AEM Rapid Development Environments using the Adobe I/O CLI plugin.

Audit images across AEM Edge Delivery Services pages for SEO and performance, checking alt text quality, dimensions, lazy loading, fetch priority, file naming, and decorative image handling, and generate per-page reports with fix instructions.

Convert static HTML pages to Edge Delivery Services while preserving original design and enabling content authoring in Document Authoring.

Execute AEM Edge Delivery Services admin operations: manage content, cache, code, indexes, sitemaps, snapshots, logs, users, jobs, sites, config, secrets, API keys, tokens, profiles, and versioning. Also supports Document Authoring operations.

Read, propose, and vote in the Starchild DAO — a hold-to-govern commons for the $STARCHILD token on Base, with gasless EIP-712 signatures.

Cypress E2E testing framework. Covers commands, assertions, and component testing. Use for end-to-end testing. USE WHEN: user mentions "cypress", "e2e test", "cy.get", "cy.visit", asks about "cypress intercept", "component testing", "cypress commands" DO NOT USE FOR: Unit tests - use `vitest` or `jest`; Multi-tab scenarios - Cypress doesn't support; Native mobile apps - use Appium; Performance testing - use dedicated tools

YAGNI-first code-minimalism ladder — before writing code, check in order: does this need to exist? already in the codebase? stdlib? native platform feature? installed dependency? one line? Cuts unnecessary code/tokens while never trading away validation, error handling, security, or accessibility. Triggers on: 'ponytail mode', 'write minimal code', 'don't over-engineer this', 'yagni', 'is there already something for this', 'use native instead of a library', 'keep this simple', 'fewest lines possible', 'lazy senior dev mode'.

Review a built frontend against its chosen direction, catch drift back to generic AI defaults, enforce state coverage, ethical patterns, UX heuristics, and polish, and check contrast with APCA (not the legacy WCAG ratio). Produces specific, prioritized fixes — never vibes-based feedback. Works with pasted screenshots or Playwright MCP automated capture. Load when the user asks to review a UI, audit a design, check if a frontend looks generic or vibecoded, evaluate visual quality or polish, says "review this UI", "is this design good", "audit my frontend", "does this feel like [product]", "design QA", or when frontend-design routes here. Sub-skill of frontend-design.

Verify a code change end-to-end in the current worktree: figure out what changed, run the relevant tests, get the app running, drive a browser to exercise the affected areas, and report a verdict with screenshots. Generic across project types (Laravel/Herd, Node/bun, frontend, CLI, library). Use this skill whenever the user wants to verify/QA/smoke-test a change, check that a PR or branch's changes actually work, validate uncommitted work before pushing, or says "/flow", "flow this", "verify this change", "does this PR work", "check my changes", "test and click through this". Accepts an optional target (a PR number/URL, a branch/ref, or a worktree path); with no argument it verifies the current uncommitted/working changes.

Reconstruct a product flow, then audit how usable it is — whether it makes sense, where users get confused or stuck, whether the copy and instructions are clear, and where friction causes drop-off. Produces a prioritized, severity-weighted findings report. Works from three inputs: frontend code in a repo, a live running app driven via a browser, or a written flow / spec / screenshots. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a UX review, usability audit, "is this flow confusing", "does this signup/onboarding/checkout make sense", "why are people dropping off", "audit this form", "where's the friction", or hands over a flow and asks whether it's user-friendly. Trigger even on casual phrasings ("is my checkout any good?") — it imposes the structure ad-hoc UX opinions miss. Audits flow usability and friction; for visual polish and interface quality the impeccable audit/critique skills apply instead.

Clones a live web page into a single self-contained working HTML file that looks and lays out like the original, then validates the clone against the original in a loop until it matches. Use whenever a user points at a live URL and wants a faithful copy with NO redesign — phrasings like "clone this page to working HTML", "copy this page exactly", "save this page as a standalone HTML file", "make me a working copy of this site", "scrape this page into one HTML file", or "clone this page as-is". Reproduces the real markup, styles, and assets verbatim, keeping the original selectors and raw CSS — it does not restyle, improve, or rewrite anything. For the same look rewritten as clean semantic Tailwind (generated selectors replaced with real utility classes), use page-tailwindify; for a rebuilt and restyled version, use page-redesigner. Requires Claude in Chrome for capturing the source page.

Anti-slop frontend design skill for building NEW landing pages, portfolios, and UI from a brief. Reads the brief and existing brand context first, infers a design direction from three configurable dials (variance, motion, density), and ships interfaces that don't look templated or default-AI. Use when starting a new page/UI with no existing identity to preserve, or when asked to design something "that doesn't look like every other AI landing page." For auditing and upgrading an EXISTING UI, use `taste-redesign` instead — this skill is for the moment before code exists. Triggers on: "build a landing page", "design a portfolio", "make this not look generic/templated/AI-generated", "anti-slop", starting UI work with a brief but no established identity yet. Also owns component-library selection (which package for toasts, dropdowns, charts, drag-and-drop, state, etc.) — use this instead of hand-rolling a component or guessing at a dependency. Source: github.com/Leonxlnx/taste-skill (taste-skill, the main v2 varian