Plugins

3 plugins

ML Model Lifecycle

Train, evaluate, and deploy a production ML system with monitoring.

10 skills · plugin

Visual Critique

Visual critique skills: hierarchy analysis, brand consistency checks against mood/voice/tokens, composition evaluation, and typography audits — with a /critique-screen command that compiles a prioritised fix list.

7 skills · plugin

@alirezarezvani

Multi-agent collaboration — spawn N parallel subagents that compete on code optimization, content drafts, research approaches, or any task that benefits from diverse solutions. 7 slash commands (/hub:init, /hub:spawn, /hub:status, /hub:eval, /hub:merge, /hub:board, /hub:run), agent templates, DAG-based orchestration, LLM judge mode, message board coordination.

8 skills · plugin

Results for “l-eval”

13 skills

Architecture Designer

Design high-level system architecture, create Architecture Decision Records (ADRs), evaluate technology trade-offs, and plan for scalability.

10.4k · bundle

claude-dev-suite

Giskard RAGET (RAG Evaluation Toolkit): automatic testset generation (simple / complex / distracting / conversational), component-level scoring (retriever / generator / rewriter), hallucination and bias tests, CI integration. Compared to RAGAS and DeepEval. USE WHEN: user mentions "Giskard", "RAGET", "Giskard RAG toolkit", "automatic testset generation", "component-level RAG scoring", "hallucination test Giskard" DO NOT USE FOR: general RAGAS usage - use `rag-evaluation`; Stanford ARES - use `ares-framework`; CI/CD wiring - use `continuous-evaluation`

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, automated anti-pattern detection, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

claude-dev-suite

Agent-driven RAG patterns. Self-RAG, Corrective RAG (CRAG) with web fallback, Adaptive RAG with routing classifier, ReAct with retrieval tool, multi-hop retrieval, plan-and-execute, LangGraph state machines for RAG. USE WHEN: user mentions "agentic RAG", "Self-RAG", "Corrective RAG", "CRAG", "Adaptive RAG", "multi-hop retrieval", "LangGraph RAG", "ReAct RAG", "plan and execute RAG" DO NOT USE FOR: static retrieval pipelines - use `rag-architecture`; query rewriting only - use `query-transformations`; evaluation - use `rag-evaluation`

Displays HTML content on connected OpenClaw nodes (Mac, iOS, Android) via a local HTTP server and node bridge, with actions for presenting, navigating, evaluating, and capturing snapshots.

More results

johnalbertini14-glitch

Displays HTML content on connected OpenClaw nodes (Mac, iOS, Android) via a local HTTP server and node bridge, with actions for presenting, navigating, evaluating, and capturing snapshots.

Product Builder Orchestrator

Use when the request is broad and spans idea evaluation, MVP planning, UX, frontend, backend, database, auth, integrations, and launch strategy. Trigger on asks like "build this app", "turn this idea into a product", "design the whole system", or "plan everything end to end".

Audit Accessibility

Automated WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit using playwright-cli to crawl every page, inject axe-core via eval, test keyboard navigation, check color contrast, ARIA labels, and heading order. Use when "audit accessibility", "check a11y", "WCAG audit", "check keyboard nav", or "test screen reader".

brycewang-stanford

Ase Experiments

Use when designing or auditing the evaluation of an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) paper, covering real subject systems, fair runnable tool baselines, task-matched effectiveness metrics, ablations that isolate a learned component, oracle and correctness validation, contamination-aware LLM handling, and provenance for mining.

Proposal Generator

Shipley-methodology federal proposal outline and section drafter. USE WHEN the user asks to draft a proposal volume, build an outline from the proposal_instruction ↔ evaluation_factor traceability (UCF Section L/M or equivalent for non-UCF — FAR 16 task orders, FOPRs, BPA calls, OTAs, agency-specific formats), generate a compliance matrix, write win themes, draft an executive summary, propose FAB (Feature → Advantage → Benefit) chains, identify discriminators, or 'respond to this RFP'. Pulls requirements, evaluation factors, instructions, customer priorities, and pain points from the active Theseus workspace KG and produces an evidence-cited draft. Also ships govcon HTML render templates under assets/ — hand the rendered content off to the `huashu-design` skill for PPTX / PDF / animation export. Format-agnostic — never assumes UCF section labels are present. DO NOT USE FOR clause compliance auditing only (use compliance-auditor) or extracting new entities (use govcon-ontology + the Theseus pipeline).

Review a built frontend against its chosen direction, catch drift back to generic AI defaults, enforce state coverage, ethical patterns, UX heuristics, and polish, and check contrast with APCA (not the legacy WCAG ratio). Produces specific, prioritized fixes — never vibes-based feedback. Works with pasted screenshots or Playwright MCP automated capture. Load when the user asks to review a UI, audit a design, check if a frontend looks generic or vibecoded, evaluate visual quality or polish, says "review this UI", "is this design good", "audit my frontend", "does this feel like [product]", "design QA", or when frontend-design routes here. Sub-skill of frontend-design.

Build multiple genuinely different versions of a UI piece you describe, rendered behind a visual picker so you can flip through them live and promote the one that feels right. Use this proactively, without waiting to be asked, whenever evaluating a new feature, a layout, a section, a visual, a design, or any UI decision — divergent options beat a single guess. Fast, no interview, single-component scope. For a full structured exploration (interview, 5 variants of a whole page, real feedback collection, implementation plan) when the direction itself is still open, use `design-lab` instead — that one requires explicit invocation. Source: github.com/emilkowalski/skills.