Results for “radar”

Giskard RAGET (RAG Evaluation Toolkit): automatic testset generation (simple / complex / distracting / conversational), component-level scoring (retriever / generator / rewriter), hallucination and bias tests, CI integration. Compared to RAGAS and DeepEval. USE WHEN: user mentions "Giskard", "RAGET", "Giskard RAG toolkit", "automatic testset generation", "component-level RAG scoring", "hallucination test Giskard" DO NOT USE FOR: general RAGAS usage - use `rag-evaluation`; Stanford ARES - use `ares-framework`; CI/CD wiring - use `continuous-evaluation`

Agent-driven RAG patterns. Self-RAG, Corrective RAG (CRAG) with web fallback, Adaptive RAG with routing classifier, ReAct with retrieval tool, multi-hop retrieval, plan-and-execute, LangGraph state machines for RAG. USE WHEN: user mentions "agentic RAG", "Self-RAG", "Corrective RAG", "CRAG", "Adaptive RAG", "multi-hop retrieval", "LangGraph RAG", "ReAct RAG", "plan and execute RAG" DO NOT USE FOR: static retrieval pipelines - use `rag-architecture`; query rewriting only - use `query-transformations`; evaluation - use `rag-evaluation`

为 MODULAR-RAG-MCP-SERVER 添加 Agentic RAG 层并跑出真实评测数据。 作者背景：应届生 + 无实习，目标 Agent 方向求职。 使用场景： 1. 用户说"加 Agent 层" / "实现 ReAct Agent" / "Agentic RAG" / "多步推理" 2. 用户说"跑评测" / "出评测数字" / "Ragas 实测" / "对比指标" 3. 用户说"继续扩建项目" / "Stage J" / "Stage K" 4. 用户在新对话中提到这个 RAG 项目需要扩展 该 skill 记录了所有背景知识、架构决策和实现细节，使 Codex 无需重新探索即可直接执行。

Structured threat modeling skill using the PASTA framework (Process for Attack Simulation and Threat Analysis) combined with Adam Shostack's 4-question framework. Use this skill whenever the user asks to do threat modeling, security analysis, map the attack surface, identify threats, or review an application for security risks — even if they don't mention PASTA or a specific framework by name. Core activities: Component Mapping (architecture + data flows), Critical Assessment (business impact prioritization), and Logic Flaw Identification (attacker mindset on business logic). Produces: component map diagram (Mermaid), data flow diagram (Mermaid), attack tree (Mermaid), STRIDE threat table, prioritized risk register, and an actionable mitigation plan. Invoke proactively for any security review, architecture review, or "what could go wrong?" session.