Results for “visual-direction”

Create a real 3D WebGL object with geometric mesh depth, physically based material, directional and ambient lighting, perspective camera, subtle rotation, and floating motion. Use when a page needs a faceted 3D hero object or product-like visual with real lighting instead of CSS transform tricks.

Route frontend design and UI implementation prompts to the right design skills. Use for accessibility, frontend visual taste, redesigns, design systems, dashboards, motion, image-to-code, web/mobile image generation, Stitch, Vue conversion, UI demos, or CE frontend design.

Takes a PRD, reference URL, screenshot, or keywords to produce a DESIGN.md specification, then generates production-ready web code that meets UI/UX, visual, motion, and responsive standards.

当用户要求可视化、画图、图解、配图、信息图、趋势图、数据对比、原图标注、圈选连线、路径轨迹、动态图、动画讲解、交互演示、参数变化、关系图、流程图、时间线、结构图、知识科普或作品解读时使用；也用于判断图表、用户原图叠加、HTML/SVG 交互、基于原图二次生成或纯文字哪种表达最合适。地图、附件导出或纯文字明显更清楚时不强行可视化。

Use when a user wants a standalone browser-based visual companion for interactive mockups, diagrams, wireframes, layout comparisons, visual brainstorming, or clickable visual option selection. Starts a local zero-dependency Node server, writes HTML screens, and reads browser click events.

Conduct a design interview, generate 5 distinct UI variations in a temporary route, collect real click-to-comment feedback on the live rendered variants via human-review, and produce an implementation plan. Use when the user wants to explore UI design options, redesign an existing component/page, or create new UI with multiple genuinely different approaches to compare — before writing production code or committing to a direction. For a lighter, single-component variant picker with no interview, use `prototype` instead. For reviewing a UI that's already real (not exploring new directions), use `visual-review`. Source: adapted from github.com/0xdesign/design-plugin's design-lab skill (interview + 5-variant structure), with feedback collection replaced by this repo's own `visual-review` skill (human-review) instead of a bespoke overlay component.

Build multiple genuinely different versions of a UI piece you describe, rendered behind a visual picker so you can flip through them live and promote the one that feels right. Use this proactively, without waiting to be asked, whenever evaluating a new feature, a layout, a section, a visual, a design, or any UI decision — divergent options beat a single guess. Fast, no interview, single-component scope. For a full structured exploration (interview, 5 variants of a whole page, real feedback collection, implementation plan) when the direction itself is still open, use `design-lab` instead — that one requires explicit invocation. Source: github.com/emilkowalski/skills.

UI/UX design intelligence and implementation guidance for building polished interfaces. Use when the user asks for UI design, UX flows, information architecture, visual style direction, design systems/tokens, component specs, copy/microcopy, accessibility, or to generate/critique/refine frontend UI (HTML/CSS/JS, React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte, Tailwind). Includes workflows for (1) generating new UI layouts and styling, (2) improving existing UI/UX, (3) producing design-system tokens and component guidelines, and (4) turning UX recommendations into concrete code changes.

Review a built frontend against its chosen direction, catch drift back to generic AI defaults, enforce state coverage, ethical patterns, UX heuristics, and polish, and check contrast with APCA (not the legacy WCAG ratio). Produces specific, prioritized fixes — never vibes-based feedback. Works with pasted screenshots or Playwright MCP automated capture. Load when the user asks to review a UI, audit a design, check if a frontend looks generic or vibecoded, evaluate visual quality or polish, says "review this UI", "is this design good", "audit my frontend", "does this feel like [product]", "design QA", or when frontend-design routes here. Sub-skill of frontend-design.