Results for “loop”

Drive Animato (github.com/otdnnc/Animato) as an API-key agent loop that turns a rigged .fbx/.gltf model plus a plain-text motion request into a baked animation: upload the model, build the bpy prompt, spend one LLM call with your own key, gate the generated script, run it headless, and verify the animated output. Use when the user wants text-to-animation for a 3D character, an unattended animation pipeline driven by a Gemini or OpenAI-compatible API key, or help operating a local Animato server. Triggers on: animato, text to animation, animate a rigged model, bpy animation script, blender headless keyframe, /api/chat animation, character motion from a prompt, GEMINI_API_KEY animation.

Set up worker environment and per-worker state for parallel pools. Use when code needs paths, environment variables, database connections, loaded libraries, or expensive objects available on workers before parfor/parfeval runs. Teaches parallel.pool.Constant, parfevalOnAll, and parpool name-value pairs. Also use when refactoring existing code that uses spmd for side-effect setup (an anti-pattern). Triggers: worker setup, pool constant, per-worker state, non-serializable, loadlibrary on workers, database connection parfor, addpath workers, spmd before parfor, worker environment, reduce parfor overhead, parfor setup, resource creation in parallel loop, cannot serialize error, undefined function or variable on workers error, load data per worker, reduce data transfer, parallelize setup, improve parallel code.

Use Orca orchestration for structured multi-agent coordination: threaded messages, blocking ask/reply flows, task dispatch, worker_done/escalation waits, task DAGs, decision gates, coordinator loops, or decomposing work across agents. Use `orca-cli` instead for full ownership handoffs, including requests phrased as "hand off", "handoff", "handover", "give this to another agent", or "another worktree" when the user did not explicitly ask to supervise, monitor, wait for results, or coordinate a DAG. Use `orca-cli` for ordinary terminal control, lightweight terminal prompts, shell commands, Orca worktree management, reading or waiting on terminals, and automation of the browser embedded inside Orca. Use Computer Use for browser windows, webviews, Orca app UI, or desktop UI outside Orca's embedded browser.

Causal inference framework for answering "does X cause Y?" beyond correlation. DoWhy (Microsoft Research) provides the identify-estimate-refute loop: define a causal graph (DAG), identify the causal effect using backdoor/frontdoor/instrumental variable criteria, estimate treatment effects with multiple estimators, and validate results with automated refutation tests. Use when: distinguishing causation from correlation, estimating treatment effects (ATE, ATT, CATE), designing and analyzing A/B tests with confounders, using instrumental variables, performing counterfactual reasoning ("what would have happened if..."), validating causal claims with sensitivity analysis, working with observational data where randomization is impossible, or any analysis where the question is "what is the CAUSAL effect of X on Y" rather than just "how do X and Y relate?"

Instrument a shipped product's AI agents with tracing and observability so you can see what they did, why outputs happened, and what each run cost. Plain-language primer plus free-tier-first backend selection (Langfuse, Phoenix, LangSmith, Braintrust) and OpenTelemetry/OpenInference instrumentation. Load when the user asks to add observability, add tracing, instrument my agents, see what my agent is doing in production, set up Langfuse or Phoenix or LangSmith, debug why my agent gave a bad answer, or track LLM cost per request. Also fires when agent-system-architecture or setup-evaluation requires an observability plan for an agent-chain product. NOT for tracing the coding agent itself — that is run-trace. Precondition for runtime-learning-loop.

Expert 3D modeling specialist with deep knowledge of topology, UV mapping, game-ready and film-ready pipelines, DCC tool workflows (Blender, Maya, ZBrush, 3ds Max, Houdini), retopology, LOD systems, and export pipelines. This skill represents years of production experience distilled into actionable guidance. Use when "3d model, 3d modeling, mesh topology, uv unwrap, uv mapping, retopology, retopo, low poly, high poly, subdivision, subdiv, edge flow, edge loops, polygon modeling, box modeling, hard surface, organic modeling, sculpting, zbrush, blender modeling, maya modeling, 3ds max, LOD, level of detail, game ready mesh, film ready, baking normals, high to low, fbx export, gltf export, texel density, 3d, modeling, topology, uv, game-dev, vfx, blender, maya, zbrush, retopology, lod, hard-surface, organic, sculpting" mentioned.

Generate full songs and instrumental tracks with ElevenLabs Music on RunComfy via the `runcomfy` CLI. ElevenLabs Music turns a style description plus structured lyrics into studio-quality 44.1 kHz stereo audio — 5 seconds to 5 minutes — with section-level control (Intro / Verse / Chorus / Bridge), multilingual vocals, and commercial-friendly output. Generate a backing track, a full vocal song, a jingle, a podcast intro, a game loop, or an instrumental bed. Calls `runcomfy run elevenlabs/elevenlabs/music-generation` through the local RunComfy CLI. Triggers on "generate music", "make a song", "AI music", "background music", "instrumental track", "ElevenLabs Music", "soundtrack", "jingle", "theme music", "royalty-free music", "compose", or any explicit ask to generate music or a song from a text description.

Generate full songs and instrumental tracks with ElevenLabs Music on RunComfy via the `runcomfy` CLI. ElevenLabs Music turns a style description plus structured lyrics into studio-quality 44.1 kHz stereo audio — 5 seconds to 5 minutes — with section-level control (Intro / Verse / Chorus / Bridge), multilingual vocals, and commercial-friendly output. Generate a backing track, a full vocal song, a jingle, a podcast intro, a game loop, or an instrumental bed. Calls `runcomfy run elevenlabs/elevenlabs/music-generation` through the local RunComfy CLI. Triggers on "generate music", "make a song", "AI music", "background music", "instrumental track", "ElevenLabs Music", "soundtrack", "jingle", "theme music", "royalty-free music", "compose", or any explicit ask to generate music or a song from a text description.

Generate full songs and instrumental tracks with ElevenLabs Music on RunComfy via the `runcomfy` CLI. ElevenLabs Music turns a style description plus structured lyrics into studio-quality 44.1 kHz stereo audio — 5 seconds to 5 minutes — with section-level control (Intro / Verse / Chorus / Bridge), multilingual vocals, and commercial-friendly output. Generate a backing track, a full vocal song, a jingle, a podcast intro, a game loop, or an instrumental bed. Calls `runcomfy run elevenlabs/elevenlabs/music-generation` through the local RunComfy CLI. Triggers on "generate music", "make a song", "AI music", "background music", "instrumental track", "ElevenLabs Music", "soundtrack", "jingle", "theme music", "royalty-free music", "compose", or any explicit ask to generate music or a song from a text description.

Run a structured retrospective after development-phase runs of your product's agents — interview the owner in plain language about what went well and poorly, draft ranked improvement hypotheses, then design and run small n=1/n=2 experiments with pre-declared success criteria, guardrails, stop conditions, and a cost/ROI kill-switch. Load when the user says how did that run go, retro this run, the agent output was bad, what should we improve, draft hypotheses, run a small experiment, or after repeated dev runs of an agentic system produce uneven quality. Priority: output quality over performance over cost, each with diminishing-returns stops. NOT a product A/B test (experimentation), NOT coding-agent harness repair (harness-evolution), NOT production-scale learning (runtime-learning-loop).

>- Skill Refiner, the eval-guided improvement loop for SKILL.md files. Runs the bootstrap, score, propose, apply, and status cycle as a thin wrapper over the published @intentsolutions/refiner CLI, proposing safe, minimal, bounded SKILL.md edits and accepting an edit only when a held-out eval score strictly improves with no regression on any other case. Ships a 3-layer cost-tiered hook architecture (sinker, line, hook) that gates skill quality at edit time, end of turn, and commit time. Use when improving an existing skill, refining a SKILL.md against measured behavior, bootstrapping an eval set for a skill, or gating skill edits before they ship. Trigger with "/j-rig", "refine this skill", "bootstrap an eval set", "propose a skill edit", "promote the candidate", or "skill refiner status".

Two-party working posture — user as director, agent as executor. Every fork, tradeoff, and taste choice is surfaced via batched AskUserQuestion with structural framing, a recommended default, and concrete previews when comparison is visual, so the human steers direction while the agent handles implementation. Eliminates the review-bottleneck (no giant diff to approve at the end — review is distributed across picks) and prevents codebase-understanding debt (the user remembers the architecture because they picked it). Use whenever the user invokes /duet, or says "work with me", "ask before", "check with me", "I want to decide", "don't assume", "human-in-the-loop", "co-author", "pair with me", "duet", or whenever a task clearly involves aesthetic, architectural, or irreversible strategic decisions — even without those exact words. Pair with the Duet output style to minimize cognitive load between picks.

Autonomously improve a real artifact (code, training recipe, agent harness, data pipeline, prompt) against an objective and an evaluator, using Hypothesis Tree Refinement (HTR) from the Arbor paper. Use this whenever someone wants to iteratively optimize something over many experiments without overfitting — e.g. "get my model's eval score up", "improve this agent/harness", "tune this pipeline", "beat the baseline on this benchmark", "run a search over approaches and keep the best", "do an MLE-bench / Kaggle-style optimization", or any long-horizon "make this artifact better and don't just memorize the dev set" task. Trigger it even when the user doesn't say "Arbor" or "hypothesis tree" but describes repeated experiment-and-evaluate loops, branching exploration of competing ideas, or worries about a dev/test gap. Runs Claude itself as the coordinator with subagent executors in...

Use this skill whenever a developer wants to turn an idea into a complete, production-ready, end-to-end system plan BEFORE writing any code. Trigger on 'plan this system', 'design the architecture for', 'help me blueprint', 'deep plan for X', 'break this idea into components', 'expand into action points', 'full implementation plan', or when the user pastes a project idea wanting architecture, components, pipelines, and file-level execution mapped out. Casual phrasing also triggers: 'help me think this through end-to-end', 'plan before coding'. Also covers living-workspace patterns: self-improving knowledge bases, reflection loops with auditor agents, four-agent teams, schema-as-code, wiki health scoring. **Resume triggers**: 'where did we leave off', 'continue this plan', 'resume my blueprint' - rehydrates state from disk via SESSION.md/NEXT.md/decisions/. Web research is mandatory every invocation.

Clones a live web page's exact look into clean, semantic Tailwind — same design, but the framework-generated selectors (css-1a2b3c, sc-bdfBwQ, jsx-hashes) are replaced with real Tailwind utility classes — then validates the rewrite against the original in a loop until it matches. Use whenever a user points at a live URL and wants the SAME design rebuilt in readable Tailwind classes, not a restyle — phrasings like "rebuild this page in Tailwind but keep the exact look", "convert this React app's styling to Tailwind classes", "clone this design into clean Tailwind", "same look, real Tailwind classes, not the hashed ones", or "de-obfuscate this page's classes into Tailwind". For a byte-exact clone that KEEPS the original ugly selectors, use page-cloner. For a redesign that changes the look, use page-redesigner. Requires Claude in Chrome for capturing the source page.

Turn natural-language descriptions into editable `.drawio` diagrams and export them to PNG / SVG / PDF / JPG via the native draw.io desktop CLI, or turn an existing codebase (Python / JS-TS / Go / Rust) into an auto-laid-out structure diagram. Wraps Agents365-ai/drawio-skill: 6 diagram presets (ERD, UML class, sequence, architecture, ML/DL, flowchart), search across 10,000+ official AWS/Azure/GCP/Cisco/K8s/UML/ BPMN shapes, 321 AI/LLM brand logos, vision self-check + auto-fix, and a 5-round iterative refinement loop. No MCP server, no daemon — runs from a single SKILL.md and the draw.io CLI. Use when the user wants polished, precise, exportable diagrams or wants to visualize code structure. Triggers on: drawio, draw.io, drawio diagram, architecture diagram, ERD, UML diagram, sequence diagram, flowchart, network diagram, visualize codebase, code structure diagram, class hierarchy, export diagram png/svg/pdf, AWS/Azure/GCP icon, draw.io shapes.

Clones a live web page into a single self-contained working HTML file that looks and lays out like the original, then validates the clone against the original in a loop until it matches. Use whenever a user points at a live URL and wants a faithful copy with NO redesign — phrasings like "clone this page to working HTML", "copy this page exactly", "save this page as a standalone HTML file", "make me a working copy of this site", "scrape this page into one HTML file", or "clone this page as-is". Reproduces the real markup, styles, and assets verbatim, keeping the original selectors and raw CSS — it does not restyle, improve, or rewrite anything. For the same look rewritten as clean semantic Tailwind (generated selectors replaced with real utility classes), use page-tailwindify; for a rebuilt and restyled version, use page-redesigner. Requires Claude in Chrome for capturing the source page.

Sets up and audits the Claude Code harness for a project: CLAUDE.md, .claude/rules, skills, subagents, settings.json permissions, hooks, verification loop. Commands: kickoff (scaffold new setup), check-playbook (score an existing one), scouting-report (last scorecard), adjust (fix bloat/misplaced instructions), drill (turn advisory prose into real hooks/permissions/CI), decline (record an accepted risk), gameplan (work order with acceptance criteria before building), watch-film (check a diff against that order for scope creep/weakened tests/false claims). Use for setting up Claude Code, or on: "Claude ignores my CLAUDE.md", "it's huge and still misses things", "it said done but ran nothing", "it changed files I didn't ask about", "it weakened a test to pass", "rule, skill, or hook?", "is my setup any good". Not for code quality (code-audit), test coverage (test-assessment), one-off prompt wording (genie-proof-prompts), new skill authoring (skill-creator), or compacting a conversation (handoff).

Expert strategy advisor for products built on LLMs or agents — not general product strategy (see `product-strategy` for that). Use this — proactively and without waiting to be asked — whenever choosing where to apply AI in a product, deciding between RAG and fine-tuning, designing how much autonomy an AI feature should have, evaluating whether an AI feature is actually defensible, or deciding whether to add AI to a feature at all. Also triggers for: "should this be an agent or a simple LLM call", "how much autonomy should this feature have", "RAG vs fine-tuning", "is this AI feature defensible", "our AI feature keeps hallucinating and users don't trust it", "should we build this with AI or just ship it deterministic", "AI product wedge", "what happens to this feature when the models get better", "human-in-the-loop design for AI features". Produces a decision-focused brief: the wedge, the architecture choice, the autonomy level, and the defensibility bet — each with an explicit trade-off.