Results for “runs”

Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the modern tidyverse + econometrics R ecosystem — dplyr + tidyr + haven + fixest + sandwich + lmtest + clubSandwich + AER + ivreg + did + bacondecomp + HonestDiD + eventstudyr + rdrobust + rddensity + Synth + gsynth + synthdid + MatchIt + WeightIt + cobalt + ebal + grf + DoubleML + mediation + marginaleffects + modelsummary + kableExtra + gt + ggplot2 + ggpubr + cowplot + binsreg. **Defaults to economics empirical-paper style** (AER / QJE / AEJ) — every run produces a publication-ready output set with a multi-column regression table (M1→M6 progressive controls/FE) as the centerpiece, plus Table 1 (descriptives), mechanism / heterogeneity / robustness tables, and event-study + coefficient + trend figures. Covers the full 8-step R pipeline an applied economist runs on every paper — (1) data import & cleaning (read_dta/read_csv, naniar, janitor, validate-merges), (2) variable construction (mutate/across/winsorize/group_by + lag/lead with dplyr), (3) descriptive

Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Python econometric stack — pandas + numpy + scipy + statsmodels + linearmodels + pyfixest + rdrobust + econml + causalml + matplotlib/seaborn. **Defaults to economics empirical-paper style** (AER / QJE / AEJ) — every run produces a publication-ready output set with a multi-column regression table (M1→M6 progressive controls/FE) as the centerpiece, plus Table 1 (descriptives), mechanism / heterogeneity / robustness tables, and event-study + coefficient + trend figures. Covers the full 8-step pipeline an applied economist or quantitative social scientist runs on every paper — (1) data cleaning, (2) variable construction & transformation, (3) descriptive statistics & Table 1, (4) statistical diagnostic tests, (5) baseline empirical modeling, (6) robustness battery, (7) further analysis (mechanism, heterogeneity, mediation, moderation), (8) publication-ready tables & figures. **Also covers two parallel domain modes that share the same 8-step scaf

Autonomously improve a real artifact (code, training recipe, agent harness, data pipeline, prompt) against an objective and an evaluator, using Hypothesis Tree Refinement (HTR) from the Arbor paper. Use this whenever someone wants to iteratively optimize something over many experiments without overfitting — e.g. "get my model's eval score up", "improve this agent/harness", "tune this pipeline", "beat the baseline on this benchmark", "run a search over approaches and keep the best", "do an MLE-bench / Kaggle-style optimization", or any long-horizon "make this artifact better and don't just memorize the dev set" task. Trigger it even when the user doesn't say "Arbor" or "hypothesis tree" but describes repeated experiment-and-evaluate loops, branching exploration of competing ideas, or worries about a dev/test gap. Runs Claude itself as the coordinator with subagent executors in...

Run KADATH (Kernel for Agentic Darwinian Adaptation, Tooling, and Heredity), a Docker-based evolutionary kernel that turns a goal into a locked, Architect-authored benchmark, then evolves a population of smolagents-based coding agents across epochs: each agent runs in an isolated container, gets graded against frozen evidence, and the population is culled, mutated, and reproduced generation over generation until it converges on the best-performing agent framework for that goal. Use when the user wants to propose/approve/run a KADATH evolutionary run, check a run's status or live dashboard, pause/resume/continue a run, export the winning agent population, or understand its Architect/Grader/Tweaker/Birther pipeline, evidence-freezing, or genome lineage/memory model. Triggers on: "kadath", "kadath.sh", "evolve an agent", "Darwinian agent evolution", "agent population fitness benchmark", "smolagents evolutionary run", "kadath dashboard", "genome lineage", "epoch champions".

Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Stata ecosystem — native Stata + reghdfe + ivreg2 + csdid + did_imputation + eventstudyinteract + sdid + rdrobust + rddensity + synth + synth_runner + psmatch2 + teffects + ebalance + coefplot + esttab + asdoc + binscatter. **Defaults to economics empirical-paper style** (AER / QJE / AEJ) — every run produces a publication-ready output set with a multi-column regression table (M1→M6 progressive controls/FE) as the centerpiece, plus Table 1 (descriptives), mechanism / heterogeneity / robustness tables, and event-study + coefficient + trend figures. Covers the full 8-step Stata pipeline an applied economist runs on every paper — (1) data import & cleaning (use/import, destring, misstable, duplicates, merge assert), (2) variable construction (gen/egen/winsor2/xtile/xtset with L./F./D.), (3) descriptive statistics & Table 1 (tabstat/balancetable/asdoc), (4) classical diagnostic tests (sktest/swilk/hettest/imtest/xtserial/xttest3/vif/dfuller/kpss/

Drive CodeBurn, a free open-source local-first CLI/TUI/web/menubar tool that reads the session files already on disk from 40 AI coding tools (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Grok, OpenCode, and more) and breaks down token usage and dollar cost by task, model, tool, and project. Use when the user wants to see where their AI coding spend went, find and fix token waste in a Claude Code / agent setup, cap a session's budget before it runs away, compare which model is actually worth its price, check whether AI spend shipped or was reverted, or wire live usage/savings data into an agent over MCP. Triggers on: "codeburn", "npx codeburn", "AI token usage", "AI coding cost", "where did my Claude spend go", "codeburn optimize", "codeburn guard", "codeburn compare models", "codeburn yield", "token waste in CLAUDE.md", "AI spend dashboard".

Pre-writing interview that captures the author's real opinions, experiences, and stances on a blog topic before the post is written on their behalf — the companion that runs BEFORE seo-blog-writer. Use this skill automatically whenever a blog post or article is about to be drafted under the user's name or brand — run the topic interview first, then hand the resulting Opinion Packet to seo-blog-writer. Also use it when the user says "interview me about this topic", "get my take first", "ask me what I think", or "update my opinion bank". Scope: blog/article topics only — not emails, docs, social posts, or other writing. If a blog post is about to be written as the user's voice and their take on the topic hasn't been captured, this skill triggers — even if they only asked for "a blog post about X".

Turn natural-language descriptions into editable `.drawio` diagrams and export them to PNG / SVG / PDF / JPG via the native draw.io desktop CLI, or turn an existing codebase (Python / JS-TS / Go / Rust) into an auto-laid-out structure diagram. Wraps Agents365-ai/drawio-skill: 6 diagram presets (ERD, UML class, sequence, architecture, ML/DL, flowchart), search across 10,000+ official AWS/Azure/GCP/Cisco/K8s/UML/ BPMN shapes, 321 AI/LLM brand logos, vision self-check + auto-fix, and a 5-round iterative refinement loop. No MCP server, no daemon — runs from a single SKILL.md and the draw.io CLI. Use when the user wants polished, precise, exportable diagrams or wants to visualize code structure. Triggers on: drawio, draw.io, drawio diagram, architecture diagram, ERD, UML diagram, sequence diagram, flowchart, network diagram, visualize codebase, code structure diagram, class hierarchy, export diagram png/svg/pdf, AWS/Azure/GCP icon, draw.io shapes.

Translates stakeholder feature requests into validated outcome statements before any work is committed. Use this skill — proactively and without waiting to be asked — whenever a stakeholder, exec, or customer arrives with a pre-packaged solution: "we need a dashboard", "add a Slack notification", "build an export feature", "create a report", "let's add a filter", "can we just add X". Also triggers for: "how do I push back on this request", "what outcome does this feature solve", "outcome vs output", "outcomes not features", "what are we really trying to achieve", "we're being a feature factory", "I need to reframe this as a problem", "the stakeholder is pushing a specific solution", "discovery before delivery", "assumption testing", "translate this request into an outcome", "ship outcomes not features". Runs the 'One Framework. Four Questions.' protocol (Liatti + Cagan + Torres): Behavior Change → Assumption Test → Cheapest Test → Success Metric. Produces an Outcome Brief with embedded AI prompts ready to pas

Turn a work-items.md file (produced by /plan-work-items) into Linear issues, one per slice, in a single target Linear team. Use when you want to publish work items as Linear issues, create implementation tickets to track in Linear, or push a broken-down plan into a Linear team. Requires a configured Linear MCP server and a target team. Reads the team's real workflow states, labels, Projects, and members and resolves every option against them before creating anything; defaults each issue to the team's initial state, unassigned, uncategorized, with no parent or Project unless you ask. Links within-file `Depends on` relationships as native Linear "blocked by" relations and annotates the source file so re-runs resume cleanly. Does not produce the work-items file itself — use plan-work-items first. Does not post to Jira — use work-items-to-jira. Does not post to GitHub — use work-items-to-issues.

The AlterLab front door and multi-agent launcher — routes a task to the right AlterLab skill(s) when the user invokes the suite without naming one, and for a multi-stage goal (or on the keyword 'alterflow', aliases 'alterresearch' / 'ultralab') it CLARIFIES the goal with a few questions, SELECTS the skills the task needs, and runs a dynamic multi-agent workflow composing them (via alterlab-workflow-orchestration, alterlab-research-pipeline, or alterlab-ssci-orchestrator). Triggers on 'use AlterLab skills', 'which AlterLab skill for X', 'is there an AlterLab skill for…', a multi-stage research goal, 'alterflow …', or any generic AlterLab request where the user does not know skill names. It always asks clarifying questions before executing a multi-step run. Use when someone references AlterLab generically, describes a multi-stage goal, or fires the alterflow keyword; when the user already names a specific skill, defer to that skill directly. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

Designs the contract for an API change inside one codebase — a component's props, a function surface, URL or query parameters, an event payload, or a module boundary — through a discovery pass, an options document with one recommendation, a question round, and an adversarial validation round, with every element of the contract justified from one stated goal. Use when you want to design, shape, decide, or nail down an interface, contract, signature, or API change for a capability you can already describe, sized for roughly one pull request. Produces a design document and changes no code. Does not specify what a feature should do — use plan-a-feature. Does not plan delivery or sequencing — use plan-implementation. Does not assess the architecture of existing code — use architectural-analysis. Does not write the code — use tdd. Does not restructure existing code — use refactor. Runs its rounds without pausing for review; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.

Generate browser walkthrough recordings as GIF and MP4 from a natural language description. Use this skill whenever the user wants to record a browser walkthrough, create a product demo, document a UI flow, generate onboarding visuals, or produce a "how to" screen recording for any web app. Triggers include: "record a walkthrough of", "create a GIF showing how to", "make a demo of", "capture the flow for", "show how [feature] works in the browser", "document this UI flow", or any request combining a browser/web app with recording/capture/demo output. The skill generates a local Node.js/TypeScript project that the user runs on their machine using Stagehand + Playwright for AI-controlled browser automation, and gifski/ffmpeg for output. For quick one-off captures in the user's live browser session, prefer the claude-in-chrome gif_creator tool instead; use this skill when a re-runnable script, MP4, high-quality GIF, clean-profile recording, or CI repeatability is needed.

Create OR review a wireflow — the artifact BETWEEN user journeys and wireframes. It maps whole journeys into swimlane flows with high-level navigation (screens, decisions, system/agent steps) while keeping Jobs-To-Be-Done at the core, WITHOUT deep UI. Use whenever the user wants to "map the flows", "make/build a wireflow", turn journeys / JTBDs / a spec / a live prototype into flows, or put every journey on one board against shared owner lanes — even if they never say "wireflow". ALSO use it to REVIEW or critique an existing wireflow (image, FigJam, or description). In the A-Team pipeline this is a definition-phase skill: output lands in docs/features/<slug>/briefs/wireflow/ with jobs consumed by id from docs/product/jtbd/; pipeline mode derives the method decisions and highlights the riskiest at the gate, standalone mode runs the full grill. CREATE generates verified SVG/HTML (self-checked by rendering and Reading its output) in a horizontal per-journey OR shared-matrix layout, and can rebuild in FigJam. Do

Create, set up, or update the personal context portfolio: structured markdown files describing who you are, how you work, your teams, and your tool/ADO configuration. Runs the interview workflow for first-time setup and targeted edits for updates. Trigger this skill when the user asks to: set up their context, create or update their context portfolio, "create my IQ", "set up my IQ", edit their profile, add/remove a stakeholder, update ADO config, change team info, update pillars, or set up any plugin configuration. Trigger when another skill fails to find context (missing files or TODO markers) and needs context populated. Also trigger when the user mentions a context change in passing (e.g., "my manager changed", "we added someone to the team") to offer a context file update. Do NOT trigger for read-only questions like "who's on my team?" or "what's my ADO config?". Those are answered directly from the context files referenced in the loaded custom instructions; no skill is needed.

Runs a Tinder-style swipe interview to pull requirements out of someone's head. Claude generates a deep pool of question cards, the user swipes right/left/up/down (yes / no / absolutely / not sure), the deck reshapes itself around every swipe, and it ends in a written brief once a saturation meter fills. Use this whenever a request is vague, broad, or taste-dependent and you would otherwise fire off a list of clarifying questions — kicking off a project, scoping a build, planning a trip or event, choosing a direction, naming something, deciding what to eat, or any "help me figure out what I want". Trigger on "swipe", "swipe deck", "tinder style", "interview me", "ask me questions", "quiz me", "20 questions me", "figure out what I want", "get it out of my head". Also reach for it proactively any time you catch yourself about to ask more than three clarifying questions in a row, or when someone says a batch of questions felt like a chore or a form.