Results for “exist”

Write the context brief a first-time tester gets before testing an app, tool, codebase, or product — it explains WHAT the thing is and why it exists, while deliberately withholding HOW anything works. The companion to the fresh-eyes skill; the brief it produces is the "starting information" handed to a fresh-eyes tester. Use this whenever the user is preparing a fresh-eyes or first-time-user test and needs the setup material, or says things like "describe my app without giving anything away", "write the context card for the tester", "explain what it is but not how to use it", "set up the newcomer test", "what would the tester be told going in?", or wants a spoiler-free description of their product. Also use it when someone asks for the briefing/intro that a new tester, new hire, or evaluator should receive before first contact with the thing being tested.

Surfaces Han's shared Human-Readable Output Standard — the readability rule and the writing-voice profile — into the calling skill's own context, so the caller drafts in voice and runs its self-check against the current standard sourced from one canonical copy. Use when a prose-producing skill needs the shared readability standard available in context before it drafts. Governs the shape of a written deliverable, where explanation-guidance governs what a run says to a person in a turn. Runs in the caller's context and hands control straight back; it does not produce a deliverable of its own, rewrite anything, or judge the caller's work. Does not run the adversarial rewrite pass — dispatch the readability-editor agent for that, or use edit-for-readability to rewrite an existing target. Does not cover explaining technical work to a reader who will not implement it — use explanation-guidance for that.

Expert content repurposing skill for creators and professionals who want to get more out of content they've already created. Use this skill whenever the user wants to turn one piece of content into multiple formats — for example: turning a blog post into social media posts, converting a YouTube video or podcast into a newsletter or article, transforming a long-form piece into short clips or quotes, or adapting any content for a different platform or audience. Triggers: "repurpose this", "turn this into a post", "make a LinkedIn post from this", "convert this blog to a tweet thread", "I have a video/podcast, can you make it into a newsletter", "get more out of this content", "adapt this for [platform]", or any request to transform existing content into a new format. Do NOT limit to obvious repurposing requests — if the user shares content and mentions another platform or format, use this skill.

Build work collaboratively in reviewable pieces, handing each piece back for review before starting the next, so the person stays in the lead and steers while the work happens instead of reviewing a finished result. Use when someone says to pair with them on something, asks to collaborate rather than direct, wants to review as it goes, or wants to guide the work piece by piece — on code, on a design decision, or on writing. For a test-first build it runs tdd, for restructuring it runs refactor, for an interface contract it runs design-an-api, and for plan work it runs iterative-plan-review or plan-implementation, each collaboratively; invoke any of those directly instead to run it straight through without pausing. Does not pace someone through code that already exists and builds nothing — use code-walkthrough. Does not explain, summarize, or research something instead of producing it — use code-overview or research.

Simulator.Company Smart Form (CDU) STYLING specialist — authoring complex Less/CSS for Smart Forms: theme tokens, page/form/section layout, component re-skinning, reusable style patterns, responsive and design-system approaches. Use when the user wants to STYLE or RESTYLE an existing Smart Form / CDU app — change its look, build a theme, style a table / sidebar / modal / form, add a design system, fix spacing/colors/fonts, or apply a complex visual design. This skill owns the `style` / `styles/` layer; it reuses the Smart Form tools (pullSmartForm / pushSmartForm / deploySmartForm) but does NOT create form templates — for the data-schema form template use `simulator-forms`, and for page layout / viewModel / backend logic use `simulator-smart-forms` / `simulator-smart-forms-logic`. Activate on: "style a smart form", "CDU styles", "theme the form", "restyle", "custom CSS/Less for the app", "style the table/sidebar/modal/button", "design system for the smart form", "make it look like …", "застилізувати смартформ

Walks a person through code changes one step at a time in conversation, starting at the entry point and following the flow that changes, showing a small chunk per step and explaining it in plain language. Defaults to the current branch's changes, and walks the code from the perspective of any context provided instead — a file, directory, symbol, pull request, plan, or ticket. Use when someone wants to be walked through, taught, paced through, or shown around code or a branch step by step, or to learn how a change works before reviewing or extending it. Stops after every step and waits, so the learner sets the pace. Paces through code that already exists and builds nothing — to build new work while being paced through it, use pairing. Does not produce a written overview to read alone — use code-overview. Does not review code quality — use code-review. Does not diagnose bugs — use investigate.

Sets up and audits the Claude Code harness for a project: CLAUDE.md, .claude/rules, skills, subagents, settings.json permissions, hooks, verification loop. Commands: kickoff (scaffold new setup), check-playbook (score an existing one), scouting-report (last scorecard), adjust (fix bloat/misplaced instructions), drill (turn advisory prose into real hooks/permissions/CI), decline (record an accepted risk), gameplan (work order with acceptance criteria before building), watch-film (check a diff against that order for scope creep/weakened tests/false claims). Use for setting up Claude Code, or on: "Claude ignores my CLAUDE.md", "it's huge and still misses things", "it said done but ran nothing", "it changed files I didn't ask about", "it weakened a test to pass", "rule, skill, or hook?", "is my setup any good". Not for code quality (code-audit), test coverage (test-assessment), one-off prompt wording (genie-proof-prompts), new skill authoring (skill-creator), or compacting a conversation (handoff).

Single entrypoint for taw-kit. User types `/taw <anything in VN or EN>` — this skill classifies the intent (BUILD / FIX / SHIP / MAINTAIN / ADVISOR) and loads the matching branch file to execute. Replaces the old one-command-per-task model (/taw-new, /taw-add, /taw-fix, /taw-deploy, /taw-security) with a single unified command. Supports dev workflows out of the box: test, upgrade, clean, perf, rollback, refactor, types, seed, review, stack-swap, status, and ADVISOR group (analyze, suggest, coverage, adversarial, scope-check) for opinionated review of existing code. User-visible strings match the user's input language (Vietnamese by default for VN users). Two modes: SAFE (default — clarify + approval, max 1 round-trip) and YOLO (skip gates, smart defaults — for demos/power users). YOLO triggers: prose contains `yolo`, `nhanh nha`, `lam luon`, `khoi hoi`, `auto`, or args start with `yolo`. Trigger phrases (EN + VN) — broad match so user can keep typing plain prose without re-invoking /taw every turn. Grouped by

Author and evolve the Corezoid backend that powers a Simulator.Company Smart Form. Use whenever the user wants a Smart Form to do anything beyond a static layout — load dynamic viewModel data, react to submits, drive page-level changes, trigger notifications, write back to actors — OR wants to modify existing backend logic (add a button branch, a new page handler, change submit behaviour, fix a bug in the viewModel builder). This skill is an orchestrator: it prepares precise briefs and hands the actual process authoring/editing off to the Corezoid plugin's `corezoid-create` and `corezoid-edit` skills. Activate on: "add logic to a smart form", "wire smart form to corezoid", "/get /send process", "smart form backend", "viewModel from corezoid", "submit handler", "page initialization process", "back end for CDU", "corezoidCredentials", "procId", "bind process to smart form", "smart form callback", "callback_url", "edit smart form backend", "add a button to smart form", "change submit logic", "add a page to smart

Use this skill whenever LMX is used, produced, reviewed, migrated, or modified. This includes composing campaigns, loops, lifecycle emails, or email-message bodies for the Loops editor or Content API. LMX (Loops Markup Language) is the format used for Loops email content. Trigger on phrases like "create a campaign", "generate an email", "write a welcome email", "draft a lifecycle email", "build an email template", "create an onboarding email", "copy this into LMX", "migrate this email", "convert this email to LMX", "design a new Loops email", "use imagegen for a Loops email", "use gpt-image for an LMX reference", "visual reference for a Loops email", "LMX", "Loops email", or any request to produce, copy, migrate, convert, review, or modify email body content intended for Loops. For net-new emails or major visual redesigns, follow this skill's Net-New Email Design Flow before generating or sourcing new visual assets. Source copy, existing HTML, MJML, Markdown, screenshots, and migration instructions do not byp

Create OR review a wireflow — the artifact BETWEEN user journeys and wireframes. It maps whole journeys into swimlane flows with high-level navigation (screens, decisions, system/agent steps) while keeping Jobs-To-Be-Done at the core, WITHOUT deep UI. Use whenever the user wants to "map the flows", "make/build a wireflow", turn journeys / JTBDs / a spec / a live prototype into flows, or put every journey on one board against shared owner lanes — even if they never say "wireflow". ALSO use it to REVIEW or critique an existing wireflow (image, FigJam, or description). In the A-Team pipeline this is a definition-phase skill: output lands in docs/features/<slug>/briefs/wireflow/ with jobs consumed by id from docs/product/jtbd/; pipeline mode derives the method decisions and highlights the riskiest at the gate, standalone mode runs the full grill. CREATE generates verified SVG/HTML (self-checked by rendering and Reading its output) in a horizontal per-journey OR shared-matrix layout, and can rebuild in FigJam. Do

Produce a plain-language manual test plan from the context supplied to it — an executive summary, a high-level list of named tests, and a detail section per test with the steps a person follows by hand and the outcomes they should expect. Use when you want to create, draft, generate, or outline a manual test plan, manual QA steps, hands-on verification steps, or an acceptance walkthrough for a feature, change, branch, plan, or PR. When the plan holds more than five tests and at least two natural categories emerge, both the test list and the detail sections are organized under plain-language categories. When nothing in the supplied context can be manually tested, it says so and asks for more context instead of producing a document. Does not analyze code for automated test coverage gaps — use automated-test-planning. Does not write test code — use tdd. Does not review code quality — use code-review. Does not stress-test an existing plan — use iterative-plan-review.

Use to CREATE or REVIEW a Job to be Done (JTBD) in Alan Klement's demand-side, progress-based sense — a job is the progress a customer is trying to make, never a task or feature. Trigger whenever someone wants to write or draft a JTBD, job statement, or job story; figure out the real motivation, struggle, or progress behind a feature, request, or product; understand why customers switch, adopt, or churn; turn interview notes or research into jobs; or pressure-test, sharpen, or rewrite existing JTBDs into proper jobs. Also trigger on "grill my JTBD", "is this a real job or just a task/feature", "what's the actual job here", "why would they switch". In an A-Team target repo, jobs are durable artifacts — this skill writes docs/product/jtbd/NN-<slug>.md per CONTRACT.md and never deletes or silently rewrites a job. Do NOT use for writing PRDs, roadmaps, tickets, or acceptance criteria (those consume a finished JTBD), or for implementation user stories.

Generate AI music on RunComfy via the `runcomfy` CLI — a smart router across the music-model catalog. Routes to ElevenLabs AI Music Generation (premium 44.1 kHz stereo vocal tracks, 5 s–5 min, $0.0083/s) and ACE Step / ACE Step 1.5 (StepFun-AI open-weights, tag-driven composition, multilingual lyrics, $0.0002–0.0003/s, ~27× cheaper), plus ACE Step audio-inpaint (regenerate a time range inside an existing track) and ACE Step audio-outpaint (extend a track before or after). Picks the right model for the user's actual intent — premium vocal hook, cheap background music library, multilingual pop song, repair a bad chorus, lengthen a 30 s draft into a 2 min cut — and ships each model's documented prompting patterns plus the minimal `runcomfy run` invoke. Triggers on "generate music", "make a song", "AI music", "background music", "instrumental track", "soundtrack", "jingle", "theme music", "royalty-free music", "compose", "music with lyrics", "extend music", "fix this song", "inpaint music", or any explicit ask to

Generate AI music on RunComfy via the `runcomfy` CLI — a smart router across the music-model catalog. Routes to ElevenLabs AI Music Generation (premium 44.1 kHz stereo vocal tracks, 5 s–5 min, $0.0083/s) and ACE Step / ACE Step 1.5 (StepFun-AI open-weights, tag-driven composition, multilingual lyrics, $0.0002–0.0003/s, ~27× cheaper), plus ACE Step audio-inpaint (regenerate a time range inside an existing track) and ACE Step audio-outpaint (extend a track before or after). Picks the right model for the user's actual intent — premium vocal hook, cheap background music library, multilingual pop song, repair a bad chorus, lengthen a 30 s draft into a 2 min cut — and ships each model's documented prompting patterns plus the minimal `runcomfy run` invoke. Triggers on "generate music", "make a song", "AI music", "background music", "instrumental track", "soundtrack", "jingle", "theme music", "royalty-free music", "compose", "music with lyrics", "extend music", "fix this song", "inpaint music", or any explicit ask to

Generate AI music on RunComfy via the `runcomfy` CLI — a smart router across the music-model catalog. Routes to ElevenLabs AI Music Generation (premium 44.1 kHz stereo vocal tracks, 5 s–5 min, $0.0083/s) and ACE Step / ACE Step 1.5 (StepFun-AI open-weights, tag-driven composition, multilingual lyrics, $0.0002–0.0003/s, ~27× cheaper), plus ACE Step audio-inpaint (regenerate a time range inside an existing track) and ACE Step audio-outpaint (extend a track before or after). Picks the right model for the user's actual intent — premium vocal hook, cheap background music library, multilingual pop song, repair a bad chorus, lengthen a 30 s draft into a 2 min cut — and ships each model's documented prompting patterns plus the minimal `runcomfy run` invoke. Triggers on "generate music", "make a song", "AI music", "background music", "instrumental track", "soundtrack", "jingle", "theme music", "royalty-free music", "compose", "music with lyrics", "extend music", "fix this song", "inpaint music", or any explicit ask to

Produces a human-readable, progressive-disclosure overview of unfamiliar code or a pull request's changes — why it exists (the real problem it solves or goal it serves for the business or a user), and from there what it does, how it flows, and where to start — so you can get up to speed before working on or reviewing it. Use when you want to understand, get oriented in, make sense of, explain, or get up to speed on a chunk of code, a file, a directory, a symbol, or a PR's changes. Writes the overview to a scratch file and changes no code. Does not review code quality or raise findings — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting them. Does not produce durable feature or system documentation — use project-documentation. Does not assess architecture or structural risk — use architectural-analysis. Does not diagnose bugs or root-cause failures — use investigate. Does not pace a person through the code one step at a time in conversation — use code-walkthrough.

Create OR review a page-brief — the artifact BETWEEN a wireflow and the full PRD. It turns each unique page/screen of a product into documented requirements TIED TO JOBS: a self-contained board card per page (what the page is accountable for, the job-tagged checklist of what it must let you do, the journeys it appears in, what it connects to, and the acceptance criteria that say how you'd know it's right). It is the "PRD per page", not a sitemap — and it stops ABOVE the screen: no components, no layout, no hierarchy. Use whenever the user wants to "spec the pages", "document each screen", turn a wireflow + live design into per-page requirements, or asks "what does this page need to do / which jobs pass through it" — even if they never say "page-brief". Natural NEXT STEP after the wireflow skill. ALSO use it to REVIEW an existing page-brief / screen catalog. In the A-Team pipeline this is a definition-phase skill: output lands in docs/features/<slug>/briefs/pages/, job codes are the durable [[NN]] ids from doc