Results for “planning”

Builds, validates, schedules, and dynamically modifies DAG execution graphs. Decomposes problems into nodes with dependencies, performs topological sorting, detects cycles, resolves conflicts, and schedules wave-based parallel execution. Use when designing a DAG structure, validating dependencies, planning execution order, or modifying a DAG at runtime. Activate on "build DAG", "plan workflow", "DAG dependencies", "topological sort", "schedule execution", "modify DAG", "replan". NOT for executing DAGs (use dag-runtime), validating outputs (use dag-quality), or matching skills to nodes (use dag-skills-matcher).

Plan a chunk of work too big for one agent session by putting it on a shared whiteboard — a map of investigation tickets on GitHub Issues — working them until nothing is left to decide, then snapshotting the board into a handoff artifact. Tickets needing nobody are worked back-to-back; the session stops when the human is the blocker. Use only when the user explicitly invokes whiteboard or asks to draw, work, run, or snapshot a whiteboard/map — not for ordinary planning requests.

Select alternative execution paths when a plan step fails — branch on outcomes instead of blind retry. Load when a structured plan step fails, an unexpected observation arrives, or the user asks what to try next after an error. Also triggers on "try another approach", "route around this failure", "replan on failure", "if X fails try Y", or outcome-based branching during multi-step work. Pairs with structured-planning and debug-and-fix. Does not replace root-cause debugging — adds plan-level path selection.

Expert knowledge for Azure Local development including troubleshooting, best practices, decision making, architecture & design patterns, limits & quotas, security, configuration, integrations & coding patterns, and deployment. Use when planning Azure Local racks, SDN networking, Arc/AKS VMs, Hyper‑V/VMware migrations, or disconnected ops, and other Azure Local related development tasks. Not for Azure Stack Edge (use azure-stack-edge), Azure Kubernetes Service Edge Essentials (use azure-aks-edge-essentials), Microsoft Foundry Local (use microsoft-foundry-local), Azure IoT Edge (use azure-iot-edge).

Triage a raw, vague issue or bug report into a structured document that names what is known, what is missing, and what to do next. Use when an incoming issue, bug report, or problem description is too vague or incomplete for investigation or planning, and recommend the right next han skill. Does not investigate root causes or trace code paths — use investigate for debugging, diagnosis, and root cause analysis. Does not plan features or build solutions — use plan-a-feature or plan-implementation for that.

When the user wants to create SEO-driven pages at scale using templates and data. Also use when the user mentions "programmatic SEO," "template pages," "pages at scale," "directory pages," "location pages," "[keyword] + [city] pages," "comparison pages," "integration pages," "building many pages for SEO," "pSEO," "generate 100 pages," "data-driven pages," or "templated landing pages." Use this whenever someone wants to create many similar pages targeting different keywords or locations. For auditing existing SEO issues, see seo-audit. For content strategy planning, see content-strategy.

Read-only diagnostic that scans Claude Code session transcripts to surface which MCP servers and tools you actually use, ranked by call frequency, with zero-use servers flagged for removal. Use when planning an MCP cleanup, evaluating whether to keep a newly-added server, deciding which servers warrant token cost in the catalog, or before authoring an MCP-removal PR. Outputs a markdown report (last N days) — does not modify any settings. Pair with the manual `claude mcp remove <name>` step once findings are reviewed.

Comprehensive go-to-market strategy and launch execution skill. Use when planning a product launch, feature announcement, market entry, or release strategy. Activates for: go to market, GTM, product launch, launch strategy, launch plan, launch execution, launch marketing, GTM playbook, launch readiness, technical launch, beta launch, early access, waitlist, Product Hunt, feature release, announcement, how do I launch this, launch checklist, we're about to ship, market entry, startup GTM, PLG vs sales-led, GTM motion, launch marketing pack, press outreach, developer product launch.

Turn "let's do a webinar" into a plan that fills seats and converts them. The topic that actually draws, the promo sequence that gets registrations, the run-of-show that keeps people watching, and the follow-up that turns attendees into pipeline. Built for B2B marketing teams, customizable to your audience and your stack. Trigger on "plan a webinar", "what should our webinar be about", "how do we promote the webinar", "build the run of show", "webinar follow-up", or any virtual-event planning question.

Turn a customer's stated goals into a success plan that predicts the renewal. It sets time-to-value milestones, names an owner on both sides for each, and picks the leading indicators that tell you a year early whether this account renews. Built for B2B customer success teams, customizable to your CRM and product analytics. Trigger on "build a success plan", "onboarding plan for this account", "what are the milestones", "how do I know they'll renew", "time-to-value plan", or any post-sale planning.

Walk into the negotiation with a plan, not a hope. Sets your walk-away and your target, builds the concession ladder (what you trade and what you get for it), maps their likely asks, and drafts the responses that protect price and terms. Built for B2B sales teams, customizable to your CRM and your deal process. Trigger on "prep me for this negotiation", "the prospect wants a discount", "what should I concede", "build my concession ladder", "hold price on a new deal", or any pre-negotiation planning.

Senior Project Manager for enterprise software, SaaS, and digital transformation projects. Specializes in portfolio management, quantitative risk analysis, resource optimization, stakeholder alignment, and executive reporting. Uses advanced methodologies including EMV analysis, Monte Carlo simulation, WSJF prioritization, and multi-dimensional health scoring. Use when a user needs help with project plans, project status reports, risk assessments, resource allocation, project roadmaps, milestone tracking, team capacity planning, portfolio health reviews, program management, or executive-level project reporting — especially for enterprise-scale initiatives with multiple workstreams, complex dependencies, or multi-million dollar budgets.

Opens a conversational planning session for a feature, bug, or ticket. Investigates the repo, discusses the approach with the user until a solution is agreed, and only then writes the plan to docs/plans/. Use whenever the user invokes it, describes a problem to solve, pastes a ticket, mentions an incident, or asks to plan a non-trivial change. Also on "plan this", "analyze this first", "what would we need to touch", "let's start with this" — or in Spanish "planeá", "analizá esto antes", "qué habría que tocar", "arranquemos con esto".

Supervises theses and dissertations end to end — structure guidance from proposal through defense, chapter-by-chapter writing support (introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion), supervision strategies, committee management, defense and viva voce preparation, timeline planning, feedback integration, examiner-expectation guidance, and formatting (APA 7, Chicago, university styles). Use when the request mentions thesis, dissertation, supervision, defense preparation, viva, proposal defense, thesis structure, thesis chapter, literature review chapter, methodology chapter, results chapter, discussion chapter, thesis timeline, committee, thesis formatting, or dissertation proposal. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

Navigate the technology adoption lifecycle from early adopters to mainstream market. Use when the user mentions "crossing the chasm", "beachhead segment", "whole product", "early adopters vs. mainstream", "tech go-to-market", "bowling pin strategy", "technology adoption lifecycle", or "pragmatist buyers". Also trigger when a startup has early traction but struggles to grow beyond initial users, or when planning go-to-market for technical products. Covers D-Day analogy, bowling-pin strategy, and positioning against incumbents. For product positioning, see obviously-awesome. For new market creation, see blue-ocean-strategy.

Turn "we should run some ads" into a paid-ads plan you can hand to a buyer. Audiences, the offer per audience, the creative angles, the budget split, the metric that calls it a win, and a kill rule so you stop feeding losers. Built for B2B marketing teams, customizable to your channels and your funnel. Trigger on "build a paid ads plan", "how should we split budget", "what should the ads say", "what's our target CPL", "when do we kill a campaign", or any paid-media planning question.

Turn a generic product tour into a buyer-specific demo that only shows what they told you hurts. Maps every feature you plan to show to a problem the buyer actually stated, writes the "so what" for each moment, and flags the trap of feature-dumping before you fall into it. Built for B2B sales teams, customizable to your product and your discovery. Trigger on "build a demo script", "prep for the demo", "what should I show", "map features to pain", "stop me from feature dumping", or any pre-demo planning pass.

Semantic topic cluster planning and automated execution engine for claude-blog. Performs SERP-based keyword research, groups keywords by search intent and SERP overlap, builds a hub-and-spoke cluster architecture, generates an interactive SVG cluster map, and executes the full cluster by orchestrating blog-write calls with shared cluster context and automatic internal-link injection. Fills the strategy-to-execution gap: blog-strategy plans the blueprint, blog-cluster builds the house. Use when user says "blog cluster", "topic cluster", "content cluster", "cluster plan", "cluster execute", "pillar content", "hub and spoke", "content ecosystem", "cluster map".

Turn "can we even hit this number" into a capacity model that shows the truth before the quarter does. Models ramped-rep productivity, builds the hiring plan the target requires, states the ramp assumptions plainly, and names the gap between plan and capacity so nobody discovers it in month three. Built for B2B sales and RevOps leaders, customizable to your ramp and your CRM. Trigger on "build a capacity model", "how many reps to hit the number", "what's the hiring plan", "are we capacity constrained", "model the ramp", or any capacity or headcount planning question.

When the user wants to create, plan, or optimize a lead magnet for email capture or lead generation. Also use when the user mentions "lead magnet," "gated content," "content upgrade," "downloadable," "ebook," "cheat sheet," "checklist," "template download," "opt-in," "freebie," "PDF download," "resource library," "content offer," "email capture content," "Notion template," "spreadsheet template," or "what should I give away for emails." Use this for planning what to create and how to distribute it. For interactive tools as lead magnets, see free-tools. For writing the actual content, see copywriting. For the email sequence after capture, see emails.

When the user wants to plan a content strategy, decide what content to create, or figure out what topics to cover. Also use when the user mentions "content strategy," "what should I write about," "content ideas," "blog strategy," "topic clusters," "content planning," "editorial calendar," "content marketing," "content roadmap," "what content should I create," "blog topics," "content pillars," or "I don't know what to write." Use this whenever someone needs help deciding what content to produce, not just writing it. For writing individual pieces, see copywriting. For SEO-specific audits, see seo-audit. For social media content specifically, see social.

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

Turn a pipeline target into a demand-generation plan that actually maps to the number. The ICP worth spending on, the offers by funnel stage, the channel mix that reaches them, the content that earns attention, and the pipeline math worked backward from the goal so you know if the plan can even hit it. Built for B2B marketing teams, customizable to your funnel and your channels. Trigger on "build a demand gen plan", "how do we hit our pipeline number", "what's our channel mix", "plan our content", "work the funnel math backward", or any demand-generation planning question.

Use when delivery work needs structuring into epics — defining a new epic, refining or superseding an existing one, or decomposing a PRD's requirements into durable delivery structures that feed issue decomposition. Writes docs/product/epics/NN-<slug>.md (durable, id-stable, superseded-never-deleted), each epic tracing to the JTBD ids it serves and the PRD requirement IDs it bundles. In the A-Team pipeline this is a definition-phase output ("the Epics"). Do not use for full roadmap/portfolio planning across quarters (deliberately not ported), for delivery tickets or acceptance criteria (ticket-writer), or to create or revise jobs (jobs-to-be-done).

Turn a target account list into a real account-based play, not a spray. It tiers the accounts, sets the research angle per tier, builds the multi-thread across marketing and sales, and orchestrates the touches so the account feels one coordinated motion instead of a rep and a marketer working past each other. Built for B2B revenue teams, customizable to your CRM and your channels. Trigger on "build an ABM play", "account-based plan for this list", "how do I run ABM on these accounts", "tier my target list", "coordinate marketing and sales on these accounts", or any account-based planning request.

Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.

Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.

Design finalization: generates production-quality Pretext-native HTML/CSS. Works with approved mockups from /design-shotgun, CEO plans from /plan-ceo-review, design review context from /plan-design-review, or from scratch with a user description. Text actually reflows, heights are computed, layouts are dynamic. 30KB overhead, zero deps. Smart API routing: picks the right Pretext patterns for each design type. Use when: "finalize this design", "turn this into HTML", "build me a page", "implement this design", or after any planning skill. Proactively suggest when user has approved a design or has a plan ready. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "build the design", "code the mockup", "make it real".

Expert product strategy advisor for Senior PMs. Use this skill — proactively and without waiting to be asked — whenever defining a product vision, setting quarterly OKRs, building a roadmap, choosing between competing bets, entering a new product area, or when stakeholders disagree on direction. Also triggers for: "what should we prioritize", "we need a north star", "how do we choose between X and Y", "roadmap conflict", "what are our bets this quarter", "strategy alignment", "choosing what NOT to build", "three bets with trade-offs", "stakeholder misalignment on direction", "product direction for next quarter", "OKR planning". Produces a decision-focused strategy doc: North Star metric, Opportunity Tree, three bets with explicit trade-offs (including do nothing), and a recommended bet with its key assumption.

Local CLI issue tracker for todos, follow-ups, structured records, and the canonical pattern for decomposing multi-step work into a parent + subissues with acceptance criteria, dependency edges, and priority. Use when the user mentions a task to remember, a bug to track, an open question, anything that needs to outlive the current turn, or when planning multi-heartbeat work that needs `chainlink issue ready`-driven pickup across sessions. Includes guidance on writing descriptions future-you can act on (handles, success path, failure path) and idempotency tactics for actions that might fire twice (boundary firing, overlapping heartbeats, retried subagent completion). Pairs with five-whys (chainlink is the storage backend for RCA trees). Storage is local — issues live under a `.chainlink/` directory in the operator's repo.

Use BEFORE generating, refactoring, reviewing, or debugging code. Trigger phrases include "write a function/script/class for X", "review this code/diff/PR", "refactor this", "debug this error", "is this implementation correct", "what's wrong with this code", "improve this code", "translate from X to Y", or any prompt with a code block the user wants you to act on. Also fires when planning architectural changes, picking algorithms or data structures, or evaluating dependency upgrades. Calls the code MCP tool to retrieve an engineering scaffold (failure pattern, procedure, correct-pattern example, verification step) before generating. Catches hallucinated APIs, lost edge cases, premature algorithm commitment, silent contract violations, refactors that change behavior masked by passing tests. Do NOT trigger for pure code reading with no action requested, simple syntax questions, file...

Use when asked to fix, build, refactor, review, verify, or release software and the work is non-trivial — including delivering a change request (issue, ticket, or request) from intake through planning, gates, implementation, review, verified PR, and authorized post-merge release. neckbeard routes the change through framing, discovery, design, implementation, review, verification, delivery, and learning — choosing the smallest *safe* intervention, proving it at the real delivery boundary, and leaving an inspectable evidence ledger. For change-request / issue-to-PR work, conditionally loads a 9-phase journey with gates, delivery packet, and lifecycle integration. Composes specialist catalog skills rather than replacing them. Not a persona, not a '10x developer' prompt, not a LOC-minimizer. The journey is not loaded for plain fixes, refactors, or reviews that lack an issue/ticket trajectory.

Complete SEO + GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) system for SaaS companies wanting to rank on both Google and AI search engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude). Use this skill whenever the user asks about SEO strategy, keyword research, content planning, writing SEO-optimized articles, auditing their search performance, creating a content calendar, analyzing competitors, or optimizing for AI search visibility. Trigger on: "seo", "keyword research", "content calendar", "rank on google", "search traffic", "write an article", "blog post", "serp", "backlinks", "competitor analysis", "content cluster", "seo audit", "geo optimization", "ai search", "search console", "organic traffic", "content strategy", "publish article", "seo setup", "ranking", "impressions", "ctr", "meta description", "schema markup", "faq schema". Also trigger when a user wants to set up their SaaS blog SEO from scratch, analyze their current rankings, or create a publishing workflow.

Mapa i przewodnik po wyspecjalizowanych skillach platformy Soneta (enova365, Triva): soneta-programming (ORM, kod biznesowy), soneta-addon-planning, soneta-business-xml, soneta-form-xml, soneta-repx (wydruki DevExpress .repx), soneta-place-def-elementow, soneta-config (import/eksport XML, scan-folders, appsettings.json — porty i adresy komponentów), soneta-config-reg (rejestr konfiguracji ConfigReg, providery, *.reg.json), soneta-tools (narzędzia CLI: dbmgr, buscall, SonetaFrame), soneta-containers (docker compose, Apple container, Helm/Kubernetes, wersje obrazów, baza w kontenerze). Używaj gdy użytkownik: (1) rozpoczyna zadanie dla platformy Soneta i nie wiadomo, który skill wybrać; (2) pyta ogólnie o dodatki, moduły lub rozszerzenia Soneta ERP; (3) wspomina enova, Soneta Enterprise, Triva bez sprecyzowania warstwy (dane, UI, logika, płace); (4) chce poznać dostępne skille; (5) realizuje zadanie obejmujące wiele warstw platformy (np. moduł z bazą, formularzami i logiką).

When the user needs a comprehensive marketing plan for a client, a company they advise, or their own product. Also use when the user mentions "marketing plan," "growth plan," "GTM plan," "go-to-market plan," "AARRR plan," "90-day marketing plan," "12-month marketing roadmap," "fractional CMO plan," or "fCMO plan." Generates an exhaustive 13-section plan structured by AARRR (Acquisition, Activation, Retention, Referral, Revenue), customized to the client's current budget, team, and stage, mapped to future funding milestones, cross-referenced with the 139-idea marketing-ideas library and an embedded 17-section current-state audit rubric, with a full marketing operations stack showing which skills and MCP/API integrations execute each part. Outputs a Notion-paste-ready markdown document. For positioning and ICP context before planning, see product-marketing. For stage-specific deep work, see onboarding, signup, emails, referrals, pricing.

Expert Socratic discovery skill for exploring ideas, architecture decisions, and technical design before writing any code. Use this skill — proactively and always first — when requirements are vague, when the user is debating between technical approaches, when the problem is unclear, or when a design decision could have significant architectural consequences. Triggers on: "should we use X or Y", "help me think through", "I'm not sure how to approach this", "what's the best architecture for", "trade-offs between", "design before I code", "let's think through this", "I have an idea", "how should I structure", "help me design", "I want to build X but not sure how", "what approach would you recommend", "is this the right way to". Produces a validated design doc with 2-3 implementation options, trade-offs, and a recommendation. Always use before planning when the approach is not yet locked.