Results for “architecture-review”

MONOPOLY is a Senior System Design Engineer skill for architecting, reviewing, and scaling systems. Triggers on requests involving architecture, databases, scaling, microservices, or infrastructure de

Design agents that watch data sources, build candidate prediction-market baskets, draft parameter changes, and hand results to a human for review.

当一段改动已经写完、要在收尾或合并前对它做一次独立审查时使用——如"审一遍这条分支、review 这次改动、这批代码有没有问题、帮我把关再合"。先把 BASE..HEAD 生成一份审查包一次读完，再按 correctness / readability / architecture / security / performance 五轴加测试质量逐项判定，输出带 file:line 的 Critical / Important / Minor 分级 findings。composable 层能力单元，通常由 execute-task 在整体验收时调用。不要用于：改动还没写完、只想跑测试、要的是动手修复而不是审查、评审需求或技术方案本身。

Use when designing a new system, choosing between architectural patterns, planning how components will connect, evaluating scalability and reliability trade-offs, or reviewing an existing system for structural problems. For system design, service boundaries, database design, API structure, monolith vs microservices decisions, and architecture decision records (ADRs). Activate when user says "how should I structure this", "design the system", "is this architecture right", or "plan the backend".

Evaluate and improve interface usability using heuristic analysis. Use when the user mentions "usability audit", "UX review", "users are confused", "heuristic evaluation", "form usability", "navigation problems", "Nielsen heuristics", "cognitive walkthrough", or "usability testing". Also trigger when reviewing a design for usability issues, improving form completion rates, or evaluating information architecture and navigation. Covers Nielsens 10 heuristics, severity ratings, and information architecture. For visual design fixes, see refactoring-ui. For conversion-focused audits, see cro-methodology.

Diagnoses AWS architecture issues and reviews Well-Architected pillars using read-only AWS CLI commands, with confirmation required for any changes.

Write readable, maintainable code through disciplined naming, small functions, and clean error handling. Use when the user mentions "code review", "naming conventions", "function too long", "code smells", "readable code", "boy scout rule", "single responsibility", or "unit test quality". Also trigger when reviewing pull requests for readability, refactoring messy functions, debating comment styles, or improving error handling patterns. Covers SRP, comment discipline, formatting, and unit testing. For refactoring techniques, see refactoring-patterns. For architecture, see clean-architecture.

Creates persona-targeted, step-by-step CodeTour walkthroughs that link to real files and line numbers for onboarding, architecture, PR review, and more.

Create or review Blazor components (.razor files) with correct architecture, covering parameters, EventCallback, RenderFragment, lifecycle, async patterns, disposal, and CSS isolation.

Guides architecture decisions, flow type selection, bulk safety validation, and fault handling standards for Salesforce Flow design and review.

Use when the team needs authentication, identity providers, custom claims, session strategy, or permission design for a Firebase-backed app. Trigger on requests to design or review Firebase Auth architecture.

Create publication-quality scientific diagrams using AI generation with smart iterative refinement and quality review.

Manage software complexity through deep modules, information hiding, and strategic programming, with a scoring framework for evaluating design quality.

Orchestrate token-heavy research, coding, and testing by delegating bounded tasks to cheaper subagents while reserving Claude Fable for architecture, synthesis, and final review.

Conducts multi-turn iterative deep research on specific topics within a codebase, tracing actual code paths and grounding every claim in evidence.

Clinic-architecture-aligned iOS animation craft guidelines for SwiftUI (iOS 26 / Swift 6.2) covering motion tokens, spring physics, gesture continuity, spatial transitions, micro-interactions, and accessibility. Enforces @Equatable on animated views and keeps animation state aligned with Domain/Data feature boundaries. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring SwiftUI animation code under the clinic modular MVVM-C architecture.

Validate process decomposition and architecture design quality before execution begins. Load when the setup-evaluator agent fires (automatic for agent-chain tasks), or when user says "evaluate this setup", "check the decomposition", "validate the architecture", "is this plan sound", "review the agent design". Catches structural errors, missing knowledge, unrealistic step ordering, and topology mismatches. Does NOT modify — only evaluates.

Designs and implements backend systems including REST APIs, microservices, database architectures, authentication flows, and security hardening. Use when the user asks to "design REST APIs", "optimize database queries", "implement authentication", "build microservices", "review backend code", "set up GraphQL", "handle database migrations", or "load test APIs". Covers Node.js/Express/Fastify development, PostgreSQL optimization, API security, and backend architecture patterns.

Two-layer memory architecture for board meeting decisions. Manages raw transcripts (Layer 1) and approved decisions (Layer 2). Use when logging decisions after a board meeting, reviewing past decisions with /cs:decisions, or checking overdue action items with /cs:review. Invoked automatically by the board-meeting skill after Phase 5 founder approval.

Create CodeTour `.tour` files with persona-targeted, step-by-step walkthroughs anchored to real files and line ranges for onboarding, architecture, PR review, and code explanation.

Coordinates a squad of specialized agents for software development, routing tasks and managing context across requirements, planning, architecture, implementation, review, testing, and deployment phases.

Packet-first BMAD/BMM front door for idea notes, product briefs, PRDs, architecture drafts, review feedback, existing repo state, and milestone pressure. Use when the user wants to know what BMAD phase or artifact comes next, or needs a portable BMAD entrypoint before routing review, execution slicing, runtime setup, or game-production work outward.

Analyzes smart contract codebases against Trail of Bits' secure development guidelines, generating documentation, reviewing architecture and upgradeability patterns, assessing implementation quality, identifying pitfalls, and providing prioritized recommendations.

Agent profile for lead framework, dependency, database, SDK, and architecture migrations with sequencing and rollback. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Comprehensive guide to prevent unmaintainable code, especially from AI generation. Covers code duplication, documentation, error handling, naming conventions, architecture, performance, dependencies, modularity, testing, and technical debt prevention. Essential for code reviews and ensuring long-term code health.

Routing-first visual approval gate for AI agent plans, markdown specs, and diffs. Use when a human needs to review a concrete plan before execution, inspect a targeted diff in a browser, mark up a spec/PRD/architecture note, or set up the review loop on Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Codex CLI, or OpenCode. Route planning/spec creation to `task-planning` or `ralph`, broad PR-policy review to `code-review`, rendered-UI critique to `agentation`, and fresh-session browser verification to `browser-harness`.

Logs board meeting decisions with a two-layer memory architecture, separating raw transcripts from approved decisions, and provides commands to review past decisions and overdue action items.

Evaluates Power BI data model architecture, relationships, storage modes, and performance to identify optimization opportunities and ensure adherence to best practices.

Build, refactor, or review macOS menubar apps that use Tuist and SwiftUI, with a focus on Tuist-first workflows, strict architecture boundaries, and reliable local launch scripts.

Evaluate a screen's information density by analyzing cognitive load, content prioritization, scanning patterns, and progressive disclosure, with actionable fixes for each dimension.

Threat modeling workflow for software systems: scope, data flow diagrams, STRIDE analysis, risk scoring, and turning mitigations into backlog and tests. Use when designing new features, reviewing architecture changes, handling sensitive data, or hardening auth/payment/multi-tenant flows.

Agent profile for coordinate mobile app architecture across iOS, Android, Expo/React Native, offline states, permissions, and releases. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Structured threat modeling skill using the PASTA framework (Process for Attack Simulation and Threat Analysis) combined with Adam Shostack's 4-question framework. Use this skill whenever the user asks to do threat modeling, security analysis, map the attack surface, identify threats, or review an application for security risks — even if they don't mention PASTA or a specific framework by name. Core activities: Component Mapping (architecture + data flows), Critical Assessment (business impact prioritization), and Logic Flaw Identification (attacker mindset on business logic). Produces: component map diagram (Mermaid), data flow diagram (Mermaid), attack tree (Mermaid), STRIDE threat table, prioritized risk register, and an actionable mitigation plan. Invoke proactively for any security review, architecture review, or "what could go wrong?" session.

A Cursor Canvas is a live React app the user opens beside the chat. MUST use a canvas for standalone analytical artifacts — quantitative analyses, billing investigations, security audits, architecture reviews, data-heavy content, timelines, charts, tables, interactive explorations, repeatable tools, or any response.

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

Perform a structured audit of a codebase covering security, code quality, performance, dependencies, architecture, and testing hygiene, then produce a prioritized findings report. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a code review, code audit, security review, codebase assessment, "look over this repo", "what's wrong with this codebase", legacy-code triage, pre-acquisition technical due diligence, or any request to systematically evaluate the health of a project. Trigger even when the user is casual ("can you eyeball my repo?") — this skill imposes the structure that ad-hoc review misses. This skill audits a whole repository at a point in time — for reviewing a diff or PR use the built-in code-review skill; for security checks on pending changes use security-review.