Results for “artifact-analysis”

Perform forensic acquisition and analysis of cloud storage services including Google Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox, and Box by collecting both API-based remote data and local sync client artifacts from endpoint devices.

Use for writing, reviewing, debugging, or testing static Python visualization with Matplotlib, including Figure, Axes, Axis, Artist, transforms, layouts, dates, categorical scales, annotations, color normalization, image export, and headless rendering. Do not use for Plotly interactivity, Altair/Vega-Lite specifications, dashboard state, or analysis without a Matplotlib artifact.

Researches an open-ended question — options, possible solutions, prior art, trade-offs, or how something works — and produces a durable, evidence-backed, adversarially-validated report that recommends an option without committing the team to any artifact. Use when you want to research approaches, weigh options, survey prior art or the state of the art, or understand how something works before committing to a direction. Does not diagnose a bug, failure, or root cause — use investigate. Does not specify a feature — use plan-a-feature. Does not create or update a coding standard — use coding-standard. Does not compare two concrete artifacts for gaps — use gap-analysis. Does not assess an existing module's architecture — use architectural-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback.

Generate a MoonSpec implementation plan and design artifacts from a single-story spec. Use when the user asks to run or reproduce `/moonspec.plan`, create or update `plan.md`, produce `research.md`, `data-model.md`, `contracts/`, or `quickstart.md`, evaluate repo principles, define separate unit and integration test strategies, and perform repo-aware gap analysis before `/moonspec.tasks`.

Comprehensive post-build verification of Shannon Framework's application outputs using three-layer methodology: Flow Verification (execution trace analysis), Artifact Verification (physical output inspection), and Functional Verification (runtime testing). Verifies Shannon built production-ready applications across all domains (Frontend, Backend, Database, Mobile, DevOps). Ensures NO MOCKS compliance, cross-platform functionality, and complete integration. Use after: Shannon builds any application via /shannon:wave, need to verify build quality, production readiness assessment.

Structured root cause analysis for arriving at a concrete action. Use when something went wrong, a pattern keeps recurring, behavior has drifted, or you catch yourself resolving to "do better" / "remember to X" without a concrete artifact. Five-whys forces behavioral resolutions into file edits, config changes, memory block updates, or scheduled jobs — the action item must produce a diff someone else can verify. Do not use for simple debugging with an obvious cause.

Splits a body of context into a sequence of vertical-slice build phases where each phase is independently demonstrable to a real user and each builds on the previous. Use when the user wants to plan, sequence, phase, slice, break down, or order the build of a feature, capability, system, or initiative, and produces a plain-language phased build outline. Does not produce implementation detail — use plan-implementation. Does not specify behavior that has not been decided — use plan-a-feature. Does not perform gap analysis between two artifacts — use gap-analysis. Does not break a plan into independently-grabbable work items — use plan-work-items.