Results for “feature-request”

Use this when the user gives a broad app, system, service, tool, or feature request and it must be converted into structured implementation requirements, runtime assumptions, security concerns, likely components, and handoff tasks for developer or designer skills.

Use when the team needs route structure, feature modules, design-system boundaries, and frontend responsibilities for a React, Next.js, or Tailwind application. Trigger on requests about frontend architecture, app structure, pages, modules, or client-side delivery planning.

Use when the team needs a clear product point of view, product principles, or a concise philosophy statement before planning UX, features, or architecture. Trigger on requests about product vision, differentiation, or what the product should optimize for.

Author pull requests with intent-separated commits, blast-radius disclosure, and verification evidence. Load when opening a PR, writing a PR description, separating refactor from feature commits, or summarizing a change set for review. Also triggers on "write the PR", "PR body", "intent-separated commits", "split refactor from feature", "pr summary", or after safe-change cycles complete. Extends git-workflow-and-versioning — does not replace it.

When the user wants help with public relations, earned media, press coverage, journalist outreach, or media strategy (not pull requests). Also use when the user mentions 'PR,' 'public relations,' 'press,' 'press release,' 'press coverage,' 'media outreach,' 'pitch a journalist,' 'get featured,' 'media list,' 'media kit,' 'press kit,' 'newsjacking,' 'news hijack,' 'HARO,' 'Qwoted,' 'Featured,' 'Help A Reporter,' 'reporter request,' 'tech press,' 'TechCrunch,' 'earned media,' 'thought leadership placement,' 'op-ed,' 'guest article,' 'press contacts,' or 'how do I get press.' Use this for earned media work — finding journalists, pitching stories, newsjacking, and responding to press requests. For startup/SaaS/AI directory submissions, see directory-submissions. For product launches, see launch. For social-media engagement, see social. For cold-email outreach to prospects, see cold-email.

Run a structured discovery interview and produce a complete, developer-ready Product Requirements Document. Load when the user asks to write a PRD, create product requirements, document a feature, define user stories with acceptance criteria, or turn a rough idea into a formal product requirements document. Also triggers on "document this feature", "write requirements for", "create a one-pager", "turn this into a PRD", "I need a PRD for", or any request to produce a structured product document for stakeholder alignment or engineering handoff. Supports Full PRD, Lean PRD, and One-Pager formats. Note: for executable feature specifications (FRs, NFRs, ACs as Given/When/Then consumable by AI coding agents), route to `feature-spec` instead — PRDs frame the product, feature-specs encode the implementable contract.

Provides foundational patterns for building type-safe frontend applications with Elm, covering The Elm Architecture, core language features, and Elm's approach to functional web development.

Implements any user intent, requirement, story, bug fix or change request by producing clean working code artifacts that follow the project's existing architecture, patterns and conventions. Use when the user wants to build, fix, tweak, refactor, add or modify any code, component or feature.

Orchestrate the full MoonSpec lifecycle from a preselected single-story feature request or active feature directory through specification, planning, TDD task generation, artifact alignment, implementation, and final verification. Use when the user asks for an end-to-end MoonSpec run and the input has already been routed to one independently testable story, or when Codex needs to coordinate `moonspec-specify`, `moonspec-plan`, `moonspec-tasks`, `moonspec-align`, `moonspec-implement`, and `moonspec-verify` without manual analyze/remediation prompts.

Create a detailed, step-by-step implementation plan for a feature or project. Load when the user asks to plan a feature, create a technical roadmap, break down a PRD into tasks, design an implementation strategy, or sequence engineering work. Also triggers on "how should we build this", "implementation plan for", "technical breakdown", "task list for", or any request to turn a high-level requirement into a concrete execution plan. Supports phased rollouts, architecture-first, and MVP-focused planning.

Run the full autonomous engineering pipeline end-to-end (plan, work, code review, test, commit, push, open PR, watch CI, fix CI failures until green). Use only when the user explicitly requests hands-off execution of a software task and provides a feature description; do not auto-route casual conversation here.

Turn a rough idea into a fully approved design before any code is written. Load when the user wants to brainstorm, explore ideas, design a feature, think through approaches, plan a new capability, or figure out what to build. Also triggers on "let's think through", "help me design", "explore options", "what's the best approach for", "I have an idea for", "before we build", or any request to design something before implementation. Enforces a hard gate: no code, no implementation until user approves a design. For executable feature specs (FRs, NFRs, ACs as Given/When/Then), route to `feature-spec` instead — brainstorming owns approach and architecture, not machine-readable requirements.

Enforces strict outside-in red-green-refactor TDD with one-failure-per-turn discipline, predicting failures before every run, hardcoding minimum changes, and using triangulation and property-based testing. Triggers on explicit TDD requests and tasks phrased as 'implement', 'add', 'write a function', 'build a feature'.

Self-contained code review checklist — formatting, type safety, duplication, readable conditions, logic-out-of-UI, test coverage, comment quality. Adapts to whatever tooling the project actually has (skips Prettier/TypeScript/test-runner checks if unconfigured). Use before merging, after completing a feature, or any time you want a second pass on code quality. In Claude Code, prefer the official `code-review` skill or `pr-review-toolkit`/`feature-dev` code-reviewer agents instead — both are real, installed, and go deeper than this checklist. This copy exists for Codex/Cursor portability, where those agents aren't available.

Expert prompt optimization system for the prompts INSIDE an AI product you are building — system prompts, LLM feature prompts, chatbot/agent instructions. Use when the user wants to write or improve a system prompt for an AI feature they're shipping, review/critique an LLM prompt, apply prompt-engineering techniques (chain-of-thought, few-shot, structured output, hard constraints) to a product prompt, or optimize cost/latency of a production prompt. Do NOT use this to clarify or structure the user's own vague request to Claude Code — that is `prompt-clarifier`'s job, not this skill's.

Generates a structured developer-facing markdown document that teaches how a specific feature, module, or piece of functionality works in the codebase. Use this skill whenever the user runs `/teach`, asks "how does X work", "explain the auth flow", "document how payments work", "walk me through the webhook system", or any request to understand and document internal codebase functionality. Also trigger when the user wants to produce onboarding docs, feature walkthroughs, or "how it works" references for developers. Always use this skill even if the user only gives a vague description — use the provided context or file hints to locate the relevant code yourself and build the teaching doc from there. This skill writes for developers reading the codebase — for end-user/customer-facing help docs, use the eli5-features skill instead.

Turn a GitHub pull request (a PR URL, owner/repo#N, or 'this PR' in a checked-out repo) into a code-change explainer video — changelog, feature reveal, fix, or refactor walkthrough built from the diff, commits, and files: the input is a code change, not a website. Not a product promo (/product-launch-video) or a no-PR topic explainer (/faceless-explainer). Unclear → /hyperframes.

Produces a progressive-disclosure overview of unfamiliar code or a pull request's changes with code-overview and publishes the resulting overview to a user-specified Confluence location. Use when the user wants code or a PR explained, oriented, or made sense of AND the overview posted to a Confluence space or page. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not produce the overview to a local file only — use code-overview. Does not publish an arbitrary existing markdown file — use markdown-to-confluence. Does not document an already-understood feature to Confluence — use project-documentation-to-confluence. Does not root-cause a bug to Confluence — use investigate-to-confluence. Does not plan or specify a new feature to Confluence — use plan-a-feature-to-confluence. Does not publish to Jira — use work-items-to-jira.

Maintains a product repo's canonical docs structure (CLAUDE.md, progress.txt, docs/product+system+design-system, context/) as single source of truth, and keeps the log.md session history separate from the progress.txt state snapshot. Trigger after feature completion, before git push, on architecture changes, at session end, or explicit "update docs"/"sync documentation" requests. Skip for trivial changes (<10 LOC, no logic/schema/UI changes).

Create structured plans for multi-step tasks -- software features, research workflows, events, study plans, or any goal that benefits from breakdown. Also deepens existing plans with interactive sub-agent review. Use when the user says 'plan this', 'create a plan', 'how should we build', 'break this down', or when a brainstorm doc is ready for planning. Use 'deepen the plan' or 'deepening pass' for the deepening flow. For exploratory requests, prefer ce-brainstorm first.

| Use when starting a chain from a GitHub issue — turning an issue URL or number into a triaged, planned, dispatched, and reviewed pull request. Classifies the thread (bug → root-cause discipline, feature → plan chain, question → drafted reply), synthesizes a spec from the issue's own acceptance criteria, then runs the standard chain with a PR exit. Trigger with /hyperflow:issue, "work on issue #N", "fix this issue <url>", "implement this issue", "triage issue #N and raise a PR".

Use to CREATE or REVIEW a Job to be Done (JTBD) in Alan Klement's demand-side, progress-based sense — a job is the progress a customer is trying to make, never a task or feature. Trigger whenever someone wants to write or draft a JTBD, job statement, or job story; figure out the real motivation, struggle, or progress behind a feature, request, or product; understand why customers switch, adopt, or churn; turn interview notes or research into jobs; or pressure-test, sharpen, or rewrite existing JTBDs into proper jobs. Also trigger on "grill my JTBD", "is this a real job or just a task/feature", "what's the actual job here", "why would they switch". In an A-Team target repo, jobs are durable artifacts — this skill writes docs/product/jtbd/NN-<slug>.md per CONTRACT.md and never deletes or silently rewrites a job. Do NOT use for writing PRDs, roadmaps, tickets, or acceptance criteria (those consume a finished JTBD), or for implementation user stories.

Tactical fast path: turn a small problem, bug report, edit request, or narrow refactor into three deliverables — a brief change-spec (docs/specs/), a detailed implementation-ready plan (docs/plans/), and a TODO.md with agent-pickable tasks and milestones. Load when the user describes a tactical problem and wants quick planning artifacts, says "plan this change", "create a TODO", "write a plan for this", "problem to plan", "break this into tasks for agents", "I want to change X — plan it", or when process-decomposer routes here after determining the user needs lightweight planning deliverables. Also triggers on "create tasks from this problem", "make this actionable", or "turn this into a plan agents can execute". For feature-sized work that needs an executable spec + constitution + cross-check gate, route to `spec-driven-development` (or `feature-spec`) instead.

Designs the contract for an API change inside one codebase — a component's props, a function surface, URL or query parameters, an event payload, or a module boundary — through a discovery pass, an options document with one recommendation, a question round, and an adversarial validation round, with every element of the contract justified from one stated goal. Use when you want to design, shape, decide, or nail down an interface, contract, signature, or API change for a capability you can already describe, sized for roughly one pull request. Produces a design document and changes no code. Does not specify what a feature should do — use plan-a-feature. Does not plan delivery or sequencing — use plan-implementation. Does not assess the architecture of existing code — use architectural-analysis. Does not write the code — use tdd. Does not restructure existing code — use refactor. Runs its rounds without pausing for review; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.

Delegate coding tasks to Codex, Claude Code, or Pi agents via background process. Use when: (1) building/creating new features or apps, (2) reviewing PRs (spawn in temp dir), (3) refactoring large codebases, (4) iterative coding that needs file exploration. NOT for: simple one-liner fixes (just edit), reading code (use read tool), thread-bound ACP harness requests in chat (for example spawn/run Codex or Claude Code in a Discord thread; use sessions_spawn with runtime:"acp"), or any work in ~/clawd workspace (never spawn agents here). Claude Code: use --print --permission-mode bypassPermissions (no PTY). Codex/Pi/OpenCode: pty:true required.

Reduce OpenClaw token usage and API costs through smart model routing, heartbeat optimization, budget tracking, and native 2026.2.15 features (session pruning, bootstrap size limits, cache TTL alignment). Use when token costs are high, API rate limits are being hit, or hosting multiple agents at scale. The 4 executable scripts (context_optimizer, model_router, heartbeat_optimizer, token_tracker) are local-only — no network requests, no subprocess calls, no system modifications. Reference files (PROVIDERS.md, config-patches.json) document optional multi-provider strategies that require external API keys and network access if you choose to use them. See SECURITY.md for full breakdown.

Enriches vague, low-detail prompts into structured, agent-optimized XML before execution. INVOKE IMMEDIATELY — before any tool use or file reads — when you detect any of these signals: prompt under 10 words with no file path or error message; vague action verbs with no object ("fix the bug", "make it better", "clean this up", "refactor this", "optimize performance", "improve the UI", "add authentication", "add payments", "add notifications", "build the feature"); CLARIFIER_ADVISORY in your context window; user says "clarify", "help me describe this", "enrich this prompt", "structure my request". Also triggers on: "make this work", "it's broken", "it looks bad", "add X" with no further detail, "implement Y" with no constraints. Do NOT trigger on: prompts ending with ?, prompts containing error messages or stack traces, prompts with specific file paths, prompts already containing acceptance criteria or success metrics.

Generate browser walkthrough recordings as GIF and MP4 from a natural language description. Use this skill whenever the user wants to record a browser walkthrough, create a product demo, document a UI flow, generate onboarding visuals, or produce a "how to" screen recording for any web app. Triggers include: "record a walkthrough of", "create a GIF showing how to", "make a demo of", "capture the flow for", "show how [feature] works in the browser", "document this UI flow", or any request combining a browser/web app with recording/capture/demo output. The skill generates a local Node.js/TypeScript project that the user runs on their machine using Stagehand + Playwright for AI-controlled browser automation, and gifski/ffmpeg for output. For quick one-off captures in the user's live browser session, prefer the claude-in-chrome gif_creator tool instead; use this skill when a re-runnable script, MP4, high-quality GIF, clean-profile recording, or CI repeatability is needed.

Produces a human-readable, progressive-disclosure overview of unfamiliar code or a pull request's changes — why it exists (the real problem it solves or goal it serves for the business or a user), and from there what it does, how it flows, and where to start — so you can get up to speed before working on or reviewing it. Use when you want to understand, get oriented in, make sense of, explain, or get up to speed on a chunk of code, a file, a directory, a symbol, or a PR's changes. Writes the overview to a scratch file and changes no code. Does not review code quality or raise findings — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting them. Does not produce durable feature or system documentation — use project-documentation. Does not assess architecture or structural risk — use architectural-analysis. Does not diagnose bugs or root-cause failures — use investigate. Does not pace a person through the code one step at a time in conversation — use code-walkthrough.