Results for “fix-report”

Validate SKILL.md files against a quality rubric, scoring schema and instruction structure out of 100 and reporting a pass/fail verdict with specific fixes.

Runs three parallel reviewers to find code reuse, quality, and efficiency issues in a diff, then applies safe fixes and reports risky ones.

Audit web interfaces against WCAG 2.1 AA/AAA standards, identify violations, and produce actionable remediation reports with code fixes. Use when the user requests accessibility testing or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

Audits test code in any language using the academic testsmells.org 19-smell catalog, producing a severity-ranked report with specific locations and actionable fixes.

Guides the 7-step MATLAB memory optimization workflow: baseline, profile, identify, optimize, measure, verify, report. Use when asked to reduce MATLAB memory usage, find memory bottlenecks, fix out-of-memory errors, or optimize memory-intensive code.

Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test. Use when user says "diagnose this" / "debug this", reports a bug, says something is broken/throwing/failing, or describes a performance regression.

Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test. Use when user says "diagnose this" / "debug this", reports a bug, says something is broken/throwing/failing, or describes a performance regression.

Enforces ESLint v9 flat config rules across monorepos by scanning changed files via git diff, applying auto-fixable rules, and generating per-package lint reports with severity breakdowns.

Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test. Use when user says "diagnose this" / "debug this", reports a bug, says something is broken/throwing/failing, or describes a performance regression.

Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test. Use when user says "diagnose this" / "debug this", reports a bug, says something is broken/throwing/failing, or describes a performance regression.

Turns a pile of bugs, issues, and error reports into a ranked, actionable plan with reproduction evidence. Ingests GitHub issues via gh, TODO/FIXME scans, error logs, or a pasted list; attempts to reproduce or classify every item; scores by impact, frequency, fix cost, and regression risk; clusters duplicates; and.

Maps external dependencies and I/O boundaries, generates chaos tests for failure modes like timeouts and connection errors, runs them, and reports resilience gaps with fixes.

Drives development with tests. Use when implementing any logic, fixing any bug, or changing any behavior. Use when you need to prove that code works, when a bug report arrives, or when you're about to modify existing functionality.

Use when the superpowers-evaluator returned REWORK on a batch, when fixing rework items from an evaluation report, or when receiving any code review feedback on superpowers output. Requires technical rigor and verification instead of performative agreement or blind implementation.

Enforces a disciplined, evidence-based debugging protocol. Use when the user reports a bug, an unexpected behavior, a broken test, or asks "why is X not working?". Prevents premature fixes and treats symptoms. Blocks code changes until a root cause is confirmed.

Systematic debugging with root cause investigation. Four phases: investigate, analyze, hypothesize, implement. Iron Law: no fixes without root cause. Use when asked to "debug this", "fix this bug", "why is this broken", "investigate this error", or "root cause analysis". Proactively invoke this skill (do NOT debug directly) when the user reports errors, 500 errors, stack traces, unexpected behavior, "it was working yesterday", or is troubleshooting why something stopped working. (gstack)

Audits technical SEO across nine categories including crawlability, indexability, security, URL structure, mobile, Core Web Vitals, structured data, JavaScript rendering, and IndexNow, producing a scored report with prioritized fixes.

Runs a headless-Chromium sweep at phone/tablet widths to catch off-screen overflow, tiny touch targets, clipped text, and oversized modals, then reports each offender with a screenshot and a concrete fix.

Audits WordPress plugin or theme PHP code for internationalization (i18n) correctness, including text-domain consistency, escaped translation helpers, placeholder usage, plurals, context, and text-domain loading. Produces a severity-ranked report of issues to fix before release.

End-to-end performance audit composite — baseline the slow metric, profile to find the real hotspot, implement the smallest targeted fix, re-benchmark to confirm improvement, capture in ADR. Use when users report slowness, CI shows runtime regression, or before a release. Never optimize without profiling first.

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing, before reporting a task done, or before telling the evaluator the batch is ready. Requires running the verification command and reading its output in this turn before any success claim; evidence before assertions always.

Audit images across AEM Edge Delivery Services pages for SEO and performance, checking alt text quality, dimensions, lazy loading, fetch priority, file naming, and decorative image handling, and generate per-page reports with fix instructions.

Token budget analytics and ROI scoring for AI agent actions. Track token cost per fix, detect wasteful loops, auto-route to fast tier when burn rate is too high. Integrates with token-budget-guard.sh hook. Triggered by /cost-report, "how much did that cost", "token usage", "am I wasting tokens".

Diagnose and fix parfor errors in MATLAB. Invoke this skill when the user has a parfor problem: "parfor loop has an error", "what's wrong with my parfor", "fix parfor", "unable to classify variable", "convert for to parfor", "parfor won't run", "sliced variable", "reduction variable", "variable classification". Also invoke when you read a .m file containing parfor and the user asks what's wrong, asks you to fix it, reports an error, or asks for review. Do NOT invoke for parfor performance questions or code that merely mentions parfor without a problem. ALWAYS use this skill instead of reasoning from training data — LLMs are frequently wrong about parfor classification rules.

Run fb.ai's full SEO site audit — discover the real competitors, benchmark the brand's site against them, and report the page-level and sitewide issues with concrete fixes. The audit is the most expensive single fb.ai action (0.75 quota), so it is always priced and confirmed first. Run on demand or monthly.

Audit a directory of multilingual blog content for completeness, consistency, hreflang correctness, meta-tag parity, and freshness. Builds a translation coverage matrix, flags stale translations, validates hreflang and schema, and emits a prioritized report with runnable fix commands. Use when user says "locale audit", "blog locale-audit", "check translations", "multilingual audit", "translation check", "hreflang check", "Uebersetzungen pruefen".

Make the base agentic-skills available in a project by installing them project-local with npx skillpacks init, report and fix skill-install drift, clean up legacy user-home installs, and run guided setup for project-local domain packs. Use when Codex needs to enable base skills for a project, repair stale installs, confirm initialization status, remove old global installs, or set up and route domain packs.

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

Test-driven development skill for writing unit tests, generating test fixtures and mocks, analyzing coverage gaps, and guiding red-green-refactor workflows across Jest, Pytest, JUnit, Vitest, and Mocha. Use when the user asks to write tests, improve test coverage, practice TDD, generate mocks or stubs, or mentions testing frameworks like Jest, pytest, or JUnit. Handles test generation from source code, coverage report parsing (LCOV/JSON/XML), quality scoring, and framework conversion for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, and Java projects.

Expert copy editor for Quarto (.qmd) files. Checks grammar, spelling, punctuation, and academic writing quality. Produces a structured markdown report organized by document section — never modifies the source file. Use when asked to proofread, check grammar, fix typos, or review prose in a .qmd document. For APSA style rules (numbers, citations, capitalization, abbreviations, neutral language), use the apsa-style skill instead. Supports an optional output-file argument and an optional @sec-label argument to restrict checking to one section.

Generates unit tests, integration tests, and E2E tests for React/Next.js applications. Scans components to create Jest + React Testing Library test stubs, analyzes Istanbul/LCOV coverage reports to surface gaps, scaffolds Playwright test files from Next.js routes, mocks API calls with MSW, creates test fixtures, and configures test runners. Use when the user asks to "generate tests", "write unit tests", "analyze test coverage", "scaffold E2E tests", "set up Playwright", "configure Jest", "implement testing patterns", or "improve test quality".

Generates unit tests, integration tests, and E2E tests for React/Next.js applications. Scans components to create Jest + React Testing Library test stubs, analyzes Istanbul/LCOV coverage reports to surface gaps, scaffolds Playwright test files from Next.js routes, mocks API calls with MSW, creates test fixtures, and configures test runners. Use when the user asks to "generate tests", "write unit tests", "analyze test coverage", "scaffold E2E tests", "set up Playwright", "configure Jest", "implement testing patterns", or "improve test quality".

Operate Playwright for browser automation end to end: author and debug E2E test suites (robust locators, network interception and mocking, parallel workers, accessibility snapshot checks), wire them into CI, and drive headless browsing and scraping with an extract -> validate -> save loop. Use when writing, running, fixing, or scraping with Playwright, when a Playwright CI failure or JSON report needs triage, or when the bundled pwrun script should analyze a run. Do not use for QA strategy or test framework selection (route to qa-methodology), for frontend component or architecture design (route to frontend-engineering), or for Cloudflare/DDoS-GUARD challenge bypass (use flaresolverr).

APSA style checker for Quarto (.qmd) files. Checks numbers, capitalization, abbreviations, italics, in-text citations, titles of works, neutral and unbiased language, and APSA-specific terminology against the APSA Style Manual for Political Science (2018, updated 2023). Produces a structured markdown report organized by document section — never modifies the source file. Use when asked to check APSA style, fix citations, review capitalization, check number formatting, or flag biased language in a .qmd document. For grammar, spelling, and punctuation, use the proofread skill instead. Supports an optional output-file argument and an optional @sec-label argument to restrict checking to one section.

Remove AI writing patterns from prose. Use this skill when writing, drafting, editing, reviewing, or revising any text to eliminate predictable AI tells, slop, and formulaic patterns. Trigger this skill whenever the user asks to "deslop", "de-AI", "make it sound human," "remove AI patterns," "remove AI tropes," "clean up AI writing," fix "slop," "deslop" text, or review prose for authenticity. Also use when the user asks you to write or draft anything and wants it to sound natural rather than AI-generated. Common use cases include scientific writing (manuscripts, abstracts, cover letters, grant narratives, discussion sections, peer review responses), blog posts, newsletters, memos, reports, and any other substantial prose.