Results for “plan-verification”

Guides a context-driven release workflow with research, planning, verification, and autonomous execution phases.

CAPA system management for medical device QMS. Covers root cause analysis, corrective action planning, effectiveness verification, and CAPA metrics. Use for CAPA investigations, 5-Why analysis, fishbone diagrams, root cause determination, corrective action tracking, effectiveness verification, or CAPA program optimization.

CAPA system management for medical device QMS. Covers root cause analysis, corrective action planning, effectiveness verification, and CAPA metrics. Use for CAPA investigations, 5-Why analysis, fishbone diagrams, root cause determination, corrective action tracking, effectiveness verification, or CAPA program optimization.

Vibe Code Orchestrator (VCO) is a governed runtime entry that freezes requirements, plans XL-first execution, and enforces verification and phase cleanup.

Decomposes an approved specification into dependency-aware waves and atomic executable tasks with exact file scope, test-first actions, verification commands, and an execution gate.

Use when a research implementation plan exists in docs/superpapers/plans/ and the user is ready to execute it — collecting data, running analysis, producing outputs, writing the paper. Orchestrates task execution with replication-driven verification and two-stage review at phase boundaries.

Perform a non-destructive post-implementation verification gate validating the implementation against spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md, and constitution.md.

ISO 13485 internal audit expertise for medical device QMS. Covers audit planning, execution, nonconformity classification, and CAPA verification. Use for internal audit planning, audit execution, finding classification, external audit preparation, or audit program management.

Use when a research design spec exists and the user is ready to translate it into a concrete implementation plan with phased tasks, artifacts, and verification criteria. Produces a research execution plan organized in canonical research phases — collection, preparation, analysis, robustness, writing, submission.

Classify whether a ticket is frontend or UI work. Use when deciding whether design-aware planning, visual verification, UI tests, or screenshot capture applies.

Classifies ECC components (skills, commands, rules, hooks) into DAILY and LIBRARY buckets based on evidence from the actual codebase, producing an install plan and verification report.

Analyze a problem, plan the fix, execute with verification. Use when tackling a non-trivial bug, feature, or refactor that needs structured approach.

Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - creates isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety verification

Structured workflow to reproduce, diagnose, plan, fix, verify, and record a bug fix, requiring a deterministic reproduction before diagnosis and minimal changes only.

Playwright-powered browser automation and E2E testing for SolanaOS Hub. Covers test configuration, agent-driven test generation (planner/generator/healer), NanoHub route testing, Convex API validation, wallet flow testing, IPFS Hub verification, and CI/CD integration. Use when asked about E2E tests, browser automation, Playwright setup, NanoHub testing, visual regression, or Hub route verification.

Structures a bounded spec-build-review development loop with explicit scope, stop conditions, and human approval gates for risky or ambiguous work.

Implements a structured problem-solving algorithm that guides every response through observe, think, plan, build, execute, verify, and learn phases toward a defined ideal state.

Manage CAPA investigations, root cause analysis, corrective action planning, and effectiveness verification for medical device quality management systems.

Detects the current state of an Open-workspace project and advances to the next logical workflow step, from discussion through planning, execution, verification, and completion.

Design and implement clear, modular, resilient software and create executor-grade implementation plans with explicit scope, drift checks, verification gates, tests, STOP conditions, dependencies, and delegated-work review. Use for development, refactoring, architecture, implementation planning, safe migrations, handoffs to another engineer or agent, or verifying delegated code changes.

Routing-first visual approval gate for AI agent plans, markdown specs, and diffs. Use when a human needs to review a concrete plan before execution, inspect a targeted diff in a browser, mark up a spec/PRD/architecture note, or set up the review loop on Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Codex CLI, or OpenCode. Route planning/spec creation to `task-planning` or `ralph`, broad PR-policy review to `code-review`, rendered-UI critique to `agentation`, and fresh-session browser verification to `browser-harness`.

Generates and writes unit tests for any programming language using a multi-agent pipeline that researches, plans, and implements tests with build and verification steps.

Upgrades or migrates an Android project from any legacy Google Play Billing Library version to the latest stable version, with automated discovery, planning, and verification.

Dynamic multi-agent workflows — plan first, then orchestrate parallel agents with adversarial verification via the local odw daemon. Use when the user asks for a "workflow", says "ultracode", or hands you a task spanning many files/items that benefits from parallel agents.

Dynamic multi-agent workflows — plan first, then orchestrate parallel agents with adversarial verification via the local odw daemon. Use when the user asks for a "workflow", says "ultracode", or hands you a task spanning many files/items that benefits from parallel agents.

Dynamic multi-agent workflows — plan first, then orchestrate parallel agents with adversarial verification via the local odw daemon. Use when the user asks for a "workflow", says "ultracode", or hands you a task spanning many files/items that benefits from parallel agents.

Provides advisory guidance for the Adobe Dispatcher Apache HTTP Server module and related HTTPD configuration in AEM 6.5 / AMS workflows, with public-doc citations and AMS-specific MCP verification plans.

Use when planning a COLT (Conference on Learning Theory) submission calendar backward from the single AoE paper deadline — proof-completion and verification milestones, writing and appendix-assembly passes, CMT logistics, the rebuttal window, decision aftermath, and PMLR camera-ready with conference presentation in early summer.

Orchestrate the full MoonSpec lifecycle from a preselected single-story feature request or active feature directory through specification, planning, TDD task generation, artifact alignment, implementation, and final verification. Use when the user asks for an end-to-end MoonSpec run and the input has already been routed to one independently testable story, or when Codex needs to coordinate `moonspec-specify`, `moonspec-plan`, `moonspec-tasks`, `moonspec-align`, `moonspec-implement`, and `moonspec-verify` without manual analyze/remediation prompts.

Produce a plain-language manual test plan from the context supplied to it — an executive summary, a high-level list of named tests, and a detail section per test with the steps a person follows by hand and the outcomes they should expect. Use when you want to create, draft, generate, or outline a manual test plan, manual QA steps, hands-on verification steps, or an acceptance walkthrough for a feature, change, branch, plan, or PR. When the plan holds more than five tests and at least two natural categories emerge, both the test list and the detail sections are organized under plain-language categories. When nothing in the supplied context can be manually tested, it says so and asks for more context instead of producing a document. Does not analyze code for automated test coverage gaps — use automated-test-planning. Does not write test code — use tdd. Does not review code quality — use code-review. Does not stress-test an existing plan — use iterative-plan-review.

Drafts attorney-supervised, state-compliant U.S. Advance Health Care Directives that appoint health care agents, resolve the HIPAA access gap, and record clinically usable treatment preferences. Enforces state-law verification for execution formalities, statutory forms, and special limitations. Addresses adversarial risks from family disputes and institutional challenges. Use when drafting advance directives, health care proxies, living wills, health care powers of attorney, HIPAA medical authorizations, or end-of-life planning documents.

Build the smallest, highest-signal context package for an AI coding task — goal, constraints, repo facts, boundaries, and a verification plan. Load when prompts are underspecified, the agent is missing key files or decisions, the user says "use the right context", "here's the repo", or when work is drifting due to missing constraints. Also triggers on "context engineering", "gather context", "what do you need from me", "before you start". Not for cross-session continuity (use memory-startup/memory-recall).

Information Security Management System (ISMS) audit expert for ISO 27001 compliance verification, security control assessment, and certification support. Use when the user mentions ISO 27001, ISMS audit, Annex A controls, Statement of Applicability (SOA), gap analysis, nonconformity management, internal audit, surveillance audit, or security certification preparation. Helps review control implementation evidence, document audit findings, classify nonconformities, generate risk-based audit plans, map controls to Annex A requirements, prepare Stage 1 and Stage 2 audit documentation, and support corrective action workflows.

Senior SecOps engineer skill for application security, vulnerability management, compliance verification, and secure development practices. Runs SAST/DAST scans, generates CVE remediation plans, checks dependency vulnerabilities, creates security policies, enforces secure coding patterns, and automates compliance checks against SOC2, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, and GDPR. Use when conducting a security review or audit, responding to a CVE or security incident, hardening infrastructure, implementing authentication or secrets management, running penetration test prep, checking OWASP Top 10 exposure, or enforcing security controls in CI/CD pipelines.

Use BEFORE generating, refactoring, reviewing, or debugging code. Trigger phrases include "write a function/script/class for X", "review this code/diff/PR", "refactor this", "debug this error", "is this implementation correct", "what's wrong with this code", "improve this code", "translate from X to Y", or any prompt with a code block the user wants you to act on. Also fires when planning architectural changes, picking algorithms or data structures, or evaluating dependency upgrades. Calls the code MCP tool to retrieve an engineering scaffold (failure pattern, procedure, correct-pattern example, verification step) before generating. Catches hallucinated APIs, lost edge cases, premature algorithm commitment, silent contract violations, refactors that change behavior masked by passing tests. Do NOT trigger for pure code reading with no action requested, simple syntax questions, file...

Use when asked to fix, build, refactor, review, verify, or release software and the work is non-trivial — including delivering a change request (issue, ticket, or request) from intake through planning, gates, implementation, review, verified PR, and authorized post-merge release. neckbeard routes the change through framing, discovery, design, implementation, review, verification, delivery, and learning — choosing the smallest *safe* intervention, proving it at the real delivery boundary, and leaving an inspectable evidence ledger. For change-request / issue-to-PR work, conditionally loads a 9-phase journey with gates, delivery packet, and lifecycle integration. Composes specialist catalog skills rather than replacing them. Not a persona, not a '10x developer' prompt, not a LOC-minimizer. The journey is not loaded for plain fixes, refactors, or reviews that lack an issue/ticket trajectory.