Results for “review-report”

Reviews all pipeline artifacts from a virtual software team and produces quality, compliance, and sign-off reports with an advisory release verdict.

Collecting user feedback via NPS surveys, review analysis, sentiment analysis, feedback classification, and insight extraction reports. Use when establishing feedback loops.

Runs a multi-perspective review of a pull request, including code quality, tests, and potential silent failures, then reports findings ranked by severity.

Reviews local branch changes for bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues, producing a prioritized report with severity ratings and concrete fixes.

Audits iOS app source code and metadata to identify App Store rejection risks and optimization opportunities, producing a structured compliance report.

Three-layer verification pipeline for AI output. Extracts verifiable claims, finds supporting or contradicting sources via web search, runs adversarial review for hallucination patterns, and produces a structured verification report with source links for human review.

Load this skill when the user says "asvs security review", "asvs-security-review", "/asvs-security-review", or when invoked by reference from the review-issue skill's standards-review step. Performs a rule-by-rule walk of docs/security-standards.md against a diff, scoped to the ASVS sections the diff actually touches, and reports findings using the project's existing severity mapping.

Revise an academic paper based on internal review comments. Reads review report or annotated manuscript, then applies revisions one by one with user approval. Trigger when user says "self revise" / "paper-selfrevise" / "内部修改" / "根据审稿意见修改".

Monday morning full pipeline review with metrics, channel performance, and forecast. Reads all CRM tabs, calculates deltas vs previous week, and generates actionable recommendations.

Runs a three-layer verification pipeline on AI-generated output: extracts verifiable claims, finds supporting or contradicting sources via web search, and produces a structured verification report with source links for human review.

Walk every branching path and boundary condition in content, report only unhandled edge cases. Orthogonal to adversarial review - method-driven not attitude-driven. Use when you need exhaustive edge-case analysis of code, specs, or diffs.

Walk every branching path and boundary condition in content, report only unhandled edge cases. Orthogonal to adversarial review - method-driven not attitude-driven. Use when you need exhaustive edge-case analysis of code, specs, or diffs.

Walk every branching path and boundary condition in content, report only unhandled edge cases. Orthogonal to adversarial review - method-driven not attitude-driven. Use when you need exhaustive edge-case analysis of code, specs, or diffs.

Manages and analyzes Jest test suites, including configuration discovery, coverage reporting, snapshot review, and test result parsing.

Architects, reviews, and scales backend systems with structured blueprints, trade-off analysis, and audit reports.

Aggregate cross-asset quality control for campaigns. Use when the user requests 'run QC', 'quality check campaign', 'review all assets', or 'generate QA report'.

Use when the superpowers-evaluator returned REWORK on a batch, when fixing rework items from an evaluation report, or when receiving any code review feedback on superpowers output. Requires technical rigor and verification instead of performative agreement or blind implementation.

Scans macOS or Windows disk usage with read-only commands, categorizes large items into auto-cleanable, manual-review, and cautious tiers, and generates an interactive HTML report with one-click deletion via a local web server.

Turn revenue reporting from a rear-view mirror into an operating rhythm. It narrates where you are against target, decomposes the variance by channel, reads your forecast for where you land, then adds an action layer of hot leads and deals to work now. Built for GTM teams reporting on ARR and bookings, customizable to your sheet and your metrics. Trigger on "weekly revenue wrap-up", "monthly revenue report", "how are we pacing", "revenue position", "forecast confidence", "run the weekly report", or any ARR, bookings, pipeline, or channel-performance review.

Performs a comprehensive cross-artifact QA/QC review of a virtual team pipeline, checking completeness, consistency, security, and compliance, then issues an advisory verdict with quality, compliance, and sign-off reports.

Watch, audit, and fix another agent's work by reconstructing the original request, inspecting evidence, and reporting gaps.

Scans copy for AI-generated writing patterns and outputs a diagnostic report. Diagnosis only by default.

Guides a structured requirements workflow from topic intake through brainstorming, spec and plan writing, user review, SRS generation, validation, and improvement reporting.

Guides a structured software requirements specification workflow from topic intake through brainstorming, spec writing, planning, review, SRS generation, validation, and improvement reporting.

Guides a structured requirements pipeline from topic intake through brainstorming, spec writing, planning, user review, SRS generation, validation, and improvement reporting.

Audit an existing processkit skill against the 5 Skill Killers, the Agent Skills standard, and Anthropic's troubleshooting playbook, producing a categorized findings report and draft Gotchas.

Publication Specialist - Writing, Review, Pre-registration & Quality Assurance Light VS applied: Avoids template-based writing + audience-specific message design Absorbed G3 (Peer Review Strategist), G4 (Pre-registration Composer), F1-F3 (Quality functions) capabilities Use when: writing abstracts, creating summaries, peer review response, pre-registration, reporting checklists, reproducibility Triggers: abstract, plain language, press release, summary, communication, peer review, revision, pre-registration, OSF, PRISMA, CONSORT, reproducibility

Finds root cause before applying fixes for errors, crashes, regressions, failing tests, broken behavior, and screenshot-reported defects. Use when users report in any language errors, crashes, broken behavior, regressions, failing tests, screenshot evidence, or something that used to work and now fails. Not for code review or new features.

Guides a structured requirements pipeline from topic intake through brainstorming, spec and plan writing, user review, SRS generation, validation, and improvement reporting.

End-to-end statistical writing assistant for LaTeX - draft title/abstract/keywords, expand outlines into sections, audit manuscripts, write reviewer reports and response letters, and scaffold book manuscripts.

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

Simulates a full multi-reviewer journal review PANEL — 5 personas (Editor-in-Chief + 3 peer reviewers + a Devil's Advocate) debate a manuscript and produce a consensus Editorial Decision (accept/minor/major/reject) plus a prioritized Revision Roadmap. Modes: full, re-review (verify revisions addressed prior comments), quick, methodology-focus, Socratic guided. Use for: simulate peer review, mock review panel, editorial review before submission, multiple reviewer perspectives, re-review of a revised manuscript, or 'critique my paper hard'. For a single-reviewer referee report use alterlab-peer-review; for rubric/grade scoring use alterlab-scholar-eval; to write/revise the paper use alterlab-paper-writer. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

Audits code quality against a shared contract, producing structured findings and blocking pipeline phases on critical issues without modifying code.

Loads an implementation plan, reviews it critically, executes each task with verification, and reports completion, stopping to ask for help when blocked.

Triage and review open GitHub issues and PRs against project contribution templates, producing a compliance report and optionally labeling, commenting, or closing items.

Loads a written implementation plan, reviews it critically, executes all tasks with verification, and reports completion, stopping to ask for help when blocked.