Results for “session-review”

Convention audit and pre-PR code review for Sage/Acorn projects — checks PHP Blade JS CSS against Sage/Acorn/Tailwind v4 conventions; audits ACF Composer field patterns, Livewire component structure, Eloquent models, Acorn routes, Blade components; verifies design alignment; dispatches sage-reviewer agent; prepares code for PR merge. Invoke for: "review before PR", "run sage-reviewer", "convention audit", "/reviewing", "check my block for issues", "pre-merge review", "review this code". Skip when: you just need to read or understand a file — that is not a review session.

Interviews users relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree.

Delegate tasks to OpenAI Codex CLI and Google Antigravity CLI from Claude Code with topic-aware sessions.

Use when the team needs authentication, identity providers, custom claims, session strategy, or permission design for a Firebase-backed app. Trigger on requests to design or review Firebase Auth architecture.

Captures, reviews, and promotes Note entities — the lightweight knowledge capture primitive in processkit. Notes are quick-capture units (thoughts, insights, questions, references) that are reviewed periodically and promoted to WorkItems, DecisionRecords, or other primitives when they ripen. Use when the user says "remember this", "note that", "I had an idea", or when running a periodic note review session.

Executes a written implementation plan in a separate session, reviewing it critically, running tasks with verification, and stopping to ask for help when blocked.

OpenAI Codex CLI wrapper — three modes. Code review: independent diff review via codex review with pass/fail gate. Challenge: adversarial mode that tries to break your code. Consult: ask codex anything with session continuity for follow-ups. The "200 IQ autistic developer" second opinion. Use when asked to "codex review", "codex challenge", "ask codex", "second opinion", or "consult codex". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "code x", "code ex", "get another opinion".

Capture structured feedback on the Han skills and agents used in the current session and optionally post it as a GitHub issue to testdouble/han. Use at the end of any session where one or more han-* skills or agents ran, to rate a run, log what worked and what didn't, or submit observations for maintainers. Does not review code, investigate bugs, or research options; use code-review, investigate, or research for those. Does not provide feedback on skills or agents from non-Han plugins.

Turns a one-line objective into a step-by-step construction plan for multi-session, multi-agent engineering projects, with self-contained context briefs, adversarial review, and dependency graphs.

Generate a step-by-step construction plan from a one-line objective, with dependency graphs, parallel step detection, and adversarial review for multi-session engineering projects.

Generates a step-by-step construction plan from a one-line objective, where each step is self-contained and executable by a fresh agent in a new session.

Orchestrates parallel AI agent sessions using dmux, a tmux pane manager, with patterns for research, implementation, testing, and code review across multiple harnesses.

Explains MariaDB server-side prepared statements (PREPARE, EXECUTE, DEALLOCATE, EXECUTE IMMEDIATE), including syntax, allowed statements, placeholders, session scope, and restrictions. Use when writing or reviewing dynamic SQL for MariaDB.

Task tracking for async/multi-step work. Use dex to create, track, and complete tasks that span multiple sessions or require coordination (e.g., coding agent dispatches, PR reviews, background jobs). Tasks stored as JSON files in .dex/tasks/.

Routing-first visual approval gate for AI agent plans, markdown specs, and diffs. Use when a human needs to review a concrete plan before execution, inspect a targeted diff in a browser, mark up a spec/PRD/architecture note, or set up the review loop on Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Codex CLI, or OpenCode. Route planning/spec creation to `task-planning` or `ralph`, broad PR-policy review to `code-review`, rendered-UI critique to `agentation`, and fresh-session browser verification to `browser-harness`.

Use to plan an ITCS campaign end to end on its single annual cycle — backward from the early-September deadline through the no-rebuttal review, the November notification, the LIPIcs camera-ready, and the January conference with its Graduating Bits session.

Routes requests into the correct obsidian-mind mode: install, daily session loop, capture, review, maintenance, multi-agent wiring, or semantic search, using a ready-made Obsidian vault template for persistent agent memory.

Generates a post-release blameless retrospective from project signals — synthesizing DORA-like metrics, WorkItem outcomes, session timeline, and drift deltas into a structured Artifact + LogEntry. Use at the end of a release cycle when asked to run a retro, "post-release review", "retrospective", or "post-mortem".

Manage project learnings. Review, search, prune, and export what gstack has learned across sessions. Use when asked to "what have we learned", "show learnings", "prune stale learnings", or "export learnings". Proactively suggest when the user asks about past patterns or wonders "didn't we fix this before?"

Use for writing, reviewing, debugging, migrating, or testing SQLAlchemy 2.x Core or ORM code involving Engine, Connection, Session, mapped models, select statements, transactions, pooling, results, loading, or AsyncSession. Do not use for raw database SQL with no SQLAlchemy boundary, Alembic migration design, DuckDB relations, or database administration.

Turn vague "what did I do?" into evidence-backed impact statements for performance reviews, self-reviews, promotion packets, and weekly updates. Uniquely mines Copilot CLI session logs to reconstruct forgotten work, plus git commits and GitHub PRs. Enforces a 3-part impact contract (action → result → evidence). Works standalone with zero dependencies. Trigger for: "brag", "log work", "what did I do", "backfill my work history", "performance review", "self-review", "self assessment", "write impact statement", "review prep", "promo packet", "promotion case", "weekly update", "status report", "accomplishments", "what did I ship", "I forgot to log my work", "summarize my work", "track my wins", "what should I highlight", "end of half", "career growth", "work journal", or any request to document, summarize, or organize work accomplishments.

Use for writing, reviewing, debugging, or testing Python Streamlit apps, especially rerun behavior, widget identity and callbacks, session_state, cache_data/cache_resource, forms, fragments, containers, multipage navigation, uploads/downloads, and Streamlit-hosted chart/table interaction. Do not use for standalone Plotly/Altair figure design, generic backend services, Dash apps, or deployment configuration without app code.

Audit, plan, implement, or review Model Context Protocol version and SDK migrations. Use for MCP 2026-07-28, stateless Streamable HTTP, server/discover, removal of initialize or Mcp-Session-Id, MCP Tasks extension changes, full JSON Schema 2020-12 tool schemas, OAuth issuer hardening, deprecated roots/sampling/logging, or cross-version client/server compatibility.

Turn a one-line objective into a step-by-step construction plan for multi-session, multi-agent engineering projects. Each step has a self-contained context brief so a fresh agent can execute it cold. Includes adversarial review gate, dependency graph, parallel step detection, anti-pattern catalog, and plan mutation protocol. TRIGGER when: user requests a plan, blueprint, or roadmap for a complex multi-PR task, or describes work that needs multiple sessions. DO NOT TRIGGER when: task is completable in a single PR or fewer than 3 tool calls, or user says "just do it".

Turn a one-line objective into a step-by-step construction plan for multi-session, multi-agent engineering projects. Each step has a self-contained context brief so a fresh agent can execute it cold. Includes adversarial review gate, dependency graph, parallel step detection, anti-pattern catalog, and plan mutation protocol. TRIGGER when: user requests a plan, blueprint, or roadmap for a complex multi-PR task, or describes work that needs multiple sessions. DO NOT TRIGGER when: task is completable in a single PR or fewer than 3 tool calls, or user says "just do it".

Turn a one-line objective into a step-by-step construction plan for multi-session, multi-agent engineering projects. Each step has a self-contained context brief so a fresh agent can execute it cold. Includes adversarial review gate, dependency graph, parallel step detection, anti-pattern catalog, and plan mutation protocol. TRIGGER when: user requests a plan, blueprint, or roadmap for a complex multi-PR task, or describes work that needs multiple sessions. DO NOT TRIGGER when: task is completable in a single PR or fewer than 3 tool calls, or user says "just do it".

Turn a one-line objective into a step-by-step construction plan for multi-session, multi-agent engineering projects. Each step has a self-contained context brief so a fresh agent can execute it cold. Includes adversarial review gate, dependency graph, parallel step detection, anti-pattern catalog, and plan mutation protocol. TRIGGER when: user requests a plan, blueprint, or roadmap for a complex multi-PR task, or describes work that needs multiple sessions. DO NOT TRIGGER when: task is completable in a single PR or fewer than 3 tool calls, or user says "just do it".

Turn a one-line objective into a step-by-step construction plan for multi-session, multi-agent engineering projects. Each step has a self-contained context brief so a fresh agent can execute it cold. Includes adversarial review gate, dependency graph, parallel step detection, anti-pattern catalog, and plan mutation protocol. TRIGGER when: user requests a plan, blueprint, or roadmap for a complex multi-PR task, or describes work that needs multiple sessions. DO NOT TRIGGER when: task is completable in a single PR or fewer than 3 tool calls, or user says "just do it".

Turn a one-line objective into a step-by-step construction plan for multi-session, multi-agent engineering projects. Each step has a self-contained context brief so a fresh agent can execute it cold. Includes adversarial review gate, dependency graph, parallel step detection, anti-pattern catalog, and plan mutation protocol. TRIGGER when: user requests a plan, blueprint, or roadmap for a complex multi-PR task, or describes work that needs multiple sessions. DO NOT TRIGGER when: task is completable in a single PR or fewer than 3 tool calls, or user says "just do it".

Turn a one-line objective into a step-by-step construction plan for multi-session, multi-agent engineering projects. Each step has a self-contained context brief so a fresh agent can execute it cold. Includes adversarial review gate, dependency graph, parallel step detection, anti-pattern catalog, and plan mutation protocol. TRIGGER when: user requests a plan, blueprint, or roadmap for a complex multi-PR task, or describes work that needs multiple sessions. DO NOT TRIGGER when: task is completable in a single PR or fewer than 3 tool calls, or user says "just do it".

Transparent, rigorous research with full methodology — not a black-box API wrapper. Conducts exhaustive investigation through mandated 2-cycle research per theme, APA 7th citations, evidence hierarchy, and 3 user checkpoints. Self-contained using native OpenClaw tools (web_search, web_fetch, sessions_spawn). Use for literature reviews, competitive intelligence, or any research requiring academic rigor and reproducibility.

Give a decisive, project-grounded point of view in the subject's own shape: a graded verdict on an external-adoption question, a holistic take on a document, or a position on a user-supplied approach set. Use for a solo POV, a mid-session second opinion, a named-peer cross-check, any request to consult other models or reconcile their opinions, an `oracle` panel, or a correction-cost-gated proactive cross-check offer. Not for findings review (use ce-doc-review), neutral explainers, or generating options (use ce-ideate or ce-brainstorm).

Structured threat modeling skill using the PASTA framework (Process for Attack Simulation and Threat Analysis) combined with Adam Shostack's 4-question framework. Use this skill whenever the user asks to do threat modeling, security analysis, map the attack surface, identify threats, or review an application for security risks — even if they don't mention PASTA or a specific framework by name. Core activities: Component Mapping (architecture + data flows), Critical Assessment (business impact prioritization), and Logic Flaw Identification (attacker mindset on business logic). Produces: component map diagram (Mermaid), data flow diagram (Mermaid), attack tree (Mermaid), STRIDE threat table, prioritized risk register, and an actionable mitigation plan. Invoke proactively for any security review, architecture review, or "what could go wrong?" session.

Use to assemble a fair, evidence-backed coaching pack for a support agent's one-to-one from QA evaluations and conversation history. Trigger for "prepare a coaching session for X", "what areas does X need to improve", "areas of markdown for this agent", "what coaching opportunities stand out", "build a coaching agenda from these tickets", or preparing a weekly or monthly agent review.

Oracle Database guidance for SQL, PL/SQL, SQLcl, ORDS, administration, app development, performance, security, migrations, and agent-safe database workflows. Use when the user asks to write, edit, rewrite, review, format, debug, tune, or explain SQL; create or refactor PL/SQL; use SQLcl, Liquibase, ORDS, JDBC, node-oracledb, Python, Java, .NET, or database frameworks; troubleshoot queries, sessions, locks, waits, indexes, optimizer plans, AWR, ASH, migrations, schemas, users, roles, privileges, backup, recovery, Data Guard, RAC, multitenant, containers, monitoring, auditing, encryption, VPD, or safe agent database operations.

Read-only diagnostic that scans Claude Code session transcripts to surface which MCP servers and tools you actually use, ranked by call frequency, with zero-use servers flagged for removal. Use when planning an MCP cleanup, evaluating whether to keep a newly-added server, deciding which servers warrant token cost in the catalog, or before authoring an MCP-removal PR. Outputs a markdown report (last N days) — does not modify any settings. Pair with the manual `claude mcp remove <name>` step once findings are reviewed.