Results for “skill-review”

`analysis-agent`/`task-agent`/`review-agent`: use when authoring SKILL.md, triggers, decisions, references, registry, routing, or validation; skip when no Skill content changes.

Reviews MDPR Markdown-to-presentation workflows with semantic hints, visual checks, and deterministic renderer boundaries.

Triage an incoming commercial document, route it to the right review skill, run a first-pass red-flag scan, and produce a consolidated verdict.

Audits all Claude skills and commands using a quality checklist and AI holistic judgment, with Quick Scan and Full Stocktake modes.

Reviews staged and unstaged code changes for security vulnerabilities, code quality issues, and adherence to project conventions, reporting findings by severity.

Use this skill before merging, deploying, or shipping changes. It reviews code for bugs, security, auth, data loss, migrations, observability, performance, and rollback risks.

Evaluate Agent Skill design quality against official specifications and best practices. Use when reviewing, auditing, or improving SKILL.md files and skill packages. Provides multi-dimensional scoring and actionable improvement suggestions.

Perform a structured audit of a codebase covering security, code quality, performance, dependencies, architecture, and testing hygiene, then produce a prioritized findings report. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a code review, code audit, security review, codebase assessment, "look over this repo", "what's wrong with this codebase", legacy-code triage, pre-acquisition technical due diligence, or any request to systematically evaluate the health of a project. Trigger even when the user is casual ("can you eyeball my repo?") — this skill imposes the structure that ad-hoc review misses. This skill audits a whole repository at a point in time — for reviewing a diff or PR use the built-in code-review skill; for security checks on pending changes use security-review.

Auto-review pipeline — reads the full CEO, design, eng, and DX review skills from disk and runs them sequentially with auto-decisions using 6 decision principles. (gstack)

专业学术论文审稿 skill。以领域专家视角对学术论文（本地 PDF、arXiv ID/URL、粘贴文本）进行系统评审，自动识别论文学科与贡献类型并切换对应领域专家标准，输出顶会 OpenReview 风格（NeurIPS/ICLR/ICML）的标准 review 意见：Summary、Strengths、Weaknesses、Questions to Authors、Overall Score (1-10)、Confidence。输出语言跟随论文语言。触发场景包括：审论文、审稿、论文评审、review this paper、peer review、写评审意见、帮我看看这篇论文能不能中、rebuttal 前自查等。

Extract structured review data from Google Maps search results using the BrowserAct API, enabling local business analysis, reputation monitoring, and competitive benchmarking.

Use ONLY for code review and test write/review guidance in `packages/agent-core-v2` (the DI × Scope agent engine). Does NOT apply to the legacy `packages/agent-core` or to any other package — for those, do not load this skill. Groups the review and testing lenses used for agent-core-v2 — `slop` (single-level-of-abstraction / layered error-handling review, invoked only on explicit request) and `test` (contract-driven per-test rules for both authoring and reviewing tests). Apply the sub-skill that matches the task; do not apply `slop` unprompted.

Guides creation of high-quality Agent Skills with domain expertise, anti-pattern detection, and progressive disclosure best practices. Activate on keywords: create skill, review skill, skill quality, skill best practices, skill anti-patterns, improve skill, skill audit. NOT for general coding advice, slash commands, MCP development, or non-skill Claude Code features.

Manage, inventory, standardize, migrate, and test reusable Codex skills for the MetaSkill repository. Use when Codex needs to inspect local skills, convert a personal workflow into a public skill candidate, normalize skill folder shape, plan skill promotion, or decide whether a skill belongs in skill-management, publication-review, or skill-examples.

Analyze the available skill set and recommend candidate groups that could be consolidated into sub-skill bundles. Read-only — proposes a plan, does not move files.

Provides design engineering guidance focused on animation principles, UI review, and interface craftsmanship.

Implements a code change on a feature branch, opens a single pull request to main, and runs a code review loop before handoff.

Reviews SwiftUI code for best practices on modern APIs, maintainability, and performance. This skill should be used when the user asks to review SwiftUI code, check for deprecated iOS/macOS APIs, validate data flow patterns, or audit accessibility compliance in Swift projects.

Distills the current conversation or a plain-language prompt into a production-ready, self-healing Claude Code skill with pre-flight checks, validation gates, self-review, and learnings capture.

Evaluates Claude Agent Skills on 10 quality axes with letter grades (A+ through F) and specific improvement recommendations. Use when auditing a skill, comparing skills, prioritizing improvements, or performing quality control on a skill library. Activate on "grade skill", "evaluate skill", "skill quality", "skill audit", "skill review", "rate skill". NOT for creating skills (use skill-architect), grading code quality, or evaluating non-skill documents.

Performs a white-box source code security review structured around OWASP ASVS 5.0, mapping attack surfaces, tracing data flows, and chaining into downstream penetration testing and threat modeling skills.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "write an article", "help me write a blog post", "draft a technical article", "review my article", "check my writing", "improve this draft", "give me writing feedback", "find a topic", "what should I write about", or mentions "writing coach". Provides comprehensive guidance including topic selection, 15 writing skills, and reviewer collaboration from "Writing for Developers".

Run the Legal Builder Hub security-review gate on a candidate legal skill — inspect its manifest and body for unsafe behavior before any install is allowed.

Use this skill when the user requests to review, analyze, critique, or summarize academic papers, research articles, preprints, or scientific publications. Supports comprehensive structured reviews covering methodology assessment, contribution evaluation, literature positioning, and constructive feedback generation. Trigger on queries involving paper URLs, uploaded PDFs, arXiv links, or requests like "review this paper", "analyze this research", "summarize this study", or "write a peer review".

Simulates a full multi-reviewer journal review PANEL — 5 personas (Editor-in-Chief + 3 peer reviewers + a Devil's Advocate) debate a manuscript and produce a consensus Editorial Decision (accept/minor/major/reject) plus a prioritized Revision Roadmap. Modes: full, re-review (verify revisions addressed prior comments), quick, methodology-focus, Socratic guided. Use for: simulate peer review, mock review panel, editorial review before submission, multiple reviewer perspectives, re-review of a revised manuscript, or 'critique my paper hard'. For a single-reviewer referee report use alterlab-peer-review; for rubric/grade scoring use alterlab-scholar-eval; to write/revise the paper use alterlab-paper-writer. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

Authoritative ato authoring and review skill: language reference, stdlib, design patterns, and end-to-end board design workflow.

Runs a multi-perspective review of a pull request, including code quality, tests, and potential silent failures, then reports findings ranked by severity.

Provides nine skills for Nature-journal-family academic publishing, covering figure creation, prose polishing, manuscript writing, citation formatting, data availability statements, paper reading, reviewer responses, paper-to-PPT conversion, and academic search via an MCP server.

Run a comprehensive code review on local source files. Use this skill when the user asks to review, audit, inspect, evaluate, or check code, even if they never use the word "review." Does not post comments to GitHub pull requests — use post-code-review-to-pr for that. Does not analyze architectural structure or module boundaries — use architectural-analysis for that. Does not explain code or a PR to build understanding before reviewing — use code-overview for a written overview, or code-walkthrough to be paced through it one step at a time. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback for that.

Reviews a pull request: runs its own baseline review of the PR diff, then a persistent Monitor watches CI and incoming reviewer comments, triages each comment through an independent skeptical agent, applies only verified fixes, and commits+pushes via inline git commands until CI passes and no comments remain to adopt — then asks whether to merge. Use this skill when the user asks to "review a PR", "monitor PR review comments", "address reviewer feedback on #123", or "watch CI on a pull request".

Creates a pull request from completed phase work, generates a rich PR body from planning artifacts, optionally runs code review, and prepares for merge.

Routes rendered UI testing, visual regression, browser QA, accessibility, responsive, performance, or frontend review to a leaf skill.

Review and prune the project context — archive completed work, summarize stale entries, and propose disabling unused skills.

Use this skill to generate or audit design systems, check visual consistency, and review PRs that touch styling.

Introduction to literature search & review skills - systematic paper finding, screening, extraction, and citation traversal

Use when an existing Antigravity skill has weak triggers, vague instructions, missing constraints, or poor structure and needs to be improved. Trigger on requests to rewrite, tighten, split, or review a skill for better routing and reuse.