Results for “spec-validation”

Agent profile for plan PPC account structure, creative testing, budget hypotheses, measurement, and landing-page alignment. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Agent profile for design test strategy across unit, integration, contract, E2E, visual, performance, and regression layers. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Agent profile for review pricing, invoices, subscriptions, entitlements, revenue logic, tax-sensitive flows, and billing UX. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Agent profile for review prompt injection, tool boundaries, untrusted content, data exfiltration, and human approval gates. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Agent profile for write developer docs, user docs, API docs, tutorials, changelogs, and concise implementation notes. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

E2E automation engineer skill for Playwright-driven flow validation, browser interaction coverage, and end-to-end regression checks. Disabled by default for E2E case/spec work; use only when the user explicitly asks for E2E tests or execution.

Agent profile for review iOS SwiftUI code, platform conventions, state flow, accessibility, performance, and App Store readiness. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Agent profile for review Android Compose code, lifecycle, permissions, navigation, Material behavior, performance, and Play release risks. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Agent profile for design AI/ML features, retrieval, model calls, structured outputs, cost controls, evals, and fallbacks. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Agent profile for design and implement backend services, API logic, data access, jobs, auth boundaries, and error handling. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Agent profile for coordinate mobile app architecture across iOS, Android, Expo/React Native, offline states, permissions, and releases. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Guides through a 5-step secure development workflow for smart contracts, including automated scanning with Slither, special feature validation, visual security diagrams, security property documentation, and manual review.

Agent profile for evaluate and implement no-code/low-code workflows, forms, automations, Airtable/Sheets/Zapier-like patterns. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Creates and manages design token systems with three-layer architecture, generates CSS variables, validates token usage, and produces brand-compliant slide presentations with Chart.js and contextual decision logic.

Knowledge-base steward in the spirit of Niklas Luhmann's Zettelkasten. Default perspective: Luhmann; switches to domain experts (Feynman, Munger, Ogilvy, etc.) by task. Enforces atomic notes, connectivity, and validation loops. Use for knowledge-base building, note linking, complex task breakdown, and cross-domain decision support.

Data pipeline specialist for ETL design, data quality, CDC patterns, and batch/stream processingUse when "data pipeline, etl, cdc, data quality, batch processing, stream processing, data transformation, data warehouse, data lake, data validation, data-engineering, etl, cdc, batch, streaming, data-quality, dbt, airflow, dagster, data-pipeline, ml-memory" mentioned.

Extracts and reconciles medical provider, wage-loss, and insurance/lien data from personal injury plaintiff fact sheets and initial disclosures against builder draft responses. Use when the user mentions PFS analysis, medical provider reconciliation, wage loss audit, insurance lien tracking, PI discovery reconciliation, builder response validation, MDL plaintiff data extraction, FRCP 26(a)(1) disclosures, treatment chronologies, or specials spreadsheets.

Use this skill to classify tabular data end-to-end in MATLAB — load a dataset, prepare and clean it, select promising classifiers, train them, and compare accuracies with cross-validation, holdout, or hyperparameter optimization plus statistical tests. TRIGGER when: user asks to classify tabular data, pick classifiers for a dataset, compare classifier accuracy, run cross-validation or a holdout evaluation, or find the best model with statistical uncertainty. DO NOT TRIGGER when: user has non-tabular inputs (images, sequences, time series), wants a regression model, is training a specific neural network architecture (use matlab-train-network), or wants cost-sensitive learning or an arbitrary class-prior vector (this skill only supports the built-in uniform-prior toggle for imbalanced data).

autonomous architecture design and refinement for mermate using iterative copilot guidance, local reasoning, repeated low-cost render validation, and final max-quality render selection. use when building, stress-testing, refining, decomposing, validating, or evolving system architectures from simple ideas, complex problem statements, markdown specifications, mermaid drafts, or ambiguous design notes. especially useful when chatgpt should act like a professional architect that thinks step by step, uses mermate repeatedly, compares intermediate diagrams, and decides when to continue refining versus when to finalize with max mode.

Create cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.

S-parameters, insertion loss, fields, currents, mesh control, and solver selection for RF PCB performance validation. TRIGGER: user asks to compute S-parameters, analyze insertion/return loss, extract fields or currents, compare MoM vs FEM, or control mesh for any RF PCB component. Invoke BEFORE writing sparameters() or solver code — API is non-obvious. SKIP: designing or creating components (use the specific matlab-design-pcb-* skill), material/stackup setup only (use matlab-manage-pcb-material), optimization sweeps (use matlab-optimize-pcb-design), PDN/IR-drop analysis (use matlab-analyze-pcb-pdn).

TLS/SSL configuration audit. Tests protocol versions (SSLv2/3, TLS 1.0/1.1/1.2/1.3), cipher strength and ordering, certificate chain validation (intermediates, CT logs, OCSP stapling, pinning), known vulnerabilities (POODLE, BEAST, CRIME, Heartbleed, ROBOT, DROWN, Ticketbleed, GOLDENDOODLE), session management (ticket reuse, resumption, fixation), renegotiation attacks, TLS 1.3-specific issues (0-RTT replay, PSK modes, downgrade), HSTS deep analysis (preload, subdomains, bypass), and certificate revocation (CRL, OCSP responder, stapled response freshness). Compliance-mapped to PCI DSS 4.0 (full Section 4), NIST SP 800-52r2, and FedRAMP. Uses testssl.sh, sslscan, sslyze, openssl, nmap NSE scripts, and nuclei SSL templates. Multi-port scanning across 20+ TLS-bearing services.

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with acade

Turn a weak/cheap "Flash" model into a "Pro" performer by wrapping HKUDS UpSkill — captures agent session failures, has a strong Teacher model analyze them and draft a skill, then validates it against the weak Student model in a closed Ralph Loop (up to 3 rounds) before storing it for automatic reuse. Use when the user wants to install UpSkill, run `/upskill-init`, `/upskill-configure`, `/upskill-build`, `/upskill-run`, `/upskill-list`, `/upskill-status`, `/upskill-mode`, `/upskill-model`, `/upskill-remove`, or `/upskill-uninstall`, wants a cheap model to perform closer to a Pro model without switching, or wants a good session (success or failure) distilled into a validated skill. Triggers on: upskill, up-skill, flash to pro, teacher student distillation, ralph loop skill validation, distill agent failures into skills. Routes skill-quality ratcheting to `skill-autoresearch`, scaffolding to `write-a-skill`, and spec-compliance rewrites to `skill-standardization`.

Designs the contract for an API change inside one codebase — a component's props, a function surface, URL or query parameters, an event payload, or a module boundary — through a discovery pass, an options document with one recommendation, a question round, and an adversarial validation round, with every element of the contract justified from one stated goal. Use when you want to design, shape, decide, or nail down an interface, contract, signature, or API change for a capability you can already describe, sized for roughly one pull request. Produces a design document and changes no code. Does not specify what a feature should do — use plan-a-feature. Does not plan delivery or sequencing — use plan-implementation. Does not assess the architecture of existing code — use architectural-analysis. Does not write the code — use tdd. Does not restructure existing code — use refactor. Runs its rounds without pausing for review; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.