Results for “task-verification”

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing, before reporting a task done, or before telling the evaluator the batch is ready. Requires running the verification command and reading its output in this turn before any success claim; evidence before assertions always.

Discovers and invokes agent skills by mapping tasks to development phases, with core operating behaviors for assumption surfacing, confusion management, and scope discipline.

Use this skill for crypto market research, tokens, narratives, liquidity, risks, source verification. Trigger when the task involves crypto work related to Crypto Market Research, production implementation, audits, debugging, strategy, or validation.

Use this skill for browser verification, console/network errors, layout checks, user-flow QA, DevTools evidence. Trigger when the task involves qa work related to Browser Devtools Qa, production implementation, audits, debugging, strategy, or validation.

Integrate Xquik into apps, scripts, data pipelines, or AI agents for X API tasks like tweet search, user lookup, follower export, media actions, and webhook verification.

Dynamic multi-agent workflows — plan first, then orchestrate parallel agents with adversarial verification via the local odw daemon. Use when the user asks for a "workflow", says "ultracode", or hands you a task spanning many files/items that benefits from parallel agents.

Dynamic multi-agent workflows — plan first, then orchestrate parallel agents with adversarial verification via the local odw daemon. Use when the user asks for a "workflow", says "ultracode", or hands you a task spanning many files/items that benefits from parallel agents.

Dynamic multi-agent workflows — plan first, then orchestrate parallel agents with adversarial verification via the local odw daemon. Use when the user asks for a "workflow", says "ultracode", or hands you a task spanning many files/items that benefits from parallel agents.

Use when a research implementation plan exists in docs/superpapers/plans/ and the user is ready to execute it — collecting data, running analysis, producing outputs, writing the paper. Orchestrates task execution with replication-driven verification and two-stage review at phase boundaries.

Use when a research design spec exists and the user is ready to translate it into a concrete implementation plan with phased tasks, artifacts, and verification criteria. Produces a research execution plan organized in canonical research phases — collection, preparation, analysis, robustness, writing, submission.

Orchestrate the full MoonSpec lifecycle from a preselected single-story feature request or active feature directory through specification, planning, TDD task generation, artifact alignment, implementation, and final verification. Use when the user asks for an end-to-end MoonSpec run and the input has already been routed to one independently testable story, or when Codex needs to coordinate `moonspec-specify`, `moonspec-plan`, `moonspec-tasks`, `moonspec-align`, `moonspec-implement`, and `moonspec-verify` without manual analyze/remediation prompts.

Write a 5-part mini spec (goal, constraints, acceptance criteria, verification, done gate) before starting any multi-step, externally-delivered, or risky task. Triggers when: a request has 3+ steps, touches external delivery, or is easy to declare done too early. NOT for: single lookups, one-line edits, routine acks, or simple factual answers.

Verify a GitHub pull request against a Jira issue's goals, requirements, and acceptance criteria, then post a PR comment with the findings. Use when a user asks Codex or MoonMind to compare a PR to a Jira story/task/bug, confirm whether a PR satisfies Jira requirements, audit implementation coverage from Jira, or publish a Jira-vs-PR verification summary.

Detects weak reverse engineering and tampering protections in mobile apps (Android/iOS). Trigger on: root detection bypass, jailbreak detection bypass, Frida detection, debugger detection, anti-debugging, ptrace, sysctl, emulator detection, code obfuscation absent, debug symbols present, get-task-allow, ProGuard disabled, R8 disabled, string encryption, integrity check, file tampering, repackaging, dynamic instrumentation, runtime hook, Magisk hide, Magisk, frida-server, objection bypass, signing verification, apk resign. Covers MASVS-RESILIENCE-1/2/3/4.

Build the smallest, highest-signal context package for an AI coding task — goal, constraints, repo facts, boundaries, and a verification plan. Load when prompts are underspecified, the agent is missing key files or decisions, the user says "use the right context", "here's the repo", or when work is drifting due to missing constraints. Also triggers on "context engineering", "gather context", "what do you need from me", "before you start". Not for cross-session continuity (use memory-startup/memory-recall).

Routing-first visual approval gate for AI agent plans, markdown specs, and diffs. Use when a human needs to review a concrete plan before execution, inspect a targeted diff in a browser, mark up a spec/PRD/architecture note, or set up the review loop on Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Codex CLI, or OpenCode. Route planning/spec creation to `task-planning` or `ralph`, broad PR-policy review to `code-review`, rendered-UI critique to `agentation`, and fresh-session browser verification to `browser-harness`.