Results for “quality”

Write readable, maintainable code through disciplined naming, small functions, and clean error handling. Use when the user mentions "code review", "naming conventions", "function too long", "code smells", "readable code", "boy scout rule", "single responsibility", or "unit test quality". Also trigger when reviewing pull requests for readability, refactoring messy functions, debating comment styles, or improving error handling patterns. Covers SRP, comment discipline, formatting, and unit testing. For refactoring techniques, see refactoring-patterns. For architecture, see clean-architecture.

Use to distil a CX dashboard into the three numbers a board or exec actually needs — volume/demand health, quality/outcome, and cost/efficiency — with commentary that drives decisions instead of forty tiles nobody acts on. Trigger for "board pack", "exec summary for support", "what should leadership see", "too many metrics on the dashboard", "three KPIs for the board", quarterly business review CX section, or when a leadership deck is mostly charts with no story.

Apply meta-principles of software craftsmanship: DRY, orthogonality, tracer bullets, and design by contract. Use when the user mentions "best practices", "pragmatic approach", "broken windows", "tracer bullet", "software craftsmanship", "technical debt prevention", "prototype vs tracer bullet", or "code ownership". Also trigger when evaluating build-vs-buy decisions, designing estimation approaches, or choosing between reversible and irreversible architectural decisions. Covers estimation, domain languages, and reversibility. For code-level quality, see clean-code. For refactoring techniques, see refactoring-patterns.

Comprehensive exploratory data analysis with publication-quality descriptive tables, correlation matrices, distribution plots, and assumption testing. Generates a standalone EDA report with Table 1 (gtsummary/great_tables), correlation heatmap, distribution diagnostics, VIF for multicollinearity, and normality/homoscedasticity tests. All figures are APA-formatted and colorblind-safe. Use when the user says "exploratory analysis," "EDA," "descriptive statistics," "explore the data," "Table 1," "correlations," "distributions," or when /data-clean completes successfully. Triggers on "EDA," "descriptive," "Table 1," "explore," "correlations."

Failure diagnosis, DAG mutation, and escalation engine for the WinDAGs meta-DAG. Receives failure information and quality vectors from the Evaluator. Classifies failures on four dimensions. Follows a five-level escalation ladder. Applies seven mutation types with saga compensation. Enforces BC-EXEC-002, BC-EXEC-003, BC-FAIL-002, BC-FAIL-005. Activate when operating as the Mutator role in the meta-DAG, when diagnosing node failures, when restructuring a DAG at runtime, or when deciding escalation level.

Test-driven development skill for writing unit tests, generating test fixtures and mocks, analyzing coverage gaps, and guiding red-green-refactor workflows across Jest, Pytest, JUnit, Vitest, and Mocha. Use when the user asks to write tests, improve test coverage, practice TDD, generate mocks or stubs, or mentions testing frameworks like Jest, pytest, or JUnit. Handles test generation from source code, coverage report parsing (LCOV/JSON/XML), quality scoring, and framework conversion for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, and Java projects.

Expert copy editor for Quarto (.qmd) files. Checks grammar, spelling, punctuation, and academic writing quality. Produces a structured markdown report organized by document section — never modifies the source file. Use when asked to proofread, check grammar, fix typos, or review prose in a .qmd document. For APSA style rules (numbers, citations, capitalization, abbreviations, neutral language), use the apsa-style skill instead. Supports an optional output-file argument and an optional @sec-label argument to restrict checking to one section.

Design automated evaluation pipelines for LLM and agent systems — combining deterministic checks, statistical metrics, and LLM-as-judge scoring into repeatable, CI-integrated eval suites. Load when the user asks to set up automated evals, design an eval pipeline, integrate evals into CI/CD, create an eval suite, do eval-driven development, or says "automate my evals", "CI eval integration", "evaluation pipeline", "continuous evaluation", "monitoring eval quality", "set up regression testing for my agent". Sub-skill of eval-output orchestrator.

Generates unit tests, integration tests, and E2E tests for React/Next.js applications. Scans components to create Jest + React Testing Library test stubs, analyzes Istanbul/LCOV coverage reports to surface gaps, scaffolds Playwright test files from Next.js routes, mocks API calls with MSW, creates test fixtures, and configures test runners. Use when the user asks to "generate tests", "write unit tests", "analyze test coverage", "scaffold E2E tests", "set up Playwright", "configure Jest", "implement testing patterns", or "improve test quality".

Generates unit tests, integration tests, and E2E tests for React/Next.js applications. Scans components to create Jest + React Testing Library test stubs, analyzes Istanbul/LCOV coverage reports to surface gaps, scaffolds Playwright test files from Next.js routes, mocks API calls with MSW, creates test fixtures, and configures test runners. Use when the user asks to "generate tests", "write unit tests", "analyze test coverage", "scaffold E2E tests", "set up Playwright", "configure Jest", "implement testing patterns", or "improve test quality".

Humanize LLM output so it reads like a careful human wrote it. Subtracts AI-isms (sycophancy, tricolons, em-dash overuse, "delve"/"tapestry"/"testament", hedging stacks, tidy five-paragraph shapes), engineers burstiness and calibrated uncertainty, and preserves technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: subtle, balanced (default), full, voice-match, anti-detector. Use when user says "humanize this", "make this sound human", "de-slop this", "rewrite without AI tone", "match my voice", "less robotic", or invokes /unslop. Also auto-triggers when text-quality is requested.

Builds, validates, schedules, and dynamically modifies DAG execution graphs. Decomposes problems into nodes with dependencies, performs topological sorting, detects cycles, resolves conflicts, and schedules wave-based parallel execution. Use when designing a DAG structure, validating dependencies, planning execution order, or modifying a DAG at runtime. Activate on "build DAG", "plan workflow", "DAG dependencies", "topological sort", "schedule execution", "modify DAG", "replan". NOT for executing DAGs (use dag-runtime), validating outputs (use dag-quality), or matching skills to nodes (use dag-skills-matcher).

Structure software around the Dependency Rule: source code dependencies point inward from frameworks to use cases to entities. Use when the user mentions "architecture layers", "dependency rule", "ports and adapters", "hexagonal architecture", "use case boundary", "onion architecture", "screaming architecture", or "framework independence". Also trigger when decoupling business logic from databases or frameworks, defining module boundaries, or debating where to put business rules. Covers component principles, boundaries, and SOLID. For code quality, see clean-code. For domain modeling, see domain-driven-design.

Autonomous experiment loop that optimizes any file by a measurable metric. Inspired by Karpathy's autoresearch. The agent edits a target file, runs a fixed evaluation, keeps improvements (git commit), discards failures (git reset), and loops indefinitely. Use when: user wants to optimize code speed, reduce bundle/image size, improve test pass rate, optimize prompts, improve content quality (headlines, copy, CTR), or run any measurable improvement loop. Requires: a target file, an evaluation command that outputs a metric, and a git repo.

Autonomous experiment loop that optimizes any file by a measurable metric. Inspired by Karpathy's autoresearch. The agent edits a target file, runs a fixed evaluation, keeps improvements (git commit), discards failures (git reset), and loops indefinitely. Use when: user wants to optimize code speed, reduce bundle/image size, improve test pass rate, optimize prompts, improve content quality (headlines, copy, CTR), or run any measurable improvement loop. Requires: a target file, an evaluation command that outputs a metric, and a git repo.

Apply named refactoring transformations to improve code structure without changing behavior. Use when the user mentions "refactor this", "code smells", "extract method", "replace conditional", "technical debt", "move method", "inline variable", or "decompose conditional". Also trigger when cleaning up legacy code, preparing code for new features by restructuring, or identifying which transformation to apply to a specific code smell. Covers smell-driven refactoring, safe transformation sequences, and testing guards. For code quality foundations, see clean-code. For managing complexity, see software-design-philosophy.

Improve agent reliability over time — diagnose why agents fail and fix the setup. Triggers on: agent keeps failing, same mistake again, agent not improving, make agent smarter, agent quality plateau, agents ignore skills, agent skips tests, fix agent behavior, agent unreliable, improve agent setup, self-improving harness, agents worse over time, tune agent instructions, agent going in circles, agent ignores AGENTS.md, repeated agent errors. Requires harness v0 and eval harness. AUTO-ROUTED from harness-engineering on symptoms. Not first setup — harness-generation first.

autonomous architecture design and refinement for mermate using iterative copilot guidance, local reasoning, repeated low-cost render validation, and final max-quality render selection. use when building, stress-testing, refining, decomposing, validating, or evolving system architectures from simple ideas, complex problem statements, markdown specifications, mermaid drafts, or ambiguous design notes. especially useful when chatgpt should act like a professional architect that thinks step by step, uses mermate repeatedly, compares intermediate diagrams, and decides when to continue refining versus when to finalize with max mode.

Orchestrates the full academic research pipeline (research, write, integrity check, review, revise, re-review, re-revise, final integrity check, finalize), coordinating alterlab-deep-research, alterlab-paper-writer, and alterlab-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Use when the request mentions academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, or complete paper workflow. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

Use for PUA/try-harder productivity coaching when the user expresses frustration, repeated failure, quality complaint, passive behavior, says retry/change approach/don't give up, asks for evidence/completion check/test before done, or wants Ding-style workplace reminders. Triggers include: try harder, stop giving up, figure it out, again??, why still failing, change approach, no evidence, run tests, done without proof, 换个方法, 再试试, 别摆烂, 别偷懒, 为什么还不行, 又错了, 证据呢, 没跑测试别说完成, 验收, 闭环, 自嗨, 置身钉外, 无招, 老板体感. Do not use for calm first-attempt requests.

Audits and enforces web interface standards covering accessibility, performance, UX, and code quality from Vercel Engineering's Web Interface Guidelines. Use this skill when reviewing UI code, checking accessibility compliance, auditing design implementations, running pre-merge frontend checks, or when someone asks to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "check my site", "audit design", or "is this component correct". Apply proactively when writing form elements, interactive components, images, animations, or anything that users directly touch — these guidelines prevent common mistakes before they reach production.

Use for PUA/try-harder productivity coaching when the user expresses frustration, repeated failure, quality complaint, passive behavior, says retry/change approach/don't give up, asks for evidence/completion check/test before done, or wants Ding-style workplace reminders. Triggers include: try harder, stop giving up, figure it out, again??, why still failing, change approach, no evidence, run tests, done without proof, 换个方法, 再试试, 别摆烂, 别偷懒, 为什么还不行, 又错了, 证据呢, 没跑测试别说完成, 验收, 闭环, 自嗨, 置身钉外, 无招, 老板体感. Do not use for calm first-attempt requests.

Translate existing blog posts into one or more target languages with SEO-optimized localization. Produces native-quality translations that preserve markdown structure, frontmatter, schema JSON-LD, image and chart embeds, and citation capsules. Localizes keywords, meta tags, numbers, dates, currencies, and quote styles per locale. Flags machine-translation artifacts for review. Run BEFORE blog-localize: this handles language conversion; localize handles cultural adaptation after translation completes. Use when user says "translate blog", "blog translate", "uebersetzen", "traduire", "traducir", "translate post", "blog auf Deutsch", "blog en espanol".

Fundamental patterns for effective agentic behavior. Teaches decomposition, tool orchestration, error recovery, context management, quality self-assessment, and knowing when to stop. Model-agnostic principles that make any agent more effective regardless of domain. Activate on: "how should I structure this agent", "agentic workflow", "agent patterns", "multi-step task", "tool orchestration", "/agentic-patterns", "decompose this", "agent best practices", "chain of actions", "when should the agent stop", "agent loop design". NOT for: creating agent infrastructure (use agent-creator), building DAGs (use windags-architect), specific tool implementation.

Python language (3.10-3.14). Covers typing, async, and modern patterns. Use when writing Python applications. USE WHEN: user mentions "python", "type hints", "dataclasses", "async/await", asks about "asyncio", "context managers", "match statement", "walrus operator", "PEP 695", "type parameter", "generic" DO NOT USE FOR: FastAPI framework - use `backend-fastapi` skill instead DO NOT USE FOR: Django framework - use Django-specific skill DO NOT USE FOR: Package management - use `python-packaging` skill DO NOT USE FOR: Linting/type checking config - use `python-quality` skill

Route academic-figure work into the lightest workable PaperBanana mode instead of jumping straight to a full multi-agent generation run. Use when the user needs publication-quality methodology diagrams, statistical plots, figure evaluation, polishing an existing figure, batch/sweep generation, or a full-paper figure package from text or PDF. Even if the user does not say "paperbanana" — also triggers on: academic figure, methodology diagram, publication figure, generate diagram from paper, statistical plot from CSV, figure evaluation, polish figure, NeurIPS/ICML figure, arxiv illustration, plan-then-refine diagram pipeline.

Eliminate generic-looking UI — anti-default checklist, custom hover states, precision typography, non-stock spacing, surface depth, and production-grade polish that separates professional from template. Use when asked to "make this look less generic", "UI looks Bootstrap-y", "looks like a template", "add polish", "impeccable UI", "production quality design", "make it look custom", "it looks like every other SaaS app", "remove default styles", or "design lacks personality". Do NOT use for: design system token architecture — see design-system-gen. Do NOT use for: animation timing specifics — see motion-design.

This skill should be used when a SKILL.md file needs compression, deduplication, or token reduction. It provides an embedding-based compression pipeline that detects and removes redundant chunks within SKILL.md files using local embeddings (all-MiniLM-L6-v2). Two-pass approach: (1) free intra-skill deduplication via cosine similarity clustering, (2) optional LLM-judged graded eval to detect pretraining overlap. Typical result: 25-46% token reduction with zero quality loss. This skill is not intended for editing skill content, creating new skills, routing optimization, or cross-skill deduplication.

Review code changes for correctness, completeness, bugs, edge cases, and quality. Load when the user explicitly asks to review code, check a PR, review a diff, audit recent changes, or verify an implementation matches requirements. Also triggers on "review this code", "check this PR", "review my changes", "code review", "did this implement correctly", "audit this diff", or any explicit request for a formal code review. Do NOT load for "review changes for context" or "review what happened" — those are requests to read code, not to perform a formal review.

Score the experience a new customer actually has, not just whether they activated. Grades the first 90 days on the moments that make someone feel taken care of, finds where the welcome goes cold, and hands back a scored audit with the specific fixes. Built for any post-sale team, customizable to your product and lifecycle. Trigger on "audit my onboarding", "score our onboarding experience", "why do new customers churn early", "grade our first 90 days", "where does onboarding go cold", "is our welcome any good", or any onboarding-quality question.

Turn "which leads should I work?" into a lead-by-lead work plan. Per-lead status (never-touched, engaged-not-replied, gone-cold, hot), days-dark per lead, last-touch quality, a re-engagement ranker, and a recommended next action for every lead. Built for SDRs and full-cycle reps, customizable to your CRM and your outreach tool. Trigger on "which leads should I work?", "who haven't I touched?", "show me cold leads", "hot leads to follow up on", "who's gone dark?", "re-engagement candidates", or any lead-level work-assignment question.

Turn any markdown file into a publication-quality PDF. Proper 1in margins, intelligent page breaks, page numbers, cover pages, running headers, curly quotes and em dashes, clickable TOC, diagonal DRAFT watermark. Not a draft artifact — a finished artifact. Use when asked to "make a PDF", "export to PDF", "turn this markdown into a PDF", or "generate a document". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "make this a pdf", "make it a pdf", "export to pdf", "turn this into a pdf", "turn this markdown into a pdf", "generate a pdf", "make a pdf from", "pdf this markdown".

Package and publish a skill to the skills.sh community registry, a public GitHub repo, or both. Load when the user asks to publish a skill, share a skill publicly, submit a skill to the registry, release a skill, or when universal-skill-creator offers publishing as a final step after creation. Also triggers on "push this skill to skills.sh", "make this skill public", "share this skill", or "contribute this skill to the community". Validates quality before publishing, packages correctly (zip for multi-file, .md for atomic), writes a README if missing, and publishes via npx skills CLI.

When the user wants help with paid advertising campaigns on Google Ads, Meta (Facebook/Instagram), LinkedIn, Twitter/X, or other ad platforms. Also use when the user mentions 'PPC,' 'paid media,' 'ROAS,' 'CPA,' 'ad campaign,' 'retargeting,' 'audience targeting,' 'Google Ads,' 'Facebook ads,' 'LinkedIn ads,' 'ad budget,' 'cost per click,' 'ad spend,' 'should I run ads,' 'ABM,' 'account-based marketing,' 'B2B ads,' 'lead quality,' 'negative keywords,' 'Performance Max,' 'thought leader ads,' or 'when should I kill an ad.' Use this for campaign strategy, audience targeting, bidding, and optimization. For bulk ad creative generation and iteration, see ad-creative. For landing page optimization, see cro.

Assess the test suite of a codebase — where tests are missing, where they exist but are weak, and which gaps actually matter. Use this skill whenever the user asks about test coverage, test quality, "are there enough tests", "where should we add tests", testing gaps, test debt, untested code paths, flaky tests, or generally wants to know whether a codebase is well-tested. Trigger even on casual phrasings ("is this tested?", "what's the test situation?", "audit our tests"). This skill does NOT write tests — it only assesses what exists and identifies what's missing. For test generation, this is the wrong skill.

Create distinctive, production-ready frontend interfaces with high visual quality. Use this skill whenever the user asks to build, design, or improve any web UI — including landing pages, dashboards, components, app screens, forms, or interactive widgets. Also trigger when the user says "make this look better", "redesign this", "add polish", "build a UI", "create a page", "style this", or references HTML/CSS/JS, React, Vue, Svelte, or any frontend framework. If the request involves any visible output rendered in a browser, use this skill — even if the user hasn't explicitly said "design." This skill produces intentional, memorable interfaces that avoid generic AI patterns.