Results for “pr-review”

Delegate a substantial diagnosis, implementation, or follow-up task to Claude Code through the tracked-job runtime. Args: --background, --wait, --resume, --resume-last, --fresh, --write, --model <model>, --effort <low|medium|high|xhigh|max>, --prompt-file <path>, [task text]. Defaults to opus + xhigh effort. Use when Claude should investigate or change things, not when the user only wants review findings.

Use for writing, reviewing, debugging, migrating, or testing Python application configuration built with pydantic-settings. Trigger for BaseSettings, SettingsConfigDict, environment names, dotenv, secrets directories, nested settings, CLI sources, custom source precedence, and secret-safe startup configuration. Do not use for ordinary Pydantic model validation, direct os.environ access in a small script, or external secret manager administration.

Universal code quality principles applicable to all languages. Covers Clean Code, SOLID, complexity metrics, and quality standards. USE WHEN: user mentions "clean code", "SOLID", "code smells", "refactoring", "complexity", asks about "cyclomatic complexity", "cognitive complexity", "code review", "maintainability" DO NOT USE FOR: language-specific linting - use ESLint/Biome skills, security - use OWASP skills, testing - use testing skills

PROACTIVE SKILL — automatically apply whenever writing, generating, or editing any text that is mainly in Chinese. No user trigger needed. Also use when the user explicitly asks to "fix Chinese", "修改中文", "去翻译腔", "去AI味", "fix Chinese formatting", or "review Chinese text". Eliminates AI-sounding expressions and translation artifacts. Enforces Chinese-English mixed formatting rules (spacing, punctuation, bold formatting).

Turn a vague research direction into a problem-anchored, elegant, frontier-aware, implementation-oriented method plan via iterative GPT-5.4 review. Use when the user says "refine my approach", "帮我细化方案", "decompose this problem", "打磨idea", "refine research plan", "细化研究方案", or wants a concrete research method that stays simple, focused, and top-venue ready instead of a vague or overbuilt idea.

Author pull requests with intent-separated commits, blast-radius disclosure, and verification evidence. Load when opening a PR, writing a PR description, separating refactor from feature commits, or summarizing a change set for review. Also triggers on "write the PR", "PR body", "intent-separated commits", "split refactor from feature", "pr summary", or after safe-change cycles complete. Extends git-workflow-and-versioning — does not replace it.

Discover, find, compare, audit, repair, adapt, craft, run, debrief, and prepare repeatable AI-agent loops for publication. Use when a user asks to analyze code or coding threads for recurring work, find a published loop, interview them to turn a goal into a bounded loop, review a loop...

Register and review WordPress 7.0 Connectors API integrations for external services, especially AI providers and API-key backed services shown under Settings > Connectors. Covers wp_connectors_init, WP_Connector_Registry, wp_get_connector, wp_get_connectors, wp_is_connector_registered, api_key vs none authentication.

Validate process decomposition and architecture design quality before execution begins. Load when the setup-evaluator agent fires (automatic for agent-chain tasks), or when user says "evaluate this setup", "check the decomposition", "validate the architecture", "is this plan sound", "review the agent design". Catches structural errors, missing knowledge, unrealistic step ordering, and topology mismatches. Does NOT modify — only evaluates.

Audit a repository, vet and prioritize evidence-backed findings, write drift-aware implementation plans, delegate bounded work, and independently verify results. Use when asked to improve, audit, modernize, harden, review, plan fixes for, or systematically reduce risk in a codebase. Use native isolated agents for implementation; use OpenRouter/free only for narrow advisory audit slices under its safety limits.

Terraform infrastructure-as-code agent skill and plugin for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenClaw. Covers module design patterns, state management strategies, provider configuration, security hardening, policy-as-code with Sentinel/OPA, and CI/CD plan/apply workflows. Use when: user wants to design Terraform modules, manage state backends, review Terraform security, implement multi-region deployments, or follow IaC best practices.

Terraform infrastructure-as-code agent skill and plugin for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenClaw. Covers module design patterns, state management strategies, provider configuration, security hardening, policy-as-code with Sentinel/OPA, and CI/CD plan/apply workflows. Use when: user wants to design Terraform modules, manage state backends, review Terraform security, implement multi-region deployments, or follow IaC best practices.

Curate Claude Code's auto-memory into durable project knowledge. Analyze MEMORY.md for patterns, promote proven learnings to CLAUDE.md and .claude/rules/, extract recurring solutions into reusable skills. Use when: (1) reviewing what Claude has learned about your project, (2) graduating a pattern from notes to enforced rules, (3) turning a debugging solution into a skill, (4) checking memory health and capacity.

Resolves an approved article comment task into a publishable AI markdown reply by fetching article context from a local HTTP API (with sf-cli fallback), reasoning with the selected quote and full article content, and writing the final reply to a backend-provided local result file path.

Generate or improve MATLAB help text (documentation comments) for a function, class, or script file following MathWorks standards (H1 line, syntax paragraphs, See Also, 75-char lines). Read BEFORE writing MATLAB help — default patterns (Inputs:/Outputs: lists, block comments, uppercase See Also) produce non-conforming output. Use when writing, rewriting, fixing, or reviewing MATLAB help comments or function documentation.

Perform a static audit of an AL workspace for Business Central against the project's copilot-instructions.md contract. Reports findings by class (Compliance, Code quality, Test coverage, Permissions) and severity (Blocker, Major, Minor, Nit) with file:line citations. Never modifies code. Never invents rules. Use when asked to audit a workspace, run a compliance check, review before PR, or diagnose contract drift.

Two-party working posture — user as director, agent as executor. Every fork, tradeoff, and taste choice is surfaced via batched AskUserQuestion with structural framing, a recommended default, and concrete previews when comparison is visual, so the human steers direction while the agent handles implementation. Eliminates the review-bottleneck (no giant diff to approve at the end — review is distributed across picks) and prevents codebase-understanding debt (the user remembers the architecture because they picked it). Use whenever the user invokes /duet, or says "work with me", "ask before", "check with me", "I want to decide", "don't assume", "human-in-the-loop", "co-author", "pair with me", "duet", or whenever a task clearly involves aesthetic, architectural, or irreversible strategic decisions — even without those exact words. Pair with the Duet output style to minimize cognitive load between picks.

Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, negative parallelisms, and excessive conjunctive phrases.

Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, negative parallelisms, and excessive conjunctive phrases.

Use for writing, configuring, integrating, reviewing, debugging, or testing Python structured logging with structlog. Trigger for bound loggers, event dictionaries, processor chains, JSON or console rendering, standard-library logging integration, contextvars, request correlation, exception rendering, and structlog test capture. Do not use for stdlib-logging-only, Loguru-only, metrics-only, tracing-only, or collector configuration tasks that do not use structlog.

Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, negative parallelisms, and excessive conjunctive phrases.

Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, negative parallelisms, and excessive conjunctive phrases.

Open a GitHub PR with a tight body — why this change, what'll surprise the reviewer, how we know it's correct — or add a pull_request_template to a repo. Use when asked to open, create, or draft a pull request, compose or regenerate a PR description, or scaffold a repo's PR template. Composes the Summary/Gotchas/Verification structure and detects an existing template first.

Rewrite, draft, and review prose so it is clear, specific, human, and appropriate to context. Use this skill when improving emails, essays, documents, reports, UI copy, marketing copy, posts, or any text that may sound generic, AI-written, over-polished, verbose, salesy, evasive, or structurally formulaic. Supports voice calibration, anti-slop audits, context-aware taste decisions, and final pre-flight checks.

Ship workflow: detect + merge base branch, run tests, review diff, bump VERSION, update CHANGELOG, commit, push, create PR. Use when asked to "ship", "deploy", "push to main", "create a PR", "merge and push", or "get it deployed". Proactively invoke this skill (do NOT push/PR directly) when the user says code is ready, asks about deploying, wants to push code up, or asks to create a PR. (gstack)

GitHub operations via `gh` CLI: issues, PRs, CI runs, code review, API queries. Use when: (1) checking PR status or CI, (2) creating/commenting on issues, (3) listing/filtering PRs or issues, (4) viewing run logs. NOT for: complex web UI interactions requiring manual browser flows (use browser tooling when available), bulk operations across many repos (script with gh api), or when gh auth is not configured.

Applies Han's shared Human-Readable Output Standard to a target you already have — a file on disk, text pasted into the prompt, or a draft already produced in the conversation — by dispatching the readability-editor to rewrite its prose so the main point comes first, headings are descriptive, each paragraph carries one idea, and sentences stay short and active, while preserving every fact. Use when you want to make a document or draft readable, edit or polish prose for readability, clean up writing, tighten wording, or re-apply the readability standard to something already written. Rewrites prose only, leaving code, diagrams, and citation identifiers unchanged. Does not write new feature or system documentation — use project-documentation. Does not restructure code or review it — use refactor to restructure code and code-review to audit it. Does not judge the underlying work or raise findings; it only rewrites the writing.

Full ASVS 5.0 compliance assessment against a codebase and/or architecture diagrams. Reads all 346 controls from the companion CSV, performs targeted code analysis per control, and produces a complete matrix marked COMPLIANT / NON_COMPLIANT / NOT_RELEVANT — with per-control reasoning and evidence (code snippets, file:line references, diagram observations). Outputs a reviewed CSV matrix and a self-contained HTML evidence report.

UI/UX design system reference, pattern library, and focused review guidance for web and mobile applications. Use for targeted design research, pattern selection, UX audits, accessibility guidance, palette and typography selection, layout heuristics, and component pattern research. Covers 50+ styles, 97 color palettes, 57 font pairings, Web Interface Guidelines compliance, and concrete visual/usability improvements for modern SaaS and product interfaces.

Cross-channel content production from an approved idea, brief, notes, transcript, or existing asset. Use when the user wants a ready-to-review draft or a small set of adaptations saved into the bootstrap content workspace. For content strategy use content-strategy-and-planning; for specialist LinkedIn, blog, email automation, SEO, landing page, or campaign work use the dedicated skill.

Use to discover specific skills for the Sales plugin, when it is at-mentioned directly, or for any mentions of potentially relevant work, including: meeting prep or call follow-up; account research, monitoring, or prioritization; internal source finding; competitive briefs; deal strategy; pipeline or forecast review; company or contact enrichment; customer quote retrieval; rep coaching; business cases; sales company research; and CRM or data enrichment workflows.

Use when defining a feature's purpose and user value before building it, writing user stories, mapping user flows end-to-end, prioritizing what to build next, evaluating whether a feature solves a real problem, or reviewing scope to prevent over-engineering. Activate when user says "what should I build", "plan the feature", "is this the right approach", "define the requirements", or presents an idea without a clear user need.

Prepares Hart-Scott-Rodino Act premerger notification filings for FTC/DOJ submission under 15 U.S.C. § 18a and 16 C.F.R. Parts 801-803. Covers threshold verification, NAICS revenue breakdowns, Item 4(c)/(d) document collection, competitive overlap analysis, prior acquisitions disclosure, and filing assembly. Use when an M&A deal may meet HSR size thresholds and requires antitrust clearance, premerger notification, or FTC/DOJ merger review.

Validate, review, and compare DESIGN.md design-system files using the Google `@google/design.md` specification and CLI. Trigger this skill whenever the user asks to lint / validate / verify / check / review / diff a `DESIGN.md` (case-insensitive), mentions "design.md", "design system spec", "design tokens YAML", "WCAG contrast on tokens", or uses Korean phrases like "DESIGN.md 검증", "디자인 시스템 검사", "디자인 토큰 점검", "design.md 린트". Also fire when the user pastes a YAML front-matter block that looks like a design-token document (top-level `colors:` / `typography:` / `components:` keys) or when a DESIGN.md file appears in the workspace and the conversation turns to validating, comparing, or shipping it. Covers YAML front matter, markdown section order, token references, component property validity, WCAG contrast findings, missing primary colors or typography, orphaned tokens, and regressions between two DESIGN.md versions.

Use as the entry point for any PMLA (Publications of the Modern Language Association) manuscript. Routes to the right PMLA sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and which venue fits — a regular blind-reviewed article or a special feature (Theories and Methodologies, The Changing Profession, Criticism in Translation, Little-known Documents). It dispatches; it does not draft content.

Deterministic LLM-first SEO audits for websites, blog posts, and GitHub repositories. Use this when the user asks to "perform SEO analysis", "run SEO audit", "analyze SEO", "check technical SEO", "review schema", "Core Web Vitals", "E-E-A-T", "hreflang", "GEO", "AEO", or GitHub repository SEO optimization. For full/page/repo audits, run bundled scripts for evidence and return prioritized, confidence-labeled fixes.