Results for “pr-review”

Structural editor that proposes cuts, reorganization, and simplification while preserving comprehension. Use when user requests structural review or editorial review of structure

Launches four parallel read-only sub-agents to review a git diff or file scope for regressions, security risks, performance issues, and contract gaps, then aggregates findings into a prioritized fix path.

Review pull requests against repository standards using automated validation and manual content review.

Review test quality using best practices validation. Use when user says "lets review tests" or "I want to evaluate test quality"

Systematic Review Pipeline Orchestrator - Coordinates systematic literature review automation Manages the complete 7-stage PRISMA 2020 pipeline from research question to RAG system Delegates to specialized agents (I1, I2, I3) while enforcing human checkpoints Use when: conducting systematic reviews, building knowledge repositories, PRISMA automation Triggers: systematic review, PRISMA, literature review automation

Code review guidelines covering code quality, security, and best practices.

Review governed memory proposals, policy tags, tombstones, and effective memory.

Professional code review with auto CHANGELOG generation, integrated with Codex AI

Professional code review with auto CHANGELOG generation, integrated with Codex AI

Professional code review with auto CHANGELOG generation, integrated with Codex AI

User-invoked, cross-discipline interface review that coordinates six domain references: accessibility, layout, writing, typography, colors, and ui. Use when explicitly invoked for a holistic review of a screen, flow, feature, or product interface. Supports quick and full review modes. Triggers on better-interface, full interface review, holistic UI audit, cross-discipline design review, review the whole interface.

Runs a multi-agent academic research pipeline covering systematic review, LaTeX paper writing, peer review, and end-to-end orchestration with integrity gates.

Provides a structured protocol for receiving and evaluating code review feedback, emphasizing technical verification over performative agreement.

Pre-landing PR review. Analyzes diff against the base branch for SQL safety, LLM trust boundary violations, conditional side effects, and other structural issues. Use when asked to "review this PR", "code review", "pre-landing review", or "check my diff". Proactively suggest when the user is about to merge or land code changes. (gstack)

Review code for AEM Edge Delivery Services projects, validating code quality, performance, accessibility, and adherence to EDS best practices during self-review or pull request review.

Dispatch a code reviewer subagent to catch issues before they cascade, with precisely crafted context for evaluation.

Verifies that fix commits properly address security audit findings without introducing new bugs or vulnerabilities.

Review C#/.NET code for design pattern implementation and suggest improvements without making changes.

Provides three modes — code review, adversarial challenge, and consult — for obtaining a second opinion on code.

Use when serving as a peer reviewer and deciding whether and how AI may assist, when a manuscript under review must never be pasted into an external tool, or when a confidentiality-preserving review and disclosure are needed.

Reviews a pull request: runs its own baseline review of the PR diff, then a persistent Monitor watches CI and incoming reviewer comments, triages each comment through an independent skeptical agent, applies only verified fixes, and commits+pushes via inline git commands until CI passes and no comments remain to adopt — then asks whether to merge. Use this skill when the user asks to "review a PR", "monitor PR review comments", "address reviewer feedback on #123", or "watch CI on a pull request".

Review docs, tool output, skills, and memory candidates for prompt-injection risk.

The single highest-leverage convention in code review is prefixing every comment

Review an exact PR head in isolation using trusted-base instructions and execution evidence

Review the current branch's changes against the project's code style and

Reviews lockfiles, installers, provenance, CI permissions, dependency confusion, artifacts, registries, and publishing.

Load this skill when the user says "asvs security review", "asvs-security-review", "/asvs-security-review", or when invoked by reference from the review-issue skill's standards-review step. Performs a rule-by-rule walk of docs/security-standards.md against a diff, scoped to the ASVS sections the diff actually touches, and reports findings using the project's existing severity mapping.

Turn engineering work into evidence-backed impact statements for performance reviews, self-reviews, promotion packets, and weekly updates by mining Copilot CLI session logs, git history, and GitHub PRs.

Conduct systematic access reviews and certifications to ensure users have appropriate access rights aligned with their roles, covering review campaign design, reviewer selection, risk-based prioritization, and remediation tracking for compliance with SOX, HIPAA, and PCI DSS.

Structured code review with a checklist covering correctness, clarity, tests, security, performance, and style. Use when reviewing a PR, diff, or set of code changes before merging — including phrases like "review this", "check my changes", or "is this ready to merge".

Run a full pull request review and post review comments directly to the current branch's GitHub PR. Requires the gh CLI to be installed and a PR to already exist for the current branch. Use when you want review feedback posted to GitHub as PR comments. For local code review without posting to GitHub, use code-review instead. Does not write or update PR descriptions — use update-pr-description for that.

Use when reviewing a branch, PR, or work-in-progress changes against standards and spec

Runs a post-launch review of a shipped PRD against its success metrics, interviewing the user on metric movement, assumptions, and decisions, then publishing an outcome-review page to Confluence and updating linked artifacts.

Eng manager-mode plan review. Lock in the execution plan — architecture, data flow, diagrams, edge cases, test coverage, performance. Walks through issues interactively with opinionated recommendations. Use when asked to "review the architecture", "engineering review", or "lock in the plan". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan or design doc and is about to start coding — to catch architecture issues before implementation. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "tech review", "technical review", "plan engineering review".

General code quality review — project guideline compliance, bug detection, code quality analysis.

Reviews code, diffs, or PRs for correctness, regressions, security, architecture, maintainability, and test gaps.