Results for “quality-check”

Teaches how to write growth logs that extract reusable patterns from complex tasks, failures, and reviews, with templates and quality checks.

One-command GitHub repository health audit. Checks for missing standard files, GitHub configuration, branch protection, documentation quality, and code hygiene. Produces a scored health report with prioritized fix recommendations.

Builds, converts, and analyzes workflows and skills. Use when the user requests to "build a workflow", "modify a workflow", "quality check workflow", "analyze skill", or "convert a skill".

Builds, converts, and analyzes workflows and skills. Use when the user requests to "build a workflow", "modify a workflow", "quality check workflow", "analyze skill", or "convert a skill".

Reviews local branch changes for bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues, using a structured checklist and verification process.

Use when formatting, linting, or type-checking standalone Python files that are not governed by a repository toolchain. Do not use for pyproject.toml or repository-level tooling work.

Self-contained code review checklist — formatting, type safety, duplication, readable conditions, logic-out-of-UI, test coverage, comment quality. Adapts to whatever tooling the project actually has (skips Prettier/TypeScript/test-runner checks if unconfigured). Use before merging, after completing a feature, or any time you want a second pass on code quality. In Claude Code, prefer the official `code-review` skill or `pr-review-toolkit`/`feature-dev` code-reviewer agents instead — both are real, installed, and go deeper than this checklist. This copy exists for Codex/Cursor portability, where those agents aren't available.

Runs systematic quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, and responsive design, then generates a prioritized audit report with actionable recommendations without fixing issues.

Prevents AI agents from calling methods, imports, or variables that do not provably exist in the user's installed version, reducing hallucinated code.

Write growth logs that extract reusable patterns from complex tasks, failures, and learning moments, using a structured template and quality checklist.

Provides a rigorous thinking partner profile that challenges assumptions, calibrates claims to evidence, and improves decision quality under uncertainty.

The art of reviewing code that improves both the codebase and the developer - sharing knowledge, maintaining standards, and building cultureUse when "code review, PR review, pull request, merge request, review comments, LGTM, review feedback, approve PR, request changes, review checklist, code quality, review standards, code-review, pull-request, PR, quality, standards, feedback, collaboration, mentoring" mentioned.

Audits a page or component against the Digital Curator design spec and movemental conventions, checking visual quality, accessibility, token compliance, and consistency before shipping.

Audits an article against voice, SEO/GEO, section architecture, citation, and pillar criteria, returning per-criterion scores and a prioritized revision list.

Two-stage review engine with four-layer quality model for the WinDAGs meta-DAG. Receives completed node outputs and produces ReviewResult containing QualityVector. Stage 1 (Haiku) checks Floor + Wall on every node. Stage 2 (Sonnet) runs Ceiling evaluation conditionally using economic escalation formula. Enforces BC-EVAL-001 through BC-EVAL-006. Activate when operating as the Evaluator role in the meta-DAG, when reviewing node outputs, when computing quality vectors, or when deciding Stage 2 escalation.

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces and presentation surfaces with high design quality. Detects and enforces the project's design system (.design-system.md, design-system skill repo, or DESIGN.md) — hard-rule grep checks, rendered-output validators, review checklist, decisions log; can also author a new design system (SKILL.md + DESIGN.md + assets).

Publishes agent skills to GitHub with automatic validation of SKILL.md, README quality checks, repository creation or updates, and real installation verification via npx skills.

Orchestrates a strict four-stage shipping pipeline: session critique, validation, commit, and pull request, halting on failure. Supports a critique-only mode for mid-session quality checks.

Deep single-page SEO analysis covering on-page elements, content quality, technical meta tags, schema, images, and performance. Use when user says "analyze this page", "check page SEO", or provides a single URL for review.

Deep single-page SEO analysis covering on-page elements, content quality, technical meta tags, schema, images, and performance. Use when user says "analyze this page", "check page SEO", or provides a single URL for review.

Deep single-page SEO analysis covering on-page elements, content quality, technical meta tags, schema, images, and performance. Use when user says "analyze this page", "check page SEO", or provides a single URL for review.

Deep single-page SEO analysis covering on-page elements, content quality, technical meta tags, schema, images, and performance. Use when user says "analyze this page", "check page SEO", or provides a single URL for review.

Deep single-page SEO analysis covering on-page elements, content quality, technical meta tags, schema, images, and performance. Use when user says "analyze this page", "check page SEO", or provides a single URL for review.

Deep single-page SEO analysis covering on-page elements, content quality, technical meta tags, schema, images, and performance. Use when user says "analyze this page", "check page SEO", or provides a single URL for review.

Deep single-page SEO analysis covering on-page elements, content quality, technical meta tags, schema, images, and performance. Use when user says "analyze this page", "check page SEO", or provides a single URL for review.

Deep single-page SEO analysis covering on-page elements, content quality, technical meta tags, schema, images, and performance. Use when user says "analyze this page", "check page SEO", or provides a single URL for review.

Manage your Lidarr music library from the terminal. Search and browse artists and albums, add new artists, check calendars, view queue and download history, inspect quality and metadata profiles, and trigger searches. Use when the user mentions Lidarr, music management, adding an artist, searching for music, checking the music library, upcoming album releases, or download queue.

Audits and enforces web interface standards covering accessibility, performance, UX, and code quality from Vercel Engineering's Web Interface Guidelines. Use this skill when reviewing UI code, checking accessibility compliance, auditing design implementations, running pre-merge frontend checks, or when someone asks to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "check my site", "audit design", or "is this component correct". Apply proactively when writing form elements, interactive components, images, animations, or anything that users directly touch — these guidelines prevent common mistakes before they reach production.

Prose quality checker for Quarto (.qmd) files, grounded in William Zinsser's *On Writing Well* (30th Anniversary Edition). Checks for clutter, weak verbs, hollow qualifiers, clichés, inflated academic voice, poor leads and endings, pronoun and tense inconsistency, and unclear explanation. Produces a structured markdown report organized by document section — never modifies the source file. Use when asked to improve prose quality, tighten writing, reduce clutter, or apply Zinsser's writing principles to a draft. For grammar and punctuation, use the proofread skill. For APSA style rules, use the apsa-style skill. Supports an optional output-file argument and an optional @sec-label argument to restrict checking to one section.

Defines a structured eval-driven development workflow with define, implement, and verify phases, including capability, behavior, and non-functional checks, plus optional swarm mode for parallel evaluation.

Review AI agent skills using a dual-axis method: deterministic code-based checks and LLM deep review, with weighted scoring and improvement recommendations.

Configure Maven, Gradle, and static analysis for Java projects. Use for Java-only build and quality tooling such as Spotless, Checkstyle, SpotBugs, SonarLint, JDK versions, and Java service Dockerfiles; defer Kotlin, Android, Flutter, and GitHub Actions-specific configuration.

Publication Specialist - Writing, Review, Pre-registration & Quality Assurance Light VS applied: Avoids template-based writing + audience-specific message design Absorbed G3 (Peer Review Strategist), G4 (Pre-registration Composer), F1-F3 (Quality functions) capabilities Use when: writing abstracts, creating summaries, peer review response, pre-registration, reporting checklists, reproducibility Triggers: abstract, plain language, press release, summary, communication, peer review, revision, pre-registration, OSF, PRISMA, CONSORT, reproducibility

Audit project and global memory for bloat, stale decisions, duplicates, contradictions, unsafe content, missing provenance, broken routing, and over-budget global files. Load when the user asks to audit memory, clean memory, check memory health, or verify memory quality.

Review whether a product, MVP, or feature is actually ready to launch. Use when the team needs a production-minded check across product quality, UX edge cases, auth and security, observability, support readiness, pricing readiness, and post-launch measurement.

Expert copy editor for Quarto (.qmd) files. Checks grammar, spelling, punctuation, and academic writing quality. Produces a structured markdown report organized by document section — never modifies the source file. Use when asked to proofread, check grammar, fix typos, or review prose in a .qmd document. For APSA style rules (numbers, citations, capitalization, abbreviations, neutral language), use the apsa-style skill instead. Supports an optional output-file argument and an optional @sec-label argument to restrict checking to one section.