Results for “reviews”

Loads a written implementation plan, reviews it critically, executes all tasks with verification, and reports completion, stopping to ask for help when blocked.

Tracks media progress, reviews, collections, analytics, and calendar for a Ryot instance, with automated daily and weekly reports via GraphQL API.

Creates, edits, and analyzes .docx files by unpacking OOXML, using docx-js for new documents, and applying tracked changes for reviews.

Reviews MATLAB fixed-point (fi) code for performance, code generation efficiency, and correctness. Identifies antipatterns and suggests idiomatic improvements. Use when reviewing fi, fimath, numerictype, or quantizenumeric code.

Reviews AWS infrastructure as code and deployed resources against the Well-Architected Framework, generating findings and GitHub issues for remediation.

Creates, structures, and reviews technical documentation using the Diátaxis framework, organizing content into tutorials, how-to guides, reference material, and explanations.

Analyzes email security including phishing dissection, SPF/DKIM/DMARC authentication checks, BEC fraud patterns, and OAuth token abuse research for authorized reviews.

Generates, reviews, fixes, and migrates Playwright end-to-end tests, with templates, agents, and integrations for TestRail and BrowserStack.

AI legal document generation powered by CellCog. Contracts, NDAs, terms of service, privacy policies, freelance agreements, employment contracts, compliance reviews, legal research. Precision legal drafting from natural language prompts. Not legal advice.

Use git worktrees to work on multiple branches simultaneously with separate working directories, enabling parallel development, stacked PRs, and isolated code reviews.

Perform language and framework-specific security best-practice reviews, write secure-by-default code, and generate prioritized vulnerability reports with suggested fixes.

Reviews Django codebases for access control vulnerabilities and IDOR by tracing authorization flows, mapping attack surfaces, and reporting confirmed gaps with enforceable fixes.

Conduct systematic literature reviews by searching multiple academic databases, synthesizing findings, and generating professionally formatted documents with verified citations.

Reviews trading strategy drafts for edge plausibility, overfitting risk, sample size adequacy, and execution realism, outputting PASS/REVISE/REJECT verdicts with confidence scores.

Reviews code through the lens of 12 classic software engineering books, catching design smells, coupling issues, and architectural risks that linters miss.

Designs, reviews, and troubleshoots Salesforce Flows from an admin perspective, covering flow type selection, bulkification, fault handling, and error diagnosis.

Performs structured code reviews of git branches, tracking findings in a living document and optionally running deep architectural analysis with subagents.

Executes implementation plans by dispatching a fresh subagent per task and running two-stage reviews for spec compliance and code quality.

Scaffolds and reviews custom WordPress REST API endpoints, covering registration, authorization, input validation, response shaping, and security best practices.

Reviews local branch changes for bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues, producing a prioritized report with severity ratings and concrete fixes.

Master software architect specializing in modern architecture patterns, clean architecture, microservices, event-driven systems, and DDD. Reviews system designs and code changes for architectural integrity, scalability, and maintainability. Use PROACTIVELY for architectural decisions.

Perform thorough code reviews on files or pull requests, checking for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and style violations. Use when the user requests code review or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

Reviews code using pi CLI with read-only tools. Delegates the review to pi (dev/pi) with a structured review rubric, running in read-only mode to prevent accidental edits. By default reviews uncommitted working tree changes (git diff HEAD) with pi restricted to the read tool; explicit targets (--branch/--diff/@file/PR) or --explore widen pi to read,grep,find,ls. Use when the user asks to "review code with pi", "pi review", "have pi review", "let pi review", or invokes /pi:review.

Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. Default to flagging; approval is earned.

Reviews closed trades, partial exits, and monthly trade aggregates for process adherence, risk discipline, execution quality, and evidence-based trading behavior patterns.

Creates a cyber-themed terminal deck for CLI, agent, or dev tool reviews with CRT scanlines, green monospace text, and three-tier tags.

Autonomously implements large Elixir/Phoenix features end-to-end: discovers complexity, plans with specialist agents, implements with verification, reviews code, and cycles back on issues.

Selects and reviews Queueable, Batch, Future, and Schedulable Apex for callouts, large data processing, retries, and background work, with decision guidance and validation checklists.

Designs and reviews schedule-triggered flows for recurring automation, covering bounded record selection, idempotent processing, and escalation to Apex when volume is too high.

Reviews all pipeline artifacts from a virtual software team and produces quality, compliance, and sign-off reports with an advisory release verdict.

Reviews staged and unstaged code changes for security vulnerabilities, code quality issues, and adherence to project conventions, reporting findings by severity.

Manage AWS cloud optimization and cost savings with nOps, including ShareSave analysis, commitment management, well-architected reviews, idle resource detection, and cost dashboards.

Use when receiving feedback from reviews, testing, QA, or HITL processes. This skill provides a structured process for incorporating feedback into deliverables, ensuring no feedback item is lost, misunderstood, or inadequately addressed.

Iteratively reviews and fixes Claude Code skill quality issues by running automated fix-review cycles using the skill-reviewer agent until they meet standards.

Designs or reviews Agentforce agent actions, covering Flow, Apex invocable, and prompt-template actions, including naming, input/output contracts, confirmation, and error behavior.

Reviews CUDA, OpenMP, and OpenCL code for parallel correctness, covering data races, memory model violations, synchronization bugs, numerical precision issues, and API-specific pitfalls.