Results for “methodology”

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality by assessing experimental design, identifying biases and confounders, and applying evidence grading frameworks like GRADE and Cochrane Risk of Bias.

Use when aer-identification has fixed the design, after methodology choice and before aer-robustness or aer-tables-figures, to run an AER-track analysis with StatsPAI — the agent-native Python engine and MCP server for causal inference, robustness, sensitivity, and publication-ready table export.

Designs and implements a ransomware-resilient backup strategy following the 3-2-1-1-0 methodology, including asset classification, immutable storage configuration, credential isolation, and automated restore testing.

Detects Follow-Through Day (FTD) signals for market bottom confirmation using William O'Neil's methodology, with dual-index tracking and a state machine for rally attempt, FTD qualification, and post-FTD health monitoring.

Conducts HIPAA risk analysis per 45 CFR §164.308(a)(1) following OCR guidance methodology. Covers threat identification, vulnerability assessment, likelihood and impact determination, risk scoring, and mitigation planning for electronic protected health information. Keywords: HIPAA risk analysis, OCR guidance, threat assessment, vulnerability, risk management, ePHI.

Conducts Data Protection Impact Assessments for AI and ML systems per EDPB Guidelines 04/2025 on AI processing. Covers training data lawfulness evaluation, model risk assessment, automated decision triggers, and AI-specific DPIA methodology. Keywords: AI DPIA, machine learning impact assessment, EDPB AI guidelines, model risk, training data.

A/B and multivariate testing methodology. Design experiments, calculate sample sizes, determine statistical significance, avoid common pitfalls, and interpret results. Platform-agnostic framework applicable to landing pages, emails, ads, pricing, and product features. Use when the user asks about A/B testing, split testing, experiment design, statistical significance, or conversion experiments.

Use this skill instead of WebSearch for ANY question requiring web research. Trigger on queries like "what is X", "explain X", "compare X and Y", "research X", or before content generation tasks. Provides systematic multi-angle research methodology instead of single superficial searches. Use this proactively when the user's question needs online information.

Design and apply QA methodology for software teams: test strategy, regression testing, CI failure triage, test automation, quality gates and metrics, risk-based testing, exploratory testing, test design techniques, AI code quality gates (independent verification, acceptance-criteria testability review for agentic Spec-Driven Development), mutation-guided test hardening and review evidence (surviving mutants, weak assertions, diff-aware mutation testing), agentic eval design (dataset test design, judge-as-system-under-test, flaky-eval discipline), QA career levels (Senior/Staff/Principal), and SDET engineering (test infrastructure, gTAA, CI/CD integration). Do not use for root-cause debugging of production incidents, security implementation or threat modeling, or evaluation framework governance and statistical analysis — route those to systematic-debugging, secure-software-engineering, and agent-evals-and-observability respectively.

Guides privacy impact assessment for emerging technologies including IoT, blockchain, AR/VR, quantum computing, and digital twins. Covers risk identification methodology, proportionality assessment, and technology-specific privacy challenges. Activate when evaluating new technology adoption, innovation projects, or emerging tech procurement. Keywords: PIA, emerging technology, IoT, blockchain, AR/VR, quantum computing, digital twins, innovation privacy.

Audit economic analysis outputs (fiscal briefings, macro briefings, market research, longlists, and other quantitative economic documents) against methodology standards, academic literature, and common errors. Runs structured checks across core categories including counterfactual, additionality, discounting, double counting, distributional analysis, Aqua Book RIGOUR, and Flyvbjerg-style strategic misrepresentation detection. Returns a RAG scorecard with issues ranked by severity.

Transparent, rigorous research with full methodology — not a black-box API wrapper. Conducts exhaustive investigation through mandated 2-cycle research per theme, APA 7th citations, evidence hierarchy, and 3 user checkpoints. Self-contained using native OpenClaw tools (web_search, web_fetch, sessions_spawn). Use for literature reviews, competitive intelligence, or any research requiring academic rigor and reproducibility.

Structured methodology for solving, writing, and presenting hiring case studies for Senior Product Manager and Technical PM roles. Use when resolving a case study, reviewing a case study response, or building a presentation prototype from a completed case study. Covers the full process from problem understanding to final delivery, including data analysis, written response, and interactive presentation.

Provides a structured risk scoring methodology for Data Protection Impact Assessments aligned with ENISA threat taxonomy and ISO 29134. Covers likelihood and severity assessment, risk matrix construction, inherent vs residual risk calculation, and risk appetite thresholds per EDPB WP248rev.01 guidance. Keywords: risk scoring, DPIA risk matrix, likelihood, severity, ENISA, ISO 29134, residual risk, risk appetite.

Query the bundled research knowledge graph for methodology guidance. Routes questions through a 3-tier knowledge base — WHY (research claims), HOW (guidance docs), WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE (domain examples) — plus structured reference documents. Returns research-backed answers grounded in specific claims with practical application to the user's system. Triggers on "/ask", "/ask [question]", "why does my system...", "how should I...".

This skill should be used when working with BMAD (BMad-CORE) v6-alpha projects. BMAD is a universal human-AI collaboration platform with specialized modules for software development (BMM), agent building (BMB), creative intelligence (CIS), and project management (BMD). Use this skill to understand agent workflows, command patterns, scale-adaptive methodology, and effective utilization of the four-phase development system.

Use this skill when the user requests to review, analyze, critique, or summarize academic papers, research articles, preprints, or scientific publications. Supports comprehensive structured reviews covering methodology assessment, contribution evaluation, literature positioning, and constructive feedback generation. Trigger on queries involving paper URLs, uploaded PDFs, arXiv links, or requests like "review this paper", "analyze this research", "summarize this study", or "write a peer review".

Use this skill when the user asks how to design or improve a fleet safety scorecard — what KPIs to track, how to weight them, telematics signals vs document compliance vs roadside outcomes, monthly cadence, driver-facing vs admin-facing dashboards, gamification considerations, peer-comparison metrics, and how a scorecard ties to insurance premiums + retention. Reference SMS Methodology v3.20 for industry-standard weights.

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.

VS-Enhanced Quantitative Design Consultant with Materials & Sampling Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Avoids obvious experimental designs, proposes context-optimal quantitative strategies Absorbed C4 (Experimental Materials Developer) and D1 (Sampling Strategy Advisor) capabilities Use when: selecting quantitative research design, planning experimental/survey methodology, power analysis, developing materials, sampling Triggers: RCT, quasi-experimental, experimental design, survey design, power analysis, sample size, factorial design, materials, stimuli, sampling strategy

Autonomously optimize any Claude Code skill by running it repeatedly, scoring outputs against binary evals, mutating the prompt, and keeping improvements. Based on Karpathy's autoresearch methodology. Use when: optimize this skill, improve this skill, run autoresearch on, make this skill better, self-improve skill, benchmark skill, eval my skill, run evals on. Outputs: an improved SKILL.md, a results log, and a changelog of every mutation tried.

Systematic methodology for auditing the Hermes Skills Hub (and external sources) to identify gaps, overlaps, redundancies, and conflicts when building a skill library for any project. Covers browsing, targeted searching, cross-referencing with web/GitHub, comparing candidates against existing inventory, verifying install safety, and planning installation order. Use when starting a new project and assembling tools, or when evaluating whether to add external skills beyond what's currently installed.

Use to compare CX performance to a published or vendor benchmark without fooling yourself — scope mismatch, survivor bias, and definition mismatch usually make external benchmarks incomparable, and internal baselines often beat them. Trigger for "how do we compare to industry", "is our CSAT good", benchmark slide for the board, vendor benchmark report, "are we above average", outsourcing RFP benchmarks, or when someone cites a round-number industry standard.

Use when the user wants to extract reusable offensive security knowledge from any source and generate a SKILL.md file. Trigger on: "distill this", "extract skill from", "turn this into a skill", "generate skill from", "convert this report/blog/book/walkthrough into a skill", or when the user pastes raw security content (bug report, pentest report, CTF writeup, blog post, ezine, book chapter) and wants it transformed into structured hunting methodology.

Systematic API design methodology with 6 validated patterns covering parameter categorization, safe refactoring, audit-first approach, automated validation, quality gates, and example-driven documentation. Use when designing new APIs, improving API consistency, implementing breaking change policies, or building API quality enforcement. Provides deterministic decision trees (5-tier parameter system), validation tool architecture, pre-commit hook patterns. Validated with 82.5% cross-domain transferability, 37.5% efficiency gains through audit-first refactoring.

Comprehensive post-build verification of Shannon Framework's application outputs using three-layer methodology: Flow Verification (execution trace analysis), Artifact Verification (physical output inspection), and Functional Verification (runtime testing). Verifies Shannon built production-ready applications across all domains (Frontend, Backend, Database, Mobile, DevOps). Ensures NO MOCKS compliance, cross-platform functionality, and complete integration. Use after: Shannon builds any application via /shannon:wave, need to verify build quality, production readiness assessment.

Evaluate and improve interface usability using heuristic analysis. Use when the user mentions "usability audit", "UX review", "users are confused", "heuristic evaluation", "form usability", "navigation problems", "Nielsen heuristics", "cognitive walkthrough", or "usability testing". Also trigger when reviewing a design for usability issues, improving form completion rates, or evaluating information architecture and navigation. Covers Nielsens 10 heuristics, severity ratings, and information architecture. For visual design fixes, see refactoring-ui. For conversion-focused audits, see cro-methodology.

Build a complete marketing plan covering the full customer journey from stranger to raving fan. Use when the user mentions "marketing plan", "target market", "USP", "lead nurture", "customer lifetime value", "referral program", "marketing strategy", or "PVP Index". Also trigger when building a marketing plan from scratch, choosing acquisition channels, or designing end-to-end customer lifecycle campaigns. Covers the PVP Index, channel selection, and advocacy systems. For brand messaging, see storybrand-messaging. For conversion optimization, see cro-methodology.

World-class level design expertise - spatial storytelling, player flow, blockout methodology, and the invisible hand that guides players without them knowingUse when "level design, blockout, graybox, whitebox, player flow, level layout, combat arena, exploration space, map design, multiplayer map, pacing, weenie, landmark, gating, metroidvania, open world design, linear level, environmental storytelling, teaching through design, playtesting, heatmap, metrics, sightlines, level-design, game-development, spatial-design, blockout, graybox, player-flow, pacing, environmental-storytelling, combat-design, multiplayer-maps, open-world, linear-design, metroidvania" mentioned.

Audit websites and landing pages for conversion issues and design evidence-based A/B tests. Use when the user mentions "landing page isnt converting", "conversion rate", "A/B test", "why visitors leave", "objection handling", "bounce rate", "split testing", or "conversion funnel". Also trigger when diagnosing why signups are low, designing experiment hypotheses, or auditing checkout flows for friction points. Covers funnel mapping, persuasion assets, and objection/counter-objection frameworks. For overall marketing strategy, see one-page-marketing. For usability issues, see ux-heuristics.

Structured verbal communication framework for Senior PM and TPM interviews. Use when preparing for interviews, rehearsing answers, practicing English (or Spanish) delivery under pressure, or when any interview question needs to be answered in a crisp, structured way. Covers SCQA/STAR/C-F-I scaffolding, answer templates by question type, pushback handling, English- and Spanish-under-pressure tactics, and post-interview debrief methodology. Trigger on any variant of "how do I answer this?", "rehearse with me", "how would you say this?", or "practice interview question".

Operate Playwright for browser automation end to end: author and debug E2E test suites (robust locators, network interception and mocking, parallel workers, accessibility snapshot checks), wire them into CI, and drive headless browsing and scraping with an extract -> validate -> save loop. Use when writing, running, fixing, or scraping with Playwright, when a Playwright CI failure or JSON report needs triage, or when the bundled pwrun script should analyze a run. Do not use for QA strategy or test framework selection (route to qa-methodology), for frontend component or architecture design (route to frontend-engineering), or for Cloudflare/DDoS-GUARD challenge bypass (use flaresolverr).

Drafts litigation-ready U.S. pre-suit demand letters that function as settlement instruments and defensible future exhibits. Enforces element-driven narratives, verified authority, damages methodology, and ethics guardrails. Use this skill when the user mentions demand letter, pre-suit demand, breach and cure notice, settlement demand, insurance policy-limits demand, Stowers demand, FDCPA collection letter, notice of intent to file, cease and desist demand for payment, or pre-litigation correspondence. Also trigger when the user asks about FRE 408 framing, contractual notice compliance, statutory pre-suit prerequisites, evidence preservation notices, or quantifying damages for a demand package. Skill includes 14 verified real-letter exemplars referenced from `references/ARCHETYPE-INDEX.md`.

Simulates a full multi-reviewer journal review PANEL — 5 personas (Editor-in-Chief + 3 peer reviewers + a Devil's Advocate) debate a manuscript and produce a consensus Editorial Decision (accept/minor/major/reject) plus a prioritized Revision Roadmap. Modes: full, re-review (verify revisions addressed prior comments), quick, methodology-focus, Socratic guided. Use for: simulate peer review, mock review panel, editorial review before submission, multiple reviewer perspectives, re-review of a revised manuscript, or 'critique my paper hard'. For a single-reviewer referee report use alterlab-peer-review; for rubric/grade scoring use alterlab-scholar-eval; to write/revise the paper use alterlab-paper-writer. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.

Runs a 13-agent deep research pipeline for rigorous academic work on any topic across 7 modes (full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis), covering research-question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk-of-bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial and devil's-advocate review, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Use when the request mentions research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, or 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.