Results for “pr-review”

Conduct systematic reviews of privileged accounts to validate access rights, identify excessive permissions, and enforce least privilege across PAM infrastructure.

Guides systematic review of processing documentation for completeness against GDPR Articles 5, 13-14, 24, 28, and 30. Activate when auditing documentation or preparing for inspections. Keywords: documentation review, processing records, completeness, privacy notices, RoPA.

Conduct a thorough project-wide code review as an expert panel, cross-referencing specs, changelogs, and design documents

Use this skill when the user requests to review, analyze, critique, or summarize academic papers, research articles, preprints, or scientific publications. Supports comprehensive structured reviews covering methodology assessment, contribution evaluation, literature positioning, and constructive feedback generation. Trigger on queries involving paper URLs, uploaded PDFs, arXiv links, or requests like "review this paper", "analyze this research", "summarize this study", or "write a peer review".

Review git diffs or file scopes for code reuse, quality, efficiency, and clarity issues, then optionally apply safe, behavior-preserving fixes.

Reviews staged and unstaged code changes for security vulnerabilities, code quality issues, and adherence to project conventions, reporting findings by severity.

Expert code reviewer who provides constructive, actionable feedback focused on correctness, maintainability, security, and performance — not style preferences.

Elite code review expert specializing in modern AI-powered code analysis, security vulnerabilities, performance optimization, and production reliability. Masters static analysis tools, security scanning, and configuration review with 2024/2025 best practices. Use PROACTIVELY for code quality assurance.

Structured code quality assessment with Conventional Comments format, scaled review depth, and soft-gating verdicts preserving user autonomy.

Subjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands, prioritizing correctness over speed for high-stakes or unfamiliar code.

Install a local rebuttal workspace for academic papers with structured intake, reviewer analysis, and strategy planning to produce venue-compliant author responses.

Guides Mandarin practice sessions using the xuezh CLI for snapshots, reviews, and audio processing.

Review GitHub PRs and GitLab MRs with structured analysis including blast radius, security scanning, test coverage delta, breaking change detection, and performance impact.

Automates repeated rounds of Copilot code review on GitHub pull requests: triggers review, triages threads, dispatches parallel fix agents, commits, replies, and loops until convergence.

Creates a GitHub pull request with an auto-generated summary, running mandatory pre-commit and code-quality review gates, plus optional deep-review subagents, and posts findings into the PR body.

Guard pattern for cleanup scripts: verify QC sentinel files and prompt for human review before destructive operations

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

21-rule prose review workflow for technical and academic Markdown/LaTeX excerpts. Use when the user asks for muxing-style-review, wants a complete agent-style check combining check-human.md with agent-style audit-only evidence, wants a compact-rule check, wants a DeepSeek/Codex manuscript draft checked for clarity, evidence, citation discipline, terminology, AI-tell prose, or wants an A/B draft comparison. Prefer a dedicated review subagent when available for non-trivial reviews. Use the sibling style-review skill for the upstream post-hoc audit/polish workflow.

Evaluates iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS, and visionOS app code against Apple's App Store Review Guidelines to identify potential rejection issues before submission.

Delegate coding tasks to the OpenCode CLI, including one-shot runs, interactive sessions, and PR reviews.

Tracks media progress, reviews, collections, analytics, and calendar in Ryot, with automation support.

Runs read-only parallel review of a PR, branch, commit, or diff across bugs, security, tests, maintainability, performance, and UI.

Decide which pull-request review comments are actionable. Use when addressing review feedback, monitoring a PR, or filtering already-handled comments.

Structure compelling design presentations for stakeholders, reviews, and showcases.

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

Shortcut for security review on current change set. Runs layered checks (secret-scan, dep-audit, semgrep, OWASP patterns, prompt-injection review).

Agent profile for review iOS SwiftUI code, platform conventions, state flow, accessibility, performance, and App Store readiness. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Agent profile for review Android Compose code, lifecycle, permissions, navigation, Material behavior, performance, and Play release risks. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Create pull requests following Sentry conventions. Use when opening PRs, writing PR descriptions, or preparing changes for review. Follows Sentry's code review guidelines.

Turn a PR, diff, merge request, or patch stack into one evidence-first review brief with severity, missing-proof checks, and route-outs.

Reviews code diffs, PRs, issue queues, release readiness, commits, pushes, publishing, and project audits. Use when users ask in any language for code review, issue or PR triage, release gates, publishing follow-through, or project audits. Not for debugging root causes or prose review.

Analyzes type design for encapsulation, invariant expression, usefulness, and enforcement, providing scores and improvement suggestions.

Expert code review of current git changes with a senior engineer lens. Detects SOLID violations, security risks, and proposes actionable improvements.

Address Codex review comments on an open PR, re-run thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review, sync with the base branch, and push the updates. Use after a Codex (or human) review has landed on a PR you opened — the skill resolves each comment in code, marks the GitHub review thread resolved, then rebases/merges any new base-branch commits before pushing.

Publication Specialist - Writing, Review, Pre-registration & Quality Assurance Light VS applied: Avoids template-based writing + audience-specific message design Absorbed G3 (Peer Review Strategist), G4 (Pre-registration Composer), F1-F3 (Quality functions) capabilities Use when: writing abstracts, creating summaries, peer review response, pre-registration, reporting checklists, reproducibility Triggers: abstract, plain language, press release, summary, communication, peer review, revision, pre-registration, OSF, PRISMA, CONSORT, reproducibility

Reviews SwiftUI code for best practices on modern APIs, maintainability, and performance. This skill should be used when the user asks to review SwiftUI code, check for deprecated iOS/macOS APIs, validate data flow patterns, or audit accessibility compliance in Swift projects.