All Skills

Kit de ferramentas abrangente de computação quântica para construir, otimizar e executar circuitos quânticos. Use quando trabalhar com algoritmos quânticos, simulações ou hardware quântico, incluindo (1) Construção de circuitos quânticos com portas e medições, (2) Execução de algoritmos quânticos (VQE, QAOA, Grover), (3) Transpilar/otimizar circuitos para hardware, (4) Executar em IBM Quantum ou outros provedores, (5) Química quântica e ciência dos materiais, (6) Aprendizado de máquina quântico, (7) Visualizar circuitos e resultados, ou (8) Qualquer tarefa de desenvolvimento de computação quântica.

Template do pack (ai-ml/03-rag-pipeline.md). Orienta o agente em integracao de IA/ML, LLM e pipelines de dados alinhado a esse contexto.

Especialista em backend reativo Convex: design de schema, funções TypeScript, assinaturas em tempo real, autenticação, armazenamento de arquivos, agendamento e deploy.

Modelagem metabólica baseada em restrições (COBRA). FBA, FVA, knockouts de genes, amostragem de fluxo, modelos SBML, para análise de biologia de sistemas e engenharia metabólica.

Filtros de química medicinal. Aplique regras de similaridade a fármacos (Lipinski, Veber), filtros PAINS, alertas estruturais, métricas de complexidade, para priorização de compostos e filtragem de bibliotecas.

Rastreie sites inteiros usando a API /crawl do Cloudflare Browser Rendering. Inicia jobs de rastreamento assíncronos, monitora a conclusão e salva os resultados como arquivos markdown. Útil para ingerir sites de documentação, bases de conhecimento ou qualquer conteúdo web no contexto do seu projeto. Requer variáveis de ambiente CLOUDFLARE_ACCOUNT_ID e CLOUDFLARE_API_TOKEN.

Build throwaway code that answers exactly one design question — a tiny terminal app to feel out logic/state models, or several radically different UI variants switchable on one route. Use when the user wants to "prototype", "mock up", "sketch", "try a few versions", "see what it'd look like", "feel out this state machine", or is stuck choosing between designs they can only judge by seeing or driving them. Also used by the whiteboard skill for napkin-type tickets.

Reconstruct a product flow, then audit how usable it is — whether it makes sense, where users get confused or stuck, whether the copy and instructions are clear, and where friction causes drop-off. Produces a prioritized, severity-weighted findings report. Works from three inputs: frontend code in a repo, a live running app driven via a browser, or a written flow / spec / screenshots. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a UX review, usability audit, "is this flow confusing", "does this signup/onboarding/checkout make sense", "why are people dropping off", "audit this form", "where's the friction", or hands over a flow and asks whether it's user-friendly. Trigger even on casual phrasings ("is my checkout any good?") — it imposes the structure ad-hoc UX opinions miss. Audits flow usability and friction; for visual polish and interface quality the impeccable audit/critique skills apply instead.

Plan a chunk of work too big for one agent session by putting it on a shared whiteboard — a map of investigation tickets on GitHub Issues — working them until nothing is left to decide, then snapshotting the board into a handoff artifact. Tickets needing nobody are worked back-to-back; the session stops when the human is the blocker. Use only when the user explicitly invokes whiteboard or asks to draw, work, run, or snapshot a whiteboard/map — not for ordinary planning requests.

Analyze a website page's UI for obvious oddities: the same information repeated multiple times (a phone number shown three times in the header, a '24/7' badge in two places, a bullet list restating the paragraph above it), duplicated or near-duplicate copy and sections, stray/orphaned text near CTAs, copy that doesn't match the business or section subject, placeholder text, overcrowded heroes, misaligned elements, and imagery that doesn't fit the business. Use this whenever the user asks to check, audit, review, sanity-check, QA, or 'look over' a web page, landing page, or UI — whether they give a live URL, a localhost/dev-server URL, a screenshot, or HTML/JSX/template files — even if they only say something casual like 'does this page look right?', 'find anything weird on this page', or 'anything off about my landing page?'.

Show the quick-reference guide for the whiteboard planning system (whiteboard, hot-seat, napkin, connotation-cop) — the flow, what to say, and the rules. Use when the user asks "whiteboard help", "how do I use the whiteboard", "what's the flow", "remind me how whiteboard works", "which skill do I use", or seems unsure how to start or continue a whiteboard effort. This skill only DISPLAYS the guide — it never starts a board, resolves tickets, or does any work.

Score any piece of writing for AI-generation tells and produce a weighted 0-100 scorecard with flagged evidence and ranked fixes. Use this skill whenever the user asks "does this sound AI-written", "run this through the AI detector", "score this writing", "check this for AI tells", "would this pass as human", "humanize check", or wants any article, blog post, email, or copy audited for AI patterns before publishing. Also use it when the user pastes or points to text and asks how it reads, whether it's too "ChatGPT-ish", or wants a QA pass on generated content. Works on pasted text, files, and URLs.

Design the architecture for a multi-command skill system — the shared state schema, the command map, the router, and the boundary each command stops at — before any skill files get written. Use when the user wants to turn one skill into a system, combine several related or overlapping skills into a single coherent one, build a skill with subcommands (like `/thing audit`, `/thing polish`), design a suite, family, or collection of skills, or asks "how should I structure this skill set". Also trigger on "skill system", "skill architecture", "multi-command skill", "system of skills", "make these skills work together", "skill with slash commands", or complaints that their skills overlap, collide, duplicate each other, or never fire. Produces an architecture spec only — it never writes SKILL.md or reference files. Hand the finished spec to skill-creator to build from.

Flip a problem, goal, or decision 180 degrees to find what forward thinking misses. Asks what would guarantee failure, then works backward to what must be avoided or changed. Load when the user says "invert this", "flip this problem", "what would guarantee failure", "think backward", "reverse engineer the goal", "think about it backwards", or when deep-thinking diagnoses an inversion frame. Also triggers on "what's the opposite of success here", "how would we sabotage this". Two methods: Failure Inversion and Opposite Goal. Max 2 clarifying questions before inverting. Always returns forward actions. For broader analysis, deep-thinking calls this.

Run a pre-mortem — imagine the project has already failed one year from now and work backward to find the root causes before they happen. Load when the user asks for a pre-mortem, wants to imagine failure before committing, asks "what could go wrong before we start", "assume this fails — why", "risk analysis before launch", "what kills this project", "what could go wrong", or when deep-thinking diagnoses a pre-mortem frame. Based on Gary Klein's prospective hindsight method, which surfaces failure causes more effectively than forward risk analysis. Most useful right before a major commitment.

Apply one logical code change with mandatory impact mapping, git snapshot, verification, and automatic revert on failure. Load when the user asks for a safe edit, verified change, one change at a time with rollback, or codespine-style edit loop. Also triggers on "safe change", "edit with verification", "don't break the build", "revert if tests fail", or any non-trivial code edit where blast radius matters. Always runs dependency-mapping first. Pairs with incremental-implementation for multi-slice work; this skill is one atomic verify cycle per invocation.

Author pull requests with intent-separated commits, blast-radius disclosure, and verification evidence. Load when opening a PR, writing a PR description, separating refactor from feature commits, or summarizing a change set for review. Also triggers on "write the PR", "PR body", "intent-separated commits", "split refactor from feature", "pr summary", or after safe-change cycles complete. Extends git-workflow-and-versioning — does not replace it.

Create handcrafted static SVG graphics and performant SVG animations — icons, illustrations, loaders, path-draw effects, morphing shapes, and motion paths. Load when the user asks to create SVG, draw an SVG icon, animate an SVG, make an SVG loader, path animation, shape morph, animated logo, line drawing effect, or improve trashy AI-generated SVG. Also triggers on "SVG animation", "SMIL", "stroke-dashoffset", "vector illustration", or "self-contained animated SVG".

Review a built frontend against its chosen direction, catch drift back to generic AI defaults, enforce state coverage, ethical patterns, UX heuristics, and polish, and check contrast with APCA (not the legacy WCAG ratio). Produces specific, prioritized fixes — never vibes-based feedback. Works with pasted screenshots or Playwright MCP automated capture. Load when the user asks to review a UI, audit a design, check if a frontend looks generic or vibecoded, evaluate visual quality or polish, says "review this UI", "is this design good", "audit my frontend", "does this feel like [product]", "design QA", or when frontend-design routes here. Sub-skill of frontend-design.

Retrieve task-relevant project and global memory without loading everything. Load when the user asks what we decided, recall prior context, find memory about a feature, explain past rationale, resume a task, or check deferred ideas.

Internal skill. Called by setup-evaluation after a PASS. Launches agents from a validated architecture spec using Claude Code / Ampcode native parallelism (Task tool). Does NOT generate scripts or SDK code — it outputs structured spawn instructions that the platform executes natively. Never invoked directly by the user. Never launches without a setup-evaluation PASS.

Capture durable project memory from work, debates, debugging discoveries, learned conventions, deferred options, and session outcomes. Load when the user says remember this, save this learning, record what happened, update project memory, or preserve context for future agents.

Research a skill domain before building or improving a skill. Searches academic papers, practitioner blogs, and GitHub skill repos in parallel to find current best practices, domain gotchas, and existing skill patterns. Called by universal-skill-creator and improve-skills before writing any skill. Also load directly when the user asks to research a domain for a skill, find existing skills on a topic, discover best practices for a skill, check what research exists before building an agent skill, or says "what does current research say about", "find best practices for".

Gracefully retire a skill that is redundant, superseded, or no longer earning its place in the context window. Load when improve-skills finds a skill scoring 0-5/14 AND research confirms the domain is now handled natively by current models, when two skills have overlapping triggers and one subsumes the other, when the user asks to remove a skill, retire a skill, delete a skill, or clean up redundant skills, or when validate-skills flags a skill as a duplicate trigger risk. Handles removal cleanly: updates all callers, removes from AGENTS.md, updates README, and archives rather than deletes so the skill can be recovered if needed.

Score an unbuilt business idea on desirability, viability, feasibility, distribution wedge, why-now, founder-market-fit, market size, alternatives, defensibility, capital intensity, and regulatory/ethical risk — and return a GO / ITERATE / KILL verdict with kill criteria and a next kill test. Load when the user asks to evaluate a business idea, score a startup idea, screen an idea, decide whether to pursue this venture, do an idea review, or says "is this a good business idea", "should I build this", "evaluate this startup", "screen this idea", "go/no-go on this idea", "kill or pursue". Sub-skill of `venture-exploration`. Calls `fermi` for sizing, `assumption-mapping` for hidden beliefs, optional `pre-mortem` / `adversarial-hat` for high-stakes ideas. Does NOT evaluate built products — for that use `reality-check`.

Record durable project decisions with rationale, alternatives, assumptions, status, and revisit triggers. Load when the user says record this decision, we decided, decision log, why did we choose, revisit this later, or capture architectural/process rationale.

Review code changes for correctness, completeness, bugs, edge cases, and quality. Load when the user explicitly asks to review code, check a PR, review a diff, audit recent changes, or verify an implementation matches requirements. Also triggers on "review this code", "check this PR", "review my changes", "code review", "did this implement correctly", "audit this diff", or any explicit request for a formal code review. Do NOT load for "review changes for context" or "review what happened" — those are requests to read code, not to perform a formal review.

Validate process decomposition and architecture design quality before execution begins. Load when the setup-evaluator agent fires (automatic for agent-chain tasks), or when user says "evaluate this setup", "check the decomposition", "validate the architecture", "is this plan sound", "review the agent design". Catches structural errors, missing knowledge, unrealistic step ordering, and topology mismatches. Does NOT modify — only evaluates.

Surface every assumption embedded in a plan, strategy, or document, assess how critical and how validated each one is, and identify which ones to test first. Load when the user asks to map assumptions, surface hidden beliefs, find what must be true for this to work, run an assumption audit, or when deep-thinking diagnoses an assumption frame. Also triggers on "what are we assuming", "what must be true for this to work", or "find the untested beliefs". Based on David Bland and Alex Osterwalder's assumption mapping method from Testing Business Ideas.

Analyse experiment results, run validity checks (SRM, exposure parity, data integrity, novelty/primacy), interpret causally, make a ship/iterate/kill decision against the pre-declared rule, and append to cumulative learnings. Forces honest readouts — strips significance claims from underpowered or peek-violating tests; never lets directional results masquerade as causal wins. Load when results exist, or when the user says "read out this experiment", "analyse the test", "did the test win", "interpret the results", "what did we learn", "ship or kill", or when the experimentation orchestrator routes here.

Decompose tasks into structured, outcome-defined process entries with complexity triage. Load when user says "decompose this", "break this down", "what steps do I need", "plan this out", "what's the process for", "how do I approach this", or when any complex task needs structured execution planning. Includes a problem-understanding pass before complexity triage. Routes to `problem-to-plan` when the user needs planning deliverables (spec + plan + TODO). Does NOT replace brainstorming — brainstorming is design approval (upstream), this is execution planning (downstream).

Orchestrator for agent harness work — the setup that makes AI agents follow project rules and improve when they fail. FIRES PROACTIVELY when agents misbehave, repeat mistakes, ignore instructions, skip skills, or when AGENTS.md exists but docs/harness/manifest.json is missing. Also triggers on: harness engineering, agent scaffold, agent keeps failing, agent not following instructions, make agents reliable, agents going off rails, agent forgot context, improve agent setup, self-improving agents, agents keep making mistakes, why is my agent bad, agent quality, agent setup broken, agents ignore skills, same mistake again, fix agent behavior, tune agent instructions, set up agent infrastructure, after project setup agents still bad. Routes bootstrap vs evolution. Not multi-agent topology — agent-builder.

Design and implement CI/CD pipelines and automation — fast checks on every PR, safe releases, and repeatable workflows. Load when setting up GitHub Actions (or similar), adding pre-merge gates, automating releases, or the user asks "add CI", "set up workflows", "automate checks", "CD pipeline". Not for one-off local scripts (use task-specific tooling).

Imported skill app from langchain

Imported skill parser from vercel

Imported skill diff from langchain