Results for “plan-structure”

Expert YouTube scriptwriting skill for creators who want to write videos that hold attention, deliver value, and grow a channel. Use this skill whenever the user wants to write or improve a YouTube video script, craft a stronger hook or intro, structure a video idea, write a YouTube title or description, or plan a video outline. Triggers: "write a YouTube script", "help me script my video", "I'm making a video about", "write an intro for my video", "help me with my hook", "write a YouTube description", "how should I structure this video", "make my script more engaging", or any request related to YouTube video content. Do NOT limit to obvious script requests — if the user has a topic or idea and mentions YouTube, use this skill.

When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, or monetization strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'pricing,' 'pricing tiers,' 'freemium,' 'free trial,' 'packaging,' 'price increase,' 'value metric,' 'Van Westendorp,' 'willingness to pay,' 'monetization,' 'how much should I charge,' 'my pricing is wrong,' 'pricing page,' 'annual vs monthly,' 'per seat pricing,' 'should I offer a free plan,' 'pricing page teardown,' 'pricing page audit,' 'is my pricing page AI-readable,' or 'can AI read my pricing.' Use this whenever someone is figuring out what to charge, how to structure their plans, or wants to audit a pricing page (for humans and for the AI agents that shortlist tools). For in-app upgrade screens, see paywalls. For offer construction (bonuses, guarantees, value framing, naming) on services/courses/coaching/high-ticket B2B, see offers.

World-class autonomous sales and revenue skill system. Use ANY time the user asks to sell, pitch, prospect, close, negotiate, launch, monetize, build funnels, write outreach, craft proposals, develop pricing, design offers, write sales copy, create email sequences, plan campaigns, position products, handle objections, create playbooks, build pipeline, forecast revenue, develop GTM strategy, optimize conversions, write ad copy, create sales decks, score leads, nurture prospects, upsell, cross-sell, retain customers, write case studies, price products, structure enterprise deals, create battle cards, script discovery calls, build affiliate programs, plan product launches, create webinar funnels, design pricing pages, A/B test offers, analyze unit economics, calculate LTV/CAC, or ANY other sales, revenue, monetization, go-to-market, or commercial growth task. If it involves selling, revenue, deals, pipeline, or commercial strategy — USE THIS SKILL. Trigger aggressively.

Full project analysis for an unfamiliar Sage/Acorn/Lando project — discovers CPTs, routes, ACF field groups, Livewire components, Service Providers, active plans, installed packages; produces a structured project overview with health status and recommended next steps. Invoke for: "/onboarding", "I'm new to this project", "what does this project do", "show me what exists", "project overview", "orient me to this codebase", "what exists in this project". Skip when: you already know the project — the session-start hook already provided basic stack info; invoke the target skill directly instead.

Full architectural preferences and skill routing map for Sage/Acorn projects — complete workflow ecosystem reference, Lando command tables, design tool URL routing (Paper/Stitch/Figma/Pencil/Playwright), MCP query patterns, discover-abilities, execute-ability, WordPress MCP Adapter, plan system structure, integration with base superpowers skills. Invoke for: "which skill should I use", "architectural preferences", "design tool routing", "mcp query patterns", "full skill list", "sage ecosystem overview", "when to use Livewire vs Blade", "Acorn vs WordPress pattern decision". Skip when: the session-start routing table already covers your decision — invoke the target skill directly instead of loading this overview first.

Build multiple genuinely different versions of a UI piece you describe, rendered behind a visual picker so you can flip through them live and promote the one that feels right. Use this proactively, without waiting to be asked, whenever evaluating a new feature, a layout, a section, a visual, a design, or any UI decision — divergent options beat a single guess. Fast, no interview, single-component scope. For a full structured exploration (interview, 5 variants of a whole page, real feedback collection, implementation plan) when the direction itself is still open, use `design-lab` instead — that one requires explicit invocation. Source: github.com/emilkowalski/skills.

Use when delivery work needs structuring into epics — defining a new epic, refining or superseding an existing one, or decomposing a PRD's requirements into durable delivery structures that feed issue decomposition. Writes docs/product/epics/NN-<slug>.md (durable, id-stable, superseded-never-deleted), each epic tracing to the JTBD ids it serves and the PRD requirement IDs it bundles. In the A-Team pipeline this is a definition-phase output ("the Epics"). Do not use for full roadmap/portfolio planning across quarters (deliberately not ported), for delivery tickets or acceptance criteria (ticket-writer), or to create or revise jobs (jobs-to-be-done).

Structured threat modeling skill using the PASTA framework (Process for Attack Simulation and Threat Analysis) combined with Adam Shostack's 4-question framework. Use this skill whenever the user asks to do threat modeling, security analysis, map the attack surface, identify threats, or review an application for security risks — even if they don't mention PASTA or a specific framework by name. Core activities: Component Mapping (architecture + data flows), Critical Assessment (business impact prioritization), and Logic Flaw Identification (attacker mindset on business logic). Produces: component map diagram (Mermaid), data flow diagram (Mermaid), attack tree (Mermaid), STRIDE threat table, prioritized risk register, and an actionable mitigation plan. Invoke proactively for any security review, architecture review, or "what could go wrong?" session.

Local CLI issue tracker for todos, follow-ups, structured records, and the canonical pattern for decomposing multi-step work into a parent + subissues with acceptance criteria, dependency edges, and priority. Use when the user mentions a task to remember, a bug to track, an open question, anything that needs to outlive the current turn, or when planning multi-heartbeat work that needs `chainlink issue ready`-driven pickup across sessions. Includes guidance on writing descriptions future-you can act on (handles, success path, failure path) and idempotency tactics for actions that might fire twice (boundary firing, overlapping heartbeats, retried subagent completion). Pairs with five-whys (chainlink is the storage backend for RCA trees). Storage is local — issues live under a `.chainlink/` directory in the operator's repo.

Use BEFORE generating, refactoring, reviewing, or debugging code. Trigger phrases include "write a function/script/class for X", "review this code/diff/PR", "refactor this", "debug this error", "is this implementation correct", "what's wrong with this code", "improve this code", "translate from X to Y", or any prompt with a code block the user wants you to act on. Also fires when planning architectural changes, picking algorithms or data structures, or evaluating dependency upgrades. Calls the code MCP tool to retrieve an engineering scaffold (failure pattern, procedure, correct-pattern example, verification step) before generating. Catches hallucinated APIs, lost edge cases, premature algorithm commitment, silent contract violations, refactors that change behavior masked by passing tests. Do NOT trigger for pure code reading with no action requested, simple syntax questions, file...

Conduct a design interview, generate 5 distinct UI variations in a temporary route, collect real click-to-comment feedback on the live rendered variants via human-review, and produce an implementation plan. Use when the user wants to explore UI design options, redesign an existing component/page, or create new UI with multiple genuinely different approaches to compare — before writing production code or committing to a direction. For a lighter, single-component variant picker with no interview, use `prototype` instead. For reviewing a UI that's already real (not exploring new directions), use `visual-review`. Source: adapted from github.com/0xdesign/design-plugin's design-lab skill (interview + 5-variant structure), with feedback collection replaced by this repo's own `visual-review` skill (human-review) instead of a bespoke overlay component.

When the user wants to design, construct, or improve an offer — the thing they actually sell — including value framing, bonus stacking, guarantee design, scarcity/urgency, naming, and payment structure. Also use when the user mentions 'offer,' 'offer design,' 'build an offer,' 'grand slam offer,' 'irresistible offer,' 'value stack,' 'bonus stack,' 'guarantee,' 'risk reversal,' 'money-back guarantee,' 'scarcity,' 'urgency,' 'high-ticket offer,' 'productize a service,' 'naming an offer,' 'payment plan,' 'down-sell,' 'upsell offer,' or 'why isn't my offer converting.' Best for services, agencies, courses, coaching, info products, high-ticket B2B, and direct-response. If you run pure self-serve SaaS, read pricing first — tiers and packaging do more work there. For price level itself (tiers, freemium, value metric), see pricing. For the page that presents the offer, see copywriting. For the launch moment, see launch. For sales collateral, see sales-enablement.

Expert Socratic discovery skill for exploring ideas, architecture decisions, and technical design before writing any code. Use this skill — proactively and always first — when requirements are vague, when the user is debating between technical approaches, when the problem is unclear, or when a design decision could have significant architectural consequences. Triggers on: "should we use X or Y", "help me think through", "I'm not sure how to approach this", "what's the best architecture for", "trade-offs between", "design before I code", "let's think through this", "I have an idea", "how should I structure", "help me design", "I want to build X but not sure how", "what approach would you recommend", "is this the right way to". Produces a validated design doc with 2-3 implementation options, trade-offs, and a recommendation. Always use before planning when the approach is not yet locked.

Captures and organizes chaotic brain dumps into a structured, actionable system with zero information loss. Use this skill whenever the user says 'capture this', 'brain dump', 'let me dump some ideas', 'I've got a bunch of thoughts', 'here's everything on my mind', 'idea dump', 'let me get this out of my head', 'I need to organize my thoughts', 'here's what I'm thinking', or any variation where someone is unloading a messy stream of ideas, tasks, thoughts, and plans wanting them turned into something coherent. Also trigger when the user pastes or dictates a long, unstructured block of mixed ideas — even without the exact phrase — the intent is the same. Fast-to-action by design: no upfront intake. Output is four sections (Projects/Ideas, Tasks, Connections, How I Can Help) ending with a directive question. Asks at most one mid-organization clarifying question when a single item is genuinely ambiguous between task and project.

Audit a landing page or marketing site through one lens: what is the ONE thing this page wants the visitor to do, and does every element on the page move them toward it? Reconstructs who lands on the page and why, spawns visitor-persona agents to react to it cold, maps the belief chain a visitor must climb before acting, inventories CTAs and everything competing with them, then delivers a prioritized cut/move/add/rewrite plan. Use whenever the user asks "what do we want people to do on this page", "is this page converting", "critique this landing page", "why would someone book/buy/sign up here", "audit the funnel on X page", or wants strategic critique of page content and structure (not visual polish). Works from frontend code in a repo, a live URL via browser tools, or pasted copy/screenshots. Judges persuasion and intent-alignment; for flow usability and friction use ux-audit, for visual and aesthetic quality use the impeccable critique/audit skills.

Turn any rough prompt, half-formed idea, or task description into a finished, ready-to-send prompt optimized for Opus 4.8 (with adaptive thinking) inside the chat app — claude.ai, the Mac app, the iOS app — NOT the API. Use this skill whenever the user wants to write, rewrite, optimize, improve, sharpen, or polish a prompt for the chat app. Trigger phrases include "rewrite this prompt", "make this a better prompt", "optimize this prompt", "turn this into a prompt", "help me prompt this", "draft a prompt that...", "I want to ask...", or whenever the user pastes a draft prompt and asks for improvements. Also trigger when the user describes a task they plan to send into the chat app and clearly wants a reusable, well-structured prompt rather than a direct answer. The output is always a single, copy-pasteable prompt in a code block that the user sends as-is — never a template with placeholders. When the request concerns the user's own work, the skill retrieves the real specifics first — memory, meeting transcript