Results for “rev-ai”

VS-Enhanced Academic Style Auditor - Academic Writing Quality Analysis Identifies 24+ writing patterns that reduce scholarly quality, adapted from Wikipedia AI Cleanup guidelines Use when: checking drafts before submission, improving academic writing quality, preparing for style improvement Triggers: writing quality, style audit, pattern check, writing review, academic style check

Orchestrator + builder for distinctive, production-grade frontends that don't look AI-generated. Derives stack and design context from product-soul/PRD/specs, then runs the anti-slop chain — explore distinct directions, lock a DESIGN.md system, build from golden examples with mandatory polish + every interactive/empty/loading/error state, then review. Load when the user asks to build a UI, design a frontend, build a landing page or dashboard or web app, beautify or redesign a page, make a UI look premium/playful/editorial, says "build me a frontend", "make this not look AI-generated", "design this interface", "give this real polish", or "frontend design". Routes to design-direction, design-system, design-review.

When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," "SEO health check," "my traffic dropped," "lost rankings," "not showing up in Google," "site isn't ranking," "Google update hit me," "page speed," "core web vitals," "crawl errors," or "indexing issues." Use this even if the user just says something vague like "my SEO is bad" or "help with SEO" — start with an audit. For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema. For AI search optimization, see ai-seo.

Look up current research and scientific information across three backends: fast web search, deep multi-source synthesis, and scholarly paper searches. Automatically routes each query to the best backend and saves every result for reproducible citation.

Audits codebases for common security vulnerabilities that AI coding assistants introduce in "vibe-coded" applications. Checks for exposed API keys, broken access control (Supabase RLS, Firebase rules), missing auth validation, client-side trust issues, insecure payment flows, and more. Use this skill whenever the user asks about security, wants a code review, mentions "vibe coding", or when you're writing or reviewing code that handles authentication, payments, database access, API keys, secrets, or user data — even if they don't explicitly mention security. Also trigger when the user says things like "is this safe?", "check my code", "audit this", "review for vulnerabilities", or "can someone hack this?".

Use to audit a customer-facing support bot or AI agent for harm rather than for volume — manipulation and prompt-injection attempts, customers stranded without a human, fabricated answers, and unsafe commitments or disclosures. Trigger for "are people trying to jailbreak our bot", "show me attempts to manipulate the assistant", "is our bot giving wrong answers", "customers stuck with the bot and never got a human", or reviewing an AI agent before or after launch.

Decentralized git for AI agents and humans. Use when the user wants to create repositories, push code, open pull requests, review and merge PRs, manage issues, create or claim bounties, delegate tasks to other agents, register human-readable names on Base L2, or interact with the gitlawb decentralized git network. Supports cryptographic DID identities, Ed25519-signed pushes, UCAN capability delegation, libp2p networking, and 31+ MCP tools for AI agent integration. Do NOT use for GitHub, GitLab, or other centralized git hosts.

When the user wants to add, fix, or optimize schema markup and structured data on their site. Also use when the user mentions "schema markup," "structured data," "JSON-LD," "rich snippets," "schema.org," "FAQ schema," "product schema," "review schema," "breadcrumb schema," "Google rich results," "knowledge panel," "star ratings in search," or "add structured data." Use this whenever someone wants their pages to show enhanced results in Google. For broader SEO issues, see seo-audit. For AI search optimization, see ai-seo.

English LaTeX academic paper assistant for existing `.tex` projects. Use this skill whenever the user wants to compile, lint, audit, or improve an English LaTeX conference or journal paper such as IEEE, ACM, Springer, NeurIPS, or ICML submissions. Trigger even when the user only mentions one paper issue, such as bibliography errors, grammar cleanup, sentence splitting, logic review, expression polishing, translation, title optimization, figure checks, pseudocode review, algorithm block cleanup, de-AI editing, or experiment-section review. Also trigger for "proofread my paper", "fix my LaTeX", "prepare for submission", "check my manuscript", "improve my writing", `algorithm2e`, `algorithmicx`, `algpseudocodex`, `Require/Ensure`, or "Algorithm 1" when the user has a .tex file.

Verify whether an online bounty, freelance task, agent marketplace job, hackathon prize, or crypto work offer is actually open, accessible, and credibly funded. Use when evaluating task URLs, payout claims, escrow or treasury evidence, eligibility restrictions, payment history, expected value, or whether a claimed amount may be counted as real revenue.

When the user wants to create, generate, or produce video content using AI tools or programmatic frameworks. Also use when the user mentions 'video production,' 'AI video,' 'Remotion,' 'Hyperframes,' 'HeyGen,' 'Synthesia,' 'Veo,' 'Sora,' 'Runway,' 'Kling,' 'Seedance,' 'Hailuo,' 'MiniMax,' 'Pika,' 'Hunyuan,' 'Wan,' 'video generation,' 'AI avatar,' 'talking head video,' 'programmatic video,' 'video template,' 'explainer video,' 'product demo video,' 'video pipeline,' 'copy this edit,' 'match this video style,' 'reverse-engineer this video,' 'edit like this reference,' or 'make me a video.' Use this for video creation, generation, and production workflows. For video content strategy and what to post, see social. For paid video ad creative, see ad-creative.

Design and verify auditable human oversight, approval gates, escalation paths, and safe state transitions for AI agent workflows. Use when deciding which agent actions require review, adding approve/reject or dual-control flows, preventing unauthorized autonomous effects, creating decision records, reducing rubber-stamping, or recovering safely from rejected, expired, or failed actions.

Threat-model and harden AI agents, RAG systems, assistants, and tool-using workflows against direct, indirect, stored, cross-agent, and multimodal prompt injection. Use when reviewing an agent architecture, isolating untrusted content, constraining tools and egress, protecting secrets, adding injection-focused tests, investigating a suspected injection incident, or documenting residual prompt-injection risk.

Use when answering questions about IFRS standards, IAS standards, IASB, financial reporting, revenue recognition, lease accounting, impairment, financial instruments, expected credit loss, ECL, consolidation, business combinations, fair value measurement, first-time adoption, deferred tax, provisions, insurance contracts, journal entries, disclosure requirements, IFRS compliance checks, audit support, GAAP differences, goodwill, or transitioning from local GAAP to IFRS.

Query the U.S. Treasury Fiscal Data REST API for federal financial data including national debt, daily and monthly treasury statements, securities auctions, interest rates, exchange rates, savings bonds, and government revenue and spending statistics. No API key required.

>- Production Part Approval Process (PPAP) — verify PPAP submission level, audit all 18 elements, check completeness for customer approval, prepare PSW. Use when a supplier needs to submit parts for approval, when reviewing a PPAP package, or when determining which PPAP level is required. Covers AIAG PPAP 4th edition with Ford, BMW, VW, and Stellantis OEM-specific requirements.

Use when planning a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) project timeline from venue and category selection through submission, the two-stage review with early reject and rebuttal, artifact evaluation by the AEC, and the LNCS open-access camera-ready, with backward-planning offsets for a verification-tool paper and honest handling of the single-annual-deadline cycle.

>- Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) — plan and track a new product launch through all 5 phases, identify deliverables per phase, run gate reviews, and ensure quality outputs are complete before Start of Production (SOP). Use when launching a new part, managing an APQP project, or auditing APQP completeness. Covers AIAG APQP 2nd edition and IATF 16949 §8.3.

Apply world-class developer documentation principles (Stripe, Snowflake, Databricks, TiDB Cloud) to structure, write, review, or refactor technical documentation. Use this skill whenever the user mentions documentation, docs, sidebar or navigation, information architecture, restructuring a section, writing or editing a guide, reviewing docs, where content belongs, English doc prose, headings, code comments, link text, docs home pages, section landing pages, long-form guides mixing content types, cross-referencing, or making docs readable for AI agents and LLMs. Covers VeloDB Cloud docs work (Monitoring restructure, sidebar, EN/中文 alignment, writing style, landing pages, LLM-friendly docs) and any SaaS or database documentation task. Trigger broadly: if the conversation touches doc organization, page structure, doc quality, doc sentences, landing pages, or AI-readable docs, consult this skill rather than answering from intuition.

PROACTIVE SKILL — automatically apply whenever writing, generating, or editing any text that is mainly in Chinese. No user trigger needed. Also use when the user explicitly asks to "fix Chinese", "修改中文", "去翻译腔", "去AI味", "fix Chinese formatting", or "review Chinese text". Eliminates AI-sounding expressions and translation artifacts. Enforces Chinese-English mixed formatting rules (spacing, punctuation, bold formatting).

Discover, find, compare, audit, repair, adapt, craft, run, debrief, and prepare repeatable AI-agent loops for publication. Use when a user asks to analyze code or coding threads for recurring work, find a published loop, interview them to turn a goal into a bounded loop, review a loop...

Audits natural-language programming artifacts such as SKILL.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, slash commands, plugin manifests, hooks, rules, and prompt files. Use when reviewing AI-agent repositories, checking manifest-vs-disk consistency, scoring skill or agent quality, adding NL artifact CI gates, or diagnosing vocabulary and version drift across Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and Antigravity-style projects.

Query real-time and historical equity market data—prices, news, financial statements, metrics, analyst estimates, insider and institutional activity, SEC filings, earnings press releases, segmented revenues, stock screening, and macro interest rates. Use when you need broad public-market research from a single AIsa-backed skill. Use when: the user needs market data, stock analysis, dividend research, or read-only financial data workflows.

Rewrite, draft, and review prose so it is clear, specific, human, and appropriate to context. Use this skill when improving emails, essays, documents, reports, UI copy, marketing copy, posts, or any text that may sound generic, AI-written, over-polished, verbose, salesy, evasive, or structurally formulaic. Supports voice calibration, anti-slop audits, context-aware taste decisions, and final pre-flight checks.

Expert prompt optimization system for the prompts INSIDE an AI product you are building — system prompts, LLM feature prompts, chatbot/agent instructions. Use when the user wants to write or improve a system prompt for an AI feature they're shipping, review/critique an LLM prompt, apply prompt-engineering techniques (chain-of-thought, few-shot, structured output, hard constraints) to a product prompt, or optimize cost/latency of a production prompt. Do NOT use this to clarify or structure the user's own vague request to Claude Code — that is `prompt-clarifier`'s job, not this skill's.

Reverse-engineer any codebase into a complete Product Requirements Document (PRD). Analyzes routes, components, state management, API integrations, and user interactions to produce business-readable documentation detailed enough for engineers or AI agents to fully reconstruct every page and endpoint. Works with frontend frameworks (React, Vue, Angular, Svelte, Next.js, Nuxt), backend frameworks (NestJS, Django, Express, FastAPI), and fullstack applications. Trigger when users mention: generate PRD, reverse-engineer requirements, code to documentation, extract product specs from code, document page logic, analyze page fields and interactions, create a functional inventory, write requirements from an existing codebase, document API endpoints, or analyze backend routes.

Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.

For a repository in the babysitter-users catalog, locate its babysitter processes and any committed runs (.a5c/runs/<runId>/) and perform a retrospective on a chosen run -- what went well, what failed, process suggestions, quality of effect design, breakpoint patterns -- mirroring the /babysitter:retrospect workflow but applied to an external repo. Invoke when asked to "retrospect on repo X's run", "analyze how someone else used babysitter", or "review an external babysitter run".

Capture exact React element context from a live browser UI and hand it to an AI coding agent as component name, source file path, line number, and HTML. Use when the user wants `react-grab`, element-context copy, component-source lookup from the browser, clipboard-to-agent React debugging, or MCP-backed element selection for React apps. Not for generic browser automation or login/session reuse (`browser-harness`, `playwriter`), broad UI annotation/review (`agentation`), React performance audits (`react-best-practices`), or general design-system work (`design-system`). Triggers on: react-grab, grab element context, copy component to AI, browser component picker, React component inspector, clipboard component source, get element context from browser, grab UI element.

Legal-specific Argument Ranking Engine. Hodnotí právní argumenty 17-sloupcovým scoringem (síla, bezpečnost, dopad, riziko + 10 legal-specific kritérií: Compliance s novelou 2026, Evidence backing, Time-sensitivity, per-document mapping, R-static/R-reversal split, Tom-weight bonus, C-XX/M-XX/N-XX/D-XX integrace). Output: priorizovaný seznam argumentů s kategoriemi CORE/SUPPORT/CONTEXT/EXCLUDED/SUMMARY a per-document bundles (PR/§909/40_06/195). Použití: pre-prioritizace argumentů před F11.x review, Phase 2 Verify input, DÁVKA 3, výživné L04, AT podání. VŽDY použij tento skill, když Tom (nebo legal/strat) zmíní: /lare, lare, argument ranking, ARE matrix, score arguments, prioritize arguments, argument bundle, CORE/SUPPORT/CONTEXT/EXCLUDED, ARE_F11, LARE_F11, legal argument evaluation, argument scoring, compliance scoring, Tom-weight.

Design and apply QA methodology for software teams: test strategy, regression testing, CI failure triage, test automation, quality gates and metrics, risk-based testing, exploratory testing, test design techniques, AI code quality gates (independent verification, acceptance-criteria testability review for agentic Spec-Driven Development), mutation-guided test hardening and review evidence (surviving mutants, weak assertions, diff-aware mutation testing), agentic eval design (dataset test design, judge-as-system-under-test, flaky-eval discipline), QA career levels (Senior/Staff/Principal), and SDET engineering (test infrastructure, gTAA, CI/CD integration). Do not use for root-cause debugging of production incidents, security implementation or threat modeling, or evaluation framework governance and statistical analysis — route those to systematic-debugging, secure-software-engineering, and agent-evals-and-observability respectively.

Reverse-lookup glossary that turns a vague description of a web animation or motion effect into its exact term ("the bouncy thing when a popover opens" → Pop in; "the iOS rubber-band scroll" → Rubber-banding). Use when the user asks "what's it called when…", or describes a motion effect without knowing its name and wants the right word to prompt an AI or designer with. For naming an effect, not designing or building one. Source: github.com/emilkowalski/skills.

Audits an EXISTING UI/codebase for generic AI patterns and applies targeted craft fixes — layout, interactivity, content, iconography, and code quality — without discarding the project's own identity. Use when a UI looks flat, generic, or "AI-slop" and there is code to improve, not build from scratch. Triggers on: "improve the design", "looks generic", "not polished enough", "redesign this", "elevate the UI", "it looks boring", "make it better looking", "apply taste", "design review". Works with any CSS framework. For designing a NEW project's identity from a brief, use `taste-skill` instead — this skill only upgrades what's already built. Source: github.com/Leonxlnx/taste-skill (redesign-skill), restored to the full checklist + the project-identity rule the earlier port had dropped.

Supply-chain malware infection scanner. IoC-based local scan + safe eradication for npm/PyPI worm campaigns (Mini Shai-Hulud 1st/2nd, S1ngularity, lottie-player). Detects OS persistence (LaunchAgent/systemd), IDE-hook implants (.claude/.vscode/.github/workflows), lockfile-pinned malicious versions, and known C2/Session-Protocol exfil traces. Orchestrates credential rotation in the correct order so revocation does not trigger the `rm -rf ~/` retaliation payload. Don't use for static SAST (Sentinel), skill/MCP/`.claude/` supply-chain audit (Chain), Sigma/YARA rule authoring (Vigil), or incident coordination (Triage).

Two-party working posture — user as director, agent as executor. Every fork, tradeoff, and taste choice is surfaced via batched AskUserQuestion with structural framing, a recommended default, and concrete previews when comparison is visual, so the human steers direction while the agent handles implementation. Eliminates the review-bottleneck (no giant diff to approve at the end — review is distributed across picks) and prevents codebase-understanding debt (the user remembers the architecture because they picked it). Use whenever the user invokes /duet, or says "work with me", "ask before", "check with me", "I want to decide", "don't assume", "human-in-the-loop", "co-author", "pair with me", "duet", or whenever a task clearly involves aesthetic, architectural, or irreversible strategic decisions — even without those exact words. Pair with the Duet output style to minimize cognitive load between picks.

Creates decision-focused PRDs and product specs — the kind that make explicit decisions, not document hopes. Make sure to use this skill whenever someone asks to write, review, draft, or improve any product document, including PRDs, feature specs, requirements docs, or product specifications. Trigger even when the user doesn't say "PRD" explicitly — phrases like "write a spec for X", "define requirements for Y", "what should my PRD include", "help me document this feature", or "my spec feels too vague" all apply. Do not attempt to write the PRD directly without consulting this skill. Produces 5-stage PRDs with behavior contracts (15-25 labeled examples for AI features), measurable success metrics with specific thresholds, precise rollout plans with percentages and ramp gates, and antipattern detection. Works for AI features, SaaS, mobile apps, and traditional software.