Results for “design-review”

Agent profile for design and implement backend services, API logic, data access, jobs, auth boundaries, and error handling. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Review a feature and enhance it with purposeful animations, micro-interactions, and motion effects that improve usability and delight. Use when the user mentions adding animation, transitions, micro-interactions, motion design, hover effects, or making the UI feel more alive.

Review a feature and enhance it with purposeful animations, micro-interactions, and motion effects that improve usability and delight. Use when the user mentions adding animation, transitions, micro-interactions, motion design, hover effects, or making the UI feel more alive.

Create data flow diagrams, identify threats using STRIDE and LINDDUN methodologies, and generate threat model reports for secure design review with OWASP Threat Dragon.

Designs and maintains versioned reusable task sequences in Financial Services Cloud using Action Plan templates for client onboarding, account opening, annual review preparation, and compliance tasks.

Enforces a canonical UI/UX ruleset with 14 sections and 70+ prioritized rules (P0–P3) for implementing, reviewing, or auditing UI components, referencing tokens from a theme reference.

Design and review native DTOs in WordPress plugins without better-data, covering immutable data carriers, explicit hydration, strict coercion, WP_Error validation, sensitive-field handling, and layer boundaries.

Audit database schema for consistency, validation, and industry standards. Use when reviewing schema design, naming conventions, constraints, indexes, or migrations. Destructive-op gates → plan-data-integrity. Who-can-read-what RLS → plan-rls-audit. Restore/RPO → plan-backup-dr.

Atomic-design guidance for Molecules — functional groups of atoms (SearchBar = input + button + icon; FormField = label + input + error) with a single cohesive purpose. Use when authoring or reviewing components under ui/molecules, composing atoms, or deciding atom vs molecule vs organism.

YC Office Hours — two modes. Startup mode: six forcing questions that expose demand reality, status quo, desperate specificity, narrowest wedge, observation, and future-fit. Builder mode: design thinking brainstorming for side projects, hackathons, learning, and open source. Saves a design doc. Use when asked to "brainstorm this", "I have an idea", "help me think through this", "office hours", or "is this worth building". Proactively invoke this skill (do NOT answer directly) when the user describes a new product idea, asks whether something is worth building, wants to think through design decisions for something that doesn't exist yet, or is exploring a concept before any code is written. Use before /plan-ceo-review or /plan-eng-review. (gstack)

Terraform infrastructure-as-code agent skill and plugin for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenClaw. Covers module design patterns, state management strategies, provider configuration, security hardening, policy-as-code with Sentinel/OPA, and CI/CD plan/apply workflows. Use when: user wants to design Terraform modules, manage state backends, review Terraform security, implement multi-region deployments, or follow IaC best practices.

UI/UX design system reference, pattern library, and focused review guidance for web and mobile applications. Use for targeted design research, pattern selection, UX audits, accessibility guidance, palette and typography selection, layout heuristics, and component pattern research. Covers 50+ styles, 97 color palettes, 57 font pairings, Web Interface Guidelines compliance, and concrete visual/usability improvements for modern SaaS and product interfaces.

Terraform infrastructure-as-code agent skill and plugin for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenClaw. Covers module design patterns, state management strategies, provider configuration, security hardening, policy-as-code with Sentinel/OPA, and CI/CD plan/apply workflows. Use when: user wants to design Terraform modules, manage state backends, review Terraform security, implement multi-region deployments, or follow IaC best practices.

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics. Trigger scenarios — use when the user mentions any of: - UI design, frontend design, web design, interface design, 界面设计, 前端设计 - responsive layout, mobile adaptation, breakpoints, 响应式, 自适应, 适配 - animation, motion, micro-interaction, transitions, 动画, 动效, 微交互 - UX copy, microcopy, error messages, labels, UX 文案, 文案优化 - performance optimization, bundle size, rendering, 性能优化, 渲染, 加载速度 - accessibility audit, a11y, WCAG, 无障碍, 可访问性 - design review, design critique, UX evaluation, 设计评审, 设计审查 - typography, fonts, type hierarchy, 字体, 排版, 字号 - color palette, color scheme, theming, 配色, 色彩, 主题 - layout, spacing, visual rhythm, grid

Use when designing or auditing experiments for an ACL paper, covering tuned LLM baselines, multi-dataset and multilingual evaluation, statistical significance and variance, human evaluation with agreement reporting, contamination and prompt-sensitivity controls, ablations, and error-analysis expectations in NLP reviewing.

Builds a feature implementation plan from an existing feature specification (or equivalent context) through a facilitated team conversation. Use when the user wants to plan how to implement, build, deliver, or ship a feature that has already been specified. Does not specify what the feature should do — use plan-a-feature first. Does not design the contract for an interface — use design-an-api. Does not refine or stress-test an already-written plan — use iterative-plan-review. Runs its resolution rounds to completion and holds its questions until after they finish; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.

当用户已有确认过的开发任务清单（理想来自 split-task），要把它逐个落地成实现 + 测试 + 提交，并经验收确认真的做完时使用——如"执行任务、把 tasks 做掉、按任务清单开始编码、实现这些任务、推进开发"。不要用于：任务还没拆（先 split-task）、技术方案没定（先 make-design）、行为没钉死（先 write-spec）、想法还模糊（先 refine-idea）、只做单个改动的红绿闭环（那是 tdd）、只做一次代码审查（那是 review-changes）、单纯调试某个 bug、代码评审。

Restructure existing code without changing its behavior, through a test-gated refactoring loop: a named target, a green suite over that target before any edit, a planned sequence of small named refactorings, and the full suite re-run after every step. Use when the user wants to refactor, restructure, clean up, simplify, or improve the design of existing code, or to apply refactoring recommendations from a code-review or architectural-analysis report. This skill changes code; it does not review code (use code-review), assess architecture (use architectural-analysis), or build new behavior test-first (use tdd). Do not use it on code inside an active tdd loop; the refactor step of tdd owns that cleanup. Runs its planned sequence to completion without pausing for review; to review each named refactoring as it lands, use pairing.

Establish CSS/Tailwind baseline quality — font smoothing, line-height defaults, box-sizing, focus rings, color contrast, Tailwind anti-patterns, and CSS containment. Use when asked to "set up CSS baseline", "Tailwind best practices", "fix font rendering", "global CSS foundation", "typography defaults", "CSS anti-patterns", "improve CSS quality", "line-height reset", "normalize styles", or reviewing a new project's base styles for correctness. Do NOT use for: full design system token architecture — see design-system-gen. Do NOT use for: component-level animation — see motion-design.

Performs a meticulous final pass on frontend work, checking visual alignment, typography, color contrast, interaction states, micro-interactions, content, icons, forms, edge cases, responsiveness, performance, and code quality to elevate work from shipped to polished.

Use for designing or reviewing resilient asynchronous HTTP call paths that combine HTTPX, Tenacity, and asyncio: client lifetime, time budgets, retry eligibility, backoff, concurrency, cancellation, and idempotency. Do not use for generic HTTPX, retry, or asyncio questions that do not cross these boundaries.

Structured logging strategy — levels, correlation IDs, context propagation, PII avoidance. Use when designing a logging approach, reviewing log statements, setting up log aggregation (ELK, Loki, CloudWatch), adding correlation IDs to a distributed system, or deciding what to log and what to keep out.

Guides Cloudflare One Zero Trust and SASE work across Access, Gateway, WARP, Tunnel, Cloudflare WAN, DLP, CASB, device posture, and identity. Use when designing, configuring, troubleshooting, or reviewing Cloudflare One deployments. Retrieval-first: use current Cloudflare docs/API schemas instead of embedded product docs.

Route LangSmith work into one workflow packet before touching SDK code. Use when the user needs LangSmith tracing, offline evals, annotation/review queues, prompt-registry decisions, audit/gap review, or cross-service trace propagation for an LLM app or agent workflow. Choose one packet: trace-debug, eval, review, prompt-registry, propagation, or audit. Triggers on: LangSmith, LangChain tracing, `@traceable` / `traceable`, `wrap_openai` / `wrapOpenAI`, datasets, experiments, annotation queues, feedback criteria, Prompt Hub, run trees, trace IDs, or production confidence for an AI feature. Not for generic SLO/alert design, non-LangSmith deployment orchestration, or runtime guardrails outside LangSmith.

Design and apply Azure role-based access control with least privilege at the right scope. Use this skill when users ask about permissions, role assignments, access errors, or governance. Covers built-in roles, custom roles, managed identities, PIM, and access reviews per Well-Architected principles.

Use for designing, creating, reviewing, or packaging GitHub Copilot and Agent Plugins for Visual Studio Code, including plugin.json, portable skills, MCP components, client-specific agents, commands, and hooks. Do not use for a single standalone skill, ordinary VS Code extensions, or installing an unreviewed plugin.

Builds a feature specification from scratch through a relentless, evidence-based interview that walks the design tree decision-by-decision, resolving dependencies as it goes. Use when the user wants to plan, design, scope, specify, or flesh out a new feature, capability, or system behavior before implementation. Produces a feature specification focused on system behaviors, not implementation detail. Does not refine or stress-test an existing plan — use iterative-plan-review. Does not document already-built features — use project-documentation. Does not design the contract for an interface — use design-an-api. Does not research open-ended options before there is a feature to specify — use research.

Designs the contract for an API change inside one codebase — a component's props, a function surface, URL or query parameters, an event payload, or a module boundary — through a discovery pass, an options document with one recommendation, a question round, and an adversarial validation round, with every element of the contract justified from one stated goal. Use when you want to design, shape, decide, or nail down an interface, contract, signature, or API change for a capability you can already describe, sized for roughly one pull request. Produces a design document and changes no code. Does not specify what a feature should do — use plan-a-feature. Does not plan delivery or sequencing — use plan-implementation. Does not assess the architecture of existing code — use architectural-analysis. Does not write the code — use tdd. Does not restructure existing code — use refactor. Runs its rounds without pausing for review; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.

Use for writing, reviewing, debugging, migrating, or testing SQLAlchemy 2.x Core or ORM code involving Engine, Connection, Session, mapped models, select statements, transactions, pooling, results, loading, or AsyncSession. Do not use for raw database SQL with no SQLAlchemy boundary, Alembic migration design, DuckDB relations, or database administration.

Use when asked to fix, build, refactor, review, verify, or release software and the work is non-trivial — including delivering a change request (issue, ticket, or request) from intake through planning, gates, implementation, review, verified PR, and authorized post-merge release. neckbeard routes the change through framing, discovery, design, implementation, review, verification, delivery, and learning — choosing the smallest *safe* intervention, proving it at the real delivery boundary, and leaving an inspectable evidence ledger. For change-request / issue-to-PR work, conditionally loads a 9-phase journey with gates, delivery packet, and lifecycle integration. Composes specialist catalog skills rather than replacing them. Not a persona, not a '10x developer' prompt, not a LOC-minimizer. The journey is not loaded for plain fixes, refactors, or reviews that lack an issue/ticket trajectory.

Designs and implements data retention schedules compliant with GDPR Article 5(1)(e) storage limitation principle. Maps data categories to retention periods with legal basis justification, regulatory minimum holding periods, and automated review triggers for schedule maintenance. Activate for retention policy, storage limitation, data lifecycle, retention period queries.

Use for designing, creating, reviewing, or debugging Model Context Protocol server configuration for GitHub Copilot in Visual Studio Code, including .vscode/mcp.json, transports, inputs, trust, sandboxing, and tool scope. Do not use for implementing an MCP server, ordinary HTTP clients, or silently installing or starting external software.

Design and implement clear, modular, resilient software and create executor-grade implementation plans with explicit scope, drift checks, verification gates, tests, STOP conditions, dependencies, and delegated-work review. Use for development, refactoring, architecture, implementation planning, safe migrations, handoffs to another engineer or agent, or verifying delegated code changes.

Design and operate bounded multi-agent workflows with task decomposition, dependency graphs, ownership, handoff contracts, shared-state controls, approvals, recovery, and synthesis. Use when a task contains genuinely independent workstreams, specialized roles, parallel research or implementation, reviewer-worker loops, or coordination problems that one agent should not execute sequentially.

Use to find where support routing is failing — misrouted contacts, reassignment chains, unassigned work, and queues nobody owns. Trigger for "why do tickets bounce between teams", "are we routing correctly", "tickets sitting unassigned", "how many tickets get reassigned", ticket ping-pong, or reviewing routing rules and queue design.

Apple's approach to interface design and fluid, physical motion, translated for the web. Use when building or reviewing gesture-driven UI, spring animations, drag/swipe/sheet interactions, momentum and interruptible transitions, translucent materials and depth, typography (optical sizing, tracking, leading), reduced-motion, or the design foundations (feedback, spatial consistency, restraint) behind Apple-style interfaces. Also applies to any HTML-rendered output with interactive elements — investor decks, annual reports, product pages, slide presentations (Reveal.js, Guizang PPT), interactive documents, and landing pages that need premium feel beyond static aesthetics. Not for static Word/PDF generation (typography rules only).