Results for “pr-review”

Create, update, and comment on GitHub pull requests with a focus on material impact, safety, and human reviewability.

Create a GitHub issue and pull request in oracle/graalvm-reachability-metadata, link the PR to the issue, and request reviews from the standard reviewer set except the PR author.

Delegate coding to OpenCode CLI (features, PR review).

Delegate coding to OpenCode CLI (features, PR review).

Reviews and authors Cloudflare Workers code against production best practices, covering configuration, request handling, architecture, observability, code patterns, and security.

Runs a 13-agent deep research pipeline for rigorous academic work on any topic across 7 modes (full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis), covering research-question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk-of-bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial and devil's-advocate review, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Use when the request mentions research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, or 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

Self-contained code review checklist — formatting, type safety, duplication, readable conditions, logic-out-of-UI, test coverage, comment quality. Adapts to whatever tooling the project actually has (skips Prettier/TypeScript/test-runner checks if unconfigured). Use before merging, after completing a feature, or any time you want a second pass on code quality. In Claude Code, prefer the official `code-review` skill or `pr-review-toolkit`/`feature-dev` code-reviewer agents instead — both are real, installed, and go deeper than this checklist. This copy exists for Codex/Cursor portability, where those agents aren't available.

Analyzes state merit review for non-covered securities offerings, applying NASAA Statements of Policy to cheap stock, promoter equity investment, voting rights, and promoter compensation. Produces examiner-ready comment responses with cap table analysis and negotiation strategy. Use when filing Reg A, Rule 504, intrastate, or direct public offerings in merit review states, responding to Blue Sky examiner comments, structuring offerings to avoid conditioning, or analyzing NASAA SOPs. Also trigger on cheap stock analysis, promoter equity tests, unequal voting rights review, state examiner correspondence, or phrases like "merit review issues" or "the state examiner sent comments."

Review documentation and prose for compliance with writing guidelines, checking style, voice, and tone against a fetched rule set.

Provides design engineering guidance focused on animation principles, UI review, and interface craftsmanship.

Automates the cycle of fixing CI failures, addressing PR review feedback, and pushing changes until all checks pass.

Review local branch changes for bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues using a structured checklist-driven process.

Monitor a pull request or review cycle until all checks pass, comments are resolved, and the PR is ready to merge.

Reviews unverified wiki pages flagged as explored: false, presenting them for human confirmation, editing, skipping, or deletion, and updating their status accordingly.

Interact with GitHub using the `gh` CLI to check PR status, manage issues, review code, and query the API.

Coordinates five specialized agents (planning, research, code, review, deploy) into a pipeline that ships features from spec to production with automated gates.

Delegates a task to OpenAI's Codex CLI for an independent review or second opinion, with guidance on prompt construction and handling output.

Automated visual design review — screenshot V0 demo URLs or local HTML, analyze rendered output, and validate against brand system. Works with both V0 live previews and Stitch-generated HTML.

Analyze contracts for risks, obligations, key clauses, and generate structured risk reports with severity ratings. Use when the user requests contract review or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

Guides teams in adapting engineering processes, architecture, code review, and testing for high-volume AI-assisted code generation.

Delegate coding tasks such as feature building, refactoring, and PR reviews to OpenAI's Codex CLI, with support for background execution and parallel worktrees.

Prevents SOQL injection and enforces CRUD, FLS, and sharing in Apex queries, with guidance for building, reviewing, and troubleshooting secure data access.

Analyze auto-memory for promotion candidates, stale entries, consolidation opportunities, and health metrics. Use when the user runs /si:review or asks what has been learned and what should be promoted or pruned.

Perform a structured audit of a codebase covering security, code quality, performance, dependencies, architecture, and testing hygiene, then produce a prioritized findings report. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a code review, code audit, security review, codebase assessment, "look over this repo", "what's wrong with this codebase", legacy-code triage, pre-acquisition technical due diligence, or any request to systematically evaluate the health of a project. Trigger even when the user is casual ("can you eyeball my repo?") — this skill imposes the structure that ad-hoc review misses. This skill audits a whole repository at a point in time — for reviewing a diff or PR use the built-in code-review skill; for security checks on pending changes use security-review.

Guides creating small, issue-linked pull requests with conventional branch naming, commit messages, and structured descriptions, plus a review cycle.

Reviews local branch changes for bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues, using a structured checklist and verification process.

Review code changes for bugs, regressions, convention violations, and high-value cleanup opportunities. Use for diffs, commit ranges, hosted PR/MR URLs, branches, paths, staged changes, or working-tree changes.

Diagnose and fix SwiftUI performance issues like slow rendering, janky scrolling, and high CPU/memory usage through code review and profiling guidance.

Use git worktrees to work on multiple branches simultaneously with separate working directories, enabling parallel development, stacked PRs, and isolated code reviews.

Perform language and framework-specific security best-practice reviews, write secure-by-default code, and generate prioritized vulnerability reports with suggested fixes.

Structures a systematic legal and compliance review of contracts, policies, or technical decisions — identifying key clauses, risks, and questions for counsel. Use when asked to review a contract, check compliance implications, flag legal risks in a technical design, or prepare for a legal consultation. Always surfaces work for qualified counsel; never replaces legal advice.

Orchestrate expensive frontier models as reviewers and cheaper subagents for bounded, token-heavy work to optimize cost and quality.

Reviews a codebase for structural smells and refactors them with provable safety, using micro commits and green-bar discipline.

OWASP Top 10 audit checklists for Web Applications (2021), APIs (2023), and Mobile (2024). Use when performing any security review, PR review, or codebase audit touching web, mobile, or API code.

When the user wants to edit, review, or improve existing marketing copy. Also use when the user mentions 'edit this copy,' 'review my copy,' 'copy feedback,' 'proofread,' 'polish this,' 'make this ...

Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.