Results for “coverage”

This skill should be used when setting up, auditing, or enforcing internationalization/localization in UI codebases (React/TS, i18next or similar, JSON locales), including installing/configuring the i18n framework, replacing hard-coded strings, ensuring en-US/zh-CN coverage, mapping error codes to localized messages, and validating key parity, pluralization, and formatting.

Produce a standalone test plan by analyzing code for test coverage gaps and edge cases. Use when you need to create, generate, or draft a test plan for a branch, need to analyze test coverage, or need to identify what tests to write for specific files or directories. Does not produce a plain-language plan for a person to run tests by hand — use manual-test-planning for that. Does not write test code — use tdd to implement behavior test-first. Does not refine existing plans — use iterative-plan-review. Does not review code quality, security, or style — use code-review for full code review. Does not evaluate architectural testability or structural coupling — use architectural-analysis for architectural assessment.

When the user wants help with public relations, earned media, press coverage, journalist outreach, or media strategy (not pull requests). Also use when the user mentions 'PR,' 'public relations,' 'press,' 'press release,' 'press coverage,' 'media outreach,' 'pitch a journalist,' 'get featured,' 'media list,' 'media kit,' 'press kit,' 'newsjacking,' 'news hijack,' 'HARO,' 'Qwoted,' 'Featured,' 'Help A Reporter,' 'reporter request,' 'tech press,' 'TechCrunch,' 'earned media,' 'thought leadership placement,' 'op-ed,' 'guest article,' 'press contacts,' or 'how do I get press.' Use this for earned media work — finding journalists, pitching stories, newsjacking, and responding to press requests. For startup/SaaS/AI directory submissions, see directory-submissions. For product launches, see launch. For social-media engagement, see social. For cold-email outreach to prospects, see cold-email.

Audits the course learn experience for section coverage, sidebar rendering, layout, design token compliance, tenant isolation, accessibility, data flow, and component quality. Use when reviewing course UI code quality or diagnosing learn experience issues. Pass a course slug or "all".

API backend test generation for Nick's stack, especially Next.js App Router APIs with Supabase-aware auth assumptions. Use when testing backend routes, generating API test suites, validating authenticated vs unauthenticated access, checking malformed inputs, or building route-by-route backend coverage for projects that use /app/api or /pages/api.

Use this skill when the user asks about trucking insurance — types of coverage (commercial auto, cargo, occupational accident, workers comp, bobtail/non-trucking, MCS-90 endorsement), federal minimums (49 CFR 387), what each covers, owner-operator vs company-driver implications, and how to read a Certificate of Insurance (COI). Cite 49 CFR 387.

Use for the search-planning stage of a literature review, when database lanes and language layers must be chosen, when DOI coverage policy is unclear, or when inclusion and exclusion criteria need drafting before any source is read; not for running the screening and PRISMA pipeline of a formal review, which is prisma-scoping-review-pipeline.

Clean and package the project for distribution. Removes __pycache__, .venv, build artifacts, data caches, logs, IDE files, coverage reports, and sanitizes API keys in config. Produces a minimal, ready-to-share codebase. Use when user says 'package', 'clean project', 'clean up', '打包', '清理项目', '清理缓存', 'prepare for distribution', 'remove caches', or wants to deliver a clean copy of the code.

Clean and package the project for distribution. Removes __pycache__, .venv, build artifacts, data caches, logs, IDE files, coverage reports, and sanitizes API keys in config. Produces a minimal, ready-to-share codebase. Use when user says 'package', 'clean project', 'clean up', '打包', '清理项目', '清理缓存', 'prepare for distribution', 'remove caches', or wants to deliver a clean copy of the code.

Audit a directory of multilingual blog content for completeness, consistency, hreflang correctness, meta-tag parity, and freshness. Builds a translation coverage matrix, flags stale translations, validates hreflang and schema, and emits a prioritized report with runnable fix commands. Use when user says "locale audit", "blog locale-audit", "check translations", "multilingual audit", "translation check", "hreflang check", "Uebersetzungen pruefen".

pytest Python testing framework. Covers fixtures, parametrize, and mocking. Use for Python testing. USE WHEN: user mentions "pytest", "python test", "fixture", asks about "@pytest.fixture", "@pytest.mark.parametrize", "conftest.py", "pytest coverage", "python unit test" DO NOT USE FOR: JavaScript/TypeScript - use `vitest` or `jest`; Java - use `junit`; E2E web tests - use `playwright`; Load testing - use locust

Run a source-grounded paid-advertising audit across major platforms including Google, Meta, YouTube, LinkedIn, TikTok, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Reddit, Pinterest, Snapchat, and X. Produces a versioned JSON audit bundle and human-readable reports with platform health scores, evidence coverage, and prioritized actions.

Clean and package the project for distribution. Removes __pycache__, .venv, build artifacts, data caches, logs, IDE files, coverage reports, and sanitizes API keys in config. Produces a minimal, ready-to-share codebase. Use when user says 'package', 'clean project', 'clean up', '打包', '清理项目', '清理缓存', 'prepare for distribution', 'remove caches', or wants to deliver a clean copy of the code.

Enforces strict outside-in red-green-refactor TDD with one-failure-per-turn discipline, predicting failures before every run, hardcoding minimum changes, and using triangulation and property-based testing. Triggers on explicit TDD requests and tasks phrased as 'implement', 'add', 'write a function', 'build a feature'.

Verify a GitHub pull request against a Jira issue's goals, requirements, and acceptance criteria, then post a PR comment with the findings. Use when a user asks Codex or MoonMind to compare a PR to a Jira story/task/bug, confirm whether a PR satisfies Jira requirements, audit implementation coverage from Jira, or publish a Jira-vs-PR verification summary.

Layer 6 of the keyword research pipeline. Organizes the vetted keyword queue into money clusters (from clusters.md), picks each cluster's keystone vs supporting articles, tracks coverage, and PROPOSES new clusters from high-business-value topics or live products not yet covered — so the blog strategy expands as the company grows. Emits cluster-tagged queue + cluster-map.md + cluster-proposals.md.

Perform a static audit of an AL workspace for Business Central against the project's copilot-instructions.md contract. Reports findings by class (Compliance, Code quality, Test coverage, Permissions) and severity (Blocker, Major, Minor, Nit) with file:line citations. Never modifies code. Never invents rules. Use when asked to audit a workspace, run a compliance check, review before PR, or diagnose contract drift.

AI/LLM red-team assessment using the OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025) + OWASP AI Testing Guide (AITG v1, Nov 2025) frameworks, plus OWASP MCP Top 10 runtime testing for agentic/MCP targets. Tests prompt injection, jailbreaks, system prompt leakage, sensitive data extraction, excessive agency, improper output handling, model extraction, content bias, evasion, membership inference, MCP token exposure, MCP command injection, and more. Uses four tools in combination: FuzzyAI (single-turn jailbreak fuzzing), PyRIT (multi-turn orchestrated attacks), Garak (probe-based vulnerability scanning), and promptfoo (plugin-based red-team evaluation). Each tool covers different OWASP categories; running them together gives systematic coverage. Includes a conditional MCP reconnaissance phase and a post-access AI infrastructure phase (chained from /post-exploit). Produces: OWASP LLM Top 10 + AITG + MCP coverage matrix, findings per category, architecture diagram of the AI system, PoCs for confirmed exploits. Chains into /gh-export for

Foundational C programming patterns covering type system, memory management, pointers, arrays, preprocessor, compilation, concurrency (pthreads, mutexes, atomics), serialization (binary, JSON, struct packing), and testing (Unity, CMocka, Check). Complete 8/8 pillar coverage. Use when writing C code, understanding manual memory management, working with system-level programming, or needing guidance on which specialized C skill to use. This is the entry point for C development.

Verify a completed implementation against the original instructions, a declarative source document, an issue brief, or an optional MoonSpec feature packet, plus AGENTS.md repo guidance and required tests. Use when the user asks to run or reproduce `/moonspec.verify`, perform a final read-only implementation check, audit unit and integration test evidence, classify requirement coverage, or decide whether more code or test work is needed.

Federal acquisition compliance auditor for the active Theseus workspace, backed by live FAR/DFARS text via the vendored `ecfr` MCP. USE WHEN the user asks to audit FAR/DFARS clause coverage, validate that cited clauses actually exist in eCFR (catch fabricated or typo'd numbers), check whether a cited clause has been amended since the solicitation issued, validate regulatory references (NIST SP, DAFI, MIL-STD), check that every "shall" requirement has a deliverable, find missing compliance artifacts, audit proposal_instruction ↔ evaluation_factor coverage (UCF Section L↔M or non-UCF equivalent — FAR 16 task orders, FOPRs, BPA calls, OTAs), or "are we compliant with the proposal instructions?". Cross-references the workspace's clause / regulatory_reference / requirement / deliverable / compliance_artifact entities against live eCFR and flags gaps with severity. Format-agnostic. DO NOT USE FOR drafting compliant prose (use proposal-generator) or extracting clauses (Theseus pipeline does that automatically).

Jest is a comprehensive JavaScript testing framework built by Meta, designed for zero-configuration testing of JavaScript and TypeScript applications. It provides a complete ecosystem for unit testing, integration testing, and snapshot testing with built-in code coverage, mocking capabilities, and parallel test execution. Jest works seamlessly with React, Node.js, Angular, Vue, and virtually any JavaScript project, making it the most widely adopted testing framework in the ecosystem.

This skill should be used when establishing comprehensive QA testing processes for any software project. Use when creating test strategies, writing test cases following Google Testing Standards, executing test plans, tracking bugs with P0-P4 classification, calculating quality metrics, or generating progress reports. Includes autonomous execution capability via master prompts and complete documentation templates for third-party QA team handoffs. Implements OWASP security testing and achieves 90% coverage targets.

Use to draw a defensible sample of support conversations for QA review, an audit or a manual analysis, so the results generalise to the population rather than to whatever was easy to pull. Trigger for "which tickets should we review", "how do we pick a sample", "is our QA sampling representative", stratified or risk-based sampling, review coverage design, or a finding based on a handful of hand-picked tickets.

Turn "is this deal real?" into a deal-by-deal risk verdict. An 8-state risk taxonomy, a qualification-vs-stage gap check, multi-thread coverage, days-dark per deal, and a commit-creep watch. Built for B2B sales teams, customizable to your CRM and your sales process. Trigger on "how are my deals", "which deals are stuck", "what's at risk this month", "is the rep sandbagging", "multi-thread check", or any open-deal diagnostic.

Detect and resolve naming collisions, overlapping intent triggers, and insufficient intent diversity across the skill library. Load when a new skill is created (called by universal-skill-creator), during improvement passes (called by improve-skills), or when the user asks to deconflict skills, check for naming collisions, audit trigger overlap, review intent coverage, find duplicate triggers, check skill names, or says "are any skills too similar", "which skills overlap", "deconflict the library", "check for confusing skill names", "intent audit".

Analyzes RFP/RFI responses for coverage gaps, builds competitive feature comparison matrices, and plans proof-of-concept (POC) engagements for pre-sales engineering. Use when responding to RFPs, bids, or proposal requests; comparing product features against competitors; planning or scoring a customer POC or sales demo; preparing a technical proposal; or performing win/loss competitor analysis. Handles tasks described as 'RFP response', 'bid response', 'proposal response', 'competitor comparison', 'feature matrix', 'POC planning', 'sales demo prep', or 'pre-sales engineering'.

Eng manager-mode plan review. Lock in the execution plan — architecture, data flow, diagrams, edge cases, test coverage, performance. Walks through issues interactively with opinionated recommendations. Use when asked to "review the architecture", "engineering review", or "lock in the plan". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan or design doc and is about to start coding — to catch architecture issues before implementation. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "tech review", "technical review", "plan engineering review".

Interactive project learning coach via interview-style Q&A. Reads codebase and docs, dynamically generates interview questions per knowledge domain and sub-topic, conducts up to 4 follow-up rounds, scores answers, provides learning guidance with code/doc references, and persists progress. 10 domains × 3-5 sub-topics = 45 knowledge points for comprehensive interview coverage. Use when user says '学习项目', '了解项目', '检验项目', '项目学习', '面试准备', 'learn project', 'study project', 'review project', 'interview prep', 'knowledge check', or wants to understand/master the project through guided Q&A.

Interactive project learning coach via interview-style Q&A. Reads codebase and docs, dynamically generates interview questions per knowledge domain and sub-topic, conducts up to 4 follow-up rounds, scores answers, provides learning guidance with code/doc references, and persists progress. 10 domains × 3-5 sub-topics = 45 knowledge points for comprehensive interview coverage. Use when user says '学习项目', '了解项目', '检验项目', '项目学习', '面试准备', 'learn project', 'study project', 'review project', 'interview prep', 'knowledge check', or wants to understand/master the project through guided Q&A.

Self-contained code review checklist — formatting, type safety, duplication, readable conditions, logic-out-of-UI, test coverage, comment quality. Adapts to whatever tooling the project actually has (skips Prettier/TypeScript/test-runner checks if unconfigured). Use before merging, after completing a feature, or any time you want a second pass on code quality. In Claude Code, prefer the official `code-review` skill or `pr-review-toolkit`/`feature-dev` code-reviewer agents instead — both are real, installed, and go deeper than this checklist. This copy exists for Codex/Cursor portability, where those agents aren't available.

Turn "what's happening with this account?" into a structured read straight from your CRM. A real-activity audit across every source, a qualification-vs-stage gap check, a one-screen account summary, and a risk verdict on the deal. Built for any sales team, customizable to your CRM and your sales process. Trigger on "analyze this account", "what's happening with this deal", "is this opp healthy", "what's stuck in my pipeline", "deal autopsy on this closed-lost", "where am I missing qualification coverage", "prep me for this account", or any account, opp, or pipeline diagnostic.

Turn "is this account a real fit?" into a stacked verdict. A composite 0-100 fit score built from every signal you have, a breakdown by source, override flags for when a scoring tool is wrong, a channel classification, and a written rationale. Built for reps, marketers, and RevOps, customizable to your CRM and whatever scoring you use. Trigger on "is {account} a real fit?", "score this list against our profile", "find lookalikes to our best customers", "why is the score wrong on {account}?", "validate this prospect list", "what's our coverage in {segment}?", or any account or list qualification.

Assess the test suite of a codebase — where tests are missing, where they exist but are weak, and which gaps actually matter. Use this skill whenever the user asks about test coverage, test quality, "are there enough tests", "where should we add tests", testing gaps, test debt, untested code paths, flaky tests, or generally wants to know whether a codebase is well-tested. Trigger even on casual phrasings ("is this tested?", "what's the test situation?", "audit our tests"). This skill does NOT write tests — it only assesses what exists and identifies what's missing. For test generation, this is the wrong skill.

Review a built frontend against its chosen direction, catch drift back to generic AI defaults, enforce state coverage, ethical patterns, UX heuristics, and polish, and check contrast with APCA (not the legacy WCAG ratio). Produces specific, prioritized fixes — never vibes-based feedback. Works with pasted screenshots or Playwright MCP automated capture. Load when the user asks to review a UI, audit a design, check if a frontend looks generic or vibecoded, evaluate visual quality or polish, says "review this UI", "is this design good", "audit my frontend", "does this feel like [product]", "design QA", or when frontend-design routes here. Sub-skill of frontend-design.

Predict genome-wide functional genomics tracks from DNA sequence with Borzoi (Linder 2025) — a sequence-to-function model outputting RNA-seq, CAGE, ATAC, and ChIP coverage across long context, used to score non-coding and regulatory variant effects. Use when predicting functional tracks from a DNA sequence, scoring a non-coding/regulatory variant's effect on expression or chromatin, or doing in-silico mutagenesis of a locus. To LOOK UP a variant's population frequency prefer alterlab-gnomad; for its clinical significance prefer alterlab-clinvar; for protein-structure effects prefer alterlab-alphafold; for single-cell foundation models prefer alterlab-scgpt. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.