Results for “how-to”

Record observable skill test runs for debugging. Use when the user wants to test, dry-run, debug, inspect, or compare how a Codex skill behaves on a concrete request; creates a local non-overwriting Markdown report with the visible process, files read, commands run, changed artifacts, errors, and a brief behavior summary. Does not certify skill quality or replace user judgment.

Use to design support career progression with IC and lead tracks, skill gates instead of tenure alone, and paths that do not treat leaving the phones as the only promotion. Trigger for "career pathing", "progression framework for support", "IC track", "how do agents get promoted", "support ladder", "team lead vs senior agent", or fixing promotion bottlenecks and title inflation.

Write the context brief a first-time tester gets before testing an app, tool, codebase, or product — it explains WHAT the thing is and why it exists, while deliberately withholding HOW anything works. The companion to the fresh-eyes skill; the brief it produces is the "starting information" handed to a fresh-eyes tester. Use this whenever the user is preparing a fresh-eyes or first-time-user test and needs the setup material, or says things like "describe my app without giving anything away", "write the context card for the tester", "explain what it is but not how to use it", "set up the newcomer test", "what would the tester be told going in?", or wants a spoiler-free description of their product. Also use it when someone asks for the briefing/intro that a new tester, new hire, or evaluator should receive before first contact with the thing being tested.

Use to compare CX performance to a published or vendor benchmark without fooling yourself — scope mismatch, survivor bias, and definition mismatch usually make external benchmarks incomparable, and internal baselines often beat them. Trigger for "how do we compare to industry", "is our CSAT good", benchmark slide for the board, vendor benchmark report, "are we above average", outsourcing RFP benchmarks, or when someone cites a round-number industry standard.

Open a GitHub PR with a tight body — why this change, what'll surprise the reviewer, how we know it's correct — or add a pull_request_template to a repo. Use when asked to open, create, or draft a pull request, compose or regenerate a PR description, or scaffold a repo's PR template. Composes the Summary/Gotchas/Verification structure and detects an existing template first.

Configure deployment settings for /land-and-deploy. Detects your deploy platform (Fly.io, Render, Vercel, Netlify, Heroku, GitHub Actions, custom), production URL, health check endpoints, and deploy status commands. Writes the configuration to CLAUDE.md so all future deploys are automatic. Use when: "setup deploy", "configure deployment", "set up land-and-deploy", "how do I deploy with gstack", "add deploy config".

Use this skill when the user asks about cargo securement requirements under 49 CFR 393 Subpart I — Working Load Limit (WLL), tiedown counts, tiedown types, commodity-specific securement rules (lumber, metal coils, paper rolls, concrete pipe, intermodal containers, vehicles, large boulders, dressed lumber, building materials), CVSA out-of-service criteria, and how to calculate aggregate WLL. Cite 49 CFR 393.100-136.

Use this skill when the user asks about Electronic Logging Device (ELD) compliance under 49 CFR 395.20-38 — ELD mandate, AOBRD vs ELD transition, ELD exemptions, ELD malfunctions, 8-day paper backup, ELD certification on FMCSA registered list, data file integrity, edits + annotations, driver portability, and how to handle ELD failures at roadside. Cite 49 CFR 395.20-395.38.

Use to design and audit how customers are told they are interacting with AI, or that AI was involved in a decision about them, and to evidence that it happened. Trigger for "do we tell customers it's a bot", "AI disclosure requirements", "should the bot say it's not human", "customer asked if they were talking to a person", AI transparency obligations, or evidencing that an AI-assisted decision was explained.

Pick the attribution model that fits the question, then build it. First touch, last touch, or multi-touch, each with its blind spots named out loud, turned into an honest channel-contribution read. Built for B2B RevOps and marketing teams, customizable to your CRM and your channel taxonomy. Trigger on "build attribution", "which channels drive pipeline", "first vs last touch", "how should we credit marketing", "what's working in our funnel", or any attribution diagnostic.

Use to analyse a support backlog and find the conversations actually at risk — never-touched tickets, work stalled on your side, customers stranded with a bot, and unassigned open work. Trigger for "report on our open tickets", "daily outstanding tickets report", "how many tickets have we not responded to", "find tickets waiting on us", "customers stuck with a bot and no human", aging backlog, or a backlog that keeps growing.

Expert in using v0.dev for AI-powered UI generation. Covers prompting strategies, component iteration, shadcn/ui integration, export workflows, and customization. Knows how to get the best results from v0 and integrate generated components into production codebases. Use when "v0, v0.dev, generate ui, shadcn component, ai component, generate component, v0, v0-dev, ui-generation, shadcn, component-generation, ai-ui, vercel" mentioned.

Use to review how an outsourcer, BPO or vendor handles your customer data and meets your conduct obligations, using evidence from the work rather than from their questionnaire answers. Trigger for "review our BPO's data handling", "vendor risk assessment for our outsourcer", "are our partners compliant", third-party oversight, outsourcing due diligence, or a supplier audit of a support vendor.

Use this skill when the user asks about Driver Qualification Files (DQF) — what must be in a DQ file under 49 CFR 391, retention periods, what's required pre-hire vs ongoing, document expiration tracking, audit-readiness for driver files, common DQF deficiencies that auditors find, or how to handle missing documents on existing drivers. Always cite the specific subsection of 49 CFR 391.

Use this skill when the user asks about FCRA adverse action procedures — what to do when a background check (MVR, criminal, drug test) returns information that may lead to denying employment or terminating a CDL driver. Covers the 5-business-day pre-adverse-action notice, FCRA Summary of Rights, final adverse action notice, state-specific add-ons (CA, NY, etc.), and how to handle disputes. Cite 15 USC § 1681 (FCRA) and 49 CFR 391.

Expert in designing and optimizing growth loops - self-reinforcing systems where the output of one cycle becomes the input for the next. Covers viral loops, content loops, paid loops, sales loops, and product loops. Knows how to identify, measure, and accelerate the specific loop mechanics that drive sustainable growth. Use when "growth loop, viral loop, content loop, flywheel, compounding growth, acquisition loop, referral loop, " mentioned.

When the user wants to plan a product launch, feature announcement, or release strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'launch,' 'Product Hunt,' 'feature release,' 'announcement,' 'go-to-market,' 'beta launch,' 'early access,' 'waitlist,' 'product update,' 'how do I launch this,' 'launch checklist,' 'GTM plan,' or 'we're about to ship.' Use this whenever someone is preparing to release something publicly. For ongoing marketing after launch, see marketing-ideas. For the offer being launched (bonuses, guarantees, scarcity, naming), see offers.

Use to get access to Rulebase and connect an AI client to it — signing up, finding your data region, installing the Rulebase MCP server in Claude Code, Claude Desktop or Cursor, and creating an API key for the REST API. Trigger for "connect Claude to Rulebase", "install the Rulebase MCP", "set up the Rulebase connector", "create a Rulebase API key", "how do I sign up for Rulebase", "Rulebase returns 401", "no token provided", or when Rulebase tools are missing from a session.

Produces durable, structured documentation in codebases with sparse docs — readable by humans and agents alike. Two invocation modes — `survey` proposes a doc plan; `draft` writes one specific doc end-to-end with a factcheck-then-persona review gate. Triggered by phrases like "doxcavate this repo", "doxcavate the X", "doxcavate `runbook-deploy`", "what should be documented?", "document this code", "write a how-it-works for X", or any request to inventory or write project documentation.

tRPC for type-safe APIs. Covers routers, procedures, and React Query integration. Use for end-to-end type-safe APIs. USE WHEN: user mentions "tRPC", "type-safe API", "end-to-end types", "procedures", "tRPC router", "tRPC React Query", asks about "how to build type-safe API", "tRPC with Next.js", "tRPC middleware", "tRPC context" DO NOT USE FOR: REST APIs - use `rest-api` instead; GraphQL - use `graphql` instead; OpenAPI specs - use `openapi` instead; Non-TypeScript projects

Upwork proposal writer that decodes a job posting and produces a tailored, ready-to-send proposal. Use when the user pastes an Upwork job posting, asks to write or improve a proposal, wants to score a draft, asks 'should I apply to this', wants Connects/budget advice, or needs scripts for after a client replies. Triggers: 'write an Upwork proposal', 'decode this job posting', 'score my proposal', 'should I apply', 'how many Connects', 'client replied, what do I say'.

Expert strategy advisor for products built on LLMs or agents — not general product strategy (see `product-strategy` for that). Use this — proactively and without waiting to be asked — whenever choosing where to apply AI in a product, deciding between RAG and fine-tuning, designing how much autonomy an AI feature should have, evaluating whether an AI feature is actually defensible, or deciding whether to add AI to a feature at all. Also triggers for: "should this be an agent or a simple LLM call", "how much autonomy should this feature have", "RAG vs fine-tuning", "is this AI feature defensible", "our AI feature keeps hallucinating and users don't trust it", "should we build this with AI or just ship it deterministic", "AI product wedge", "what happens to this feature when the models get better", "human-in-the-loop design for AI features". Produces a decision-focused brief: the wedge, the architecture choice, the autonomy level, and the defensibility bet — each with an explicit trade-off.

Install, configure, and run Hermes Agent locally on a laptop/workstation with the full intelli-verse-x wiring — LiteLLM gateway, admin-mcp, self-hosted Firecrawl, org skills, and the IX Agency desktop app. Use when someone asks "how do I get Hermes on my machine", when bootstrapping a new employee system, or when a local install is missing MCPs/tools/skills that the org supports.

Semantic-search personal knowledge (memory, plans, handoffs, skills, Codex rules) via the local RAG index at ~/.claude/rag-index/. Use when a query is fuzzy or cross-file ("how did we fix X", "what did we decide about Y", "which skill handles Z"). Complements grep (exact) and Serena (code symbols). If the user asks a recall question that doesn't map to a specific known file, reach here first.

Winston - versatile logging library for Node.js with multiple transports, custom formatting, and log rotation. Supports structured logging, custom levels, and enterprise integration. USE WHEN: user mentions "winston", "node.js logging", "multiple transports", "log rotation", asks about "how to log to multiple destinations", "rotate log files in Node.js", "custom log formats" DO NOT USE FOR: Pino logging - use `pino` instead, Python logging - use `python-logging` instead, Java logging - use `slf4j` or `logback` instead

Your customer-interview target finder. Connect Salesforce (CSM-managed customer book) and a canonical ICP doc — turns "who should I interview to validate the ICP, test the positioning, learn how they found us?" into a ranked slate of ~20 customers, each with a verdict, three-bullet why, and one named buying-committee recipient ready for a CSM-mediated intro. Use when a founder, GTM leader, or PMM is starting an ICP-validation round, testing new positioning, building a win-story program, or scouting reference customers. Trigger on "find customers to interview", "ICP validation interviews", "test our positioning with customers", "customer interview targets", "who in my book matches the ICP", "build a customer research slate", "find reference customers", "who should we talk to about how they found us", "validate the ICP with real customers", or any request to convert a CSM or AE book into a prioritized interview slate. Also fires when a new ICP doc ships and needs socializing with the customers who define it.

AI-powered financial analysis suite. Generates executive CFO briefings from QuickBooks exports (P&L, Balance Sheet, General Ledger, Cash Flow, etc.) with anomaly detection, burn rate, runway analysis, and scenario modeling. Also estimates codebase development costs with organizational overhead and AI ROI analysis. Triggers on: 'CFO briefing', 'financial analysis', 'cost briefing', 'expense review', 'runway analysis', 'burn rate', 'cost estimate', 'how much would this cost to build', 'development cost', 'Claude ROI'.

For a repository in the babysitter-users catalog, locate its babysitter processes and any committed runs (.a5c/runs/<runId>/) and perform a retrospective on a chosen run -- what went well, what failed, process suggestions, quality of effect design, breakpoint patterns -- mirroring the /babysitter:retrospect workflow but applied to an external repo. Invoke when asked to "retrospect on repo X's run", "analyze how someone else used babysitter", or "review an external babysitter run".

Use when the user asks how to build with OpenAI products or APIs, asks about Codex itself or choosing Codex surfaces, needs up-to-date official documentation with citations, help choosing the latest model for a use case, latest/current/default-model prompting guidance, or model upgrade and prompt-upgrade guidance; use OpenAI docs MCP tools for non-Codex docs questions, use the Codex manual helper first for broad Codex self-knowledge, and restrict fallback browsing to official OpenAI domains.

Writes Built GTM Playbooks for Heath Barnett: problem-driven, step-by-step guides in his voice. The format is the problem (costed), why it matters, the tools and stack, the step-by-step anyone can follow, the receipt, and steal this. Trigger on "write a playbook", "how-to on", "step by step guide for", "turn this into a playbook", or any request for an actionable build guide. Will not draft without the specific tools, steps, and receipt. Asks first.

Turn raw revenue data into a weekly or monthly wrap-up that drives action, not another dashboard screenshot. Position vs plan, what moved, the risks worth naming, and the specific next moves. Built for B2B revenue teams, customizable to your data and your cadence. Trigger on "write the revenue report", "how did we do this month", "revenue wrap-up", "are we on plan", "monthly number", or any revenue-recap request.

The on-ramp for any Built GTM analyst skill when your tools are not connected yet. Tells you exactly what to paste or upload to run a given analysis today, in plain language, then hands the data to the right skill. Trigger on "I haven't connected my tools", "how do I run this without connecting", "what do I paste", "run this on my data", "I have a CSV", "bring my own data", or any moment a connector-dependent skill needs data and nothing is connected.

Fundamental patterns for effective agentic behavior. Teaches decomposition, tool orchestration, error recovery, context management, quality self-assessment, and knowing when to stop. Model-agnostic principles that make any agent more effective regardless of domain. Activate on: "how should I structure this agent", "agentic workflow", "agent patterns", "multi-step task", "tool orchestration", "/agentic-patterns", "decompose this", "agent best practices", "chain of actions", "when should the agent stop", "agent loop design". NOT for: creating agent infrastructure (use agent-creator), building DAGs (use windags-architect), specific tool implementation.

Define product positioning by mapping competitive alternatives, unique attributes, and best-fit customers to the right market category. Use when the user mentions "positioning", "competitive alternatives", "how to position", "market category", "why customers dont get it", "positioning canvas", "repositioning", or "category creation". Also trigger when launching a new product, entering a crowded market, or diagnosing why prospects dont understand the products value. Covers positioning canvas and team workshops. For customer jobs analysis, see jobs-to-be-done. For go-to-market, see crossing-the-chasm.

Simulator.Company form designer specialist. Use when the user wants to create or modify form templates (a.k.a. Account Templates / «Шаблон рахунків»), define custom field structures, set up account definitions, explore system forms, work with Smart Forms (CDU / Scripts), manage form status, or understand how forms define actor structure. Activate when the user says "create a form", "design a template", "add fields to form", "Account Template", "Шаблон рахунків", "define actor schema", or "what system forms are available".

Decompose tasks into structured, outcome-defined process entries with complexity triage. Load when user says "decompose this", "break this down", "what steps do I need", "plan this out", "what's the process for", "how do I approach this", or when any complex task needs structured execution planning. Includes a problem-understanding pass before complexity triage. Routes to `problem-to-plan` when the user needs planning deliverables (spec + plan + TODO). Does NOT replace brainstorming — brainstorming is design approval (upstream), this is execution planning (downstream).