Results for “invest”

Expert in residential hollow space detection, hidden room discovery, and safe room planning. Helps map house dimensions, identify anomalies suggesting hidden spaces, and safely explore potential voids. Knowledge of architectural history, construction methods, and non-destructive investigation techniques. Activate on "panic room", "hidden room", "secret room", "hollow space", "house mapping", "find hidden space", "room dimensions", "hidden door", "false wall", "priest hole", "prohibition era", "safe room". NOT for illegal entry, structural modifications without permits, or bypassing security systems.

Debug LLM applications using the Phoenix CLI. Fetch traces, analyze errors, structure trace review with open coding and axial coding, inspect datasets, review experiments, query annotation configs, and use the GraphQL API. Use whenever the user is analyzing traces or spans, investigating LLM/agent failures, deciding what to do after instrumenting an app, building failure taxonomies, choosing what evals to write, or asking "what's going wrong", "what kinds of mistakes", or "where do I focus" — even without naming a technique.

Plan a chunk of work too big for one agent session by putting it on a shared whiteboard — a map of investigation tickets on GitHub Issues — working them until nothing is left to decide, then snapshotting the board into a handoff artifact. Tickets needing nobody are worked back-to-back; the session stops when the human is the blocker. Use only when the user explicitly invokes whiteboard or asks to draw, work, run, or snapshot a whiteboard/map — not for ordinary planning requests.

Design habit-forming product loops using the Hook Model (Trigger, Action, Variable Reward, Investment). Use when the user mentions "users arent coming back", "engagement loops", "habit formation", "push notifications", "variable rewards", "daily active users", "habit zone", or "user retention loops". Also trigger when designing notification strategies, building streaks or progress systems, or analyzing why users stop using a product after initial signup. Covers ethics evaluation and onboarding for habits. For friction reduction and B=MAP, see improve-retention. For viral sharing, see contagious.

Build a compact, validation-gated implementation plan for multi-step, risky, or ambiguous work — typically when phases need explicit checkpoints, the change touches multiple files/services, or the user wants alignment before execution. Output goes to `.claude/plans/<topic>.md` (or `.agents/plans/`) with goal, in/out-of-scope, phased steps, validation per phase, and replanning triggers. Skip for trivial single-file fixes, bug investigations (use `tracer`), or open-ended exploration (use `explore`). Pair with `ship` once the plan ends and merge work begins.

Use this skill when the user requests to generate, create, or write professional research reports including but not limited to market analysis, consumer insights, brand analysis, financial analysis, industry research, competitive intelligence, investment due diligence, or any consulting-grade analytical report. This skill operates in two phases — (1) generating a structured analysis framework with chapter skeleton, data query requirements, and analysis logic, and (2) after data collection by other skills, producing the final consulting-grade report with structured narratives, embedded charts, and strategic insights.

Discover what customers truly need by analyzing the "job" they hire your product to do. Use when the user mentions "customer discovery", "why customers churn", "what job does this solve", "competing against luck", "product-market fit", "switching behavior", "milkshake moment", or "functional vs emotional jobs". Also trigger when investigating why users choose competitors, designing features around real customer needs, or reframing product value propositions. Covers JTBD interviews, competition analysis, and jobs-oriented roadmaps. For product positioning, see obviously-awesome. For rapid validation, see design-sprint.

Diagnose and fix retention problems using behavior design (B=MAP). Use when the user mentions "users drop off", "activation rate", "onboarding friction", "retention metrics", "why users dont complete", "churn analysis", "user activation", or "aha moment". Also trigger when analyzing cohort retention curves, designing activation milestones, reducing time-to-value for new users, or investigating why users stop after their first session. Covers the Ability Chain, prompt design, and tiny behaviors that compound. For habit loops and variable rewards, see hooked-ux. For intrinsic motivation, see drive-motivation.

Run a structured 5-day process to prototype, test, and validate product ideas with real users. Use when the user mentions "design sprint", "validate in a week", "rapid prototype", "test with users", "de-risk before building", "GV sprint", "prototype testing", or "design workshop". Also trigger when a team needs to make a critical product decision quickly, resolve stakeholder disagreements, or test risky ideas before investing in development. Covers mapping, sketching, deciding, prototyping, and testing. For ongoing experimentation, see lean-startup. For customer job analysis, see jobs-to-be-done.

Opens a conversational planning session for a feature, bug, or ticket. Investigates the repo, discusses the approach with the user until a solution is agreed, and only then writes the plan to docs/plans/. Use whenever the user invokes it, describes a problem to solve, pastes a ticket, mentions an incident, or asks to plan a non-trivial change. Also on "plan this", "analyze this first", "what would we need to touch", "let's start with this" — or in Spanish "planeá", "analizá esto antes", "qué habría que tocar", "arranquemos con esto".

Analytics tracking, interpretation, funnel analysis, product metrics, and ROI measurement. Use when setting up GA4/GTM tracking, interpreting analytics data, analyzing conversion funnels, calculating ROI, or measuring product engagement. Triggers on "analytics," "GA4," "Google Analytics," "conversion tracking," "event tracking," "UTM parameters," "tag manager," "GTM," "tracking plan," "funnel analysis," "conversion rates," "user flow," "cohort analysis," "retention," "product metrics," "North Star metric," "ROI," "break-even," "payback period," "investment analysis," "validate my funnel," "why isn't my funnel converting," or "executive financial report." For A/B test setup, see ab-test-setup.

Analyzes state merit review for non-covered securities offerings, applying NASAA Statements of Policy to cheap stock, promoter equity investment, voting rights, and promoter compensation. Produces examiner-ready comment responses with cap table analysis and negotiation strategy. Use when filing Reg A, Rule 504, intrastate, or direct public offerings in merit review states, responding to Blue Sky examiner comments, structuring offerings to avoid conditioning, or analyzing NASAA SOPs. Also trigger on cheap stock analysis, promoter equity tests, unequal voting rights review, state examiner correspondence, or phrases like "merit review issues" or "the state examiner sent comments."

Evaluate any project, product, or system's claims against its actual implementation — scoring each claim for truth, identifying architectural gaps, assessing competitive positioning, proposing creative solutions, and producing an actionable roadmap. Load when the user asks to evaluate claims, reality-check a project, assess what this project actually does vs what it says, validate product claims, or score a system's credibility. Also triggers on "is this real", "does this work as claimed", "evaluate this project", "assess the gap between claims and reality", "how credible is this", "investor assessment", "score these claims", or "what's real vs marketing".

Apple's approach to interface design and fluid, physical motion, translated for the web. Use when building or reviewing gesture-driven UI, spring animations, drag/swipe/sheet interactions, momentum and interruptible transitions, translucent materials and depth, typography (optical sizing, tracking, leading), reduced-motion, or the design foundations (feedback, spatial consistency, restraint) behind Apple-style interfaces. Also applies to any HTML-rendered output with interactive elements — investor decks, annual reports, product pages, slide presentations (Reveal.js, Guizang PPT), interactive documents, and landing pages that need premium feel beyond static aesthetics. Not for static Word/PDF generation (typography rules only).

Strategic search planning for agent-driven research. Generates structured search-term matrices with tiered fallback strategies, engine-specific operators, and grading criteria before executing any searches. Use this skill whenever research requires more than a single search query — comparing technologies, verifying claims across sources, surveying a landscape, investigating a multi-faceted question, or building evidence for a decision. Do NOT use for quick factual lookups, fetching a single known URL, or questions answerable from a single source. Covers tech, academic, regulatory, and general domains. Think of it as "research planning" — the matrix is the plan, execution comes after.

Requires python3, and AISA_API_KEY. Uses the supplied AISA_API_KEY to send requests to https://api.aisa.one. Native-first ClawHub plugin for `stock-analysis`. Ships the packaged AIsa skill with an `openclaw.plugin.json` manifest and a Claude-compatible bundle fallback. Analyze stocks and cryptocurrencies with 8-dimension scoring via AIsa API. Provides BUY/HOLD/SELL signals with confidence levels, entry/target/stop prices, and risk flags. Supports single or multi-ticker analysis with optional fast mode and JSON output. Use when the user asks to analyze a stock, check a ticker, or compare investments.

Sharpens and stress-tests an existing plan file through multiple codebase-grounded review passes, editing it in place and recording every finding and iteration in cross-referenced companion files. Use this skill whenever the user wants to iterate on, refine, tighten, or improve a plan. Also use it when the user asks to verify, validate, or confirm feasibility of an approach. Does not implement plan steps, write test plans, review code, or investigate bugs, and does not generate new plans from scratch — use plan-a-feature for a new plan. Runs its review rounds to completion without pausing between them; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.

Expert web research skill for professionals, creators, and curious individuals who need to research any topic quickly and thoroughly. Use this skill whenever the user wants to research a topic, find information, fact-check a claim, compare options, understand an industry, investigate a subject, or compile a research brief. Triggers: "research this for me", "find information about", "can you look into", "I need to understand", "compare these options", "what do I need to know about", "help me research", "give me a summary of", "fact-check this", or any request where the user wants comprehensive, organized information on a topic. Do NOT limit to obvious research requests — if the user is trying to make a decision or understand something complex, treat it as a research task.

Researches an open-ended question — options, possible solutions, prior art, trade-offs, or how something works — and produces a durable, evidence-backed, adversarially-validated report that recommends an option without committing the team to any artifact. Use when you want to research approaches, weigh options, survey prior art or the state of the art, or understand how something works before committing to a direction. Does not diagnose a bug, failure, or root cause — use investigate. Does not specify a feature — use plan-a-feature. Does not create or update a coding standard — use coding-standard. Does not compare two concrete artifacts for gaps — use gap-analysis. Does not assess an existing module's architecture — use architectural-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback.

A Cursor Canvas is a live React app that the user can open beside the chat. You MUST use a canvas when the agent produces a standalone analytical artifact — quantitative analyses, billing investigations, security audits, architecture reviews, data-heavy content, timelines, charts, tables, interactive explorations, repeatable tools, or any response that benefits from visual layout. Especially prefer a canvas when presenting results from MCP tools (Datadog, Databricks, Linear, Sentry, Slack, etc.) where the data is the deliverable — render it in a rich canvas rather than dumping it into a markdown table or code block. If you catch yourself about to write a markdown table, stop and use a canvas instead. You MUST also read this skill whenever you create, edit, or debug any .canvas.tsx file.

Default entry point for any research request — a hybrid router that classifies the question deterministically and either delegates to a specialist research skill (pulse for trends/sentiment, grants for NIH funding, litreview for academic literature, syllabus for course reading, patent for prior-art + IP landscape, dossier for entity research) or runs its own plan-decompose-multi-source-search-synthesize-cite fallback workflow when no specialist matches. Always surfaces the routing decision so users can override. Triggers — "research [topic]", "look into [topic]", "what do we know about [topic]", "investigate [topic]", "find me information on [topic]", "do some research on [topic]", "I need to understand [topic]", or any research request that doesn't obviously match a more-specific specialist skill. Output is a markdown briefing (default) or .docx document (on request) with full citations and an audit log.

Produces a progressive-disclosure overview of unfamiliar code or a pull request's changes with code-overview and publishes the resulting overview to a user-specified Confluence location. Use when the user wants code or a PR explained, oriented, or made sense of AND the overview posted to a Confluence space or page. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not produce the overview to a local file only — use code-overview. Does not publish an arbitrary existing markdown file — use markdown-to-confluence. Does not document an already-understood feature to Confluence — use project-documentation-to-confluence. Does not root-cause a bug to Confluence — use investigate-to-confluence. Does not plan or specify a new feature to Confluence — use plan-a-feature-to-confluence. Does not publish to Jira — use work-items-to-jira.

Greenfield development path for products, tools, and systems that do not yet exist. G Stack validates the idea before anything is planned or built. Use when starting from zero: no existing codebase, no existing schema, no existing API that this extends. AUTO-FIRE immediately when the user says any of: - "new development", "/new-development [description]" - "I have an idea for [X]", "I want to build [X] from scratch" - "new product", "new tool", "new platform", "new application" - "build [X] — it doesn't exist yet", "start a new project" Do NOT use when an existing codebase already exists for the work — use /full-development for large brownfield work. If unsure: ask "Does any part of this already exist in code?" If yes → /full-development. This is the most token-intensive command. Use it when the investment is justified by the scope of what is being built.

Personal finance review skill for individuals who want to understand their spending, budgets, and financial patterns. Use whenever the user wants to analyze expenses, categorize spending, review a budget, build a budget from scratch, analyze debt, audit subscriptions, understand their savings rate, or track progress toward a financial goal. Triggers: "help me review my spending", "here are my expenses", "can you look at my budget", "help me build a budget", "I want to understand where my money goes", "categorize these transactions", "help me pay off my debt", "audit my subscriptions", "am I saving enough", "am I on track for my goal", "analyze my finances", or any time the user shares financial data (even raw or messy) and wants insight. Does NOT provide investment, tax, or financial planning advice — helps users understand their own data. Trigger proactively when the user pastes transactions, expenses, or any money-related data, even without an explicit request for analysis.

Walks a person through code changes one step at a time in conversation, starting at the entry point and following the flow that changes, showing a small chunk per step and explaining it in plain language. Defaults to the current branch's changes, and walks the code from the perspective of any context provided instead — a file, directory, symbol, pull request, plan, or ticket. Use when someone wants to be walked through, taught, paced through, or shown around code or a branch step by step, or to learn how a change works before reviewing or extending it. Stops after every step and waits, so the learner sets the pace. Paces through code that already exists and builds nothing — to build new work while being paced through it, use pairing. Does not produce a written overview to read alone — use code-overview. Does not review code quality — use code-review. Does not diagnose bugs — use investigate.

Write code through a disciplined, BDD-framed Test-Driven Development loop: build a behavior test list, then drive each behavior through red-green-refactor with an enforced observed-failure gate. Use when the user wants to implement, build, or write code test-first, "do TDD", follow "red-green-refactor", drive code from tests, choose the next test by the Transformation Priority Premise (TPP) or ZOMBIES ordering, or grow a feature behavior-by-behavior with tests leading. This skill writes and changes code; it does not produce a test plan document (use automated-test-planning, or manual-test-planning for a plan a person runs by hand), review or audit existing code (use code-review), restructure existing code outside a TDD loop (use refactor), specify what a feature should do (use plan-a-feature), or find the root cause of a bug (use investigate). Runs its loop to completion without pausing for review; to review each behavior as it lands, use pairing.

Produces a human-readable, progressive-disclosure overview of unfamiliar code or a pull request's changes — why it exists (the real problem it solves or goal it serves for the business or a user), and from there what it does, how it flows, and where to start — so you can get up to speed before working on or reviewing it. Use when you want to understand, get oriented in, make sense of, explain, or get up to speed on a chunk of code, a file, a directory, a symbol, or a PR's changes. Writes the overview to a scratch file and changes no code. Does not review code quality or raise findings — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting them. Does not produce durable feature or system documentation — use project-documentation. Does not assess architecture or structural risk — use architectural-analysis. Does not diagnose bugs or root-cause failures — use investigate. Does not pace a person through the code one step at a time in conversation — use code-walkthrough.