Results for “pr-draft”

Prose quality checker for Quarto (.qmd) files, grounded in William Zinsser's *On Writing Well* (30th Anniversary Edition). Checks for clutter, weak verbs, hollow qualifiers, clichés, inflated academic voice, poor leads and endings, pronoun and tense inconsistency, and unclear explanation. Produces a structured markdown report organized by document section — never modifies the source file. Use when asked to improve prose quality, tighten writing, reduce clutter, or apply Zinsser's writing principles to a draft. For grammar and punctuation, use the proofread skill. For APSA style rules, use the apsa-style skill. Supports an optional output-file argument and an optional @sec-label argument to restrict checking to one section.

Drafts litigation-ready U.S. pre-suit demand letters that function as settlement instruments and defensible future exhibits. Enforces element-driven narratives, verified authority, damages methodology, and ethics guardrails. Use this skill when the user mentions demand letter, pre-suit demand, breach and cure notice, settlement demand, insurance policy-limits demand, Stowers demand, FDCPA collection letter, notice of intent to file, cease and desist demand for payment, or pre-litigation correspondence. Also trigger when the user asks about FRE 408 framing, contractual notice compliance, statutory pre-suit prerequisites, evidence preservation notices, or quantifying damages for a demand package. Skill includes 14 verified real-letter exemplars referenced from `references/ARCHETYPE-INDEX.md`.

Expert HIPAA compliance assistant for healthcare and software contexts. Use this skill whenever the user mentions HIPAA, PHI (Protected Health Information), ePHI, covered entities, business associates, healthcare data privacy, medical records, health information security, BAA (Business Associate Agreements), or any compliance review involving patient data. Also trigger for requests to draft privacy notices, HIPAA policies, consent forms, security risk assessments, or breach notification letters. Use for developers building healthcare software who need technical safeguard guidance (encryption, access controls, audit logs), compliance officers reviewing documents or procedures, and anyone asking "is this HIPAA compliant?" or "what does HIPAA require for X?". When in doubt about whether a healthcare or data privacy question falls under this skill — use it.

Expert GDPR compliance assistant covering all four core workflows: (1) auditing code and systems for GDPR violations, (2) drafting GDPR-compliant documents such as privacy policies, Data Processing Agreements (DPAs), and consent notices, (3) answering GDPR compliance questions with authoritative article citations, and (4) reviewing data flows and PII handling practices. Use this skill whenever the user mentions GDPR, data protection, privacy compliance, lawful basis, data subject rights, DPA, privacy notices, consent management, data breaches, DPIAs, controller/ processor relationships, cross-border data transfers, or any EU/UK data privacy topic. Also trigger for questions like "is this GDPR compliant?", "how do I handle personal data?", "what does a privacy policy need?", or any request involving PII, personal data, or data retention in a regulatory context.

Use this skill when creating a new Claude skill from scratch, editing or improving an existing skill, or measuring skill performance with evals and benchmarks. Invoke whenever the user says things like 'make a skill for X', 'turn this workflow into a skill', 'test my skill', 'improve my skill', 'run evals', 'benchmark this', or 'optimize my skill description'. Also use proactively when the conversation has produced a repeatable workflow that would benefit from being captured as a skill. Covers the full lifecycle: capture intent, draft SKILL.md, run evals, review with user, iterate, optimize description, package. NOT for general coding help, debugging runtime errors, building MCP servers, writing Claude hooks, or creating plugins - use domain-specific skills for those.

Live application prep for Heath Barnett. Given a role name or a job application URL, renders the real application form, reads every field including the bespoke custom questions, drafts each answer grounded in Heath's receipts and resume master, and returns a copy-paste breakdown plus the submit window in the hiring manager's timezone. Built for the hot window: Heath is at the keyboard, this gets him ready to paste and submit in minutes. Trigger on "prep [company/role]", "apply prep", "get me ready to apply to [company]", "prep my application for [role]", "extract the questions for [role]", "what does the [company] application ask", or Heath pasting an application URL with intent to apply. Never submits the form. Never fabricates. No em dashes.

Produce a standalone test plan by analyzing code for test coverage gaps and edge cases. Use when you need to create, generate, or draft a test plan for a branch, need to analyze test coverage, or need to identify what tests to write for specific files or directories. Does not produce a plain-language plan for a person to run tests by hand — use manual-test-planning for that. Does not write test code — use tdd to implement behavior test-first. Does not refine existing plans — use iterative-plan-review. Does not review code quality, security, or style — use code-review for full code review. Does not evaluate architectural testability or structural coupling — use architectural-analysis for architectural assessment.

Creates decision-focused PRDs and product specs — the kind that make explicit decisions, not document hopes. Make sure to use this skill whenever someone asks to write, review, draft, or improve any product document, including PRDs, feature specs, requirements docs, or product specifications. Trigger even when the user doesn't say "PRD" explicitly — phrases like "write a spec for X", "define requirements for Y", "what should my PRD include", "help me document this feature", or "my spec feels too vague" all apply. Do not attempt to write the PRD directly without consulting this skill. Produces 5-stage PRDs with behavior contracts (15-25 labeled examples for AI features), measurable success metrics with specific thresholds, precise rollout plans with percentages and ramp gates, and antipattern detection. Works for AI features, SaaS, mobile apps, and traditional software.

Expert social media writing skill for creators, professionals, and brands who want to write posts that actually perform. Use this skill whenever the user wants to write, improve, or get help with any social media content — including LinkedIn posts, Twitter/X tweets or threads, Instagram captions, or TikTok captions. Also trigger for: "write a post about", "help me with my LinkedIn", "draft a tweet", "create a thread", "write a caption", "I want to post about", "turn this into a social post", "make this more engaging", or any request to create or improve content for a social platform. Do NOT limit to obvious requests — if the user has an idea, a story, or a piece of content and mentions a platform, use this skill.

Use this skill whenever a user wants to create a presentation outline, slide deck structure, storyboard slides, or plan a deck for any context (talk, boardroom, email report). Also use when the user mentions "help me structure my presentation", "slide outline", "storyboard my deck", "presentation flow", "plan my slides", "key message for my deck", "pyramid principle for slides", "what slides should I include", or "help me tell a story with slides". This skill walks through a complete, interactive process in two phases: Phase 1 (setup → key message → storyboard) saves a slide-outline.md; Phase 2 (interactive per-slide copy drafting → polish) saves a slide-copy.md that is linked from slide-outline.md. Trigger even when the user only mentions a vague intent like "I need to present X to my team" or "help me put together a board deck".

NIH grant research skill for clinical researchers. Grill-me intake (research idea + career stage + preliminary data + environment + submission posture + known institute targets) locks down the funding strategy before any search runs. Runs a 5-facet Consensus positioning analysis (with draft Significance/Innovation language), maps the research to the right NIH institutes and study sections via RePORTER, finds NOSIs and funded overlap, and produces an editable Word document (.docx) with budget/scope-aware mechanism recommendations, submission timelines, and a mandatory program officer recommendation. Use when the user asks about research funding or makes any grant-related request (e.g., 'grants for [topic]', 'find grants for my research idea', 'what grants match my research', 'help me find NIH funding', 'grant opportunities for my research'). NIH-only scope — non-NIH funders (PCORI, DOD CDMRP, VA, foundations) are out of scope and flagged at intake.

Generate typed SDK bindings (Pydantic v2 models, TypeScript types) from the Bloodbank JSON Schema tree at `bloodbank/schemas/bloodbank/v1/**` (Draft 2020-12). Uses `datamodel-code-generator` and `json-schema-to-typescript` — NOT the deprecated hand-rolled Holyfields generators. Use when generating event-contract bindings for a Bloodbank consumer, importing typed CloudEvents envelopes into another project, or scaffolding a `bloodbank-contracts` SDK package. Trigger keywords — "bloodbank SDK", "bloodbank contracts", "Pydantic from bloodbank schemas", "TypeScript types for bloodbank events", "bloodbank.v1.* types", "event contract bindings", "datamodel-code-generator", "json-schema-to-typescript", "regenerate SDK", "CloudEvents bindings". Do NOT use for schema authoring (edit `bloodbank/schemas/` directly per `docs/event-naming.md` §12), runtime envelope validation (use `BLOODBANK_HOOK_VALIDATE=1`), schema-tree consistency (`mise run smoketest:schemas`), or generic JSON Schema codegen unrelated to Bloodbank.

Turn a weak/cheap "Flash" model into a "Pro" performer by wrapping HKUDS UpSkill — captures agent session failures, has a strong Teacher model analyze them and draft a skill, then validates it against the weak Student model in a closed Ralph Loop (up to 3 rounds) before storing it for automatic reuse. Use when the user wants to install UpSkill, run `/upskill-init`, `/upskill-configure`, `/upskill-build`, `/upskill-run`, `/upskill-list`, `/upskill-status`, `/upskill-mode`, `/upskill-model`, `/upskill-remove`, or `/upskill-uninstall`, wants a cheap model to perform closer to a Pro model without switching, or wants a good session (success or failure) distilled into a validated skill. Triggers on: upskill, up-skill, flash to pro, teacher student distillation, ralph loop skill validation, distill agent failures into skills. Routes skill-quality ratcheting to `skill-autoresearch`, scaffolding to `write-a-skill`, and spec-compliance rewrites to `skill-standardization`.

Federal acquisition compliance auditor for the active Theseus workspace, backed by live FAR/DFARS text via the vendored `ecfr` MCP. USE WHEN the user asks to audit FAR/DFARS clause coverage, validate that cited clauses actually exist in eCFR (catch fabricated or typo'd numbers), check whether a cited clause has been amended since the solicitation issued, validate regulatory references (NIST SP, DAFI, MIL-STD), check that every "shall" requirement has a deliverable, find missing compliance artifacts, audit proposal_instruction ↔ evaluation_factor coverage (UCF Section L↔M or non-UCF equivalent — FAR 16 task orders, FOPRs, BPA calls, OTAs), or "are we compliant with the proposal instructions?". Cross-references the workspace's clause / regulatory_reference / requirement / deliverable / compliance_artifact entities against live eCFR and flags gaps with severity. Format-agnostic. DO NOT USE FOR drafting compliant prose (use proposal-generator) or extracting clauses (Theseus pipeline does that automatically).

Federal Other Transaction (OT) prototype bid strategist for 10 USC 4021 research and 10 USC 4022 prototype/4022(f) production-follow-on agreements. USE WHEN the user asks to "build an OT bid", "respond to this OT solicitation", "estimate should-cost for an OT prototype", "is this milestone price reasonable", "compare 4022(d) cost-share paths", "team with an NDC to avoid 1/3 cost share", "OT price-to-win", or "TRL milestone phasing" — any milestone-based prototype scoping, OT cost stack, or 4022(d) cost-share strategy question. Reconstructs the AO's TRL phasing from the active workspace KG, picks the 4022(d) path that minimizes our exposure, builds a per-milestone cost stack from BLS OEWS + GSA CALC+ + GSA Per Diem, and emits a JSON envelope handed to `proposal-generator`. DO NOT USE FOR FAR-based contracts (`price-to-win`/`proposal-generator`), incumbent research (`competitive-intel`), FAR clause audit (`compliance-auditor`), or prime-to-sub SOW drafting (`subcontractor-sow-builder`).

Verifies that every entry in a bibliography ACTUALLY EXISTS by cross-checking it against four keyless public scholarly APIs (Crossref, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, arXiv) with a polite mailto identifier, resolving DOI/arXiv IDs, fuzzy-matching title and authors (difflib SequenceMatcher ratio >=0.70), flagging retractions marked in Crossref (update-to) or OpenAlex (is_retracted), and emitting per-entry JSON verdicts mapped to the AlterLab citation-hallucination taxonomy (TF/PAC/IH/PH/SH). Accepts BibTeX, a DOI/arXiv ID list, or free-form references; degrades gracefully offline by emitting 'unverified' verdicts and never silently passing. Use when the request mentions verify citations, check references, fabricated or hallucinated references, fake DOI, retraction check, bibliography audit, or reference existence check. Does NOT write or draft papers — for authoring a manuscript (whose citation-check mode inserts citations) prefer alterlab-paper-writer instead. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

Pre-writing interview that captures the author's real opinions, experiences, and stances on a blog topic before the post is written on their behalf — the companion that runs BEFORE seo-blog-writer. Use this skill automatically whenever a blog post or article is about to be drafted under the user's name or brand — run the topic interview first, then hand the resulting Opinion Packet to seo-blog-writer. Also use it when the user says "interview me about this topic", "get my take first", "ask me what I think", or "update my opinion bank". Scope: blog/article topics only — not emails, docs, social posts, or other writing. If a blog post is about to be written as the user's voice and their take on the topic hasn't been captured, this skill triggers — even if they only asked for "a blog post about X".

Use to CREATE or REVIEW a Job to be Done (JTBD) in Alan Klement's demand-side, progress-based sense — a job is the progress a customer is trying to make, never a task or feature. Trigger whenever someone wants to write or draft a JTBD, job statement, or job story; figure out the real motivation, struggle, or progress behind a feature, request, or product; understand why customers switch, adopt, or churn; turn interview notes or research into jobs; or pressure-test, sharpen, or rewrite existing JTBDs into proper jobs. Also trigger on "grill my JTBD", "is this a real job or just a task/feature", "what's the actual job here", "why would they switch". In an A-Team target repo, jobs are durable artifacts — this skill writes docs/product/jtbd/NN-<slug>.md per CONTRACT.md and never deletes or silently rewrites a job. Do NOT use for writing PRDs, roadmaps, tickets, or acceptance criteria (those consume a finished JTBD), or for implementation user stories.

Reviews a product document (PRD, spec, design brief) BEFORE implementation to surface holes — undefined edge cases, missing states, policy gaps — by attacking what the document is SILENT about (things unwritten, and things written only for the happy path). Acts as a strict "sign-off manager," ruling Approve / Conditional / Reject and producing a polite, forwardable question list. Works for planners/PMs (self-review before sharing), engineers (blocking questions before coding), and designers (screen states with no mockup). Use whenever the user wants a spec/PRD/plan/brief checked for readiness or gaps, or says "review this spec", "find holes in this PRD", "poke holes in this", "is this plan good to build?", "can I start implementing this?", "what states/edge cases am I missing?", "what should I ask the PM before coding?", "run devil", or pastes/links a planning document and asks whether it's ready to act on. Do NOT use it to: write or draft a new spec, summarize or translate a document, estimate/break down tic

Generate AI music on RunComfy via the `runcomfy` CLI — a smart router across the music-model catalog. Routes to ElevenLabs AI Music Generation (premium 44.1 kHz stereo vocal tracks, 5 s–5 min, $0.0083/s) and ACE Step / ACE Step 1.5 (StepFun-AI open-weights, tag-driven composition, multilingual lyrics, $0.0002–0.0003/s, ~27× cheaper), plus ACE Step audio-inpaint (regenerate a time range inside an existing track) and ACE Step audio-outpaint (extend a track before or after). Picks the right model for the user's actual intent — premium vocal hook, cheap background music library, multilingual pop song, repair a bad chorus, lengthen a 30 s draft into a 2 min cut — and ships each model's documented prompting patterns plus the minimal `runcomfy run` invoke. Triggers on "generate music", "make a song", "AI music", "background music", "instrumental track", "soundtrack", "jingle", "theme music", "royalty-free music", "compose", "music with lyrics", "extend music", "fix this song", "inpaint music", or any explicit ask to

Use this skill whenever LMX is used, produced, reviewed, migrated, or modified. This includes composing campaigns, loops, lifecycle emails, or email-message bodies for the Loops editor or Content API. LMX (Loops Markup Language) is the format used for Loops email content. Trigger on phrases like "create a campaign", "generate an email", "write a welcome email", "draft a lifecycle email", "build an email template", "create an onboarding email", "copy this into LMX", "migrate this email", "convert this email to LMX", "design a new Loops email", "use imagegen for a Loops email", "use gpt-image for an LMX reference", "visual reference for a Loops email", "LMX", "Loops email", or any request to produce, copy, migrate, convert, review, or modify email body content intended for Loops. For net-new emails or major visual redesigns, follow this skill's Net-New Email Design Flow before generating or sourcing new visual assets. Source copy, existing HTML, MJML, Markdown, screenshots, and migration instructions do not byp

Produce a plain-language manual test plan from the context supplied to it — an executive summary, a high-level list of named tests, and a detail section per test with the steps a person follows by hand and the outcomes they should expect. Use when you want to create, draft, generate, or outline a manual test plan, manual QA steps, hands-on verification steps, or an acceptance walkthrough for a feature, change, branch, plan, or PR. When the plan holds more than five tests and at least two natural categories emerge, both the test list and the detail sections are organized under plain-language categories. When nothing in the supplied context can be manually tested, it says so and asks for more context instead of producing a document. Does not analyze code for automated test coverage gaps — use automated-test-planning. Does not write test code — use tdd. Does not review code quality — use code-review. Does not stress-test an existing plan — use iterative-plan-review.

Generate, visually edit, and export beautiful HTML/CSS presentation decks with agents using slides-grab (NomaDamas, MIT) — the open-source Claude Design alternative and best harness + editor + linter for slides in Claude Code / Codex. One routing-first skill across Plan (agent drafts an outline), Design (each slide is a self-contained slide-XX.html), Edit (a pure-JS browser editor where you drag a bbox over any region and ask the agent to rewrite just that area, or hand-tweak text/size/bold), and Export (capture-or-print PDF, per-slide PNG incl. Instagram 1:1 card-news, plus experimental/unstable PPTX and Figma-importable PPTX). Picks an install path (npm package + npx skills add, or clone), a deck workspace (--slides-dir, multi-deck decks/<name>/), one of 35 bundled design styles, and the supported asset flow (local ./assets/<file> only — image via god-tibo-imagen/codex/nano-banana, fetch-video via yt-dlp, tldraw .tldr→SVG), validating with slides-grab validate before any export.

Generate AI music on RunComfy via the `runcomfy` CLI — a smart router across the music-model catalog. Routes to ElevenLabs AI Music Generation (premium 44.1 kHz stereo vocal tracks, 5 s–5 min, $0.0083/s) and ACE Step / ACE Step 1.5 (StepFun-AI open-weights, tag-driven composition, multilingual lyrics, $0.0002–0.0003/s, ~27× cheaper), plus ACE Step audio-inpaint (regenerate a time range inside an existing track) and ACE Step audio-outpaint (extend a track before or after). Picks the right model for the user's actual intent — premium vocal hook, cheap background music library, multilingual pop song, repair a bad chorus, lengthen a 30 s draft into a 2 min cut — and ships each model's documented prompting patterns plus the minimal `runcomfy run` invoke. Triggers on "generate music", "make a song", "AI music", "background music", "instrumental track", "soundtrack", "jingle", "theme music", "royalty-free music", "compose", "music with lyrics", "extend music", "fix this song", "inpaint music", or any explicit ask to

Generate AI music on RunComfy via the `runcomfy` CLI — a smart router across the music-model catalog. Routes to ElevenLabs AI Music Generation (premium 44.1 kHz stereo vocal tracks, 5 s–5 min, $0.0083/s) and ACE Step / ACE Step 1.5 (StepFun-AI open-weights, tag-driven composition, multilingual lyrics, $0.0002–0.0003/s, ~27× cheaper), plus ACE Step audio-inpaint (regenerate a time range inside an existing track) and ACE Step audio-outpaint (extend a track before or after). Picks the right model for the user's actual intent — premium vocal hook, cheap background music library, multilingual pop song, repair a bad chorus, lengthen a 30 s draft into a 2 min cut — and ships each model's documented prompting patterns plus the minimal `runcomfy run` invoke. Triggers on "generate music", "make a song", "AI music", "background music", "instrumental track", "soundtrack", "jingle", "theme music", "royalty-free music", "compose", "music with lyrics", "extend music", "fix this song", "inpaint music", or any explicit ask to