Results for “pr-review”

Captures, reviews, and promotes Note entities — the lightweight knowledge capture primitive in processkit. Notes are quick-capture units (thoughts, insights, questions, references) that are reviewed periodically and promoted to WorkItems, DecisionRecords, or other primitives when they ripen. Use when the user says "remember this", "note that", "I had an idea", or when running a periodic note review session.

Prompt Summary - rigorous, review-ready analysis of any AI prompt

Reviews local branch changes for bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues, producing a prioritized report with severity ratings and concrete fixes.

Use for all ClawSweeper work: MarketingClaw issue/PR sweep reports, commit-review reports, repair jobs, cloud fix PRs, @clawsweeper maintainer mention commands, trusted ClawSweeper-reviewed autofix/automerge, GitHub Actions monitoring, permissions, gates, and manual backfills.

Analyzes prompts for safety, bias, security vulnerabilities, and effectiveness, providing detailed improvement recommendations with frameworks, testing methodologies, and educational content.

Iteratively improves a PR (GitHub), MR (GitLab), or shelved changelist (Perforce) until Greptile gives it a 5/5 confidence score with zero unresolved comments. Triggers Greptile review, fixes all actionable comments, pushes/re-shelves, re-triggers review, and repeats. Use when the user wants to fully optimize a PR/MR/CL against Greptile's code review standards.

Validates product direction before building, runs product diagnostics, founder reviews, user journey audits, and feature prioritization, producing actionable briefs and recommendations.

Drives a PRD-based persistence loop that iterates on a task until all user stories pass and are reviewer-verified, with automatic retry and progress tracking.

Enforces modern, safe, and idiomatic C++ coding practices based on the C++ Core Guidelines for writing, reviewing, or refactoring C++ code.

Structured framework for reviewing UI designs, evaluating visual hierarchy, consistency, accessibility, spacing, typography, and color usage, and providing actionable improvement recommendations.

Audits iOS app source code and metadata to identify App Store rejection risks and optimization opportunities, producing a structured compliance report.

Creates a pull request from completed phase work, generates a rich PR body from planning artifacts, optionally runs code review, and prepares for merge.

Executes GitHub CLI and git commands with proper authentication, enforcing the --repo flag and providing helper functions for code review comments with suggestion blocks.

Manage GitHub repositories: triage issues, review PRs, debug CI/CD, prepare releases, and monitor security alerts using the gh CLI.

Evaluate whether a product is production-ready, publish-ready, or sellable-ready. Triggers: 'publish ready', 'ready check', 'readiness review', 'quality check', 'production ready', 'sellable ready', 'can I publish', 'release check', 'final review'.

Use for the search-planning stage of a literature review, when database lanes and language layers must be chosen, when DOI coverage policy is unclear, or when inclusion and exclusion criteria need drafting before any source is read; not for running the screening and PRISMA pipeline of a formal review, which is prisma-scoping-review-pipeline.

Pre-send email quality review and scoring across 5 dimensions (subject line, copy quality, technical/HTML, deliverability, compliance). Analyzes subject lines, body copy, HTML structure, spam triggers, and CAN-SPAM compliance. Scores 0-100 with detailed recommendations for improvement. Use when user wants to review an email before sending, check email quality, or validate marketing email best practices.

Restructure code while preserving behavior: confirm tests are green, refactor in small steps, keep tests green, review, and commit with a gated workflow.

Organizes 70+ React and Next.js performance optimization rules across 8 priority categories for use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code.

Embed before/after screenshots and annotated images in pull request descriptions to help reviewers see visual changes without checking out the branch.

Use `analysis-agent` to analyze permissions, secrets, sensitive data, trust boundaries, and injection; `task-agent` to implement controls; and `review-agent` to assess evidence. Skip self-review and no-trust-impact work.

Master software architect specializing in modern architecture patterns, clean architecture, microservices, event-driven systems, and DDD. Reviews system designs and code changes for architectural integrity, scalability, and maintainability. Use PROACTIVELY for architectural decisions.

LLM-assisted human-in-the-loop review. Make sense of a change, focus attention where it matters, test. Use when the user says "checkpoint", "human review", or "walk me through this change".

LLM-assisted human-in-the-loop review. Make sense of a change, focus attention where it matters, test. Use when the user says "checkpoint", "human review", or "walk me through this change".

Run structured competitive analysis with feature matrices, SWOT, pricing comparison, review mining, and positioning maps using the inference.sh CLI.

Scrapes Amazon product data from ASINs using browseract.com automation API and performs competitive analysis, comparing specifications, pricing, review quality, and visual strategies.

Produces academic papers, literature reviews, grant proposals, and clinical reports with LaTeX formatting and verified citations, using research-lookup and parallel-web skills.

Create product objectives, key results, initiatives, guardrails, and review cadence.

Routing-first visual approval gate for AI agent plans, markdown specs, and diffs. Use when a human needs to review a concrete plan before execution, inspect a targeted diff in a browser, mark up a spec/PRD/architecture note, or set up the review loop on Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Codex CLI, or OpenCode. Route planning/spec creation to `task-planning` or `ralph`, broad PR-policy review to `code-review`, rendered-UI critique to `agentation`, and fresh-session browser verification to `browser-harness`.

Provides a structured workflow for unit, integration, E2E, and performance testing, including browser automation, code review, and quality gates.

Iterate on a pull request until actionable CI checks pass and high/medium review feedback is addressed, stopping at human approval, draft, or merge gates.

Reviews closed trades, partial exits, and monthly trade aggregates for process adherence, risk discipline, execution quality, and evidence-based trading behavior patterns.

Detect and fix repo-wide anti-patterns and consistency drift (naming, organisation, repeated smells). Use when "code smell", "anti-pattern", "technical debt", or "standardize the codebase". This PR/diff review → audit-code-review.

Comprehensive legal document review specialist for contracts, litigation documents, and real estate agreements — summarizing documents, flagging risk clauses, comparing contract versions, and checking compliance across any law firm size or practice area

Apply opinionated, production-grade Python design and review standards. Use for substantial Python implementation, refactoring, API design, module design, exception boundaries, interfaces, or a deep code-quality review; not for a quick standalone script.

Diagnose SaaS business health across growth, retention, unit economics, and capital efficiency. Use when preparing a business review or prioritizing urgent fixes.