Results for “access-review”

Review UI code for compliance with web interface guidelines, accessibility, and UX best practices.

Review UI code for compliance with web interface guidelines, including accessibility and UX best practices.

Run a WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility audit on a design or page. Trigger with "audit accessibility", "check a11y", "is this accessible?", or when reviewing a design for color contrast, keyboard navigation, touch target size, or screen reader behavior before handoff.

Use this when reviewing or designing UI for keyboard access, semantic structure, focus handling, labels, contrast, error communication, motion sensitivity, or screen-reader-friendly behavior.

Review code for AEM Edge Delivery Services projects, validating code quality, performance, accessibility, and adherence to EDS best practices during self-review or pull request review.

Reviews UI code for compliance with Web Interface Guidelines, checking accessibility, design, and UX best practices.

Gates a git branch before merge by running code review, security, test, and accessibility passes on the diff, then emits a single verdict.

Audits UI code for compliance with the StyleSeed design system, covering design tokens, component conventions, accessibility, mobile UX, and typography.

Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy, flagging issues with easing, duration, performance, and accessibility.

Reviews authorization, tenant isolation, roles, ownership, row access, admin boundaries, sharing, and privilege escalation.

Review UI code for StyleSeed design-system compliance, accessibility, mobile ergonomics, spacing discipline, and implementation quality.

Structured framework for reviewing UI designs, evaluating visual hierarchy, consistency, accessibility, spacing, typography, and color usage, and providing actionable improvement recommendations.

Audit a Supabase/Postgres project for Row-Level Security and access-control gaps, then produce a phased remediation plan. Use when "RLS", "is my Supabase secure", "anyone can read my data", "lock down my tables". App-layer session/route gates → audit-auth-flows.

Turn interactive commit reviews back on for the current herdr workspace.

Use this when reviewing a feature, service, API, auth design, integration, job system, or deployment plan for security weaknesses, unsafe trust assumptions, input risks, or privilege issues.

Review UI code for StyleSeed design-system compliance, accessibility, mobile ergonomics, spacing discipline, and implementation quality.

Systematically test web applications for broken access control vulnerabilities including privilege escalation, missing function-level checks, and insecure direct object references.

通用跨模型审查：Review LLM 对任意研究制品进行独立评审，输出结构化评分、wiki 实体映射与改进建议

Visually inspect websites to identify and fix design issues including layout, responsive, accessibility, and visual consistency problems at the source code level.

Use when a skill needs the user to interactively review code changes in revdiff mid-workflow — working changes, staged changes, or a specific commit — then read their annotations back. Takes a review mode.

Perform thorough code reviews on files or pull requests, checking for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and style violations. Use when the user requests code review or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

Audits OAuth 2.0 permissions across identity providers to identify over-privileged third-party integrations, excessive API scopes, and unused token grants, enforcing least-privilege access.

Reviews authorized diffs for auth, input, filesystem, network, secrets, parsers, injection, CI/CD, and supply-chain regressions.

任意のリポジトリ（アプリ/ライブラリ/運用スクリプト/コンテンツ等）の種別を判定し、 種別に応じた評価軸（品質・テスト・依存、または検証ゲート等）で**実測ベース**評価して優先度付き改善案を出すスキル。 言語非依存（Python は AST 詳細・その他は近似と明記）。ベンダーコード混入・除外の空振り・偽の成功終了コードなど、 「黙って間違った数値を出す」失敗を構造的に封じる。 「リポジトリレビューして」「コード品質を評価して」「このプロジェクトを診断して」「包括レビュー」「repo-review」 「アーキテクチャ評価して」等で発火。/repo-review でも起動。

Audit a component or page for accessibility issues and fix them

Review a ticket or PR through focused specialist lenses: scope, architecture, security, tests, AC coverage, and PR metadata.

Review an entire codebase for architecture, engineering health, and exploitable risk; generate a prioritized remediation plan, an evidence-anchored system knowledge document, or both.

`analysis-agent`/`task-agent`/`review-agent`: use when code needs correctness, security, performance, maintainability, or hallucinated-API review; skip when no review is needed.

Routes rendered UI testing, visual regression, browser QA, accessibility, responsive, performance, or frontend review to a leaf skill.

Use this when reviewing or designing Firebase security rules for Firestore or related client-accessed Firebase data. Trigger on requests about Firebase rules safety, access constraints, auth-claim checks, or client data exposure.