Results for “conflict-avoidance”

Federal Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) sweeper backed by FAR Subpart 9.5 (9.501-9.508) and the active Theseus workspace knowledge graph. USE WHEN the user asks about OCI risk on a bid, organizational conflicts, incumbent conflicts, biased ground rules, unequal access to information, impaired objectivity, or any pre-bid OCI due diligence. Pulls `company`, `incumbent`, `subcontractor`, `customer`, `program_office`, and prior-contract relationships from the workspace KG, classifies each potential conflict into one of the three FAR 9.505 classes (biased ground rules, unequal access, impaired objectivity), and emits a structured findings envelope with mitigation recommendations (firewall, NDA, recusal, novation). DO NOT USE FOR FAR clause coverage audit (use `compliance-auditor`), proposal prose (use `proposal-generator`), competitor research (use `competitive-intel`), or pricing (use `price-to-win`).

Use when two or more agents produce conflicting outputs, recommendations, or decisions. This skill provides a structured process for resolving disagreements between agents, ensuring conflicts are resolved fairly with clear reasoning and documented decisions.

Executes containment strategies to stop active adversary operations and prevent lateral movement during a confirmed security breach, using network segmentation, endpoint isolation, credential revocation, and access control modifications.

VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram

Use with analysis-agent or task-agent for task-local transaction, isolation, and conflict decisions. Do not use without a transaction decision or as task owner.

Hunt for adversary abuse of legitimate cloud services for C2, data staging, and exfiltration across Azure, AWS, GCP, and SaaS platforms.

Systematically collects, categorizes, and distributes indicators of compromise (IOCs) during and after security incidents to enable detection, blocking, and threat intelligence sharing.

Drafts opt-out forms and notices of exclusion for class actions, settlements, arbitration clauses, and privacy programs. Covers party identification, election language, consequence statements, signature blocks, and submission instructions per governing orders or contracts (FRCP 23, arbitration windows, CCPA/GDPR). Use when preparing opt-out paperwork, notices of exclusion, settlement opt-outs, or arbitration opt-out letters.

许三多（军旅剧虚构）认知与表达框架（压缩蒸馏）：钝感坚持、不抛弃不放弃、草根成长 触发：士兵突击 等。禁止军事违法教程

Drafts formal responses to governmental Notices of Violation, covering acknowledgment, factual timeline, legal defenses, mitigation, and proposed corrective action. Use when responding to environmental enforcement actions, regulatory citations, compliance violations, or governmental NOVs from agencies including EPA, OSHA, state environmental departments, or local code enforcement.

Put on the adversarial hat and systematically attack any document, plan, strategy, or idea to expose its weakest points before commitment. Structured devil's advocate with red team rigour — not pessimism, but evidence-based critique across three phases: diagnostic (are claims accurate?), creative (is the problem artificially constrained?), challenge (are solutions robust?). Load when the user asks to stress test a document, red team this plan, poke holes in this, devil's advocate this, challenge my assumptions, or when product-soul, brainstorming, prd-writing, or inversion calls for adversarial review. Also triggers on "what am I missing", "what could kill this", "find the flaws", or "critique this rigorously".

当试图建立或改变一个习惯、例行程序，但遇到阻力或难以坚持时

当遇到令人情绪激动或陷入僵局的情境，需要跳出固有反应模式以做出更优决策时

Convenes four independent advisor voices to surface structured disagreement for ambiguous decisions, tradeoffs, and go/no-go calls before choosing a path.

当需要在2-3个月内集中精力攻克一个重大、有挑战性的个人或职业目标时，使用此模型

Process the Refinery merge queue - collect agent work, detect and resolve conflicts, merge in dependency order, and verify integration.

Security controls for RAG. Indirect prompt-injection via retrieved documents, PII detection/redaction (Microsoft Presidio, AWS Comprehend), multi-tenant isolation, ACL-aware retrieval with row-level/metadata filtering, data-leakage prevention, jailbreak hardening on retrieved context, GDPR right-to-be-forgotten in vector DBs. USE WHEN: user mentions "prompt injection RAG", "indirect prompt injection", "PII redaction", "Presidio", "ACL RAG", "row-level security", "multi-tenant RAG isolation", "GDPR vector DB", "right to be forgotten", "jailbreak", "data leakage RAG" DO NOT USE FOR: hallucination detection - use `rag-guardrails`; tenancy scaling patterns - use `rag-production`; audit tracing schema - use `rag-observability`

Proceed through ordinary ambiguity by making reasonable assumptions, keeping momentum, validating as you go, and ending with a clear recap of decisions, changes, verification, and residual risk.

Compare, cross-review, and merge competing plans from multiple agents into one executable direction with a clear handoff.

Ranks any list of impediments and their countermeasures using a value-stream scoring model (ROI, Cost to Implement, Ease of Deployment, Risk Factor) and a fixed prioritization formula.

Resolves legacy references to the security-guardian capability by routing to the current runtime equivalent.

Convene a four-voice council for ambiguous decisions, tradeoffs, and go/no-go calls. Use when multiple valid paths exist and you need structured disagreement before choosing.

Convene a four-voice council for ambiguous decisions, tradeoffs, and go/no-go calls. Use when multiple valid paths exist and you need structured disagreement before choosing.

Deliberately disables or degrades security controls to verify detection and response capabilities, including WAF bypass, firewall rule removal, log pipeline disruption, and EDR disablement scenarios using boto3 and subprocess.

Reduce voluntary and involuntary churn through cancel flow design, save offers, exit surveys, and dunning sequences.

VS-Enhanced Qualitative Design Consultant with Ethnography & Action Research Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Avoids overused phenomenology, proposes context-optimal qualitative strategies Absorbed H1 (Ethnographic Research Advisor) and H2 (Action Research Facilitator) capabilities Use when: selecting qualitative research design, planning phenomenology/grounded theory/case study/ethnography/action research Triggers: phenomenology, 현상학, grounded theory, 근거이론, case study, 사례연구, narrative inquiry, ethnography, 민족지, action research, 실행연구, qualitative design

Use to monitor support conversations for conduct risk — pressure, mis-selling, unfair outcomes, obstruction and misleading statements — as distinct from whether the answer matched policy. Trigger for "monitor for mis-selling", "conduct risk in our support conversations", "are agents pressuring customers", "customers being obstructed from cancelling", conduct surveillance, or a conduct finding raised by second line.

Use to audit how payment disputes, chargebacks and unrecognised-transaction claims are handled against scheme deadlines and evidence standards. Trigger for "audit our dispute handling", "chargeback quality review", "are we meeting scheme deadlines", unrecognised transaction claims, provisional credit decisions, or a customer complaining their dispute was rejected unfairly.

Detect and resolve naming collisions, overlapping intent triggers, and insufficient intent diversity across the skill library. Load when a new skill is created (called by universal-skill-creator), during improvement passes (called by improve-skills), or when the user asks to deconflict skills, check for naming collisions, audit trigger overlap, review intent coverage, find duplicate triggers, check skill names, or says "are any skills too similar", "which skills overlap", "deconflict the library", "check for confusing skill names", "intent audit".

Convene a four-voice council of advisors to surface structured disagreement and tradeoffs for ambiguous decisions, go/no-go calls, and multi-path choices.

Byzantine fault-tolerant consensus and distributed coordination. Queen-led hierarchical swarm management with multiple consensus strategies. Use when: distributed coordination, fault-tolerant operations, multi-agent consensus, collective decision making. Skip when: single-agent tasks, simple operations, local-only work.

The Sovereign Litigation Protocol (SLP-2026). A recursive, high-fidelity framework for autonomous advocacy, multi-jurisdictional discovery, and the algorithmic resolution of civil and commercial disputes.

Convene a four-voice council for ambiguous decisions, tradeoffs, and go/no-go calls. Use when multiple valid paths exist and you need structured disagreement before choosing.

Proactively hunt for threats by analyzing IOCs, detecting behavioral anomalies in telemetry, and prioritizing signals mapped to MITRE ATT&CK.

Convene a four-voice council for ambiguous decisions, tradeoffs, and go/no-go calls. Use when multiple valid paths exist and you need structured disagreement before choosing.