Results for “criteria-analysis”

Transforms a raw product idea into four planning files: clarifying questions, deep research, a PRD with non-goals and metrics, and a phased execution plan with kill criteria.

Analyse student work against criteria to identify specific gaps between current performance and learning objectives. Use when reviewing submissions, planning feedback, or diagnosing learning needs.

Evaluates Base ERC-20 tokens by contract address, returning a 0-100 score across five criteria, launch protocol classification, security flags, and a narrative interpretation.

Systematically evaluates alternatives against weighted criteria, builds a comparison matrix, and recommends the best option with documented rationale and trade-offs.

Provides a rigorous thinking partner profile that challenges assumptions, calibrates claims to evidence, and improves decision quality under uncertainty.

Generate comprehensive Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) for software systems and AI-powered features, including executive summaries, user stories, technical specifications, and risk analysis.

Analyzes .NET project code coverage and CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) scores to identify risk hotspots, methods blocking coverage gains, and prioritize where to add tests.

`analysis-agent`/`task-agent`/`review-agent`: primary-Skill-selected for races, locks, optimistic conflicts, or worker overlap; never task owner; skip without concurrency impact.

Use when evaluating competitors, market positioning, or assessing competitive threats. This skill provides a structured framework for analyzing competitors' offerings, strategies, and market positioning to inform strategic decisions.

Answer any data question, scaling effort from a one-number lookup to a full stakeholder-ready analysis with a recommendation.

VS-Enhanced Literature Review Strategist - Comprehensive support for multiple review methodologies Full VS 5-Phase process: Prevents Mode Collapse and presents creative search strategies Supports: Systematic Review (PRISMA 2020), Scoping Review (JBI/PRISMA-ScR), Meta-Synthesis, Realist Synthesis, Narrative Review, Rapid Review Use when: conducting any type of literature review, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, scoping reviews, finding prior research Triggers: literature review, PRISMA, systematic review, scoping review, meta-synthesis, realist synthesis, narrative review, rapid review

当分析个人或他人成就差异的根本原因，并寻求提升路径时

Analyze closed deals and lost opportunities for patterns

Categorize, evaluate, and prioritize customer feature requests against product goals using strategic alignment, impact, effort, and risk analysis.

Cross-channel campaign performance analysis with blended CAC and budget recommendations

Audits colour decisions on a screen for contrast ratios, palette coherence, semantic meaning, and accessibility, flagging deviations and recommending specific corrections.

Multi-dimensional lead qualification scoring. Evaluates leads against BANT criteria, firmographic fit, behavioral signals, and intent indicators. Outputs qualified/disqualified verdict with detailed reasoning.

Conduct a structured literature review on a given topic by defining a search strategy, applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracting key findings, and synthesizing results into a coherent academic review. Use when the user requests literature review or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

Identify and prioritize risks by impact and controllability. Use for risk management, project planning, and strategic decision support.

Use with analysis-agent or task-agent for task-local transaction, isolation, and conflict decisions. Do not use without a transaction decision or as task owner.

帮助用户撰写高质量的文献综述类论文。提供从选题、文献检索、评估筛选、结构规划到最终写作的全流程指导。适用于需要撰写独立文献综述论文或学术论文中文献综述部分的用户。

当个人或组织经历重大环境变化、目标转换或阶段性迷茫时，用于理解当前所处阶段、预测发展轨迹并规划应对策略

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.

Analyze suspected malware through static, dynamic, and behavioral techniques, including IOC extraction, YARA or Sigma rules, sandboxing, and anti-analysis behavior detection.

Conducts thorough landscape research, competitive analysis, best practices evaluation, and evidence-based recommendations. Expert in market research and trend analysis.

Comprehensive results analysis for empirical research: generate publication-quality descriptive statistics and balance tables, interpret regression coefficients with economic magnitude and effect sizes, assess identification assumption diagnostics, and produce structured results memos. Use when asked to create summary statistics, Table 1, balance tests, interpret results, assess economic significance, or write results narratives.

Systematically evaluates evidence to determine which threat actor is responsible for a cyber operation using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses.

Layer 4 of the keyword research pipeline. Spawns a "skeptical SEO" adversarial sub-agent to argue against every survivor of Layers 1-3. Catches mechanical-classifier blind spots — wrong SERP intent, hidden link-graph gauntlets, AIO trajectory shifts, vanity-rank metrics. Same pattern as quality-check's adversarial draft read, applied to keyword selection.

Design grading plans. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with grading-plan related tasks.

Use for the search-planning stage of a literature review, when database lanes and language layers must be chosen, when DOI coverage policy is unclear, or when inclusion and exclusion criteria need drafting before any source is read; not for running the screening and PRISMA pipeline of a formal review, which is prisma-scoping-review-pipeline.