Results for “critic”

Evaluates the agent's own work, catches mistakes, and improves permanently through self-reflection, self-criticism, and learning from corrections.

{'CRITICAL': 'Use for MolyKit AI chat toolkit. Triggers on:'}

PowerShell Windows patterns. Critical pitfalls, operator syntax, error handling.

Stress-test ideas, plans, and decisions using structured critical reasoning across five modes: Socratic questioning, dialectic, pre-mortem, red teaming, and evidence audit.

Analyzes dependencies between stories, code modules, tickets, or specs to compute an optimal implementation order with parallel batches, cycle detection, and critical path analysis.

Get a deep critical review of research from GPT via Codex MCP. Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.

Test coverage quality analysis — behavioral coverage, critical gap identification, test resilience evaluation.

Generates Gantt charts with task dependencies, critical path analysis, and resource allocation

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality by assessing experimental design, identifying biases and confounders, and applying evidence grading frameworks like GRADE and Cochrane Risk of Bias.

Bash/Linux terminal patterns. Critical commands, piping, error handling, scripting. Use when working on macOS or Linux systems.

Bash/Linux terminal patterns. Critical commands, piping, error handling, scripting. Use when working on macOS or Linux systems.

Bash/Linux terminal patterns. Critical commands, piping, error handling, scripting. Use when working on macOS or Linux systems.

Bash/Linux terminal patterns. Critical commands, piping, error handling, scripting. Use when working on macOS or Linux systems.

Bash/Linux terminal patterns. Critical commands, piping, error handling, scripting. Use when working on macOS or Linux systems.

Analyze candidate task nodes, dependencies, collisions, and critical path before a consumer accepts or rejects a final DAG.

Analyze the spatial and structural qualities of a screen design, evaluating balance, whitespace, rhythm, and gestalt principles to identify compositional weaknesses and propose specific fixes.

Perform a Cynical Review and produce a findings report. Use when the user requests a critical review of something

Engages users in Socratic dialogue to examine beliefs and concepts through questioning.

Audits colour decisions on a screen for contrast ratios, palette coherence, semantic meaning, and accessibility, flagging deviations and recommending specific corrections.

Perform a Cynical Review and produce a findings report. Use when the user requests a critical review of something

Perform a Cynical Review and produce a findings report. Use when the user requests a critical review of something

Ruthless product and app critique for Nick's workflow. Use when evaluating an app, landing page, flow, or product experience to identify why users may bounce, distrust it, fail to activate, or never come back. Focus on practical weaknesses, not polite fluff.

贺涵（都市剧虚构）认知与表达框架（压缩蒸馏）：导师型男主、职场金句、情感争议 触发：我的前半生 等。虚构；忌情感操控教程

Audits typographic decisions on a screen for scale usage, readability, consistency, and token compliance, providing specific fixes.

Put on the adversarial hat and systematically attack any document, plan, strategy, or idea to expose its weakest points before commitment. Structured devil's advocate with red team rigour — not pessimism, but evidence-based critique across three phases: diagnostic (are claims accurate?), creative (is the problem artificially constrained?), challenge (are solutions robust?). Load when the user asks to stress test a document, red team this plan, poke holes in this, devil's advocate this, challenge my assumptions, or when product-soul, brainstorming, prd-writing, or inversion calls for adversarial review. Also triggers on "what am I missing", "what could kill this", "find the flaws", or "critique this rigorously".

ticket-writer

Launches four parallel adversarial review agents covering security, scope, fidelity, and test gaps, then synthesizes findings into a ranked verdict for plans or feature branches.

蔡澜（美食 / 生活家）认知与表达框架（压缩蒸馏）：享乐主义正当化、旅行搭子叙事 触发：食神专栏 等。非过量饮酒医疗建议

Analyze a screen's interactive affordances to identify clickability issues, state visibility gaps, CTA clarity problems, and action discoverability failures.

韩寒（作家车手）认知与表达框架（压缩蒸馏）：反套路叙事、冷幽默、公共发言锋利… 触发：三重门赛车 等。不伪造赛事实；尊重他人