Results for “critique-frameworks”

Orchestrates cross-domain design work by dispatching to specialized design sub-skills and applying behavioral science frameworks for audits, critiques, and strategy.

Run the HyperFrames CLI to scaffold, author, lint, preview, render, and publish video compositions locally or on HeyGen Cloud, AWS Lambda, and Google Cloud Run.

Guide teams through MITRE's Problem Framing Canvas to clarify problem statements before jumping to solutions.

Analyze the spatial and structural qualities of a screen design, evaluating balance, whitespace, rhythm, and gestalt principles to identify compositional weaknesses and propose specific fixes.

通用跨模型审查：Review LLM 对任意研究制品进行独立评审，输出结构化评分、wiki 实体映射与改进建议

Runs a structured bug-fix pipeline: scouts evidence, diagnoses root cause, applies minimal fixes, and reviews before committing.

Apply meta-principles of software craftsmanship: DRY, orthogonality, tracer bullets, and design by contract to build systems that are easy to change, understand, and trust.

Structured framework for reviewing UI designs, evaluating visual hierarchy, consistency, accessibility, spacing, typography, and color usage, and providing actionable improvement recommendations.

Audits colour decisions on a screen for contrast ratios, palette coherence, semantic meaning, and accessibility, flagging deviations and recommending specific corrections.

Get structured design feedback on usability, hierarchy, and consistency. Trigger with "review this design", "critique this mockup", "what do you think of this screen?", or when sharing a Figma link or screenshot for feedback at any stage from exploration to final polish. If the user asks specifically about accessibility, use `accessibility-review` instead.

Multi-perspective dialectical reasoning with cross-evaluative synthesis. Spawns parallel evaluative lenses (STRUCTURAL, EVIDENTIAL, SCOPE, ADVERSARIAL, PRAGMATIC) that critique thesis AND critique each other's critiques, producing N-squared evaluation matrix before recursive aggregation. Triggers on /critique, /dialectic, /crosseval, requests for thorough analysis, stress-testing arguments, or finding weaknesses. Implements Hegelian refinement enhanced with interleaved multi-domain evaluation and convergent synthesis.

Use the HyperFrames CLI development loop: init, add, catalog, capture, lint, check, snapshot, compare, grade-compare, preview, play, present, beats, keyframes, single or batch render, publish, cloud, cloudrun, feedback, lambda, doctor, browser, info, upgrade, skills, compositions, docs, benchmark, telemetry, transcribe, auth, tts, and remove-background. Also use when diagnosing build or render failures. validate, inspect, and layout are deprecated aliases; use check. Covers local, HeyGen-hosted cloud, AWS Lambda, and Google Cloud Run rendering.

Runs a five-phase pipeline—evaluation, specification, implementation, review, and QA—to build a feature end-to-end with specialized agents.

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

Creates or edits custom video compositions using HyperFrames, supporting multi-scene pieces, brand reels, montages, and freeform builds with media, Figma, and creative treatments.

Build a single renderable HyperFrames composition using HTML with data-* timing attributes, clips, tracks, sub-compositions, variables, and deterministic rendering rules.

Draft performance reviews, self-assessments, peer reviews, and upward feedback in your own voice using WorkIQ to surface actual contributions and structure them into impact-focused writing.

Install, discover, and wire reusable blocks and components into HyperFrames compositions using the CLI.

Creates, edits, and renders videos and animations from HTML compositions using the HyperFrames framework, handling project state, input adaptation, and workflow routing.

Structured code quality assessment with Conventional Comments format, scaled review depth, and soft-gating verdicts preserving user autonomy.

Find deepening opportunities in a codebase, informed by the domain language in CONTEXT.md and the decisions in docs/adr/. Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more testable and AI-navigable.

Runs a structured bug-fix pipeline that scouts, diagnoses, fixes, reviews, and finalizes code changes with optional quality re-verification.

Check a screen's brand expression by comparing it against mood, voice, and design token reference files, flagging divergences and suggesting corrections.

贺涵（都市剧虚构）认知与表达框架（压缩蒸馏）：导师型男主、职场金句、情感争议 触发：我的前半生 等。虚构；忌情感操控教程

Audits code quality against a shared contract, returning structured findings without modifying code. Supports gate, audit, diff, changed, and verify modes.

Launches four parallel adversarial review agents covering security, scope, fidelity, and test gaps, then synthesizes findings into a ranked verdict for plans or feature branches.

Spec Craft

顾佳（都市剧虚构）认知与表达框架（压缩蒸馏）：精英妈妈、婚姻风险对冲、体面崩塌 触发：三十而已 等。虚构

Create or update Cursor agent skills (SKILL.md). Use when authoring a new skill, updating an existing skill, or asking about SKILL.md structure and best practices.

Docs Craft

Audits code quality against a shared contract, producing structured findings and blocking pipeline phases on critical issues without modifying code.

Analyze a screen's interactive affordances to identify clickability issues, state visibility gaps, CTA clarity problems, and action discoverability failures.

Builds a compact secret-safe repository pack for AI handoff, review, or large analysis; prefers Repomix when available.

Build evaluation frameworks for agent systems, covering rubric design, test set creation, and automated evaluation pipelines.