Results for “evidence-synthesis”

Orchestrates evidence-based research across local PDFs, scholarly search, citation-context tools, web sources, and code repositories to produce traceable syntheses with counterevidence audits.

Search scientific papers and retrieve structured experimental data extracted from full-text studies via the BGPT MCP server, returning 25+ fields per paper including methods, results, sample sizes, quality scores, and conclusions.

Merges multiple research, analysis, or brainstorming inputs into a single coherent synthesis with key insights and a recommended action.

Multi-source research synthesizer. Takes a question, runs 3-5 parallel web searches with varied phrasings, deduplicates, and returns a cited, concise answer. For Hebrew questions, searches in both Hebrew and English. Output is always under ~400 words.

Clusters raw detection tickets into reusable edge concepts with thesis, invalidation signals, and strategy playbooks before strategy design.

Provides narrative synthesis, framing, and audience-aware communication patterns to improve decision narratives, written artifacts, and shared understanding.

Synthesize interviews into themes, contradictions, opportunities, and product implications.

Formulate testable hypotheses from observations, design experiments, and generate predictions using a structured scientific method framework.

Turn research inputs into concise evidence, patterns, confidence levels, and product decisions.

Evidence-first current-state research workflow for ECC. Use when the user wants fresh facts, comparisons, enrichment, or a recommendation built from current public evidence and any supplied local context.

Runs evidence-first current-state research, comparing options and enriching people or companies, then reports with explicit evidence boundaries.

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality by assessing experimental design, identifying biases and confounders, and applying evidence grading frameworks like GRADE and Cochrane Risk of Bias.

Select evidence-based study strategies matched to material type, learning goal, and student habits. Use when advising students on revision techniques, homework, or independent study approaches.

Philosophy of science methodology examining how research programs evolve through proofs and refutations

将一篇经管实证论文摄取为实证研究 wiki：论文卡片 + 变量 + 数据 + 模型 + 机制 + 识别 + 稳健性 + 异质性 + 表格线索

Comprehensive results analysis for empirical research: generate publication-quality descriptive statistics and balance tables, interpret regression coefficients with economic magnitude and effect sizes, assess identification assumption diagnostics, and produce structured results memos. Use when asked to create summary statistics, Table 1, balance tests, interpret results, assess economic significance, or write results narratives.

Orchestrate a full theory-first idea discovery pipeline. Use when the user wants the analysis counterpart of idea-discovery: literature context, proof-oriented idea generation, novelty checking, DeepSeek critique, and an analysis plan instead of an experiment-first workflow.

Mines a codebase for evidence-backed improvement opportunities, forcing two escalation gates to surface breakthrough ideas, and outputs a ranked portfolio with a plan seed without implementing.

Guide product managers through a complete discovery cycle from problem hypothesis to validated solution using problem framing, customer interviews, synthesis, and experimentation.

Generate falsifiable trade strategy hypotheses from market data, trade logs, and journal snippets, with ranked hypothesis cards, experiment designs, kill criteria, and optional strategy.yaml export.

Challenge system assumptions against accumulated evidence. Triages observations and tensions, detects patterns, generates proposals. The scientific method applied to knowledge systems. Triggers on "/rethink", "review observations", "challenge assumptions", "what have I learned".

Botany Synthesis Expert Skill

从 claim graph 编译论文大纲：编译 evidence map → 叙事结构 → 章节计划 + figure plan + citation plan，Review LLM review 必选

E1-Quantitative Analysis Guide with Code Generation & Sensitivity Analysis VS-Enhanced with Full 5-Phase process: Avoids obvious analyses, explores innovative methodologies Expanded to include qualitative analysis (thematic, grounded theory, content, narrative) Absorbed E4 (Analysis Code Generator) and E5 (Sensitivity Analysis - Primary Study) capabilities Use when: selecting statistical/qualitative methods, interpreting results, checking assumptions, generating code, sensitivity analysis Triggers: statistical analysis, ANOVA, regression, t-test, power analysis, assumption checking, effect size, thematic analysis, grounded theory, content analysis, narrative analysis, NVivo, ATLAS.ti, coding, qualitative data, R code, Python code, SPSS syntax, sensitivity analysis, robustness check

Search, summarize, and synthesize economics literature. find research gaps, position your contribution.

Generate novel research ideas through structured, conversational brainstorming that explores interdisciplinary connections, challenges assumptions, and identifies research gaps.

Build students' capacity to compare accounts across multiple historical sources — identifying agreements, contradictions, and gaps. Use when students treat individual documents as complete answers rather than partial perspectives.

Build visually engaging scientific slide decks for conferences, seminars, defenses, and research talks with structured planning, design templates, and automated image generation.

Merge many sources into one cited, deduplicated answer with per-claim confidence.

Systematic research methodology for formulating problems, building evidence-based arguments, and communicating findings in academic contexts. For scholarly writing, thesis development, and knowledge contribution. NOT for creative writing, journalistic reporting, or business analytics.

Multi-perspective dialectical reasoning with cross-evaluative synthesis. Spawns parallel evaluative lenses (STRUCTURAL, EVIDENTIAL, SCOPE, ADVERSARIAL, PRAGMATIC) that critique thesis AND critique each other's critiques, producing N-squared evaluation matrix before recursive aggregation. Triggers on /critique, /dialectic, /crosseval, requests for thorough analysis, stress-testing arguments, or finding weaknesses. Implements Hegelian refinement enhanced with interleaved multi-domain evaluation and convergent synthesis.

Evidence-driven tracing lane that orchestrates competing tracer hypotheses in Claude built-in team mode